Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a growing cause for concern and often missed or not thought of among pediatric population in developing economies. It is reported that about 25% of IBDs present before the age of 20.
Growing plethora of investigations have not been able to replace the role of direct visualisation of intestinal mucosa in various colorectal issues. Macroscopic findings may or may not help in clinching the diagnosis of IBD, hence “Biopsy” remains the Elixir of diagnosis. In this article, we review and attempt to correlate colonoscopic(macroscopy) and histological (microscopy) findings of colonoscopies in pediatric population, done over a period of 1 year.

Aims & Methods

Aim and objectives: To compare macroscopic findings versus histopathology findings of colonoscopies in pediatric population in suspected IBD.
To study the correlation of macroscopic findings with histopathologic findings of colonoscopies in pediatric population and to assess the frequency and pattern of microscopic impressions of colonoscopies in our cohort.
Material and methods: A prospective observational study carried out in a tertiary referral centre in children who underwent colonoscopies, aged 1 month to 17 years over a period of 12 months.
All children whose parents consented were included in the study. Inclusion and Exclusion criteria were formulated. Informed consent was obtained from the parents. Clinical details, colonoscopy findings and histopathology reports were. A total of 135 cases were enrolled during our study period. Results were collated using Microsoft Excel ™.
© Ethical clearance was obtained from the institutional ethical committee.

Results

We found that the diagnosis of IBD was much more specific than expected with good sensitivity when data was matched between Macroscopy and Microscopy

Conclusion

• It is our standard practice to do colonoscopic biopsies from 7 areas (terminal ileum, cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum) of the colon to exclude microscopic colitis which may be missed by the endoscopist or marked as ‘normal’.
• Microscopic findings are considered as ‘Gold standard’ in the diagnosis of IBD and we envisage that it will remain the gold standard in the many next decades to come
• Our data of sensitivity and sensitivity of the microscopic findings inclined the relevance of colonic mucosal biopsies in children with a normal-appearing mucosa and also the need to analyse every segment of the colon to diagnose IBD that may masquerade as “normal” in children which will add burden to the family, society and health care system and more importantly to the child’s quality of life.

References

1. Manfredi, Michael A et al. “Good agreement between endoscopic findings and biopsy reports supports limited tissue sampling during pediatric colonoscopy.” Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition vol. 58,6 (2014): 773-8.
2. Altamimi, Eyad & Odeh, Yousef & Al-Quraan, Tuka & Mohamed, Elmi & Rawabdeh, Naif. (2022). Diagnostic and therapeutic outcomes of pediatric colonoscopies in Jordanian children. Journal of Pediatric and Neonatal Individualized Medicine. 11.

Introduction

Collagenous colitis (CC) is a debilitating, non-destructive inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that causes intense watery, non-bloody diarrhoea. The abnormal immune response is thought to be initiated by deficient tolerance to commensal gut microbiota, and fecal sample analyses indicate similarities with classic IBD forms as ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Yet, the exact members of the microbiome that might trigger and maintain the disease remain unknown.

Aims & Methods

To identify primary microbial triggers of CC pathogenesis that could directly interact with intestinal epithelial and submucosal cells, we isolated subepithelial mucosa from CC and healthy control (Hc) formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (n=7-10) by using a laser microdissection microscope (PALM MicroBeam LCM, Zeiss, Germany). Isolated nucleic acids were sequenced using shotgun metagenomics in a NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, USA). Microbial communities were identified using MetaPhlan3/4, and microbial metabolic and molecular function pathways using Humann3.2 algorithms.

Results

Bray-Curtis and Jaccard similarity coefficients showed that CC subepithelial microbiome was similar to that from Hc samples. Still, further analyses indicated that microbial metabolic pathways and molecular functions could differ. Microbiota that was associated with CC included Anoxybacillus and Barnesiella, whereas microbiota associated with Hc comprised Bacteroides, Leuconostoc and Lactobacillus.

Conclusion

Mucosa-associated microbiota in CC did not significantly differ from healthy microbiota. However, our results point to a relation of CC with bacteria that form biofilms (Anoxybacillus) and affect the variability of colitis development (Barnesiella). Thus, validation and further follow-up of these results could help us identify CC triggers in the future.

References

Carstens A. The Gut Microbiota in Collagenous Colitis Shares Characteristics With Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Dysbiosis. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;10(7):e00065

Disclosure

AM has received salary for consultancies from Tillotts Pharma AG, Ferring, Vifor and Dr Falk Pharma; speaker’s honoraria from Tillotts Pharma AG and Vifor. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Introduction

Several studies have shown that a low quality of colonoscopy reduces its effect in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC), but it is not clear to which extent a low-quality colonoscopy is still effective compared to no colonoscopy. We aimed to compare the 13-year risk of developing CRC between persons with I) a high-quality screening colonoscopy, II) a low-quality screening colonoscopy and III) without a screening colonoscopy.

Aims & Methods

Using observational data from a German claims database (GePaRD; 20% population coverage) we emulated a target trial with three arms: High-quality screening colonoscopy (highQualSC) vs. low-quality screening colonoscopy (lowQualSC) vs. no screening colonoscopy (noSC) at baseline. The quality of baseline colonoscopy was categorized based on the polyp detection rate of the examining physician. We included persons at average CRC risk aged 55–69 years and without a colonoscopy, polypectomy or fecal occult blood test before baseline. We estimated adjusted cumulative CRC incidence over 13 years of follow-up.

Results

Overall, we included 142,960 persons in the highQualSC arm, 62,338 persons in the lowQualSC arm and 124,040 persons in the noSC arm. The adjusted 13-year risk of any CRC was 1.77% in the highQualSC arm, 2.09% in the lowQualSC arm and 2.74% in the noSC arm. Compared to the noSC arm, the adjusted relative risk (aRR) was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.84) in the lowQualSC arm and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.60-0.69) in the highQualSC arm.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that the effect of screening colonoscopy in preventing CRC is substantially lower in persons with a low-quality as compared to a high-quality screening colonoscopy. However, it also showed that attending a low-quality screening colonoscopy still markedly reduces the risk of CRC compared to no screening colonoscopy.

Introduction

Treatment targets of ulcerative colitis (UC) have evolved to include not only endoscopic but also histologic remission. However, the concept of histological activity is still in its early days. We aimed to capture the attitudes towards UC histology and the uptake of standardized reporting of endoscopy and histology of UC in daily practice.

Aims & Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of physicians involved in the care of IBD worldwide. The survey included 21 questions divided into 3 sections. The first recorded demographics, specialty, and level of experience of participants; the second covered clinical practices and attitudes towards the use and reporting of endoscopy, and the third of histology.

Results

Participants: In total 359 physicians, from 60 countries (54.4% Europe, 24.4% Asia, 12.9% South America, 3.7% North America, 3.2% Africa, and 1.4% Oceania) responded; 87% were gastroenterologists, the remainder other specialists involved in the care of IBD. The majority practiced in academic hospitals (54.5%) or tertiary centers (22.1%), and only around one-fifth worked in secondary hospitals (12.8%) or local practices (8.1%).
Endoscopy: When performing endoscopy in quiescent UC, 72.1% of respondents reported taking biopsies also to assess microscopic activity, while 16.8% only for dysplasia detection, and 10.4% just in case of suspicious lesions; the average number of biopsies was 10.8 (SD 7.34, range 0 to 36). In the case of active UC, the percentage of operators collecting biopsies increased to 93.6%.
Endoscopy reports included a validated score in 91.9% of cases. Mayo was nearly always used (90%), with a large difference from the second most common score UCEIS (26.5%); other indices accounted for 1.7%. Of note, except for 1 respondent, all scores different from Mayo were used in addition to, and not instead of, Mayo. When restricting the analysis to participants working in high-volume centers (>500 UC patients cared for per year) all but one (117/118) reported using the Mayo score to grade endoscopic activity, and 32% (38/117) used also other scores in addition to Mayo, mainly UCEIS.
Histology: Centers represented in the survey were roughly equally split between those with a pathologist dedicated to IBD (46.2%) and those without (51%). UC histology was used by nearly all respondents (90.5%) for initial diagnosis, 72% to monitor disease course, 62.4% to determine microscopic extension, 59.9% to confirm deep remission when considering stopping treatment, and 42.3% to increase/optimize treatment. Nevertheless, 77.2% of participants reported that standard histological indices were not routinely available, although 21.7% of these used scores in selected cases, such as clinical trials or research. Among those who used (or worked in a center that used) standard scores (160/357) the choice of which index was mixed: 64.4% (103/160) used the Nancy index, followed by Geboes 31.9% (51/160), and Robarts 20.6% (33/160), a minority applied other scores.
The majority of respondents welcomed as useful or very useful an artificial intelligence system to automate scoring of endoscopy (69%) or histology (73%).

Conclusion

UC histology reports are less standard than endoscopy ones. Most physicians consider histological activity useful when managing UC and would welcome artificial intelligence systems to automate endoscopic and histological scoring.

Disclosure

OMN has served as a speaker for Janssen, Ferring, Takeda, Pfizer, Fresenius Kabi
MI has received research grants and equipment loans from Pentax USA, Olympus, and Fujifilm; is partially funded by NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham.
LPB reports personal fees from Galapagos, AbbVie, Janssen, Genentech, Ferring, Tillots, Celltrion, Takeda, Pfizer, Index Pharmaceuticals, Sandoz, Celgene, Biogen, Samsung Bioepis, Inotrem, Al-lergan, MSD, Roche, Arena, Gilead, Amgen, BMS, Vifor, Norgine, Mylan, Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Enthera, Theravance, Pandion Therapeutics, Gossamer Bio, Viatris, Thermo Fisher; grants from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Fresenius Kabi; stock options: CTMA.
SG has served as consultant, Steering committee member, Advisory Board Member and Drug Monitoring committee member for Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, Abbvie, BMS, Gilead, Galapagos, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ferring.
SD has served as a speaker, consultant and advisory board member for Schering Plough, Abbott (AbbVie) Laboratories, Merck and Co, UCB Pharma, Ferring, Cellerix, Millenium Takeda, Nycomed, Pharmacosmos, Actelion, Alfa Wasserman, Genentech, Grunenthal, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Vifor and Johnson and Johnson.

Remaining authors declare no relevant conflict of interest.

Introduction

Patients with metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (NAFLD activity score ≥4) and significant fibrosis (≥F2) (fibrotic MASH) are at increased risk for disease progression and development of cirrhosis. Following the recent approval of the first agent for the management of noncirrhotic MASH, timely identification of these patients is of major importance. Fibroscan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST^TM) score enables the noninvasive diagnosis of fibrotic MASH, and has been assessed in several studies.

Aims & Methods

To assess the overall performance of FAST^TM score for diagnosing fibrotic MASH. We searched Medline, Cochrane library, Web of science and Scopus up to January 2024. We included diagnostic accuracy studies assessing the performance of FAST^TM score for ruling out (FAST^TM score ≤0.35) and ruling in (FAST^TMscore ≥0.67) fibrotic MASH using liver biopsy as the reference standard. We calculated pooled diagnostic accuracy estimates using bivariate random-effects models, and assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

Results

We included 16 studies with 8838 participants. Most studies (87.5%) were at high or unclear risk of bias due to concerns regarding patient selection, interpretation of FAST score without knowledge of biopsy results, and length of biopsy specimens for fibrotic MASH diagnosis. Across all participants, 54.8% were females and 31% had type 2 diabetes. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) were 52.4 years and 32.4 kg/m². Mean aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase were 45.0 IU and 57.6 IU, respectively. The prevalence of fibrotic MASH across studies was 32.9% ranging from 14% to 55%. Using the rule out cut off (≤0.35), FAST^TM yielded a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI; 0.83, 0.91), specificity 0.52 (0.45, 0.60), positive likelihood ratio (LRp) 1.8 (1.6, 2.1) and negative likelihood ratio (LRn) 0.23 (0.18, 0.30). By applying the rule in cut off (≥0.67), pooled sensitivity, specificity, LRp, and LRn were 0.45 (0.39, 0.52), 0.87 (0.82, 0.90), 3.4 (2.8, 4.1) and 0.63 (0.58, 0.69) respectively. Assuming a pre-test probability (prevalence) of 30% for fibrotic MASH, a FAST^TM score ≥0.67 resulted in a positive predictive value of 60%, while with a FAST^TM score ≤0.35 the negative predictive value was 91%.

Conclusion

FAST^MT score has acceptable accuracy for the diagnosis of fibrotic MASH. Proposed thresholds of ≤0.35 and ≥0.67 might be useful for ruling out/in fibrotic MASH respectively.

Introduction

Since the report of Shaker in 1994, transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGDS) has been reported worldwide as one technique to facilitate comfortable procedures avoiding sedation. From 1996 in our Centre, we routinely use this technique in all the patients for diagnostic and selected operative EGDS. This approach is also suitable for the placement of percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) but in the published papers it has been performed only when conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was unusable (dysphagic patients with neurological disease or with stenosis and/or occlusion of the mouth or pharynx). On the contrary, since 2000 we have routinely used the transnasal approach for all patients requiring PEG, reserving the oral technique when the transnasal access route is impossible.

Aims & Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent PEG placement between January 2000 and March 2023 in the Unit of Gastroenterology of San Camillo De Lellis Hospital, Rieti, Italy, in order to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of T-PEG placement in routine practice. We used ultrathin gastroscope through a nostril after assessment and lubrification, and the pull technique was used for tube placement.

Results

PEG placement was required for 256 consecutive patients (male 49.4%; female 51.6%), the average age was 79 years, within a range from 26 to 104 years. Transnasal approach was used in 162 patients (nasal group: 63.3%) while oral approach was used in 94 (oral group: 36.7%). The failure of transnasal approach was related to impossibility of nasal intubation due to narrow nasal passages or to inability to transilluminate the stomach. In these cases we needed transoral route. 14 patients underwent transoral PEG placement due to unavailability of transnasal gastroscope. The duration of the procedures was similar in both approaches (12 ±3 minutes oral vs 13±4 minutes nasal).
The most common indications for PEG insertion were neurologic disorders (n=132, 51.6 %), cerebrovascular accident (n=73, 28.5 %), esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer (n=18, 7 %), other pathologies (n=33, 12.9 %). 167 procedures were performed without sedation: 77.8 % ( n= 130) in the nasal group and only 22.1% (n=37) in the oral group. Outpatient regimen PEG placement was also significantly higher in trans nasal group (79 % vs 58 % oral group). We registered 3 major complications, 1 in oral group and 2 in nasal group (one necessitated surgery). No procedure-related death was registered. There were no unplanned re-admissions of outpatients discharged from the gastroenterology unit for procedure-related complications.

Conclusion

The more than twenty years’ experience of our center demonstrates that the transnasal approach is safety, feasible and could be routinely used in daily endoscopic practice for PEG placement. The minimally invasive technique therefore reserves sedation to a few selected cases to reduce costs, improve logistic organization and avoid anesthesia related complications.

References

1. Campo R, Montserrat A, Brullet E. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance. Endoscopy. 1998 Jun;30(5):448-52.
2. Schuldt AL, Kirsten H, Tuennemann J, Heindl M, van Bommel F, Feisthammel J, Hollenbach M, Hoffmeister A. Necessity of transnasal gastroscopy in routine diagnostics: a patient-centred requirement analysis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr 14;6(1):e000264.
3. Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Pereira A, Lagarrigue JP, Chavaillon A, Ponchon T. Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jan;59(1):54-7.
4. Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F, Pellissier PE, Leprince E, Pujol B, Ponchon T. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Feb;57(2):198-204
5. Preiss C, Charton JP, Schumacher B, Neuhaus H. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD. Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):641-6.