UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
new
Gut Guide online
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in coagulation in liver disease and how to avoid them

Edoardo G. Giannini

Summary

AI Generated

Coagulation abnormalities and thrombocytopenia are integral features of advanced chronic liver disease with established roles in prognostic assessment and clinical evaluation.

  • The International Normalised Ratio for prothrombin time is incorporated into the MELD score, which is commonly used to assess prognosis and determine the need for liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis.
  • Thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease is mainly related to hypersplenism and decreased synthesis of thrombopoietin by the liver.
  • Thrombocytopenia can be used to identify the presence of portal hypertension and decreased liver function in patients with chronic liver disease.
  • This material provides foundational context on hemostatic abnormalities in cirrhosis relevant to hepatologists and clinicians managing advanced liver disease.
Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

References

Mistakes
References
Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5 Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8
1.
Intagliata NM, Argo CK, Stine JG, et al. Concepts and controversies in haemostasis and thrombosis associated with liver disease: Proceedings of the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Thromb Haemost 2018; 118: 1491–1506. [Link]
2.
Botta F, Giannini E, Romagnoli P, et al. MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study. Gut 2003; 52: 134–139. [Link]
3.
Giannini EG and Peck-Radosavljevic M. Platelet dysfunction: status of thrombopoietin in thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver failure. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 455–461. [Link]
4.
Tripodi A and Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 147–156. [Link]
5.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Coagulation pathways, hemostasis, and thrombosis in liver failure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 39: 598–608. [Link]
6.
Stine JG, Intagliata NM, Shah NL, et al. Clinical cirrhosis dilemmas: Survey of practice from the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 1334–1339. [Link]
7.
Northup PG, Sundaram V, Fallon MB, et al. Hypercoagulation and thrombophilia in liver disease. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2–9. [Link]
8.
Søgaard KK, Horváth-Puhó E, Grønbaek H, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: a nationwide population-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 96–101. [Link]
9.
Stine JG, Niccum BA, Zimmet AN, et al. Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018; 9: 140. [Link]
10.
Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, et al. Evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 265–270. [Link]
11.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE, Lafond J, et al. Acute kidney injury is associated with low factor XIII in decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 1409–1415. [Link]
12.
Zanetto A, Rinder HM, Campello E, et al. Acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis is associated with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features. Hepatology 2020; 72: 1327–1340. [Link]
13.
Jakab SS and Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and management of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2020; 24: 335–350. [Link]
14.
Lisotti A, Azzaroli F, Buonfiglioli F, et al. Indocyanine green retention test as a noninvasive marker of portal hypertension and esophageal varices in compensated liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 59: 643–650. [Link]
15.
Burton JR Jr, Liangpunsakul S, Lapidus J, et al. Validation of a multivariate model predicting presence and size of varices. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 609–615. [Link]
16.
North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 983–989. [Link]
17.
Basili S, Raparelli V, Napoleone L, et al. Platelet count does not predict bleeding in cirrhotic patients: results from the PRO-LIVER Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 368–375. [Link]
18.
Quick AJ. The prothrombin in hemophilia and in obstructive jaundice. J Biol Chem 1935; 109: 73–74. [Link]
19.
Tripodi A, Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, et al. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 141–148. [Link]
20.
Trotter JF, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, et al. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1624–1628. [Link]
21.
Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions—Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30: 1168–1184. [Link]
22.
Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Dig Dis Sci 1981; 26: 388–393. [Link]
23.
Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, et al. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology 2004; 40: 484–488. [Link]
24.
Vieira da Rocha EC, D'Amico EA, Caldwell SH, et al. A prospective study of conventional and expanded coagulation indices in predicting ulcer bleeding after variceal band ligation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 988–993. [Link]
25.
Giannini EG, Greco A, Marenco S, et al. Incidence of bleeding following invasive procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia and advanced liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 899–902. [Link]
26.
Fortea JI, Puente A, Ezcurra I, et al. Management of haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in cirrhosis in Spain: a national survey. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 95–103. [Link]
27.
Desborough MJ, Hockley B, Sekhar M, et al. Patterns of blood component use in cirrhosis: a nationwide study. Liver Int 2016; 36: 522–529. [Link]
28.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Correction of hemostatic abnormalities and portal pressure variations in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 60: 1442. [Link]
29.
Lisman T, Kleiss S, Patel VC, et al. In vitro efficacy of pro- and anticoagulant strategies in compensated and acutely ill patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2018; 38: 1988–1996. [Link]
30.
Bernal W, Caldwell SH and Lisman T. Nails in the coffin of fresh frozen plasma to prevent or treat bleeding in cirrhosis? J Hepatol 2020; 72: 12–13. [Link]
31.
Rassi AB, d'Amico EA, Tripodi A, et al. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy: Effect on conventional coagulation tests and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation. J Hepatol 2020; 72: 85–94. [Link]
32.
Giannini EG. Review article: thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease and pharmacologic treatment options. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 1055–1065. [Link]
33.
Giannini E, Botta F, Borro P, et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gut 2003; 52: 1200–1205. [Link]
34.
Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, et al. Review article: blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1017–1029. [Link]
35.
Lisman T, Bongers TN, Adelmeijer J, et al. Elevated levels of von Willebrand factor in cirrhosis support platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity. Hepatology 2006; 44: 53–61. [Link]
36.
Reuken PA, Kussmann A, Kiehntopf M, et al. Imbalance of von Willebrand factor and its cleaving protease ADAMTS13 during systemic inflammation superimposed on advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2015; 35: 37–45. [Link]
37.
Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Scher J, et al. Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience. Thorax 2015; 70: 127–132. [Link]
38.
Perdigão JP, de Almeida PC, Rocha TD, et al. Postoperative bleeding after dental extraction in liver pretransplant patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: e177–e184. [Link]
39.
Giannini EG, Giambruno E, Brunacci M, et al. Low fibrinogen levels are associated with bleeding after varices ligation in thrombocytopenic cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 830–835. [Link]
40.
Seeff LB, Everson GT, Morgan TR, et al. Complication rate of percutaneous liver biopsies among persons with advanced chronic liver disease in the HALT-C trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 877–883. [Link]
41.
Park JG, Park SY, Tak WY, et al. Early complications after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 1,843 ablations in 1,211 patients in a single centre: experience over 10 years. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 692.e9–692.e15. [Link]
42.
Khemichian S and Terrault NA. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with chronic liver disease. Semin Thromb Hemost 2020; 46: 682–692. [Link]
43.
O'Leary JG, Greenberg CS, Patton HM, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update: Coagulation in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 34–43.e1. [Link]
44.
Simonetto DA, Singal AK, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. ACG clinical guideline: disorders of the hepatic and mesenteric circulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 18–40. [Link]
45.
Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet 2015; 386: 1576–1587. [Link]
46.
Bajaj JS. Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure: will East and West ever meet? Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1337–1339. [Link]
47.
Moreau R, Jalan R, Ginès P, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1426–1437. [Link]
48.
Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, et al. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 1272–1284. [Link]
49.
Dong V and Karvellas CJ. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Objective admission and support criteria in the intensive care unit. JHEP Rep. 2019; 1: 44–52. [Link]
50.
Blasi A, Calvo A, Prado V, et al. Coagulation failure in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis: beyond the international normalized ratio. Hepatology 2018; 68: 2325–2337. [Link]
51.
Blasi A, Patel VC, Adelmeijer J, et al. Mixed fibrinolytic phenotypes in decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure with hypofibrinolysis in those with complications and poor survival. Hepatology 2020; 71: 1381–1390. [Link]
52.
Fisher C, Patel VC, Stoy SH, et al. Balanced haemostasis with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features in critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic-liver failure. J Crit Care 2018; 43: 54–60. [Link]
53.
Premkumar M, Saxena P, Rangegowda D, et al. Coagulation failure is associated with bleeding events and clinical outcome during systemic inflammatory response and sepsis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: An observational cohort study. Liver Int 2019; 39: 694–704. [Link]
54.
Shukla A and Jain A. Association of acute-on-chronic liver failure with vascular liver diseases. Hepatol Int 2019; 13:399–402. [Link]
55.
Lin S, Wang M, Zhu Y, et al. Hemorrhagic complications following abdominal paracentesis in acute on chronic liver failure: a propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e2225. [Link]
56.
Cruz-Ramón V, Chinchilla-López P, Ramírez-Pérez O, et al. Thrombosis of the portal venous system in cirrhotic vs. non-cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 476–481. [Link]
57.
Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH and Tripodi A. Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1582–1599. [Link]
58.
Hagerty T and Rich MW. Fall risk and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A delicate balance. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84: 35–40. [Link]
59.
Ghabril M, Agarwal S, Lacerda M, et al. Portal vein thrombosis is a risk factor for poor early outcomes after liver transplantation: analysis of risk factors and outcomes for portal vein thrombosis in waitlisted patients. Transplantation 2016; 100: 126–133. [Link]
60.
Pettinari I, Vukotic R, Stefanescu H, et al. Clinical impact and safety of anticoagulants for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114: 258–266. [Link]
61.
Delgado MG, Seijo S, Yepes I, et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 776–783. [Link]
62.
Villa E, Cammà C, Marietta M, et al. Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1253–1260. [Link]
63.
Calvaruso V, Maimone S, Gatt A, et al. Coagulation and fibrosis in chronic liver disease. Gut 2008; 57: 1722–1727. [Link]
64.
Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Healing gone wrong: convergence of hemostatic pathways and liver fibrosis? Clin Sci (Lond) 2020; 134: 2189–2201. [Link]
65.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Portal vein thrombosis and chronic liver disease progression: The closer you look the more you see. Hepatology 2016; 63: 342–343. [Link]
66.
Luca A, Caruso S, Milazzo M, et al. Natural course of extrahepatic nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 2012; 265: 124–132. [Link]
67.
Nery F, Chevret S, Condat B, et al. Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study. Hepatology 2015; 61: 660–667. [Link]
68.
Intagliata NM, Henry ZH, Maitland H, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhosis patients pose similar risks of bleeding when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 1721–1727. [Link]
69.
Naymagon L, Tremblay D, Zubizarreta N, et al. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 655–666. [Link]
70.
Rodriguez-Castro KI, Vitale A, Fadin M, et at. A prediction model for successful anticoagulation in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31: 34–42. [Link]
71.
Giannini EG and Savarino V. Which anticoagulant drug should be used to treat portal vein thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 103. [Link]
72.
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: The Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093–1100. [Link]
73.
Zhang S, Meng H, Chen Q, et al. Is frailty a prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndrome? Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1435–1442. [Link]
74.
Olson ST, Richard B, Izaguirre G, et al. Molecular mechanisms of antithrombin-heparin regulation of blood clotting proteinases. A paradigm for understanding proteinase regulation by serpin family protein proteinase inhibitors. Biochimie 2010; 92: 1587–1596. [Link]
75.
Bechmann LP, Sichau M, Wichert M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2011; 31: 75–82. [Link]
76.
Goodpasture EW. Fibrinolysis in chronic hepatic insufficiency. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1914; 25: 330–336.
77.
Joist JH. AICF and DIC in liver cirrhosis: expressions of a hypercoagulable state. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2801–2803. [Link]
78.
Rijken DC, Kock EL, Guimarães AH, et al. Evidence for an enhanced fibrinolytic capacity in cirrhosis as measured with two different global fibrinolysis tests. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 2116–2222. [Link]
79.
de Franchis R, on behalf of the Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743–752. [Link]
80.
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2017; 65: 310–335. [Link]
81.
DeAngelis GA, Khot R, Haskal ZJ, et al. Bleeding risk and management in interventional procedures in chronic liver disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 1665–1674. [Link]
82.
Ben-Ari Z, Panagou M, Patch D, et al. Hypercoagulability in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis evaluated by thrombelastography. J Hepatol 1997; 26: 554–559. [Link]
83.
Montalto P, Vlachogiannakos J, Cox DJ, et al. Bacterial infection in cirrhosis impairs coagulation by a heparin effect: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2002; 37: 463–470. [Link]

Abstract

Alteration of common coagulation tests and thrombocytopenia represent an integral part of the clinical picture of patients with advanced chronic liver disease. As such, the International Normalised Ratio (INR) for prothrombin time is part of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, which is commonly used to assess prognosis and the need for liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis. Thrombocytopenia—being mainly related to hypersplenism and decreased synthesis of thrombopoietin by the liver—can also be used to identify the presence of portal hypertension and decreased liver function in patients with chronic liver disease.


Topics

Hepatobiliary

Citation

Giannini EG and Caldwell SH. Mistakes in coagulation in liver disease and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2021; 21: 29–34.

Published

2021

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis [UC] is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] characterised by colonic inflammation extending to a variable extent from the rectum. Care of the patient with UC requires appropriate input from across the multiprofessional team. These guidelines summarise the recommended medical treatment for adults with UC.

In 2022, the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] published new guidelines on the management of UC in two papers focused on the medical and surgical management of the disease.1,2 For the 2022 UC guidelines, ECCO adopted the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation [GRADE] approach, a systematic process for developing guidelines that addresses how to frame healthcare questions, summarise the evidence, formulate recommendations, and grade their strength and the quality of associated evidence.3 The present paper represents an update to the 2022 guidelines and focuses specifically on the medical management of UC, while a companion paper developed as part of the same process addresses optimal surgical management [ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Surgical Treatment].

For this iteration of the guidelines, we have introduced several new, clinically relevant questions selected by members of the guidelines group, alongside a systematic approach to reviewing and updating previous topics to incorporate new evidence and to reappraise all findings within the context of contemporary practice. We have also introduced several “practice points” to summarise evidence and provide expert recommendations in key areas where the evidence remains limited but clinical decisions are still required. In such instances, where application of the GRADE methodology may be impractical, we adopted an approach based on systematic literature review, expert discussion, and voting to reach consensus recommendations outside the formal GRADE process.

Patients living with UC can have a variable disease course.4 In this document, we discuss therapeutic approaches stratified by disease severity [mildly-to-moderately active and moderately-to-severely active disease]. Definitions of disease severity are commonly used to establish clinical trial inclusion criteria and may be based on several distinct assessment frameworks.5 It is also important to remember that these definitions capture severity at a given point in time and may not reflect the cumulative long-term burden of disease experienced by a patient.6

It is also important to consider disease extent when planning treatment in UC, as this may affect the optimal route of drug administration. This is typically defined according to disease involving the rectum only [proctitis], disease distal to the splenic flexure [left-sided or distal UC], or disease extending proximal to the splenic flexure [extensive UC].7 It should be noted that disease distribution can change4 and that proximal disease extension can be a negative prognostic marker.8

Publisher

European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation logo
European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

IBD

Citation

Journal of Crohn's and Colitis, Volume 20, Issue 7, July 2026

Published

2026

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Mistakes In Articles
New
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Spyridon Pantzios, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Christos Triantos

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

References

Mistakes
References
Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5 Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8
1.
Intagliata NM, Argo CK, Stine JG, et al. Concepts and controversies in haemostasis and thrombosis associated with liver disease: Proceedings of the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Thromb Haemost 2018; 118: 1491–1506. [Link]
2.
Botta F, Giannini E, Romagnoli P, et al. MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study. Gut 2003; 52: 134–139. [Link]
3.
Giannini EG and Peck-Radosavljevic M. Platelet dysfunction: status of thrombopoietin in thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver failure. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 455–461. [Link]
4.
Tripodi A and Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 147–156. [Link]
5.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Coagulation pathways, hemostasis, and thrombosis in liver failure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 39: 598–608. [Link]
6.
Stine JG, Intagliata NM, Shah NL, et al. Clinical cirrhosis dilemmas: Survey of practice from the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 1334–1339. [Link]
7.
Northup PG, Sundaram V, Fallon MB, et al. Hypercoagulation and thrombophilia in liver disease. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2–9. [Link]
8.
Søgaard KK, Horváth-Puhó E, Grønbaek H, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: a nationwide population-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 96–101. [Link]
9.
Stine JG, Niccum BA, Zimmet AN, et al. Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018; 9: 140. [Link]
10.
Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, et al. Evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 265–270. [Link]
11.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE, Lafond J, et al. Acute kidney injury is associated with low factor XIII in decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 1409–1415. [Link]
12.
Zanetto A, Rinder HM, Campello E, et al. Acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis is associated with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features. Hepatology 2020; 72: 1327–1340. [Link]
13.
Jakab SS and Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and management of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2020; 24: 335–350. [Link]
14.
Lisotti A, Azzaroli F, Buonfiglioli F, et al. Indocyanine green retention test as a noninvasive marker of portal hypertension and esophageal varices in compensated liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 59: 643–650. [Link]
15.
Burton JR Jr, Liangpunsakul S, Lapidus J, et al. Validation of a multivariate model predicting presence and size of varices. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 609–615. [Link]
16.
North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 983–989. [Link]
17.
Basili S, Raparelli V, Napoleone L, et al. Platelet count does not predict bleeding in cirrhotic patients: results from the PRO-LIVER Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 368–375. [Link]
18.
Quick AJ. The prothrombin in hemophilia and in obstructive jaundice. J Biol Chem 1935; 109: 73–74. [Link]
19.
Tripodi A, Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, et al. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 141–148. [Link]
20.
Trotter JF, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, et al. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1624–1628. [Link]
21.
Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions—Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30: 1168–1184. [Link]
22.
Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Dig Dis Sci 1981; 26: 388–393. [Link]
23.
Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, et al. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology 2004; 40: 484–488. [Link]
24.
Vieira da Rocha EC, D'Amico EA, Caldwell SH, et al. A prospective study of conventional and expanded coagulation indices in predicting ulcer bleeding after variceal band ligation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 988–993. [Link]
25.
Giannini EG, Greco A, Marenco S, et al. Incidence of bleeding following invasive procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia and advanced liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 899–902. [Link]
26.
Fortea JI, Puente A, Ezcurra I, et al. Management of haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in cirrhosis in Spain: a national survey. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 95–103. [Link]
27.
Desborough MJ, Hockley B, Sekhar M, et al. Patterns of blood component use in cirrhosis: a nationwide study. Liver Int 2016; 36: 522–529. [Link]
28.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Correction of hemostatic abnormalities and portal pressure variations in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 60: 1442. [Link]
29.
Lisman T, Kleiss S, Patel VC, et al. In vitro efficacy of pro- and anticoagulant strategies in compensated and acutely ill patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2018; 38: 1988–1996. [Link]
30.
Bernal W, Caldwell SH and Lisman T. Nails in the coffin of fresh frozen plasma to prevent or treat bleeding in cirrhosis? J Hepatol 2020; 72: 12–13. [Link]
31.
Rassi AB, d'Amico EA, Tripodi A, et al. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy: Effect on conventional coagulation tests and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation. J Hepatol 2020; 72: 85–94. [Link]
32.
Giannini EG. Review article: thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease and pharmacologic treatment options. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 1055–1065. [Link]
33.
Giannini E, Botta F, Borro P, et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gut 2003; 52: 1200–1205. [Link]
34.
Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, et al. Review article: blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1017–1029. [Link]
35.
Lisman T, Bongers TN, Adelmeijer J, et al. Elevated levels of von Willebrand factor in cirrhosis support platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity. Hepatology 2006; 44: 53–61. [Link]
36.
Reuken PA, Kussmann A, Kiehntopf M, et al. Imbalance of von Willebrand factor and its cleaving protease ADAMTS13 during systemic inflammation superimposed on advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2015; 35: 37–45. [Link]
37.
Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Scher J, et al. Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience. Thorax 2015; 70: 127–132. [Link]
38.
Perdigão JP, de Almeida PC, Rocha TD, et al. Postoperative bleeding after dental extraction in liver pretransplant patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: e177–e184. [Link]
39.
Giannini EG, Giambruno E, Brunacci M, et al. Low fibrinogen levels are associated with bleeding after varices ligation in thrombocytopenic cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 830–835. [Link]
40.
Seeff LB, Everson GT, Morgan TR, et al. Complication rate of percutaneous liver biopsies among persons with advanced chronic liver disease in the HALT-C trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 877–883. [Link]
41.
Park JG, Park SY, Tak WY, et al. Early complications after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 1,843 ablations in 1,211 patients in a single centre: experience over 10 years. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 692.e9–692.e15. [Link]
42.
Khemichian S and Terrault NA. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with chronic liver disease. Semin Thromb Hemost 2020; 46: 682–692. [Link]
43.
O'Leary JG, Greenberg CS, Patton HM, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update: Coagulation in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 34–43.e1. [Link]
44.
Simonetto DA, Singal AK, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. ACG clinical guideline: disorders of the hepatic and mesenteric circulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 18–40. [Link]
45.
Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet 2015; 386: 1576–1587. [Link]
46.
Bajaj JS. Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure: will East and West ever meet? Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1337–1339. [Link]
47.
Moreau R, Jalan R, Ginès P, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1426–1437. [Link]
48.
Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, et al. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 1272–1284. [Link]
49.
Dong V and Karvellas CJ. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Objective admission and support criteria in the intensive care unit. JHEP Rep. 2019; 1: 44–52. [Link]
50.
Blasi A, Calvo A, Prado V, et al. Coagulation failure in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis: beyond the international normalized ratio. Hepatology 2018; 68: 2325–2337. [Link]
51.
Blasi A, Patel VC, Adelmeijer J, et al. Mixed fibrinolytic phenotypes in decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure with hypofibrinolysis in those with complications and poor survival. Hepatology 2020; 71: 1381–1390. [Link]
52.
Fisher C, Patel VC, Stoy SH, et al. Balanced haemostasis with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features in critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic-liver failure. J Crit Care 2018; 43: 54–60. [Link]
53.
Premkumar M, Saxena P, Rangegowda D, et al. Coagulation failure is associated with bleeding events and clinical outcome during systemic inflammatory response and sepsis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: An observational cohort study. Liver Int 2019; 39: 694–704. [Link]
54.
Shukla A and Jain A. Association of acute-on-chronic liver failure with vascular liver diseases. Hepatol Int 2019; 13:399–402. [Link]
55.
Lin S, Wang M, Zhu Y, et al. Hemorrhagic complications following abdominal paracentesis in acute on chronic liver failure: a propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e2225. [Link]
56.
Cruz-Ramón V, Chinchilla-López P, Ramírez-Pérez O, et al. Thrombosis of the portal venous system in cirrhotic vs. non-cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 476–481. [Link]
57.
Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH and Tripodi A. Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1582–1599. [Link]
58.
Hagerty T and Rich MW. Fall risk and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A delicate balance. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84: 35–40. [Link]
59.
Ghabril M, Agarwal S, Lacerda M, et al. Portal vein thrombosis is a risk factor for poor early outcomes after liver transplantation: analysis of risk factors and outcomes for portal vein thrombosis in waitlisted patients. Transplantation 2016; 100: 126–133. [Link]
60.
Pettinari I, Vukotic R, Stefanescu H, et al. Clinical impact and safety of anticoagulants for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114: 258–266. [Link]
61.
Delgado MG, Seijo S, Yepes I, et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 776–783. [Link]
62.
Villa E, Cammà C, Marietta M, et al. Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1253–1260. [Link]
63.
Calvaruso V, Maimone S, Gatt A, et al. Coagulation and fibrosis in chronic liver disease. Gut 2008; 57: 1722–1727. [Link]
64.
Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Healing gone wrong: convergence of hemostatic pathways and liver fibrosis? Clin Sci (Lond) 2020; 134: 2189–2201. [Link]
65.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Portal vein thrombosis and chronic liver disease progression: The closer you look the more you see. Hepatology 2016; 63: 342–343. [Link]
66.
Luca A, Caruso S, Milazzo M, et al. Natural course of extrahepatic nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 2012; 265: 124–132. [Link]
67.
Nery F, Chevret S, Condat B, et al. Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study. Hepatology 2015; 61: 660–667. [Link]
68.
Intagliata NM, Henry ZH, Maitland H, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhosis patients pose similar risks of bleeding when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 1721–1727. [Link]
69.
Naymagon L, Tremblay D, Zubizarreta N, et al. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 655–666. [Link]
70.
Rodriguez-Castro KI, Vitale A, Fadin M, et at. A prediction model for successful anticoagulation in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31: 34–42. [Link]
71.
Giannini EG and Savarino V. Which anticoagulant drug should be used to treat portal vein thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 103. [Link]
72.
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: The Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093–1100. [Link]
73.
Zhang S, Meng H, Chen Q, et al. Is frailty a prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndrome? Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1435–1442. [Link]
74.
Olson ST, Richard B, Izaguirre G, et al. Molecular mechanisms of antithrombin-heparin regulation of blood clotting proteinases. A paradigm for understanding proteinase regulation by serpin family protein proteinase inhibitors. Biochimie 2010; 92: 1587–1596. [Link]
75.
Bechmann LP, Sichau M, Wichert M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2011; 31: 75–82. [Link]
76.
Goodpasture EW. Fibrinolysis in chronic hepatic insufficiency. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1914; 25: 330–336.
77.
Joist JH. AICF and DIC in liver cirrhosis: expressions of a hypercoagulable state. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2801–2803. [Link]
78.
Rijken DC, Kock EL, Guimarães AH, et al. Evidence for an enhanced fibrinolytic capacity in cirrhosis as measured with two different global fibrinolysis tests. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 2116–2222. [Link]
79.
de Franchis R, on behalf of the Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743–752. [Link]
80.
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2017; 65: 310–335. [Link]
81.
DeAngelis GA, Khot R, Haskal ZJ, et al. Bleeding risk and management in interventional procedures in chronic liver disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 1665–1674. [Link]
82.
Ben-Ari Z, Panagou M, Patch D, et al. Hypercoagulability in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis evaluated by thrombelastography. J Hepatol 1997; 26: 554–559. [Link]
83.
Montalto P, Vlachogiannakos J, Cox DJ, et al. Bacterial infection in cirrhosis impairs coagulation by a heparin effect: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2002; 37: 463–470. [Link]

Abstract

Liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for about 90% of cases and mostly arises in chronic liver disease, especially cirrhosis. Viral hepatitis remains a leading cause, but alcohol-related disease and MASLD are rising. With immune checkpoint inhibitors transforming HCC management, it is timely to highlight common mistakes across screening, staging, diagnosis and treatment.

Topics

Digestive Oncology Hepatobiliary

Published

2026

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Standards and Guidelines
Consensus
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

ABSTRACT

This international, multidisciplinary consensus report represents the first effort to systematically define and characterize fatty pancreas. A key outcome of this endeavor was the recommendation to adopt “fatty pancreas” as the standardized and inclusive term to describe all forms of fat accumulation in the pancreas. This terminological consensus provides a critical foundation for unified reporting and clinical communication. Another major contribution of the report is the consensus on diagnostic imaging findings, which was based on radiological and endoscopic modalities. The proposed criteria aim to enhance consistency in clinical assessment and support the development of standardized research protocols. In addition to establishing terminology and diagnostic frameworks, the report also synthesizes current knowledge across a wide range of relevant domains. These include the etiology and epidemiology of fatty pancreas, as well as its associations with alcohol consumption, smoking, acute and chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and surgical outcomes. The potential links between fatty pancreas and neoplastic conditions such as intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and pancreatic cancer are also addressed, alongside the current understanding of its metabolic implications (beta-cell function and glucose homeostasis) and treatment strategies. Throughout the consensus process, a consistent theme emerged: the limited availability of high-quality, prospective clinical data. Therefore, many of the recommendations in this report are based on expert consensus rather than strong empirical evidence. As such, the statements require rigorous prospective validation before they can be adopted into routine clinical practice. This underscores a critical need for further research, particularly studies aimed at clarifying causal relationships, validating diagnostic tools, and determining the clinical relevance of fatty pancreas across diverse patient populations. This report serves as both a summary of our current understanding and a roadmap for future investigations, aiming to close existing knowledge gaps and guide evidence-based clinical practice in this emerging field.

Publishers

European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition logoThe European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism logoEuropean Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology logoEuropean Society of Pathology logoEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logoEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology logoEuropean Association for the Study of the Liver logoEuropean Pancreatic Club logo
European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, European Society for Primary Care Gastroenterology, European Society of Pathology, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology, European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Pancreatic Club

Guideline

Consensus

Topics

Pancreas

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal, 2026; 14:e70185

Published

2026

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Ana Catarina Garcia, Gonçalo Alexandrino

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

References

Mistakes
References
Mistake 1 Mistake 2 Mistake 3 Mistake 4 Mistake 5 Mistake 6 Mistake 7 Mistake 8
1.
Intagliata NM, Argo CK, Stine JG, et al. Concepts and controversies in haemostasis and thrombosis associated with liver disease: Proceedings of the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Thromb Haemost 2018; 118: 1491–1506. [Link]
2.
Botta F, Giannini E, Romagnoli P, et al. MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study. Gut 2003; 52: 134–139. [Link]
3.
Giannini EG and Peck-Radosavljevic M. Platelet dysfunction: status of thrombopoietin in thrombocytopenia associated with chronic liver failure. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 455–461. [Link]
4.
Tripodi A and Mannucci PM. The coagulopathy of chronic liver disease. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 147–156. [Link]
5.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Coagulation pathways, hemostasis, and thrombosis in liver failure. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2018; 39: 598–608. [Link]
6.
Stine JG, Intagliata NM, Shah NL, et al. Clinical cirrhosis dilemmas: Survey of practice from the 7th International Coagulation in Liver Disease Conference. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65: 1334–1339. [Link]
7.
Northup PG, Sundaram V, Fallon MB, et al. Hypercoagulation and thrombophilia in liver disease. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 2–9. [Link]
8.
Søgaard KK, Horváth-Puhó E, Grønbaek H, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver disease: a nationwide population-based case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 96–101. [Link]
9.
Stine JG, Niccum BA, Zimmet AN, et al. Increased risk of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2018; 9: 140. [Link]
10.
Tripodi A, Primignani M, Lemma L, et al. Evidence that low protein C contributes to the procoagulant imbalance in cirrhosis. J Hepatol 2013; 59: 265–270. [Link]
11.
Intagliata NM, Davis JPE, Lafond J, et al. Acute kidney injury is associated with low factor XIII in decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 1409–1415. [Link]
12.
Zanetto A, Rinder HM, Campello E, et al. Acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis is associated with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features. Hepatology 2020; 72: 1327–1340. [Link]
13.
Jakab SS and Garcia-Tsao G. Evaluation and management of esophageal and gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Liver Dis 2020; 24: 335–350. [Link]
14.
Lisotti A, Azzaroli F, Buonfiglioli F, et al. Indocyanine green retention test as a noninvasive marker of portal hypertension and esophageal varices in compensated liver cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 59: 643–650. [Link]
15.
Burton JR Jr, Liangpunsakul S, Lapidus J, et al. Validation of a multivariate model predicting presence and size of varices. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 609–615. [Link]
16.
North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esophageal Varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 983–989. [Link]
17.
Basili S, Raparelli V, Napoleone L, et al. Platelet count does not predict bleeding in cirrhotic patients: results from the PRO-LIVER Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2018; 113: 368–375. [Link]
18.
Quick AJ. The prothrombin in hemophilia and in obstructive jaundice. J Biol Chem 1935; 109: 73–74. [Link]
19.
Tripodi A, Caldwell SH, Hoffman M, et al. Review article: the prothrombin time test as a measure of bleeding risk and prognosis in liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 141–148. [Link]
20.
Trotter JF, Olson J, Lefkowitz J, et al. Changes in international normalized ratio (INR) and model for endstage liver disease (MELD) based on selection of clinical laboratory. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1624–1628. [Link]
21.
Patel IJ, Rahim S, Davidson JC, et al. Society of Interventional Radiology consensus guidelines for the periprocedural management of thrombotic and bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous image-guided interventions—Part II: Recommendations: endorsed by the Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30: 1168–1184. [Link]
22.
Ewe K. Bleeding after liver biopsy does not correlate with indices of peripheral coagulation. Dig Dis Sci 1981; 26: 388–393. [Link]
23.
Grabau CM, Crago SF, Hoff LK, et al. Performance standards for therapeutic abdominal paracentesis. Hepatology 2004; 40: 484–488. [Link]
24.
Vieira da Rocha EC, D'Amico EA, Caldwell SH, et al. A prospective study of conventional and expanded coagulation indices in predicting ulcer bleeding after variceal band ligation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 988–993. [Link]
25.
Giannini EG, Greco A, Marenco S, et al. Incidence of bleeding following invasive procedures in patients with thrombocytopenia and advanced liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 899–902. [Link]
26.
Fortea JI, Puente A, Ezcurra I, et al. Management of haemostatic alterations and associated disorders in cirrhosis in Spain: a national survey. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51: 95–103. [Link]
27.
Desborough MJ, Hockley B, Sekhar M, et al. Patterns of blood component use in cirrhosis: a nationwide study. Liver Int 2016; 36: 522–529. [Link]
28.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Correction of hemostatic abnormalities and portal pressure variations in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2014; 60: 1442. [Link]
29.
Lisman T, Kleiss S, Patel VC, et al. In vitro efficacy of pro- and anticoagulant strategies in compensated and acutely ill patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int 2018; 38: 1988–1996. [Link]
30.
Bernal W, Caldwell SH and Lisman T. Nails in the coffin of fresh frozen plasma to prevent or treat bleeding in cirrhosis? J Hepatol 2020; 72: 12–13. [Link]
31.
Rassi AB, d'Amico EA, Tripodi A, et al. Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in patients with cirrhosis and coagulopathy: Effect on conventional coagulation tests and thrombomodulin-modified thrombin generation. J Hepatol 2020; 72: 85–94. [Link]
32.
Giannini EG. Review article: thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease and pharmacologic treatment options. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 23: 1055–1065. [Link]
33.
Giannini E, Botta F, Borro P, et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio: proposal and validation of a non-invasive parameter to predict the presence of oesophageal varices in patients with liver cirrhosis. Gut 2003; 52: 1200–1205. [Link]
34.
Witters P, Freson K, Verslype C, et al. Review article: blood platelet number and function in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1017–1029. [Link]
35.
Lisman T, Bongers TN, Adelmeijer J, et al. Elevated levels of von Willebrand factor in cirrhosis support platelet adhesion despite reduced functional capacity. Hepatology 2006; 44: 53–61. [Link]
36.
Reuken PA, Kussmann A, Kiehntopf M, et al. Imbalance of von Willebrand factor and its cleaving protease ADAMTS13 during systemic inflammation superimposed on advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2015; 35: 37–45. [Link]
37.
Ault MJ, Rosen BT, Scher J, et al. Thoracentesis outcomes: a 12-year experience. Thorax 2015; 70: 127–132. [Link]
38.
Perdigão JP, de Almeida PC, Rocha TD, et al. Postoperative bleeding after dental extraction in liver pretransplant patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70: e177–e184. [Link]
39.
Giannini EG, Giambruno E, Brunacci M, et al. Low fibrinogen levels are associated with bleeding after varices ligation in thrombocytopenic cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 830–835. [Link]
40.
Seeff LB, Everson GT, Morgan TR, et al. Complication rate of percutaneous liver biopsies among persons with advanced chronic liver disease in the HALT-C trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 877–883. [Link]
41.
Park JG, Park SY, Tak WY, et al. Early complications after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of 1,843 ablations in 1,211 patients in a single centre: experience over 10 years. Clin Radiol 2017; 72: 692.e9–692.e15. [Link]
42.
Khemichian S and Terrault NA. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in patients with chronic liver disease. Semin Thromb Hemost 2020; 46: 682–692. [Link]
43.
O'Leary JG, Greenberg CS, Patton HM, et al. AGA Clinical Practice Update: Coagulation in cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 34–43.e1. [Link]
44.
Simonetto DA, Singal AK, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. ACG clinical guideline: disorders of the hepatic and mesenteric circulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 18–40. [Link]
45.
Bernal W, Jalan R, Quaglia A, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure. Lancet 2015; 386: 1576–1587. [Link]
46.
Bajaj JS. Defining acute-on-chronic liver failure: will East and West ever meet? Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1337–1339. [Link]
47.
Moreau R, Jalan R, Ginès P, et al. Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 1426–1437. [Link]
48.
Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, et al. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 1272–1284. [Link]
49.
Dong V and Karvellas CJ. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Objective admission and support criteria in the intensive care unit. JHEP Rep. 2019; 1: 44–52. [Link]
50.
Blasi A, Calvo A, Prado V, et al. Coagulation failure in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and decompensated cirrhosis: beyond the international normalized ratio. Hepatology 2018; 68: 2325–2337. [Link]
51.
Blasi A, Patel VC, Adelmeijer J, et al. Mixed fibrinolytic phenotypes in decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure with hypofibrinolysis in those with complications and poor survival. Hepatology 2020; 71: 1381–1390. [Link]
52.
Fisher C, Patel VC, Stoy SH, et al. Balanced haemostasis with both hypo- and hyper-coagulable features in critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic-liver failure. J Crit Care 2018; 43: 54–60. [Link]
53.
Premkumar M, Saxena P, Rangegowda D, et al. Coagulation failure is associated with bleeding events and clinical outcome during systemic inflammatory response and sepsis in acute-on-chronic liver failure: An observational cohort study. Liver Int 2019; 39: 694–704. [Link]
54.
Shukla A and Jain A. Association of acute-on-chronic liver failure with vascular liver diseases. Hepatol Int 2019; 13:399–402. [Link]
55.
Lin S, Wang M, Zhu Y, et al. Hemorrhagic complications following abdominal paracentesis in acute on chronic liver failure: a propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e2225. [Link]
56.
Cruz-Ramón V, Chinchilla-López P, Ramírez-Pérez O, et al. Thrombosis of the portal venous system in cirrhotic vs. non-cirrhotic patients. Ann Hepatol 2018; 17: 476–481. [Link]
57.
Intagliata NM, Caldwell SH and Tripodi A. Diagnosis, development, and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in patients with and without cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 1582–1599. [Link]
58.
Hagerty T and Rich MW. Fall risk and anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in the elderly: A delicate balance. Cleve Clin J Med 2017; 84: 35–40. [Link]
59.
Ghabril M, Agarwal S, Lacerda M, et al. Portal vein thrombosis is a risk factor for poor early outcomes after liver transplantation: analysis of risk factors and outcomes for portal vein thrombosis in waitlisted patients. Transplantation 2016; 100: 126–133. [Link]
60.
Pettinari I, Vukotic R, Stefanescu H, et al. Clinical impact and safety of anticoagulants for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019; 114: 258–266. [Link]
61.
Delgado MG, Seijo S, Yepes I, et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation on patients with cirrhosis and portal vein thrombosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 776–783. [Link]
62.
Villa E, Cammà C, Marietta M, et al. Enoxaparin prevents portal vein thrombosis and liver decompensation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1253–1260. [Link]
63.
Calvaruso V, Maimone S, Gatt A, et al. Coagulation and fibrosis in chronic liver disease. Gut 2008; 57: 1722–1727. [Link]
64.
Davis JPE and Caldwell SH. Healing gone wrong: convergence of hemostatic pathways and liver fibrosis? Clin Sci (Lond) 2020; 134: 2189–2201. [Link]
65.
Giannini EG, Stravitz RT and Caldwell SH. Portal vein thrombosis and chronic liver disease progression: The closer you look the more you see. Hepatology 2016; 63: 342–343. [Link]
66.
Luca A, Caruso S, Milazzo M, et al. Natural course of extrahepatic nonmalignant partial portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis. Radiology 2012; 265: 124–132. [Link]
67.
Nery F, Chevret S, Condat B, et al. Causes and consequences of portal vein thrombosis in 1,243 patients with cirrhosis: results of a longitudinal study. Hepatology 2015; 61: 660–667. [Link]
68.
Intagliata NM, Henry ZH, Maitland H, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in cirrhosis patients pose similar risks of bleeding when compared to traditional anticoagulation. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 1721–1727. [Link]
69.
Naymagon L, Tremblay D, Zubizarreta N, et al. The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in noncirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Blood Adv 2020; 4: 655–666. [Link]
70.
Rodriguez-Castro KI, Vitale A, Fadin M, et at. A prediction model for successful anticoagulation in cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 31: 34–42. [Link]
71.
Giannini EG and Savarino V. Which anticoagulant drug should be used to treat portal vein thrombosis in patients with chronic liver disease? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11: 103. [Link]
72.
Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: The Euro Heart Survey. Chest 2010; 138: 1093–1100. [Link]
73.
Zhang S, Meng H, Chen Q, et al. Is frailty a prognostic factor for adverse outcomes in older patients with acute coronary syndrome? Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32: 1435–1442. [Link]
74.
Olson ST, Richard B, Izaguirre G, et al. Molecular mechanisms of antithrombin-heparin regulation of blood clotting proteinases. A paradigm for understanding proteinase regulation by serpin family protein proteinase inhibitors. Biochimie 2010; 92: 1587–1596. [Link]
75.
Bechmann LP, Sichau M, Wichert M, et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Liver Int 2011; 31: 75–82. [Link]
76.
Goodpasture EW. Fibrinolysis in chronic hepatic insufficiency. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1914; 25: 330–336.
77.
Joist JH. AICF and DIC in liver cirrhosis: expressions of a hypercoagulable state. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2801–2803. [Link]
78.
Rijken DC, Kock EL, Guimarães AH, et al. Evidence for an enhanced fibrinolytic capacity in cirrhosis as measured with two different global fibrinolysis tests. J Thromb Haemost 2012; 10: 2116–2222. [Link]
79.
de Franchis R, on behalf of the Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2015; 63: 743–752. [Link]
80.
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, et al. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology 2017; 65: 310–335. [Link]
81.
DeAngelis GA, Khot R, Haskal ZJ, et al. Bleeding risk and management in interventional procedures in chronic liver disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27: 1665–1674. [Link]
82.
Ben-Ari Z, Panagou M, Patch D, et al. Hypercoagulability in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis evaluated by thrombelastography. J Hepatol 1997; 26: 554–559. [Link]
83.
Montalto P, Vlachogiannakos J, Cox DJ, et al. Bacterial infection in cirrhosis impairs coagulation by a heparin effect: a prospective study. J Hepatol 2002; 37: 463–470. [Link]

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains an important global health concern. It is estimated that there are approximately 50 million people infected with HCV globally, with around 1 million new infections each year and about 242,000 deaths annually attributed to HCV-related complications. Most acute HCV infections (55–85%) become chronic due to the virus’s effective evasion strategies, with spontaneous clearance being rare once chronicity is established. This condition often progresses silently, with many individuals unaware of their infection until advanced liver damage has occurred. If left untreated, HCV can lead to severe complications, including liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). HCV transmission occurs mainly through percutaneous exposure to infected blood. HCV can also spread from mother to infant (vertical transmission) and, less frequently, via sexual contact.1,2 In recent years, the introduction of oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), with remarkable safety and effectiveness profiles, has led to a sustained virological response (SVR) in virtually all (>97%) HCV-infected patients, regardless of HCV genotype or disease stage. However, significant barriers remain, such as issues with diagnosis, access to treatment and awareness of the disease.

Here, we discuss some of the misconceptions in HCV management and provide a practical management approach grounded in evidence and clinical experience.

Topics

Hepatobiliary

Citation

Garcia A.C and Alexandrino G. Mistakes in hepatits C and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2025; 25: 14-17.

Published

2025

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

Main Recommendations

At a population level, the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) suggest endoscopic screening for gastric cancer (and precancerous conditions) in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate [ASR] > 20 per 100 000 person-years) every 2 to 3 years or, if cost–effectiveness has been proven, in intermediate risk regions (ASR 10–20 per 100 000 person-years) every 5 years, but not in low-risk regions (ASR < 10).

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that irrespective of country of origin, individual gastric risk assessment and stratification of precancerous conditions is recommended for first-time gastroscopy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80 should be discontinued or not started, and that patients’ comorbidities should be considered when treatment of superficial lesions is planned.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that a high quality endoscopy including the use of virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, is performed for screening, diagnosis, and staging of precancerous conditions (atrophy and intestinal metaplasia) and lesions (dysplasia or cancer), as well as after endoscopic therapy. VCE should be used to guide the sampling site for biopsies in the case of suspected neoplastic lesions as well as to guide biopsies for diagnosis and staging of gastric precancerous conditions, with random biopsies to be taken in the absence of endoscopically suspected changes. When there is a suspected early gastric neoplastic lesion, it should be properly described (location, size, Paris classification, vascular and mucosal pattern), photodocumented, and two targeted biopsies taken.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP do not recommend routine performance of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography (PET)-CT prior to endoscopic resection unless there are signs of deep submucosal invasion or if the lesion is not considered suitable for endoscopic resection.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for differentiated gastric lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low grade and high grade) or as intramucosal carcinoma (of any size if not ulcerated or ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR being an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions of size ≤ 10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest that a decision about ESD can be considered for malignant lesions clinically staged as having minimal submucosal invasion if differentiated and ≤ 30 mm; or for malignant lesions clinically staged as intramucosal, undifferentiated and ≤ 20 mm; and in both cases with no ulcerative findings.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommends patient management based on the following histological risk after endoscopic resection:

Curative/very low-risk resection (lymph node metastasis [LNM] risk < 0.5 %–1 %): en bloc R0 resection; dysplastic/pT1a, differentiated lesion, no lymphovascular invasion, independent of size if no ulceration and ≤ 30 mm if ulcerated. No further staging procedure or treatment is recommended.

Curative/low-risk resection (LNM risk < 3 %): en bloc R0 resection; lesion with no lymphovascular invasion and: a) pT1b, invasion ≤ 500 µm, differentiated, size ≤ 30 mm; or b) pT1a, undifferentiated, size ≤ 20 mm and no ulceration. Staging should be completed, and further treatment is generally not necessary, but a multidisciplinary discussion is required.

Local-risk resection (very low risk of LNM but increased risk of local persistence/recurrence): Piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin of a lesion otherwise meeting curative/very low-risk criteria (or meeting low-risk criteria provided that there is no submucosal invasive tumor at the resection margin in the case of piecemeal resection or tumor-positive horizontal margin for pT1b lesions [invasion ≤ 500 µm; well-differentiated; size ≤ 30 mm, and VM0]). Endoscopic surveillance/re-treatment is recommended rather than other additional treatment.

High-risk resection (noncurative): Any lesion with any of the following: (a) a positive vertical margin (if carcinoma) or lymphovascular invasion or deep submucosal invasion (> 500 µm from the muscularis mucosae); (b) poorly differentiated lesions if ulceration or size > 20 mm; (c) pT1b differentiated lesions with submucosal invasion ≤ 500 µm with size > 30 mm; or (d) intramucosal ulcerative lesion with size > 30 mm. Complete staging and strong consideration for additional treatments (surgery) in multidisciplinary discussion.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP suggest the use of validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e. g. Kimura–Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e. g. endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia [EGGIM]) to endoscopically stage precancerous conditions and stratify the risk for gastric cancer.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that biopsies should be taken from at least two topographic sites (2 biopsies from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, guided by VCE) in two separate, clearly labeled vials. Additional biopsy from the incisura is optional.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3 + or EGGIM 5 +) or advanced histological stages of atrophic gastritis (severe atrophic changes or intestinal metaplasia, or changes in both antrum and corpus, operative link on gastritis assessment/operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia [OLGA/OLGIM] III/IV) should be followed up with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of the individual’s country of origin.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that no surveillance is proposed for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection). This group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend H. pylori eradication for patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy.

ESGE/EHMSG/ESP recommend that patients should be advised to stop smoking and low-dose daily aspirin use may be considered for the prevention of gastric cancer in selected individuals with high risk for cardiovascular events.

Publishers

European Society of Pathology logoEuropean Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group logoEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logo
European Society of Pathology, European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Endoscopy Stomach & H. Pylori

Citation

Endoscopy 2025; 57(05): 504-554

Published

2025

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to continue.

This content is part of Gutflix. Log in with your myUEG account, or create one free, to watch it.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana

Summary

AI Generated

Summary is not available for this content yet.

Download PDF

Was this helpful?

Thanks for your feedback.

This summary was generated by an AI large language model based on the content transcript. It is for informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for clinical judgment. Always rely on your professional expertise and the full clinical context when making clinical decisions.

Guideline

ABSTRACT

Pain is often the presenting symptom of acute pancreatitis (AP) and has a prognostic significance, with poorly treated pain affecting patient outcomes. Despite this, there are currently no international recommendations for pain management in patients admitted with AP. This current guideline was developed following the United European Gastroenterology framework for the development of high-quality clinical guidelines. Nine working groups were formed to develop statements on pain management in AP from admission to discharge. After systematic literature reviews, the evidence was evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology, as appropriate. Statements and comments were developed by the working groups and voted using three rounds of Delphi method. The guidelines concluded that acute postoperative pain management guidelines are applicable for treating acute pain due to AP. The numerical rating scale is preferred for pain assessment because of better compliance. Opioids currently form the cornerstone of severe pain management. Potent opioids such as buprenorphine and pentazocine provide superior pain relief over non-opioid medications and decrease the need for rescue analgesia. Current evidence does not consistently demonstrate harm from opioids in AP. In patients with severe pain, safety concerns should not delay the timely use of opioids to ensure adequate pain management. Specific recommendations concerning the use of epidural analgesia, acupuncture and management of pain in the paediatric population and during pregnancy are provided based on evidence and expert opinions. Finally, the unmet needs for future research were discussed and proposed.

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Pancreas

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal, 2026

Published

2026

More Like This:

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment

Javier P. Gisbert Javier P. Gisbert

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Mistakes in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma and how to avoid them

Christos Triantos Christos Triantos, Ioannis Elefsiniotis, Spyridon Pantzios

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

International Multidisciplinary Consensus Report on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, and Management of Fatty Pancreas: A Joint Statement Endorsed by EPC, APA, EASD, EASL, ESGAR, ESGE, ESP, ESPCG, ESPEN, ESPGHAN, IAP, JPS, KPBA, LAPSG, and UEG

Miroslav Vujasinovic Miroslav Vujasinovic

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Mistakes in hepatitis C and how to avoid them

Gonçalo Alexandrino Gonçalo Alexandrino, Ana Catarina Garcia

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): ESGE, EHMSG and ESP Guideline update 2025

Mario Dinis-Ribeiro Mario Dinis-Ribeiro

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

European Interdisciplinary Guidelines on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: UEG, EPC, EDS, ESDO, EAGEN, ESPGHAN, ESGAR, and ESPCG Evidence-Based Recommendations

Sanjay Pandanaboyana Sanjay Pandanaboyana

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.