Introduction
Anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment is effective in ulcerative colitis (UC). Optimal duration of treatment remains uncertain. In the BIOSTOP study 2017-2021, 172 UC patients were randomised to open-label anti-TNF withdrawal or maintenance treatment for 2 years, with an option to re-start anti-TNF in case of UC flare. After 2 years anti-TNF was also withdrawn in the maintenance group, and we here report the results 4 years after randomisation.
Aims & Methods
BIOSTOP was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label non-inferiority study. Patients in clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission were randomised 1:1 to anti-TNF withdrawal (intervention) or maintenance (control) treatment the first 2 years (Part 1), followed by another 2 years (Part 2) of open anti-TNF withdrawal in all patients in sustained, endoscopically confirmed remission defined as Mayo endoscopic score (MES) 0 or 1. A total of 113 anti-TNF withdrawal patients were followed up in Part 2; 68 control group (CW) and 45 intervention group (IW) patients. Thirty-six patients continued anti-TNF maintenance treatment; 26 intervention group (IM) and 10 control group (CM) patients. The main outcome was endoscopic remission after 4 years. Secondary endpoints included clinical remission, UC flare rate and treatment response.
Results
The primary outcome was similar in all groups; 4 year endoscopic remission rate was 88% (100/113) in anti-TNF withdrawal groups and 86% (31/36) in anti-TNF maintenance groups. Seventy-one (41%) of the 172 randomised BIOSTOP study patients were still in sustained endoscopicremission without anti-TNF at the end of the study; 35 of 71 after 2 years anti-TNF withdrawal, and 36 of 71 after 4 years.
Clinical remission rate at 4-year visit was 97% (35/36) in the anti-TNF maintenance group and 93% (105/113) in the anti-TNF withdrawal group (p = 0,69).
UC flare rate was significantly higher (p < 0,001) after anti-TNF withdrawal compared to maintenance treatment: 40% (54/113) of withdrawal patients experienced UC flares; 42% in IW and 51% in CW groups, respectively. Thirty-six of 54 (67%) were re-treated with anti-TNF; 81% (29/36) were in endoscopic remission after 4 years. Eighteen of 54 (33%) had minor UC flares treated with non-biologic drugs; 17 of 18 (94%) were in endoscopic remission after 4 years. In the anti-TNF maintenance treatment groups (IM and CM), UC flares were registered in 5 of 36 (14%); 3 of these 5 had no symptoms, but 4-year endoscopy revealed active UC.
We did not find significant differences between groups regarding azathioprine or mesalamine comedication, MES 0 vs 1, calprotectin, histologic inflammation or patient related outcomes. Serious adverse events related to study intervention were observed in 4 of 113 (3.5 %) of anti-TNF withdrawal patients, and in 2 of 36 (5.5 %) of anti-TNF maintenance patients.
Conclusion
Endoscopic remission rates after 4 years were similar in anti-TNF maintenance and withdrawal groups (including anti-TNF retreated UC flares); around 90%. As in BIOSTOP Part 1, half of the patients who withdraw anti-TNF in Part 2 experienced UC flares, . Most flares were successfully retreated with anti-TNF or non-biologic treatment. We did not identify clinical or baseline factors predicting UC flare. Importantly, 4 years after randomisation 41% of the anti-TNF withdrawal patients still were in sustained steroid free endoscopic remission.
Disclosure
I have