Gut Guide online

Ten years of clinical insight, compiled.

Gut Guide online brings together 74 articles from UEG's 'Mistakes in …' series , written by European gastroenterology specialists across all major GI subspecialties. Each article covers a common clinical pitfall. Videos and podcasts from Gutflix are embedded throughout, so you can read, watch, and listen in one place. The full edition, 8 chapters and 326 pages, is accessible with a free myUEG account.

MyUEG account is free. Registration takes a few minutes and gives you access to Gut Guide online as well as all of UEG's educational content on Gutflix.

Gut Guide online — promotional hero visual

Read Gut Guide now

Preview version

  • 8 chapters
  • 8 'Mistakes in...' articles
  • 72 pages
  • 12 UEG Week recordings
  • 4 Online Course videos
  • 2 podcasts

Full version

  • 8 chapters
  • 74 'Mistakes in...' articles
  • 326 pages
  • 110 UEG Week recordings
  • 33 Online Course videos
  • 18 podcasts
Log in Create free myUEG account

A myUEG account is free. Registration takes a few minutes and gives you access to Gut Guide Online as well as UEG's full educational content on Gutflix.

Preview

References for each chapter

Chapter 1: Endoscopy

  • Topic: Endoscopy

    Authors: Arnaud Lemmers and Jacques Devière

    Affiliation: Arnaud Lemmers is Head of Clinic, GI Endoscopy, Hospital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. Jacques Devière is former Head of Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

    Correspondence: arnaud.lemmers@erasme.ulb.ac.be

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/HJFyglfu17eA

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Cameron AJ, Higgins JA. Linear gastric erosion. A lesion associated with large diaphragmatic hernia and chronic blood loss anemia. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91: 338-342. [ Link ]
    2. Camus M, et al. Severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage from linear gastric ulcers in large hiatal hernias: a large prospective case series of Cameron ulcers. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 397–400. [ Link ]
    3. Lara LF, et al. Dieulafoy lesions of the GI tract: localization and therapeutic outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3436–3441. [ Link ]
    4. Baxter M and Aly EH. Dieulafoy's lesion: current trends in diagnosis and management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 548–554. [ Link ]
    5. Hirano I. 2015 David Y Graham Lecture: The first two decades of eosinophilic esophagitis—from acid reflux to food allergy. Am J Gastro 2016; 111: 770–776. [ Link ]
    6. Vahabzadeh B, et al. Validation of the Prague C and M criteria for the endoscopic grading of Barrett’s esophagus by gastroenterology trainees: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 236–241. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Gastroscopy

    Authors: Jochen Weigt and Arne Kandulski

    Affiliation: Jochen Weigt is a Professor and Section leader of Endoscopy at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44 39120 Magdeburg, Germany. Arne Kandulski is Head of the University Endoscopy Department at the Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.

    Correspondence: Jochen.Weigt@med.ovgu.de

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/sfsGTLX3Rybn

    Conflicts of Interest: JW receives honorary for lectures and research grant from Fujifilm Europe. AK receives speaker, consultancy and advisory board fees from Roche Pharma AG, Eisai GmbH, Abbvie Deutschland, Janssen-Cilag, Boston Scientific Corp., Micro-Tech Europe, Bayer Vital GmbH, and Bristol Myers Squibb.

    References:

    1. Ho S-H, Uedo N, Aso A, et al. Development of Image-enhanced Endoscopy of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Review of History and Current Evidences. Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2018; 52: 295-306. [ Link ]
    2. Zhao Z, Yin Z, Wang S, et al. Meta-analysis: The diagnostic efficacy of chromoendoscopy for early gastric cancer and premalignant gastric lesions. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2016; 31: 1539-45. [ Link ]
    3. Kikuste I, Marques-Pereira R, Monteiro-Soares M, et al. Systematic review of the diagnosis of gastric premalignant conditions and neoplasia with high-resolution endoscopic technologies. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 2013; 48: 1108-17. [ Link ]
    4. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Soares JB, et al. A multicenter validation of an endoscopic classification with narrow band imaging for gastric precancerous and cancerous lesions. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 236-46. [ Link ]
    5. Dias-Silva D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Magalhaes J, et al. The learning curve for narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of precancerous gastric lesions by using Web-based video. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2014; 79: 910-20; quiz 983-e1, 983.e4. [ Link ]
    6. Esposito G, Pimentel-Nunes P, Angeletti S, et al. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 515-521. [ Link ]
    7. Shu X, Wu G, Zhang Y, et al. Diagnostic value of linked color imaging based on endoscopy for gastric intestinal metaplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of translational medicine 2021; 9: 506. [ Link ]
    8. Zhang G, Zheng J, Zheng L, et al. Gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment between linked color imaging based on endoscopy and pathology. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology 2021; 56: 103-110. [ Link ]
    9. Subramaniam S, Kandiah K, Schoon E, et al. Development and validation of the international Blue Light Imaging for Barrett's Neoplasia Classification. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2020; 91: 310-320. [ Link ]
    10. de Groof AJ, Fockens KN, Struyvenberg MR, et al. Blue-light imaging and linked-color imaging improve visualization of Barrett's neoplasia by nonexpert endoscopists. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2020; 91: 1050-1057. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Cholangioscopy

    Authors: Malina Wiesand, Paraskevas Gkolfakis and Marianna Arvanitakis

    Affiliation: MW is at the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium Illustrations: J. Shadwell Correspondence to: pgolfakis@gmail.com Clarunis University Digestive Health Care Center, Basel, Switzerland; PG is at the Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopouleio-Patision” General Hospital, Athens, Greece; MA is at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepato Pancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital HUB, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

    Correspondence: pgolfakis@gmail.com

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/hWFo9Cdm3fvF

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Troncone E, Mossa M, De Vico P, et al. Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022; 58. [ Link ]
    2. Cotton PB and Leung JWC. ERCP : the fundamentals. Third edition. ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2020, p.xv, 410 pages : illustrations (some color). [ Link ]
    3. Karagyozov P, Boeva I and Tishkov I. Role of digital single-operator cholangioscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of biliary disorders. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 31-40. [ Link ]
    4. Mauro A, Mazza S, Scalvini D, et al. The Role of Cholangioscopy in Biliary Diseases. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13. [ Link ]
    5. Subhash A, Abadir A, Iskander JM, et al. Applications, Limitations, and Expansion of Cholangioscopy in Clinical Practice. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2021; 17: 110-120. [ Link ]
    6. Subhash A, Buxbaum JL and Tabibian JH. Peroral cholangioscopy: Update on the state-of-the-art. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 63-76. [ Link ]
    7. Moon JH, Terheggen G, Choi HJ, et al. Peroral Cholangioscopy: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 276-282. [ Link ]
    8. Itoi T, Reddy DN, Sofuni A, et al. Clinical evaluation of a prototype multi-bending peroral direct cholangioscope. Digestive Endoscopy 2014; 26: 100-107. [ Link ]
    9. Nabi Z and Reddy DN. Multidisciplinary Approach to Indeterminate Biliary Strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32: 411-425. [ Link ]
    10. Shima Y, Sugiyama H, Ogasawara S, et al. Diagnostic value of peroral cholangioscopy in addition to computed tomography for indeterminate biliary strictures. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 3408-3417. [ Link ]
    11. Rösch T, Meining A, Frühmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 870-876. [ Link ]
    12. Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 547-557. [ Link ]
    13. Saluja SS, Sharma R, Pal S, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant hilar obstructions using laboratory and radiological investigations: a prospective study. HPB (Oxford) 2007; 9: 373-382. [ Link ]
    14. Elmunzer BJ, Maranki JL, Gómez V, et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Biliary Strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118: 405-426. [ Link ]
    15. Lee YN, Moon JH, Choi HJ, et al. Tissue acquisition for diagnosis of biliary strictures using peroral cholangioscopy or endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 50-59. [ Link ]
    16. Tyberg A, Raijman I, Siddiqui A, et al. Digital Pancreaticocholangioscopy for Mapping of Pancreaticobiliary Neoplasia: Can We Alter the Surgical Resection Margin? J Clin Gastroenterol 2019; 53: 71-75. [ Link ]
    17. Phillpotts S, Webster G and Arvanitakis M. Endoscopic Management of Complex Biliary Stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32: 477-492. [ Link ]
    18. Angsuwatcharakon P, Kulpatcharapong S, Moon JH, et al. Consensus guidelines on the role of cholangioscopy to diagnose indeterminate biliary stricture. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24: 17-29. [ Link ]
    19. Othman MO, Guerrero R, Elhanafi S, et al. A prospective study of the risk of bacteremia in directed cholangioscopic examination of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 151-157. [ Link ]
    20. Thosani N, Zubarik RS, Kochar R, et al. Prospective evaluation of bacteremia rates and infectious complications among patients undergoing single-operator choledochoscopy during ERCP. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 424-431. [ Link ]
    21. Turowski F, Hügle U, Dormann A, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy with SpyGlassDS™: results of a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 3981-3988. [ Link ]
    22. Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GL, et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 251-256. [ Link ]
    23. Gustafsson A, Enochsson L, Tingstedt B, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis and post-procedure infectious complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with peroral cholangioscopy. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E1177-e1183. [ Link ]
    24. Chon HK, Choi KH, Seo SH, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangioscopy with the Spyglass DS Direct Visualization System in Patients with Surgically Altered Anatomy: A Pilot Study. Gut Liver 2022; 16: 111-117. [ Link ]
    25. Khara HS, Parvataneni S, Park S, et al. Review of ERCP Techniques in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients: Highlight on the Novel EUS-Directed Transgastric ERCP (EGDE) Technique. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2021; 23: 10. [ Link ]
    26. Tarantino I and Rizzo GEM. Biliopancreatic Endoscopy in Altered Anatomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 2021; 57. [ Link ]
    27. Parsi MA. Direct peroral cholangioscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6: 1-5. [ Link ]
    28. Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 805-814. [ Link ]
    29. Laleman W, Verraes K, Van Steenbergen W, et al. Usefulness of the single-operator cholangioscopy system SpyGlass in biliary disease: a single-center prospective cohort study and aggregated review. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 2223-2232. [ Link ]
    30. Lin CC, Chen CJ, Chu CH, et al. Evaluating the feasibility of direct peroral cholangioscopy training with an endoscopic simulator. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 2016-2021. [ Link ]
    31. Alameel T, Bain V and Sandha G. Clinical application of a single-operator direct visualization system improves the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Can J Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 15-19. [ Link ]
    32. Arvanitakis M. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy-guided biopsy for indeterminate biliary strictures: Seeing is believing? Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1114-1116. [ Link ]
    33. Pouw RE, Barret M, Biermann K, et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1174-1188. [ Link ]
    34. Seo DW, Lee SK, Yoo KS, et al. Cholangioscopic findings in bile duct tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 630-634. [ Link ]
    35. Wen LJ, Chen JH, Xu HJ, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Biliary Strictures by Targeted Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10. [ Link ]
    36. Fujii-Lau LL, Thosani NC, Al-Haddad M, et al. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of malignancy in biliary strictures of undetermined etiology: summary and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 685-693. [ Link ]
    37. Gerges C, Beyna T, Tang RSY, et al. Digital single-operator peroral cholangioscopy-guided biopsy sampling versus ERCP-guided brushing for indeterminate biliary strictures: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1105-1113. [ Link ]
    38. Sethi A, Doukides T, Sejpal DV, et al. Interobserver agreement for single operator choledochoscopy imaging: can we do better? Diagn Ther Endosc 2014; 2014: 730731. [ Link ]
    39. Jang S, Stevens T, Kou L, et al. Efficacy of digital single-operator cholangioscopy and factors affecting its accuracy in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary stricture. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 385-393.e381. [ Link ]
    40. Almadi MA, Itoi T, Moon JH, et al. Using single-operator cholangioscopy for endoscopic evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures: results from a large multinational registry. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 574-582. [ Link ]
    41. Gerhards MF, Vos P, van Gulik TM, et al. Incidence of benign lesions in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 48-51. [ Link ]
    42. Matsumori T, Uza N, Okada H, et al. Innovative method for the diagnosis of bile duct lesions using a novel tapered-tip sheath system to facilitate biliary biopsies. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 43-50.e41. [ Link ]
    43. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan M, et al. Optimizing Outcomes of Single-Operator Cholangioscopy-Guided Biopsies Based on a Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 441-448.e441. [ Link ]
    44. Manti M, Shah J, Papaefthymiou A, et al. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Biliary Stones: An Evergreen Issue. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60. [ Link ]
    45. Seitz U, Bapaye A, Bohnacker S, et al. Advances in therapeutic endoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 1998; 22: 1133-1144. [ Link ]
    46. Manes G, Paspatis G, Aabakken L, et al. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 472-491. [ Link ]
    47. Watson RR, Parsi MA, Aslanian HR, et al. Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices. VideoGIE 2018; 3: 329-338. [ Link ]
    48. Lee TH, Moon JH, Lee YN, et al. A Preliminary Study on the Efficacy of Single-Operator Cholangioscopy with a New Basket for Residual Stone Retrieval After Mechanical Lithotripsy. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67: 2571-2576. [ Link ]
    49. Fugazza A, Gabbiadini R, Tringali A, et al. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy in diagnostic and therapeutic bilio-pancreatic diseases: A prospective, multicenter study. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54: 1243-1249. [ Link ]
    50. McCarty TR, Gulati R and Rustagi T. Efficacy and safety of peroral cholangioscopy with intraductal lithotripsy for difficult biliary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 110-122. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Capsule endoscopy

    Authors: Cristina Carretero and Reena Sidhu

    Affiliation: Cristina Carretero is a Gastroenterologist at University of Navarra Clinic, Pamplona, Spain. Reena Sidhu is a Consultant Gastroenterologist & Hon Sen Lecturer University of Sheffield. FRCP MD. Academic unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK.

    Correspondence: ccarretero@unav.es ; reena.sidhu@sth.nhs.uk

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/cTQrDVFIYZt2

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 352–386. [ Link ]
    2. Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Seigal A, et al. Long-Term Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Cyclooxygenase-2 Selective Agents on the Small Bowel: A Cross- Sectional Capsule Enteroscopy Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1040–1045. [ Link ]
    3. Sidhu R, Brunt LK, Morley SR, et al. Undisclosed use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may underlie small-bowel injury observed by capsule endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 992–995. [ Link ]
    4. Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, et al. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 280–286. [ Link ]
    5. Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S, et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 423–446. [ Link ]
    6. Nemeth A, Kopylov U, Koulaouzidis A, et al. Use of patency capsule in patients with established Crohn’s disease. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 373–379. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Tissue acquisition during endoscopy

    Authors: Richard Azevedo and Mário Dinis-Ribeiro

    Affiliation: Richard Azevedo and Mário Dinis-Ribeiro are at the Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto, Portugal.

    Correspondence: mdinisribeiro@gmail.com

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/vyj1ze2vPLYZ

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Ono S, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S, et al. Evaluation of safety of endoscopic biopsy without cessation of antithrombotic agents in Japan. Journal of Gastroenterology 2012; 47: 770–774. [ Link ]
    2. Whitson MJ, Dikman AE, von Althann C, et al. Is gastroduodenal biopsy safe in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel?: a prospective, randomized study involving 630 biopsies. Journal of clinical gastroenterology 2011; 45: 228–33. [ Link ]
    3. Veitch AM, Radaelli F, Alikhan R, et al. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline update. Gut 2021; 70: 1611–1628. [ Link ]
    4. Acosta RD, Abraham NS, Chandrasekhara V, et al. The management of antithrombotic agents for patients undergoing GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2016; 83: 3–16. [ Link ]
    5. Sancho-Poch FJ, Balanîzo J, Ocaña J, et al. An evaluation of gastric biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1978; 24: 281–282. [ Link ]
    6. Misumi A, Mori K, Ikeda T, et al. Evaluation of fibergastroscopic biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a study of 339 cases. Gastroenterologia Japonica 1978; 13: 255–63. [ Link ]
    7. Lal N, Bhasin DK, Malik AK, et al. Optimal number of biopsy specimens in the diagnosis of carcinoma of the oesophagus. Gut 1992; 33: 724–726. [ Link ]
    8. Choi Y, Choi HS, Jeon WK, et al. Optimal Number of Endoscopic Biopsies in Diagnosis of Advanced Gastric and Colorectal Cancer. Journal of Korean Medical Science 2012; 27: 36–39. [ Link ]
    9. Pimenta-Melo AR, Monteiro-Soares M, Libânio D, et al. Missing rate for gastric cancer during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology 2016; 28: 1041–9. [ Link ]
    10. Pouw RE, Barret M, Biermann K, et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 1: Upper gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary tracts. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1174–1188. [ Link ]
    11. Pouw RE, Bisschops R, Gecse KB, et al. Endoscopic tissue sampling - Part 2: Lower gastrointestinal tract. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1261–1273. [ Link ]
    12. Han KS, Sohn DK, Choi DH, et al. Prolongation of the period between biopsy and EMR can influence the nonlifting sign in endoscopically resectable colorectal cancers. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008; 67: 97–102. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Colonoscopy

    Authors: Manmeet Matharoo, Srivathsan Ravindran and Siwan Thomas-Gibson

    Affiliation: Manmeet Matharoo is a consultant Gastroenterologist at St Mark’s Hospital, London. Srivathsan Ravindran is a research fellow based at St Mark’s Hospital, Imperial College London and the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal endoscopy (JAG), London, UK. Siwan Thomas-Gibson is a gastroenterologist and specialist endoscopist and Deputy Director of Bowel Cancer Screening at St Mark’s Hospital, London, London, UK. She was the appointed Dean of St Mark’s Hospital Academic Institute in 2019-2021.

    Correspondence: m.matharoo@nhs.net

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/7WbNZU9z8WbQ

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Rees CJ, Trebble TM, Wagner CV, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology position statement on patient experience of GI endoscopy. Gut 2020; 69: 1718–1719. [ Link ]
    2. Maurice JB, Rochford A, Marshall S, et al. Green endoscopy: using quality improvement to develop sustainable practice. Frontline Gastroenterology 2022; 13: 342–345. [ Link ]
    3. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI), and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Guidance on the indications for diagnostic upper gi endoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. 2013. [ Link ]
    4. Ravindran S, Haycock A, Woolf K, et al. Development and impact of an endoscopic non-technical skills (ENTS) behavioural marker system. BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 2020; 7: 17–25. [ Link ]
    5. Hicks M MS Caitlin W. Improving Safety and Quality of Care With Enhanced Teamwork Through Operating Room Briefings. JAMA Surgery 2014; 149: 863–868. [ Link ]
    6. Matharoo M, Thomas-Gibson S, Haycock A, et al. Implementation of an endoscopy safety checklist. Frontline Gastroenterology 2014; 5: 260–265. [ Link ]
    7. Gralnek IM, Bisschops R, Matharoo M, et al. Guidance for the implementation of a safety checklist for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 206–210. [ Link ]
    8. Ching H-L, Lau MS, Azmy IA, et al. Performance measures for the SACRED team-centered approach to advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 712–722. [ Link ]
    9. Everett SM, Griffiths H, Nandasoma U, et al. Guideline for obtaining valid consent for gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures. Gut 2016; 65: 1585–1601. [ Link ]
    10. Choy MC, Matharoo M, Thomas-Gibson S. Diagnostic ileocolonoscopy: getting the basics right. Frontline Gastroenterology 2020; 11: 484–490. [ Link ]
    11. Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT, et al. The national colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 2013; 62: 242–249. [ Link ]
    12. Anderson R, Burr NE, Valori R. Causes of Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancers Based on World Endoscopy Organization System of Analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1287-1299.e2. [ Link ]
    13. Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. UEG Journal 2017; 5: 309–334. [ Link ]
    14. Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 98–105. [ Link ]
    15. Manfredi MA, Dayyeh BKA, Bhat YM, et al. Electronic chromoendoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2015; 81: 249–261. [ Link ]
    16. Repici A, Spadaccini M, Antonelli G, et al. Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials. Gut 2022; 71: 757–765. [ Link ]
    17. Kröner PT, Engels MM, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review. World Journal of Gastroenterology 2021; 27: 6794–6824. [ Link ]
    18. Siau K, Crossley J, Dunckley P, et al. Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training. Surgical Endoscopy 2019; 34: 105–114. [ Link ]
    19. Ravindran S, Matharoo M, Coleman M, et al. Teamworking in endoscopy: a human factors toolkit for the COVID-19 era. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 879–883. [ Link ]
    20. Ravindran S, Healey C, Coleman M, et al. Validation of the TEAM-ENTS (teamwork in endoscopy assessment module for endoscopic non-technical skills) framework. Endoscopy 2022; 54: S171. [ Link ]
    21. Lee TJ, Siau K, Esmaily S, et al. Development of a national automated endoscopy database: The United Kingdom National Endoscopy Database (NED). UEG Journal 2019; 7: 798–806. [ Link ]
    22. Rey JF, Lambert R, ESGE Quality Assurance Committee. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 901–3. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Endoscopic resection

    Authors: Francesco Auriemma and Alessandro Repici

    Affiliation: Francesco Auriemma and Alessandro Repici are at the Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Alessandro Repici is also at the Humanitas University, Rozzano, MI, Italy.

    Correspondence: francesco.auriemma@humanitas.it

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/kG0n1LlVhG2z

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    Online Video 1: https://youtu.be/G2I8XTtYVqc?feature=shared

    References:

    1. Moss A, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909-1918. [ Link ]
    2. Rex DK, Hassan C, Bourke MJ. The colonoscopist's guide to the vocabulary of colorectal neoplasia: histology, morphology, and management. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2017; 86: 253-263. [ Link ]
    3. Klein A and Bourke MJ. How to perform high-quality endoscopic mucosal resection during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 466-471. [ Link ]
    4. Fahrtash-Bahin F et al. Snare tip soft coagulation achieves effective and safe endoscopic hemostasis during wide-field endoscopic resection of large colonic lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 158-163. [ Link ]
    5. Burgess NG et al. Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12: 651-661.e3. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Polypectomy

    Authors: Lynn Debels and David J. Tate

    Affiliation: Lynn Debels is a gastroenterologist and a fellow in Interventional Endoscopy at the University Hospital of Ghent, C Heymanslaan 10, Belgium. David J. Tate is a British Interventional Endoscopist at theUniversity Hospital of Ghent, C Heymanslaan 10, Belgium

    Correspondence: djtate@gmail.com

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/6cv1x6VUA7NL

    Conflicts of Interest: DJT consulting fees and research support from Olympus Medical. LD no conflicts of interest.

    References:

    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. The New England journal of medicine 1993; 329: 1977–81. [ Link ]
    2. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. The New England journal of medicine 2012; 366: 687–96. [ Link ]
    3. Anderson R, Burr NE, Valori R. Causes of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancers based on World Endoscopy Organization system of analysis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1287–99.e2. [ Link ]
    4. Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP, et al. Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy – results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 74–80.e1. [ Link ]
    5. Waschke KA, Anderson J, Valori RM, et al. ASGE principles of endoscopic training. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2019; 90: 27–34. [ Link ]
    6. Jegadeesan R, Aziz M, Desai M, et al. Hot snare vs cold snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of 4–10 mm colorectal polyps during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies. Endoscopy international open 2019; 7: E708–16. [ Link ]
    7. Qu J, Jian H, Li L, et al. Effectiveness and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy: a meta-analysis. Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2019; 34: 49–58. [ Link ]
    8. Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S, et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut 2018; 67: 1950–7. [ Link ]
    9. Rodríguez Sánchez J, Sánchez Alonso M, Pellisé Urquiza M. The "bubble sign": a novel way to detect a perforation after cold snare polypectomy. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 796–7. [ Link ]
    10. Tate DJ, Desomer L, Heitman SJ, et al. Clinical implications of decision making in colorectal polypectomy: an international survey of Western endoscopists suggests priorities for change. Endoscopy international open 2020; 8: E445–55. [ Link ]
    11. Schett B, Wallner J, Weingart V, et al. Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy. Endoscopy international open 2017; 5: E580–6. [ Link ]
    12. Paspatis GA, Tribonias G, Konstantinidis K, et al. A prospective randomised comparison of cold vs hot snare polypectomy in the occurrence of postpolypectomy bleeding in small colonic polyps. Colorectal disease 2011; 13: e345–8. [ Link ]
    13. Sidhu M, Forbes N, Tate DJ, et al. A randomised controlled trial of cold snare polypectomy technique: technique matters more than snare wire diameter. The American journal of gastroenterology 2022; 117: 100. [ Link ]
    14. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270–97. [ Link ]
    15. The Gastrointestinal Quality and Safety Foundation [Internet]. Brussels: GIEQs Online Educational Platform; c2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Best practice demonstration of cold snare polypectomy; [starts at Chapter 4]. [ Link ]
    16. Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E, et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicentre study. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 27–31. [ Link ]
    17. Moss A, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 1909–18. [ Link ]
    18. Moss A, Williams SJ, Hourigan LF, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut 2015; 64: 57–65. [ Link ]
    19. Peery AF, Cools KS, Strassle PD, et al. Increasing rates of surgery for patients with nonmalignant colorectal polyps in the United States. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 1352–60.e3. [ Link ]
    20. Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut 2019; 68: 1130. [ Link ]
    21. Adler J, Robertson DJ. Interval colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: exploring explanations and solutions. The American journal of gastroenterology 2015; 110: 1657–64. [ Link ]
    22. Kudo S-e, Tamura S, Nakajima T, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1996; 44: 8–14. [ Link ]
    23. Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo S-e, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Digestive endoscopy 2016; 28: 526–33. [ Link ]
    24. Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 599–607.e1. [ Link ]
    25. Debels L, Tate DJ. The accuracy of human detection of submucosal invasive cancer – analysis of 739 individual assessments of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps using a novel clinical decision support tool. United European gastroenterology journal 2021; 9: 1197–221. [ Link ]
    26. Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, et al. Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicentre cohort. Gastroenterology 2017. [ Link ]
    27. Tate DJ. GIEQs prediction tool for submucosal invasion [Internet]. Brussels: GIEQs Online Educational Platform; c2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. [ Link ]
    28. Bahin FF, Heitman SJ, Bourke MJ, et al. Wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gut 2018; 67: 1965–73. [ Link ]
    29. Gupta S, Miskovic D, Bhandari P, et al. A novel method for determining the difficulty of colonoscopic polypectomy. Frontline gastroenterology 2013; 4: 244–8. [ Link ]
    30. Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Desomer L, et al. The size, morphology, site, and access score predicts critical outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection in the colon. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 684–92. [ Link ]
    31. Anderson J, Lockett M. Training in therapeutic endoscopy: meeting present and future challenges. Frontline gastroenterology 2019; 10: 135–40. [ Link ]
    32. Sidhu M, Tate DJ, Desomer L, et al. SMSA-EMR score is a novel endoscopic risk assessment tool for predicting critical endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes. Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2018; 87: AB467–8. [ Link ]
    33. The Gastrointestinal Quality and Safety Foundation [Internet]. Brussels: GIEQs Online Educational Platform; c2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Lecture regarding competency in polypectomy covering SMSA and SMSA+ scores in practice; [starts at Chapter 17]. [ Link ]
    34. Tate DJ, Desomer L, Hourigan LF, et al. Two-stage endoscopic mucosal resection is a safe and effective salvage therapy after a failed single-session approach. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 888–98. [ Link ]
    35. Tate DJ, Bahin FF, Desomer L, et al. Cold-forceps avulsion with adjuvant snare-tip soft coagulation (CAST) is an effective and safe strategy for the management of non-lifting large laterally spreading colonic lesions. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 52–62. [ Link ]
    36. The Gastrointestinal Quality and Safety Foundation [Internet]. Brussels: GIEQs Online Educational Platform; c2022 [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Assessing the mucosal defect after colorectal polypectomy. [ Link ]
    37. Bahin FF, Naidoo M, Williams SJ, et al. Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2015; 13: 722–4. [ Link ]
    38. Bahin FF, Rasouli KN, Byth K, et al. Prediction of clinically significant bleeding following wide-field endoscopic resection of large sessile and laterally spreading colorectal lesions: a clinical risk score. The American journal of gastroenterology 2016; 111: 1115–22. [ Link ]
    39. Burgess NG, Bassan MS, McLeod D, et al. Deep mural injury and perforation after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a new classification and analysis of risk factors. Gut 2017; 66: 1779–1789. [ Link ]
    40. Gupta S, Sidhu M, Shahidi N, et al. Effect of prophylactic endoscopic clip placement on clinically significant post-endoscopic mucosal resection bleeding in the right colon: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet gastroenterology & hepatology 2022; 7: 152–60. [ Link ]
    41. Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, et al. Clip closure prevents bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps in a randomised trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 977–84.e3. [ Link ]
  • Topic: Colorectal cancer

    Authors: Joaquín Castillo-Iturra, Antoni Castells and Francesc Balaguer

    Affiliation: Joaquín Castillo-Iturra, Antoni Castells and Francesc Balaguer are at the Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Spain; Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS); Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD) and the Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salud, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain

    Correspondence: CASTELLS@clinic.cat ; FPRUNES@clinic.cat

    Link to online article: https://gutflix.eu/r/0zX4pUOs8f0h

    Conflicts of Interest: None

    References:

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249. [ Link ]
    2. Vasen HFA, Tomlinson I, Castells A. Clinical management of hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 88-97. [ Link ]
    3. IJspeert JEG, Vermeulen L, Meijer GA, et al. Serrated neoplasia-role in colorectal carcinogenesis and clinical implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 401-409. [ Link ]
    4. Baile-Maxía S, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Sala-Miquel N, et al. Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2024; 12: 309-318. [ Link ]
    5. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306. [ Link ]
    6. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251-2270. [ Link ]
    7. Carballal S, Balaguer F, IJspeert JEG. Serrated polyposis syndrome; epidemiology and management. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2022; 58-59: 101791. [ Link ]
    8. Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 2020; 76: 182-188. [ Link ]
    9. Crockett SD, Nagtegaal ID. Terminology, Molecular Features, Epidemiology, and Management of Serrated Colorectal Neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 949-966.e4. [ Link ]
    10. van Leerdam ME, Roos VH, van Hooft JE, et al. Endoscopic management of polyposis syndromes: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 877-895. [ Link ]
    11. Dekker E, Bleijenberg A, Balaguer F. Update on the World Health Organization Criteria for Diagnosis of Serrated Polyposis Syndrome. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1520-1523. [ Link ]
    12. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2010; 375: 1624-1633. [ Link ]
    13. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult Blood. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1365-1371. [ Link ]
    14. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, et al. Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 2345-2357. [ Link ]
    15. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic Polypectomy and Long-Term Prevention of Colorectal-Cancer Deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696. [ Link ]
    16. Van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 343-350. [ Link ]
    17. Kaminski MF, Wieszczy P, Rupinski M, et al. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 98-105. [ Link ]
    18. Ji X. Poorly differentiated cluster grade-a vital predictor for lymph node metastasis and oncological outcomes in patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. [ Link ]
    19. Dang H, Dekkers N, Le Cessie S, et al. Risk and Time Pattern of Recurrences After Local Endoscopic Resection of T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20: e298-e314. [ Link ]
    20. Miyachi H, Kudo S, Ichimasa K, et al. Management of T1 colorectal cancers after endoscopic treatment based on the risk stratification of lymph node metastasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 31: 1126-1132. [ Link ]
    21. Beaton C, Twine CP, Williams GL, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of histopathological factors influencing the risk of lymph node metastasis in early colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 788-797. [ Link ]
    22. Ozawa T, Kandimalla R, Gao F, et al. A MicroRNA Signature Associated With Metastasis of T1 Colorectal Cancers to Lymph Nodes. Gastroenterology 2018; 154: 844-848.e7. [ Link ]
    23. Zwager LW, Bastiaansen BAJ, Montazeri NSM, et al. Deep Submucosal Invasion Is Not an Independent Risk Factor for Lymph Node Metastasis in T1 Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterology 2022; 163: 174-189. [ Link ]
    24. Brunori A, Daca-Alvarez M, Pellisé M. pT1 colorectal cancer: A treatment dilemma. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 66: 101854. [ Link ]
    25. Rutter MD, Beintaris I, Valori R, et al. World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 909-925.e3. [ Link ]
    26. Le Clercq CMC, Bouwens MWE, Rondagh EJA, et al. Postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers are preventable: a population-based study. Gut 2014; 63: 957-963. [ Link ]
    27. Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA, et al. Rate and Predictors of Early/Missed Colorectal Cancers After Colonoscopy in Manitoba: A Population-Based Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2588-2596. [ Link ]
    28. Singh S, Singh PP, Murad MH, et al. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Interval Colorectal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109: 1375-1389. [ Link ]
    29. Adler J, Robertson DJ. Interval Colorectal Cancer After Colonoscopy: Exploring Explanations and Solutions. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1657-1664. [ Link ]
    30. Robertson DJ, Lieberman DA, Winawer SJ, et al. Colorectal cancers soon after colonoscopy: a pooled multicohort analysis. Gut 2014; 63: 949-956. [ Link ]
    31. Leung LJ, Lee JK, Merchant SA, et al. Post-Colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Etiologies in a Large Integrated US Health Care Setting. Gastroenterology 2023; 164: 470-472.e3. [ Link ]
    32. Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S, et al. Microsatellite Instability in Interval Colon Cancers. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1700-1705. [ Link ]
    33. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Lin-Cooper C, et al. Five-Year Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia after Negative Screening Colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1218-1224. [ Link ]
    34. Laiyemo AO, Murphy G, Sansbury LB, et al. Hyperplastic polyps and the risk of adenoma recurrence in the polyp prevention trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 2009; 7: 192-197. [ Link ]
    35. Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau J-M, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700. [ Link ]

Share with colleagues

Gut Guide online is kindly supported by