| Review Type (NMA or SR+MA or SR only) | Author, year | Search date (up to) | Searched database | Number of included studies/ study designs | Study Eligibility | Adults or pediatric | Induction trials, maintenance trials, or both | Intervention (5ASA) / dose/treatment duration/follow-up duration (range) | Comparisons (Control regimens, dose)/duration | Key conclusions related to 5-ASA |
| NMA | Coward, 2017 | Nov 2015 | Cochrane reviews, Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL | 22 RCTs (mesalamine =9, sulfasalazine=4) | RCTs comparing budesonide, sulfasalazine, mesalamine, or systemic corticosteroids with placebo in CD | Adults | Induction | Sulfasalazine: 1 g/15 kg /d to 3 g /d; 6 - 17 wk
Mesalamine: 1- 4 g /d; 8-16 wk (above and below 2.4 g/d as high vs low dose) | Placebo, systemic corticosteroids, budesonide | Treatment ranking for induction from best to worst: systemic corticosteroid> high dose budesonide > high dose mesalamine > (low dose budesonide = sulfasalazine)> low dose mesalamine > placebo. Mesalamine at doses above 2.4 g/day was more effective than placebo for the induction of remission in CD, this finding was shown in NMA but not the traditional MA. High dose mesalamine may be an option among patients preferring to avoid steroids. Sulfasalazine was not significantly superior to any therapy including placebo. |
| SR + MA | Chen, 2017 | May 2014 | Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, CINAHL, COCHRANE Database of Systematic Reviews, CBM, CNKI, ChiCTR | Total 8 RCTs, but 6 for CD | RCTs of AZA or 6-MP vs 5-ASA | Adults | Both | AZA: 2-3 mg/kg/d; 1-3 yr
6-MP: 50 mg/d; 2 yr | Mesalamine: 3-4 g/d ; 1-3 yr | Thiopurines (AZA/6-MP) are more effective that 5-ASA for the treatment of CD (clinical relapse rate and remission rate). |
| SR+MA (Cochrane review) | Akobeng, 2016 | Jun 2016 | MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cochrane IBD group specialized register | 12 RCTs | 5-ASA agents vs either placebo or sulfasalazine in quiescent CD | Both | Maintenance | 5-ASA: 1.6 g to 4 g/d; 12-24 mo
dose 50 mg/kg/d />6 mo | Placebo | No evidence to suggest that oral 5-ASA preparations are superior to placebo for the maintenance of medically induced remission in patients with CD. |
| SR+MA (Cochrane review) | Chande, 2016 | Oct 2015 | MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library | 13 RCTs, only two compared vs 5-ASA | RCTs of AZA and 6-MP for induction of remission in active CD (5-ASA as one of the comparative arms). One study 6-MP vs 5-ASA, one study AZA vs sulfasalazine; the two studies were pooled together | Adults | Induction | AZA and 6MP: NR ;NR | Mesalamine: 3 g/d; 30 wk
Sulfasalazine: NR; 17 wk | Overall quality of the evidence for both outcomes was low to very low due to sparse data. |
| SR + MA (cochrane review) | Lim, 2016 | Jun 2015 | PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the cochrane Central Library | 20 RCTs | 5-ASA drugs (sulfasalazine & mesalamine) vs placebo, corticosteroids, and other 5-ASA (alone or in combo with corticosteroids) in mild to moderate active CD | Adults | Induction | Mesalamine: 1 - 4.5 g /d; 6-16 wk
Sulfasalazine: NR; up to 18 wk | Placebo, corticosteroids, other 5-ASA alone or in combination with corticosteroids | Sulfasalazine is modestly effective compared to placebo and inferior to corticosteroids for the treatment of mild to moderate active CD. Olsalazine and low dose mesalamine (1-2g/d) are not superior to placebo. High dose mesalamine (3.2-4g/d) is not more effective than placebo for inducing response or remission. High dose mesalamine (4-4.5g/d) has conflicting results compared to budesonide. |
| SR + MA (cochrane review) | Chande, 2015 | Jun 2016 | MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library | 11 RCTs (only two RCTs included mesalamine or sulfasalazine, published in 2000 and in 1979) | RCTs of AZA and 6-MP for maintenance of remission in active CD (5-ASA was one of the comparative arms). One study compared 6-MP to 5-ASA, one study compared AZA to sulfasalazine- the two studies were pooled together in meta-analysis | Adults | Maintenance | 6-MP: 1 mg kg/ d
Methotrexate: 10 mg/wk; 76 weeks
AZA: 1- 2.5 mg/kg/ d | 5-ASA: 3g/d; 76 wk | Only two RCTs; no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who maintained remission between AZA (1.0 to 2.5 mg/kg/day) or 6-MP (1.0 mg/day) and mesalamine (3 g/day) or sulfasalazine (0.5 g/15 kg/day) therapy. |
| NMA | Moja, 2015 | Oct 2014 | MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov | 25 RCTs (induction =11, maintenance n=14) | Budesonide or mesalamine vs placebo or against each other in active or quiescent CD | Adults | Both | Mesalamine: 1 - 4 g/d; 6 wk for induction, 6 mo for maintenance
Budesonide: 3 -18 mg/d; 6 wk for induction, 6 mo for maintenance | Placebo or mesalamine or budesonide in different doses | Budesonide 9mg/d or higher for induction of remission in active mild-to-moderate CD and 6mg/d for maintenance of remission appears to be the best treatment choice. Mesalamine is not effective in induction of remission and preventing relapse in mild-to moderate CD. |
| SR + MA | Ford, 2011 | Dec 2011 | MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane central register | 23 RCTs (active CD n=7, quiescent CD n=13, in active and quiescent CD=3) | 5-ASA drugs (sulfasalazine, mesalamine, balsalazide, olsalazine) vs placebo or no treatment in quiescent or active CD. | Adults | Both | Sulfasalazine: 1 g/15 kg /d to max 5 g/d Mesalamine: 1 - 4 g/d Olsalazine: 2 g /d; 4-12 mo Duration in active CD: 6 wk - 4 mo, in quiescent CD: 6-48 mo | Placebo or no treatment | The role of 5-ASA in inducing remission of active CD and preventing relapse of quiescent CD remains uncertain. |