UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
new
Gut Guide online
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in pouchitis and how to avoid them

Ailsa L Hart, Susan K. Clark, Jonathan Segal

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Citation

Jonathan P Segal JP, Clark SK and Hart AL. Mistakes in pouchitis and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2020; 20: 7–11.

Published

2020
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Oncology: Colorectal cancer

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Oncology: Colorectal cancer

Xavier Llor 1

1 Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, United States of America

Event

UEG Week Berlin 2025

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Hepatobiliary Small Intestine & Nutrition

Session

Best of DDW

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Early gastric cancer (Complete Session)

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Early gastric cancer (Complete Session)

Event

UEG Week Berlin 2025

Topics

Digestive Oncology Stomach & H. Pylori

Session

Early gastric cancer

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Video Case: Intestinal strictures in IBD - Dilatation, stenting or surgery?

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Video Case: Intestinal strictures in IBD - Dilatation, stenting or surgery?

Carme Loras Alastruey 1

1 Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

Event

UEG Postgraduate Teaching Programme Vienna 2024

Topics

Colorectal Digestive Oncology Education & Training Endoscopy IBD Oesophagus Small Intestine & Nutrition

Session

Endoscopic treatment and prognosis of GI diseases

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024
UEG Poster
Audio / Video Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

​The peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC line) is a highly useful form of vascular access in various areas of clinical patient care. It is particularly indicated in patients requiring long-term antibiotic therapy, medium-term parenteral nutrition, extended intravenous treatment during prolonged hospital stays, or those with poor venous access. PICC lines are typically 60 cm in length and must be individually trimmed to the correct length immediately before insertion. Several approaches exist for estimating the appropriate length on a case-by-case basis.

Aims & Methods

To establish a methodology for accurately estimating the required length of PICC lines.
Between November 2023 and April 2025, various body measurements were collected during PICC line placements. The depth of the selected vein was measured sonographically. Patients’ height, weight, and sex were documented. The PICC line length was determined based on clinical expertise. A post-insertion chest X-ray was performed to confirm the central position of the catheter tip. The distance from the catheter tip to the carina was measured to objectively define central placement. Multiple formulas in clinical use were compared for their accuracy. A regression analysis was conducted to develop a formula that is both accurate and simple to apply.

Results

​A total of 60 PICC lines were successfully inserted without complications. The median patient height was 168 cm (range: 164.3–175.8 cm), weight 59 kg (range: 50.0–83.8 kg), and age 56.5 years (range: 46–65.8). Thirty-five insertions were performed in female patients. The ideal PICC line length was 42 cm (range: 38–44.5 cm). Of the five tested formulas, the best correlations were found with Formula 5 (puncture site to jugulum + jugulum to 3rd intercostal space) with r = 0.68 (p = 0.0005), and Formula 3 (puncture site to acromion + clavicle length + jugulum to 4th intercostal space) with r = 0.67 (p = 0.0005). In simple linear regression, the distances from puncture site to acromion and to jugulum were significantly correlated (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0019, respectively). The best-fit model in multiple regression included age, height, weight, arm side, puncture site to jugulum, and puncture site to 4th intercostal space (p = 0.0005).

ModelR²Success Rate (±2cm)
Success Rate (±3cm)
Success Rate (±4cm)
Formula 1
0.1631.25%50.00%65.63%
Formula 20.5618.75%37.50%53.13%
Formula 30.5318.75%25.00%28.13%
Formula 40.420.00%0.00%0.00%
Formula 50.6140.63%59.38%68.75%
New Formula0.8362.50%90.63%96.88%

Conclusion

An optimal formula for calculating the correct PICC line length has been identified.

References

Table 1: comparison between the various existing formulas and the newly developed one.

RETROSPECTIVE MONOCENTRIC ANALYSIS OF PICC LINES PLACED IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER TO ESTABLISH A FORMULA FOR DETERMINING IDEAL PICC LINE LENGTH

RETROSPECTIVE MONOCENTRIC ANALYSIS OF PICC LINES PLACED IN A TERTIARY CARE CENTER TO ESTABLISH A FORMULA FOR DETERMINING IDEAL PICC LINE LENGTH

Hans-Peter Erasmus 1, Katharina Stratmann 1, Florian Alexander Michael 1, Ludwig Hofbauer 1, Daniel Hessz 1, Stefan Zeuzem 1, Mireen Friedrich-Rust 1, Irina Blumenstein 1

1 Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Conference

UEG Week Berlin 2025

Topics

Small Intestine & Nutrition

Submission format

Abstract

Session

NUTRITION (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2025; 13 (Supplement 8)

Published

2025
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Main recommendations

The following recommendations should only be applied after a thorough diagnostic evaluation including a contrast- enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan.

1 ESGE recommends colonic stenting to be reserved for patients with clinical symptoms and radiological signs of malignant large-bowel obstruction, without signs of perforation. ESGE does not recommend prophylactic stent placement.
Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

2 ESGE recommends stenting as a bridge to surgery to be discussed, within a shared decision-making process, as a treatment option in patients with potentially curable left-sided obstructing colon cancer as an alternative to emergency resection.
Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.

3 ESGE recommends colonic stenting as the preferred treatment for palliation of malignant colonic obstruction.
Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.

4 ESGE suggests consideration of colonic stenting for malignant obstruction of the proximal colon either as a bridge to surgery or in a palliative setting.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

5 ESGE suggests a time interval of approximately 2 weeks until resection when colonic stenting is performed as a bridge to elective surgery in patients with curable left-sided colon cancer.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

6 ESGE recommends that colonic stenting should be performed or directly supervised by an operator who can demonstrate competence in both colonoscopy and fluoroscopic techniques and who performs colonic stenting on a regular basis.
Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

7 ESGE suggests that a decompressing stoma as a bridge to elective surgery is a valid option if the patient is not a candidate for colonic stenting or when stenting expertise is not available.
Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.

Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020

Self-expandable metal stents for obstructing colonic and extracolonic cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020

Jeanin van Hooft

Publisher

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logo
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy

Citation

Endoscopy. 2020 May;52(5):389-407

Published

2020
Login to access
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

The future of immunotherapy → are surgeons obsolete soon? with Jeroen Dekervel

Jeroen Dekervel, Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Digestive Oncology

Published

2026

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.