Introduction
The PROFILE trial previously demonstrated better outcomes over 48-weeks for patients with Crohn’s disease receiving “top-down” (TD) anti-TNF therapy from diagnosis, compared to a conventional “step-up” (SU) strategy. The use of medication not just to control symptoms and inflammation in Crohn’s disease but to modify the trajectory of the disease has emerged as a desirable goal of treatment. An important question, therefore, is whether early intervention using a ‘top-down’ approach from diagnosis can better achieve this outcome than conventional “step-up” strategies.
Aims & Methods
Through longer-term follow-up of PROFILE participants, we aimed to assess whether the benefits of TD therapy from diagnosis result in modification of the long-term disease course. PROFILE was a randomised controlled trial of adults newly diagnosed with active Crohn’s disease between 2017 and 2022. Patients received either a TD (infliximab + immunomodulator) or SU treatment strategy until week 48. After week-48, participants reverted to local standards of care. In 2025 the medical records of PROFILE participants were reviewed. Objective outcomes data were extracted for up to 5 years after the week-48 visit, including need for Crohn’s-related abdominal surgery, hospital admission, progression to stricturing or penetrating (B2/B3) complications, and anti-TNF treatment durability. Safety outcomes data were collected for serious infections and malignancies. Data were analysed based on the original PROFILE randomisation and intention-to-treat population. Time-to-event analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
Of the 386 participants in the PROFILE primary trial, 358 (93%; 182 TD, 176 SU) had post-week 48 records available for review. Median follow-up was 5 years from randomisation, by when 90% of SU and 99% of TD patients had received biologic and/or immunomodulator therapy. There were 28 Crohn’s disease-related abdominal surgeries in 26 patients initially treated by SU versus 6 surgeries in 6 patients treated by TD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=5.23, 95% CI=1.99-13.76, p=0.0008). Time-to-first abdominal surgery was shorter in SU compared to TD, even for SU patients who received anti-TNF within one year of diagnosis. Incidence of CD-related hospital admissions was higher in SU vs TD (aHR=2.01, 95% CI=1.18–3.41, p=0.017). Progression to B2 / B3 complications was also more frequent in SU compared to TD (32 vs 13 patients; aHR=2.46, 95% CI=1.25-4.86, p=0.01). Of the 193 patients in SU, 91 (47%) had started on anti-TNF therapy within one year after randomisation and these patients still had a significantly higher risk of abdominal surgery than those managed with a TD strategy from the outset. For the 323 patients who started anti-TNF treatment, durability was high with a median treatment-persistence of 73 months. There was no difference in safety outcomes between SU or TD for either serious infections (12 vs 14) or malignancies (5 vs 3).
Conclusion
Early and effective control of inflammation with “top-down” anti-TNF therapy modifies the course of Crohn’s disease, resulting in fewer abdominal surgeries, reduced disease progression and high durability of anti-TNF treatment. Even an "accelerated step-up" approach to care results in significantly higher risk of abdominal surgery for patients compared to "top-down" management. Early effective “top-down” therapy should therefore be considered the standard-of-care for patients newly presenting with moderate or severely active inflammation.
References
1. Noor NM, Lee JC, Bond S, et al. A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2024.
2. Noor NM, Davies N, Tahir W, et al. Anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment from diagnosis is more effective and less costly than conventional “step-up” care for patients with active Crohn’s disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis from the PROFILE trial. Journal of Crohns and Colitis, 2025.
Disclosure
NMN reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Dr Falk, Ferring, Galapagos, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Spyre, Takeda and Tillotts. MTS reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Falk, Takeda, Teva. HZ reports research grants from National Institute for Health and Care Research, Wellcome, AstraZeneca. KVP reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Falk, Ferring, Galapagos, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda, Tillotts. TA reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from Amgen, AbbVie, Celltrion, J&J, LaCAR MDx, Lilly, MAST, Nova Laboratories, Takeda, Tillotts. RC reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from grants from AbbVie, Celltrion, Lilly, Takeda, Wellcome. JDLRN support for attending meetings and travel from AbbVie, Celltrion, Lilly. SD reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation, Falk, Ferring, Helmsley Charitable Trust, J&J, Lilly, Lord Leonard and Lady Estelle Wolfson Foundation, Pathological Society of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Takeda. ALH reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, BMS, Celltrion, Galapagos, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda. PMI reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alfasigma, BMS, Boomerang Medical, Caldera, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda. KBK reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Galapagos, J&J, Takeda. GWM reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv Inc, AstraZeneca, BMS, Dova Health, J&J, Motilent, Pfizer, Takeda. TR reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Domain Therapeutics, Ferring, Gilead, GSK, Heptares, J&J, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Scientia, Takeda, UCB. MAS reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from J&J. SS reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, Celltrion, Falk, Ipsen, J&J, Takeda. HRTW reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from Pfizer, Takeda, Tillotts. JOL reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Engytix, Ferring, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, J&J, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Tillotts, Takeda. NAK reports educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board fees from AbbVie, BMS, Falk, J&J, Lilly, Pharmacosmos, Sandoz, Tillotts. JCL reports grants or contracts from Kenneth Rainin Foundation Research Grant, MRC/MSD Alliance Research Grant, Lifearc ‘idea-to-innovation’ research grant; has received consulting fees from J&J, Enhanced Genomics, Pasithea, Isomorphic labs; honoraria from J&J, Abbie; Patents planned, issued or pending GB2304900.0: “Methods of Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases”. DSR reports payment or honoraria from American Statistical Association; grants from LifeArc, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Wellcome; and advisory board membership of Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, and PlaqueTec. MP reports travel grants from J&J, Takeda; and grants from AstraZeneca, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Pfizer. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.