UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
new
Gut Guide online
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Incidental liver lesions are increasingly found due to the incremental use of cross-sectional imaging. They encompass a large group of benign and malignant lesions, and the combined use of different imaging modalities is often required to make an accurate diagnosis. It is of utmost importance for clinicians and radiologists to be familiar with each imaging modality's strengths and limitations and be aware of common pitfalls that can confound the correct interpretation of findings. The article will discuss eight common mistakes in the interpretation and acquisition of radiological images. Recommendations on avoiding these mistakes will be based on clinical experience and literature where possible. As MRI plays an essential role in the characterisation of liver lesions, a standard MRI protocol with a brief explanation of the sequences has been added for reference

Mistakes in imaging hepatic lesions and how to avoid them

Mistakes in imaging hepatic lesions and how to avoid them

Katja De Paepe

Topics

Hepatobiliary Radiology & Imaging

Citation

DePaepe K. Mistakes in imaging hepatic lesions and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2022; 22: 37-42.

Published

2022
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Oesophageal cancer with Massimiliano di Pietro (Part 1)

Massimiliano di Pietro, Pradeep Mundre

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Oesophagus

Published

2025
UEG Mistakes In Articles
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Barrett’s oesophagus is a premalignant condition of the distal oesophagus predisposing to oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Given the potential for malignant progression and the poor prognosis of eosophageal adenocarcinoma when diagnosed at a symptomatic stage, patients with known Barrett oesophagus undergo regular endoscopic surveillance to detect neoplastic progression at an early and preferably endoscopically, treatable stage. Endoscopic management of early Barrett oesophagus neoplasia consists of a combination of endoscopic imaging, endoscopic resection and endoscopic ablation. Below we discuss a number of mistakes that are frequently made when managing Barrett oesophagus neoplasia and how to avoid them. Much of this discussion draws on existing guidelines (for background reading, check the ESGE Barrett oesophagus guideline), but in many instances the underlying evidence (even in the guideline) is missing and therefore many of our practically driven recommendations are based on common sense and our experience in this field.


Mistakes in endoscopic treatment of Barrett oesophagus neoplasia and how to avoid them

Mistakes in endoscopic treatment of Barrett oesophagus neoplasia and how to avoid them

Jacques J. Bergman, Roos E. Pouw, Eva Verheij

Topics

Oesophagus

Citation

Verheij EPD, Pouw RE and Bergman JJ. Mistakes in endoscopic treatment of Barrett oesophagus neoplasia and how to avoid them. UEG Education 2021; 21: 35–39.

Published

2021
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Abstract

Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a well-described inherited syndrome, characterized by the development of gastrointestinal polyps, and characteristic mucocutaneous freckling. Development of small bowel intestinal polyps may lead to intussusception in children may require emergency laparotomy with potential loss of bowel. Gastrointestinal polyps may lead to bleeding and anemia. This European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition position paper provides a guide for diagnosis, assessment, and management of PJS in children and adolescents and guidance on avoiding complications from PJS or from the endoscopic procedures performed on these patients. This is the first position paper regarding PJS published by European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition. Literature from PubMed, Medline, and Embase was reviewed and in the absence of evidence, recommendations reflect the opinion of pediatric and adult experts involved in the care of polyposis syndromes. Because many of the studies that form the basis for the recommendations were descriptive and/or retrospective in nature, some of the recommendations are based on expert opinion. This position paper will be helpful in the appropriate management and timing of procedures in children and adolescents with PJS.

Keywords: adolescent; child; colonoscopy; colorectal cancer; Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; polyposis


Management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Polyposis Working Group

Management of Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Polyposis Working Group

Andrew Latchford, Shlomi Cohen, Marcus Auth, Michele Scaillon, Jérome Viala, Richard Daniels, Cecile Talbotec, Thomas Attard, Carol Durno, Warren Hyer

Publisher

European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition logo
European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Digestive Oncology Endoscopy Paediatrics Primary Care Small Intestine & Nutrition

Citation

JPGN 2019;68: 442–452

Published

2019
Login to access
UEG Standards and Guidelines
Clinical Practice Guideline
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Main recommendations

1 ESGE suggests performing segmental biopsies (at least two from each segment), which should be placed in different specimen containers (ileum, cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and rectum) in patients with clinical and endoscopic signs of colitis.
Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence

2 ESGE recommends taking two biopsies from the right hemicolon (ascending and transverse colon) and, in a separate container, two biopsies from the left hemicolon (descending and sigmoid colon) when microscopic colitis is suspected.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

3 ESGE recommends pancolonic dye-based chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies of any visible lesions during surveillance endoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence.

4 ESGE suggests that, in high risk patients with a history of colonic neoplasia, tubular-appearing colon, strictures, ongoing therapy-refractory inflammation, or primary sclerosing cholangitis, chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies can be combined with four-quadrant non-targeted biopsies every 10cm along the colon.
Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence.

5 ESGE recommends that, if pouch surveillance for dysplasia is performed, visible abnormalities should be biopsied, with at least two biopsies systematically taken from each of the afferent ileal loop, the efferent blind loop, the pouch, and the anorectal cuff.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

6 ESGE recommends that, in patients with known ulcerative colitis and endoscopic signs of inflammation, at least two biopsies be obtained from the worst affected areas for the assessment of activity or the presence of cytomegalovirus; for those with no evident endoscopic signs of inflammation, advanced imaging technologies may be useful in identifying areas for targeted biopsies to assess histologic remission if this would have therapeutic consequences.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence

7 ESGE suggests not biopsying endoscopically visible inflammation or normal-appearing mucosa to assess disease activity in known Crohn’s disease.
Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence.

8 ESGE recommends that adequately assessed colorectal polyps that are judged to be premalignant should be fully excised rather than biopsied.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

9 ESGE recommends that, where endoscopically feasible, potentially malignant colorectal polyps should be excised en bloc rather than being biopsied. If the endoscopist cannot confidently perform en bloc excision at that time, careful representative images (rather than biopsies) should be taken of the potential focus of cancer, and the patient should be rescheduled or referred to an expert center.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

10 ESGE recommends that, in malignant lesions not amenable to endoscopic excision owing to deep invasion, six carefully targeted biopsies should be taken from the potential focus of cancer.
Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence

Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopic tissue sampling – Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Roos E. Pouw

Publisher

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy logo
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Guideline

Clinical Practice Guideline

Topics

Endoscopy

Citation

Endoscopy 2021; 53, 1261–1273

Published

2021
Login to access
UEG Podcast Episode
Journal Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Smoking and colorectal neoplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Dose-effect relationship

Haluk Tarik Kani 1, Anouk M. Wijnands 2

1 Department of Gastroenterology, Marmara University, School Of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

2 UMC Utrecht, Netherlands

Topics

IBD

Published

2023
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

The Evolving Landscape of Scientific Publishing: Navigating Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities

Pradeep Mundre 1, Joost Drenth 2

1 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

2 Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands

Topics

Education & Training

Published

2024

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.