UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in pouchitis and how to avoid them

Ailsa L Hart, Susan K. Clark, Jonathan Segal

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Citation

Jonathan P Segal JP, Clark SK and Hart AL. Mistakes in pouchitis and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2020; 20: 7–11.

Published

2020
UEG Podcast Episode
New
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Nutrition in coeliac disease for a clinician with Cristian Costas

Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Published

2026
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Best of UEG Week - Endoscopy with Manmeet Matharoo

Manmeet Matharoo, Egle Dieninyte - Misiune

Topics

Endoscopy

Published

2025
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Main recommendations

The following recommendations should only be applied after a thorough diagnostic evaluation including a contrast- enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan.

1 ESGE recommends colonic stenting to be reserved for patients with clinical symptoms and radiological signs of malignant large-bowel obstruction, without signs of perforation. ESGE does not recommend prophylactic stent placement.
Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

2 ESGE recommends stenting as a bridge to surgery to be discussed, within a shared decision-making process, as a treatment option in patients with potentially curable left-sided obstructing colon cancer as an alternative to emergency resection.
Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.

3 ESGE recommends colonic stenting as the preferred treatment for palliation of malignant colonic obstruction.
Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.

4 ESGE suggests consideration of colonic stenting for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon either as a bridge to surgery or in a palliative setting.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

5 ESGE suggests a time interval of approximately 2 weeks until resection when colonic stenting is performed as a bridge to elective surgery in patients with curable left-sided colon cancer.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

6 ESGE recommends that colonic stenting should be performed or directly supervised by an operator who can demonstrate competence in both colonoscopy and fluoroscopic techniques and who performs colonic stenting on a regular basis.
Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

7 ESGE suggests that a decompressing stoma as a bridge to elective surgery is a valid option if the patient is not a candidate for colonic stenting or when stenting expertise is not available.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020

Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020

Jeanin van Hooft

Publisher

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logo
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy

Citation

Endoscopy. 2020 May;52(5):389-407

Published

2020
Login to access
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Barrett’s oesophagus: Epidemiology and risk factors

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Barrett’s oesophagus: Epidemiology and risk factors

Nastazja Pilonis 1

1 The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Institute, Warsaw, Poland

Event

UEG Postgraduate Teaching Programme Berlin 2025

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Oesophagus

Session

Best of Barrett’s oesophagus

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

There is a need for more effective treatments for IBD, with advanced therapies having placebo-adjusted clinical remission rates of only 10 to 25%. The combined use of targeted biologic agents could break through this efficacy ceiling while avoiding the risks associated with broad immunosuppression. Towards this end, Spyre Therapeutics is developing half-life extended antibody drug candidates that can be administered in combination, inhibiting the clinically validated IBD targets α4β7 integrin (SPY001), TL1A (SPY002), and IL-23 (SPY003). The efficacy of combined inhibition of integrin β7 and TL1A, integrin β7 and IL-23, and TL1A and IL-23 was evaluated in proof-of-concept studies utilizing the TNBS-induced murine colitis model.

Aims & Methods

Mice were dosed intravenously with surrogate antibodies targeting mouse integrin β7 (25 mg/kg), mouse TL1A (25 mg/kg), mouse IL-23 (25 or 1 mg/kg), pairwise combinations of these three antibodies (integrin β7 + TL1A, integrin β7 + IL-23, TL1A + IL-23), an isotype control antibody, or vehicle on Day -1 and Day 2. TNBS was administered intrarectally (IR) on day 0 to induce colitis in all mice except the non-disease control group, which received IR vehicle. Body weight and disease activity score were recorded daily until the end of the study on Day 6. Colon weight and length were measured at the conclusion of the study. Colon histopathology was scored by a blinded pathologist.

Results

Monotherapy treatment with 25 mg/kg anti-β7 or 25 mg/kg anti-TL1A antibodies resulted in low magnitude, directional improvements in colitis outcome measurements, while treatment with 25 mg/kg anti-IL-23 antibody resulted in significant improvements relative to the vehicle and isotype control groups. Combinations of anti-β7 + anti-TL1A, anti-β7 + anti-IL-23, and anti-TL1A + anti-IL-23 resulted in superior efficacy compared to their constituent monotherapies based upon disease activity scoring. To further explore combination therapy benefit, a lower dose (1 mg/kg) of anti-IL-23 alone or in combination with anti-β7 or anti-TL1A was evaluated. Low dose anti-IL-23 showed minimal activity as a monotherapy, but low dose anti-IL-23 + anti-β7 maintained efficacy similar to the high dose combination. The combination of low dose anti-IL-23 + anti-TL1A was more effective than either monotherapy alone.

Conclusion

Combination therapy with anti-β7 + anti-TL1A, anti-β7 + anti-IL-23 or anti-TL1A + anti-IL-23 resulted in efficacy superior to their constituent monotherapies in the murine TNBS model of colitis. These data support and provide biologic rationale for the advancement of antibody combinations into human clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease.

Disclosure

All authors are employees and shareholders in Spyre Therapeutics, Inc.

COMBINED INHIBITION OF INTEGRIN Β7 AND TL1A, INTEGRIN Β7 AND IL-23, OR TL1A AND IL-23 ARE SUPERIOR TO THEIR CONSTITUENT MONOTHERAPIES IN MOUSE TNBS-INDUCED COLITIS

COMBINED INHIBITION OF INTEGRIN Β7 AND TL1A, INTEGRIN Β7 AND IL-23, OR TL1A AND IL-23 ARE SUPERIOR TO THEIR CONSTITUENT MONOTHERAPIES IN MOUSE TNBS-INDUCED COLITIS

Matthew Siegel 1, Joshua Friedman 1, Deanna Nguyen 1, Emily Lewis 1, David Giles 1, Andy Spencer 1

1 Spyre Therapeutics, Waltham, United States

Conference

UEG Week Berlin 2025

Topics

IBD

Submission format

Abstract

Session

Emerging therapies for intestinal inflammation (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Tools for managing foreign bodies in the GI tract

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Tools for managing foreign bodies in the GI tract

Thomas Beck 1

1 None, None, Germany

Event

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Nurses

Session

New trends and developments in endoscopic techniques

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.