Introduction
Gastric adenoma is recognized as a premalignant lesion.1Much of the literature lumps all adenomas together with different classifications. These are few western reports regarding the prevalence, associated risk factors and outcomes of endoscopic management of different subtypes of gastric adenoma.
Aims & Methods
Aims: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence, potential predictors, and outcomes of endoscopic management of the different subtypes of gastric adenoma.
Methods: Of 162 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric lesions between 2017 and 2022 at our center, 79 patients were enrolled. All the hyperplastic polyps (n=37) and subepithelial lesions (n=46) were excluded. The patient clinical characteristics, endoscopic and histopathological features of gastric lesions were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided according to the histological types of gastric adenoma into 4 groups: intestinal group (n= 49), foveolar group (n= 23),pyloric group (n= 6) and oxyntic group (n=1). We statistically compared the clinical and endoscopic features of the three groups. In addition to the analysis of the outcomes of endoscopic resection of gastric adenomas.
Results
Of the 79 patients with a mean follow-up of 26![]()
22 months, 51 patients were males (65 %) and 28 patients were females (35%). Forty-nine patients (49/79,62%) had intestinal adenoma, 23 patients (29%) showed foveolar adenoma, 6 patients (8%) developed pyloric adenoma and only 1 patient (1%) had oxyntic adenoma. The mean age was significantly older in the intestinal group (71 ± 13 years vs. 64 ± 16 years vs. 58 ± 18 years, p = 0.03). Intestinal adenomas were significantly associated with family history of gastric adenocarcinoma (14% vs. 4% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) and history of statin intake (39% vs. 26% vs. 0%, p = 0.04).Foveolar adenomas were significantly associated with multiple lesions (≥3 lesions) (p < 0.001) and 0-IIa+IIc Paris classification (6/23, 26%). the size of largest polyp was significantly higher among pyloric group (28 ±15, p= 0.00). Among intestinal group, 33/49 patients (67%) had atrophic gastritis. 82% of the adenomas were resected by ESD with histologically complete resection (R0) in 72/79 patients (91%). Although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.4), adenocarcinoma was most frequently encountered among the intestinal adenoma group (17/49, 35%). The post endoscopic resection outcome was comparable among 3 groups with overall recurrence rate (group1:8% vs. group 2:17% vs group 3:17%, P = 0.07) with a comparable mean time to recurrence among three groups (21 ± 17 months vs. 20±17months vs. 14 months, p=0.8). Family history of gastric adenocarcinoma (HR=1.33, p< 0.001) and active helicobacter pylori infection (HR=1.14, p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of recurrence after endoscopic resection of different gastric adenoma. Among baseline endoscopic characteristics, polyp size ³ 30mm(HR= 2.04, p< 0.001), more than 3 polyps (HR=1.51, p<0.001), lesser curvature as lesion location (HR=1.72, p< 0.001) and morphology as Paris classification IIc are potential predictors of post resection recurrence. In addition to specimen size ³ 15mm (HR=2.19, p< 0.001) and T1b as lesion histology (HR=2.07, p< 0.001), in the histopathological examination.
Conclusion
The present study clarifies the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of different gastric adenomas, in addition to the potential predictive factors for each subtype. Potential predictors of recurrence after endoscopic resection emphazie the importance of endoscopic follow up.
References
1. Fujiwara, Y. et al. Diagnosis of borderline adenomas of the stomach by endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 28, 425–430 (1996).
