Introduction
ESD is an excellent endoscopic treatment with high en-bloc and R0 resection rate. However, duodenal ESD is technically difficult. And, it has been reported that the perforation rate of duodenal ESD is higher than that of ESD of other organs.
Hybrid ESD, which involves circumferential incision followed by removal of the lesion using a snare, may shorten the operation time, but detailed studies have not been conducted.
Aims & Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of ESD and hybrid ESD for duodenal tumors.
The subjects were superficial duodenal tumors that were resected at Saku Central Hospital from Dec.2002 to Dec. 2023, and diagnosed as grade 3 or 4 according to the Vienna classification.
ESD and Hybrid ESD were performed for 16 and 148 patients. Gender (Male/Female), age and location (1st, 2nd, 3rd) of both groups were 18/8, 106/42, 64 (39-84), 62 (37-84) and (4/18/4), 9/119/20, respectively. There was no significant difference.
Results
1. Paris classification 0-I/IIa/IIb/IIc were 2/17/1/6 and 3/6/0/84, respectively.
2. En-bloc resection rate was 100% (26/26) and 89% (131/148), respectively (p=0.07). R0 resection rate was 100% (26/26) and 82% (121/148), respectively (p=0.01).
3. Size of tumor and specimen were 20 (5-63) / 9(2-27) and 28 (17-66) / 16 (8-34) mm, respectively (P<0.001、P<0.001).
4. Duration of procedure was 95 (34-265) and 30 (8-34), respectively (P<0.001).
5. Complications: Perforation, delayed perforation and delayed bleeding were 0% and 2.7% (4/148), 3.8% (1/26) and 2% (3/148), 0% and 0.7% (1/148), respectively. There was no significant difference.
6. Local recurrence rate was 0%, 0.7% (1/148), and the only local recurrent case was treated by HOT biopsy.
Hybrid ESD was useful for shortening treatment duration, however the R0 rate were significantly lower. Recently, under water EMR has been applied to the duodenal lesions, and it seems necessary to conduct a comparative study of hybrid ESD and under water EMR in the future.
Conclusion
ESD has excellent R0 resection rate, however it is technically difficult and has long treatment duration. On the other hand, hybrid ESD shortens treatment times but has lower R0 resection rates. Therefore, the indication of hybrid ESD is limited. Further examination including under water EMR should be performed.
References
None