Introduction

Epithelial barrier dysfunction is a hallmark of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), contributing to increased permeability, microbial translocation, and sustained mucosal inflammation^1,2. Targeting barrier restoration has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy³. Gallic acid, a dietary polyphenol with known anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, has shown potential in modulating mucosal responses⁴. To investigate its impact on epithelial integrity under inflammatory stress, we utilized intestinal organoids as a physiologically relevant ex vivo model system.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of gallic acid to restore intestinal epithelial barrier function under inflammatory conditions, using colonic epithelial organoids and integrating transcriptomic and permeability analyses.
The study was approved by the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (protocol no. BE-2-31). Inflamed differentiated colonic epithelial organoids were established from a patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) and non-IBD control individual by exogenous stimulation with TNF-α and IFN-γ (10 ng/mL each) for 24 hours. For gallic acid (GA) screening, organoids were pre-treated with metabolite (100 μM) for 1 hour prior to inflammation induction and co-treated during the induction period. Subsequently, organoids were either processed for mRNA sequencing (1×75 bp, NextSeq 550, Illumina) or subjected to a FITC-Dextran (4kDa) assay. RNA-seq data was processed, analyzed, and visualized using nf-core/RNAseq pipeline and RStudio. Images for permeability assay analysis were acquired using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer 7), processed with ImageJ, and analyzed and visualized in RStudio.

Results

Principal component analysis of transcriptomic profiles from both UC and non-IBD organoids revealed clear sample clustering driven by stimulation. Differential gene expression and Gene set enrichment (GSEA) analyses indicated a more pronounced cell response to both treatments in UC organoids compared to non-IBD organoids. Inflammation activated immune (CXCL9/10/11, CX3CL1), interferon (IFI44, SOCS1, NOS2), and defense genes (GBP4, GBP5, OAS2), while downregulating metabolic genes (FABP6, CFTR, HMGCS2) in both groups. Gene Ontology-based GSEA confirmed immune pathway enrichment and lipid metabolism suppression in inflamed cultures. In total, 3,148 and 1,479 DEGs were identified in inflamed UC and non-IBD organoids, respectively. GA treatment modulated 2,144 and 384 genes (e.g., LYPD8, MKI67, MT-ATP6, CXCL14, CCL22) in these groups, suggesting potential to rebalance inflammation and metabolism. GA co-treatment enhanced epithelial integrity in UC organoids via upregulation of cell junction, peptide hormone processing, and immune-related pathways. In non-IBD organoids, GA promoted cell adhesion pathways, supporting epithelial cohesion. Functional permeability analysis confirmed GA’s protective role, as supported by transcriptomic data. Mean percentages of FITC-Dextran-permeable organoids were 16.02% (untreated), 86.08% (inflamed), and 42.58% (inflamed + GA). A trend toward statistical significance (Wilcoxon p = 0.125) was observed in both untreated vs. inflamed and inflamed vs. inflamed + GA comparisons.

Conclusion

In conclusion, gallic acid modulates inflammatory and metabolic pathways during colonic inflammation and enhances epithelial barrier integrity.
Study was funded by the European Union and the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) (project: miGut-Health, grant no. 101095470).

References

¹Jostins, L., et al. (2012). Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature, 491(7422), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11582
²Cleynen, I., et al. (2016). Inherited determinants of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: A genetic association study. The Lancet, 387(10014), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00465-1
³Vieujean, S., et al. (2025). Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-024-01035-7
⁴Tian, B., Ye, P., Zhou, X., Hu, J., Wang, P., Cai, M., Yang, K., Sun, P., & Zou, X. (2025). Gallic acid ameliorated chronic DSS-induced colitis through gut microbiota modulation, intestinal barrier improvement, and inflammation. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70024

Introduction

​​​​​Pancreatic cancer (PC) has one of the poorest prognoses among malignancies. Early detection, particularly of stage 0 or stage 1 disease, is crucial to improving survival outcomes. However, conventional screening strategies based solely on family history or symptoms—as commonly practiced in Western countries—have shown limited sensitivity for early-stage PC. In Japan, more comprehensive approaches are being developed.

Aims & Methods

Low-grade relevant (LGR) factor	High-grade relevant (HGR) factor
・sporadic family history ・diabetes mellitus ・diabetes mellitus worsening ・stomach/back symptoms ・weight loss ・elevated serum pancreatic enzyme ・heavy alcohol consumption ・smoking history ・obesity	・familial PC ・hereditary PC syndrome/pancreatitis ・new-onset diabetes mellitus ・jaundice ・elevated serum tumor biomarkers ・chronic pancreatitis ・pancreatic cyst ・main pancreatic duct dilation
Score positive; 3 points or more	Score positive; 1 point or more

This nationwide, multicenter prospective study aimed to evaluate the utility of a novel scoring system for early PC detection among hospital outpatients. From August 2019 to May 2024, all outpatients presenting with symptoms, risk factors, subtle imaging abnormalities of the pancreas, or requesting pancreatobiliary screening at the Department of Gastroenterology in hospitals participating in the Early Pancreatic Cancer Screening Study (EPSS) were considered for inclusion. Consecutive patients who had no pancreatic tumors suspected by any imaging modalities were examined, no prior history of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination for pancreatic disease, and/or no referrals from other hospitals specifically for PC diagnosis were prospectively enrolled. The system comprised low- and high-grade relevant (LGR/HGR) factors referring to both risk factors and diagnostic indicators, including symptoms and subtle imaging abnormalities associated with PC. Patients were classified as score-positive if they had ≥3 LGR or ≥1 HGR factor(s). Diagnostic yield for stage 0/1 and all-stage PC was compared between score-positive and score-negative groups. Diagnostic performance was also evaluated against previous large-scale Japanese data and Western screening methods based on family/genetic risk or symptoms. The sample size was determined based on a previous large-scale PC screening study in Japan.

Results

Of 3,287 patients, 2,531 were score-positive and 756 were score-negative. PC was diagnosed in 283 patients (8.6%), including 67 with stage 0/1 disease. The detection rate of stage 0/1 PC was significantly higher in score-positive than in score-negative patients (2.6% vs. 0.7%, P=.001). Compared to a previous Japanese study (0.78%), this study showed a significantly higher detection rate (P<.001). The sensitivity of the scoring system for stage 0/1 PC was 93.1%, significantly outperforming Western-style approaches (12.5% for family/genetic risk and 50.0% for symptom-based screening; both P<.001), while maintaining comparable accuracy. Even combining family/genetic risk and symptoms, sensitivity remained lower than that of the scoring system (56.9%, P<.001). For all-stage PC, both the accuracy and sensitivity of the diagnosis based on the scoring system were significantly higher than those based on family/genetic risk, symptom, or the combination of symptom and family/genetic risk (P = .030, .004, .002 for accuracy; and all P <.001 for sensitivity, respectively). Among the 283 PC cases, 23.7% were stage 0/1, 15.9% were ≤10 mm, and 45.6% underwent surgical resection. Multivariate logistic analysis identified older age, worsening diabetes, and MPD dilation as significant independent predictors of stage 0/1 PC.

Conclusion

The scoring system demonstrated superior sensitivity and comparable accuracy to traditional screening strategies for detecting early-stage PC. Its use in outpatient settings may facilitate earlier diagnosis and intervention, thereby improving resectability and prognosis.

References

Klein AP. Pancreatic cancer epidemiology: understanding the role of lifestyle and inherited risk factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021;18:493-502.
Hanada K, Okazaki A, Hirano N, et al. Diagnostic strategies for early pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol 2015;50:147-54.
Sagami R, Hayasaka K, Ujihara T, et al. Role of EUS combined with a newly modified scoring system to detect pancreatic high-grade precancerous lesions. Endosc Ultrasound 2022.