UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
What is the role of behavioural, psychological therapy?

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

What is the role of behavioural, psychological therapy?

Livia Guadagnoli 1

1 KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

IBD Primary Care Small Intestine & Nutrition

Session

Pain in IBS and IBD

Published

2023
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Panel discussion: Large lesions in the proximal colon

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Panel discussion: Large lesions in the proximal colon

Sergio Alfieri 1, Jérémie Jacques 2, Leon M.G. Moons 3, David James Tate 4

1 Catholic University of the Sacred Heart - UNICATT, Milan, Italy

2 CHU Limoges - Hepato-Gastro-Enterology, CHU Limoges; Limoges/FR, Limoges, France

3 University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

4 University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Endoscopy Small Intestine & Nutrition Surgery

Session

Large lesions in the proximal colon

Published

2023
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Different sedation regimes in Europe

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Different sedation regimes in Europe

Konstantinos Triantafyllou 1

1 Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Nurses Standards & Guidelines

Session

Sedation

Published

2023
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Exit strategies: Still to be considered?

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Exit strategies: Still to be considered?

Edouard Louis 1

1 CHU Liège and Liège University, Liège, Belgium

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

IBD

Session

Medical management of Crohn's disease

Published

2023
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Evolution of acute necrotising pancreatitis: Imaging, clinical decision-making, and management of complications

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Evolution of acute necrotising pancreatitis: Imaging, clinical decision-making, and management of complications

Andrea Anderloni 1, Thomas L. Bollen 2

1 San Matteo Hospital, Pavia, Italy

2 St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands

Event

UEG Postgraduate Teaching Programme Berlin 2025

Session

A 360-degree appraisal of acute pancreatitis

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
EFFICACY OF THE THIRD-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

First-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GNP) have improved the survival outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) and nano-liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-FU/leucovorin is proven as the second-line agents.

Aims & Methods

The current study aims to assess the efficacy of third-line palliative chemotherapy in APC.
Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in a single tertiary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We enrolled patients with APC who experienced progression after the second-line chemotherapy following the first-line FOLFIRINOX or GNP. To define the efficacy of the third-line chemotherapy, Cox-regression analysis was performed. To identify the clinical factors affecting the survival, multivariable logistic regression analysis was also performed.

Results

Total 141 patients were enrolled. The median age at diagnosis was 61.8 years (range 36.0 – 86.0), and males were 54.9% (n=78). The first-line chemotherapy regimen was FOLFIRINOX (95, 67.4%) and GNP (46, 32.6%). The second-line chemotherapy regimen was FOLFIRINOX (38, 27.0%), GNP (74, 52.5%), and others (29, 20.4%). Regarding the third-line regimen, TS-1 and nal-IRI plus 5-FU/leucovorin were 69 (27.0%) and 53 (37.6%). The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 18.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.3 – 20.7). The median OS and median progression-free survival after the third-line treatment were 14.6 (95% CI, 12.1 – 17.0) and 7.3 weeks (95% CI, 6.3– 8.3). About the best tumor response during the third-line chemotherapy, there was no complete response, 2 (1.4%) with a partial response, 41 (29.1%) with stable disease, and 80 (56.7%) with progressive disease. Consequently, the disease control rate in the third-line treatment was 30.5%. Of the patients with the third-line chemotherapy, the following clinical factors affected OS; ECOG of 2 at third-line chemotherapy (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.58-4.42; p <0.001), serum CA19-9 level ≥ 1,000 U/ml before the third-line chemotherapy (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.11-2.52; p=0.014), duration of the second-line chemotherapy < 19 weeks (HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.03-2.21; p=0.034), and peritoneal seeding before the third-line chemotherapy (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.03-2.25; p=0.033).




Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis


Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P
Hazard ratio (95% CI)
P
Gender
Male1.425 (1.010-2.010)
0.044
1.330 (0.911-1.943)
0.140
ECOG at third-line CTx
Score 2
2.257 (1.413-3.607)
0.0012.639 (1.576-4.419)
<0.001
CA 19-9 level before third-line CTx
≥1,000U/ml
1.540 (1.061-2.235)
0.0231.672 (1.109-2.522)
0.014
Duration of second-line CTx
< 19 weeks
1.749 (1.215-2.516
0.0031.508 (1.031-2.206)
0.034
Peritoneal seeding before third-line CTx
Positive
1.429 (1.009–2.023)
0.0441.526 (1.034-2.253)
0.033

Conclusion

The current study suggested that proceeding with the third-line chemotherapy could be recommended in some patients. There is no difference in survival rate according to the type of the third-line chemotherapy regimen. ECOG 0 or 1, CA 19-9 <1,000U/ml, duration of second-line chemotherapy ≥ 19 weeks, and no peritoneal seeding showed significantly more benefit from the third-line therapy.

References

1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M, Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of U, Intergroup P. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011; 364(19): 1817-1825
2. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, Seay T, Tjulandin SA, Ma WW, Saleh MN, Harris M, Reni M, Dowden S, Laheru D, Bahary N, Ramanathan RK, Tabernero J, Hidalgo M, Goldstein D, Van Cutsem E, Wei X, Iglesias J, Renschler MF. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 2013; 369(18): 1691-1703
3. Walker EJ, Ko AH. Beyond first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: an expanding array of therapeutic options? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(9): 2224-2236
4. Wang-Gillam A, Hubner RA, Siveke JT, Von Hoff DD, Belanger B, de Jong FA, Mirakhur B, Chen LT. NAPOLI-1 phase 3 study of liposomal irinotecan in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Final overall survival analysis and characteristics of long-term survivors. Eur J Cancer 2019; 108: 78-87

EFFICACY OF THE THIRD-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER

Bomi Kim 1, Soomin Yang 2, Jinwoo Ahn 1, Kwangrok Jung 1, Jinkyeong Park 2, Jong-chan Lee 1, Jin-Hyeok Hwang 1, Jaihwan Kim 1

1 Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

2 Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea, Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Digestive Oncology Hepatobiliary Pancreas

Submission format

Abstract

Session

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer: Basic meets clinical practice

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2023; 11 (Supplement 8)

Published

2023
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Endoscopy and radiology: Partners or alternatives?

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Endoscopy and radiology: Partners or alternatives?

Lotte Boxhoorn 1

1 Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Event

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Endoscopy Small Intestine & Nutrition Pancreas Radiology & Imaging

Session

Management of acute pancreatitis

Published

2023

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.