UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
new
Gut Guide online
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
OPTICAL PD-L1 IMAGING USING ULTRASOUND-GUIDED QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENCE MOLECULAR ENDOSCOPY COMBINED WITH DURVALUMAB-680LT IN LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

Locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC) is treated with neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nCRT) followed by surgery, but only a modest percentage of patients (16-43%) achieves a pathological complete response post-nCRT. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) targeting programmed death-1 or its ligand (PD-1/PD-L1) is explored to increase response rates, yet adequate patient selection methods are lacking. PD-L1 expression’s predictive value in biopsies is inconsistent due to intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity, and the influence of nCRT on ICI response is unclear. Novel imaging methods are crucial to understand PD-L1 heterogeneity in order to ultimately select patients for ICI.

Aims & Methods

This ongoing study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of the innovative technique ultrasound guided quantitative fluorescence molecular endoscopy (US-qFME) using the fluorescently labelled ICI drug durvalumab-680LT before and after nCRT in EC patients to visualize, for the first time, PD-L1 drug distribution from the macroscopic to the cellular level. A durvalumab-680LT dose-optimization was performed in which up to now fifteen EC patients scheduled for nCRT were included in either the control (not receiving durvalumab-680LT), 4.5 mg, or 15 mg cohort. The next five patients will receive 25 mg durvalumab-680LT, after which the most optimal dose group will be expanded with 16 patients. US-qFME procedures were performed both before and after nCRT, consisting of in vivo fluorescence signal visualization, quantification by mucosal and ultrasound-guided spectroscopy measurements of healthy esophageal tissue, tumor and/or lymph nodes, and collection of biopsies. Subsequently, ex vivo analyses were performed for quantification of fluorescence signals, correlation to histology and visualization of tissue drug distribution and drug target cells.

Results

Higher fluorescence signals were visualized in vivo in tumor compared to healthy tissue. Ex vivo quantification of the fluorescence signals revealed higher median fluorescence signal intensities in tumor biopsies compared to healthy esophageal tissue pre-nCRT in both the 4.5 mg and 15 mg dose cohorts with a broad range in signals in the tumor (94.8 a.u. [41.0-131.7] vs. 31.0 a.u. [24.6-38.1] (p=0.125), and 103.9 a.u. [40.7-197.6] vs. 27.1 a.u. [25.8-40.8] (p=0.0625), respectively). Similar results were found during both mucosal and ultrasound-guided spectroscopy with higher signals in tumor tissue both in vivo and ex vivo compared to healthy tissue. The signals in healthy tissues of patients receiving the tracer were comparable to both tumor and healthy tissue in the control cohort (26.2 a.u. [21.5-37.6] and 11.7 a.u. [11.3-19.0]). An SDS-PAGE experiment confirmed the tracer’s integrity and stability in the mucosa. During fluorescence microscopy, only a dose of 15 mg durvalumab-680LT was sufficient to visualize membrane-bound durvalumab. Analyses post-nCRT are still ongoing. No (serious) adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

Durvalumab-680LT administration was safe and specifically targeted the tumor tissue as higher signals were found in tumor than in healthy tissue. In addition, the broad range in signals in the tumor tissue indicates, as expected, an inter- and intra-patient difference in PD-L1 expression. These preliminary findings show the potential of the novel combination of durvalumab-680LT and US-qFME to guide future patient selection for ICI therapy. Further analyses are ongoing, including correlation to PD-L1 staining and fluorescence microscopy to visualize drug distribution and potential drug-target interactions.

Supplementary Infographic ↗

OPTICAL PD-L1 IMAGING USING ULTRASOUND-GUIDED QUANTITATIVE FLUORESCENCE MOLECULAR ENDOSCOPY COMBINED WITH DURVALUMAB-680LT IN LOCALLY ADVANCED ESOPHAGEAL CANCER PATIENTS

Anne M. van der Waaij 1, Ymke van Ginkel 1, Sara Hone-Lopez 1, Rina Bijlsma 2, Sophie J. van Asselt 2, Laurens A. van der Waaij 2, Marjolijn N. Lub-de Hooge 1, Dominic James Robinson 3, Gursah Kats-Ugurlu 1, Massimiliano di Pietro 4, Wouter B. Nagengast 1

1 University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

2 Martini Hospital, Groningen, Netherlands

3 Center for Optic Diagnostics and Therapy, Rotterdam, Netherlands

4 University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Event

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Mechanisms & Personalised Medicine Oesophagus

Submission format

Abstract

Session

Diagnose and treat to target in GI cancer: Latest news

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

The future of immunotherapy → are surgeons obsolete soon? with Jeroen Dekervel

Jeroen Dekervel, Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Digestive Oncology

Published

2026
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

BOSS update: Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano Di Pietro (bonus episode)

Massimiliano di Pietro, Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Oesophagus

Published

2025
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Abstract

Background: Evidence and practice recommendations on the use of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer are conflicting.

Objective: We aimed to summarize best evidence and develop a rapid guideline using transparent, trustworthy, and standardized methodology.

Methods: We developed a rapid guideline in accordance with GRADE, G-I-N, and AGREE II standards. The steering group consisted of general surgeons, members of the EAES Research Committee/Guidelines Subcommittee with expertise and experience in guideline development, advanced medical statistics and evidence synthesis, biostatisticians, and a guideline methodologist. The guideline panel consisted of four general surgeons practicing colorectal surgery, a radiologist with expertise in rectal cancer, a radiation oncologist, a pathologist, and a patient representative. We conducted a systematic review and the results of evidence synthesis by means of meta-analyses were summarized in evidence tables. Recommendations were authored and published through an online authoring and publication platform (MAGICapp), with the guideline panel making use of an evidence-to-decision framework and a Delphi process to arrive at consensus.

Results: This rapid guideline provides a weak recommendation for the use of TaTME over laparoscopic or robotic TME for low rectal cancer when expertise is available. Furthermore, it details evidence gaps to be addressed by future research and discusses policy considerations. The guideline, with recommendations, evidence summaries, and decision aids in user-friendly formats can also be accessed in MAGICapp: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/4494.

Conclusions: This rapid guideline provides evidence-informed trustworthy recommendations on the use of TaTME for rectal cancer.

Keywords: Rectal cancer · TaTME · Transanal TME · Clinical practice guideline · GRADE · EAES

Additional resource: https://app.magicapp.org/#/guideline/LGm87E

UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer

UEG and EAES rapid guideline: Systematic review, meta-analysis, GRADE assessment and evidence-informed European recommendations on TaTME for rectal cancer

Marco Milone

Publisher

European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other interventional techniques logo
European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other interventional techniques

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Digestive Oncology Surgery

Citation

Surgical Endoscopy volume 36, pages2221–2232 (2022)

Published

2021
Login to access
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.


Summary

Acute kidney disease (AKD) - which includes acute kidney injury (AKI) – and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly prevalent among hospitalized patients, including those in nephrology and medicine wards, surgical wards, and intensive care units (ICU), and they have important metabolic and nutritional consequences.

Moreover, in case kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is started, whatever is the modality used, the possible impact on nutritional profiles, substrate balance, and nutritional treatment processes cannot be neglected.

The present guideline is aimed at providing evidence-based recommendations for clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with AKD and CKD. Due to the significant heterogeneity of this patient population as well as the paucity of high-quality evidence data, the present guideline is to be intended as a basic framework of both evidence and - in most cases - expert opinions, aggregated in a structured consensus process, in order to update the two previous ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral (2006) and Parenteral (2009) Nutrition in Adult Renal Failure. Nutritional care for patients with stable CKD (i.e., controlled protein content diets/low protein diets with or without amino acid/ketoanalogue integration in outpatients up to CKD stages four and five), nutrition in kidney transplantation, and pediatric kidney disease will not be addressed in the present guideline.

Keywords: Acute kidney disease, Acute kidney injury, Clinical nutrition, Kidney replacement therapy, Hospitalized patients, Intensive care unit, Malnutrition, Muscle wasting

ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease

ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in hospitalized patients with acute or chronic kidney disease

Enrico Fiaccadori

Publisher

The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism logo
The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Citation

Clinical Nutrition, Volume 40, Issue 4, 1644 - 1668

Published

2021
Login to access
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

UEG Online Courses x UEG Podcast: Impact of polyp detection in colonoscopy

Raf Bisschops, Manuele Furnari, Pieter Sinonquel, Veronique Van der Voort

Topics

Endoscopy

Published

2026
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Management of gastric preneoplastic lesions (MAPS 3) - what’s new? With Mario Dinis-Ribeiro (Part 2)

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro, Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Stomach & H. Pylori

Published

2025

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.