Introduction
There are currently no studies comparing vonoprazan-dual, vonoprazan-triple therapies and classic bismuth quadruple therapy.
Aims & Methods
We aimed to compare efficacy of vonoprazan-dual or triple therapies and bismuth-quadruple therapy for treatment-naive Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection in Southern China, where primary resistance rates of clarithromycin and levofloxacin are >30%.
Between March 2022 and August 2023, treatment-naïve HP-infected adults were randomly assigned to receive one of the three 14-day regimens (1:1:1 ratio): vonoprazan-dual (VA-dual; vonoprazan 20mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1g thrice daily), vonoprazan-triple (VAC-triple; vonoprazan 20mg/amoxicillin 1g/clarithromycin 500mg twice daily), or bismuth-quadruple therapy containing bismuth, esomeprazole, tetracycline and metronidazole. Primary outcome was noninferiority in HP eradication, evaluated by UBT 4-6 weeks post-treatment by intention-to-treat (ITT) (based on all recruited subjects who took at least one dose of treatment regimen, and those lost to follow-up were considered as treatment failure cases), modified intention-to-treat (mITT) (based on patients who took at least one dose of the treatment and completed follow-up) and per-protocol (PP) analysis (based on subjects who completed 14-day treatment and rechecked UBT). Bonferroni-adjusted p-value of <0.017 was used to determine statistical significance. Primary outcome was noninferiority in HP eradication, evaluated by UBT 4-6 weeks post-treatment by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis (based on subjects who completed 14-day treatment and rechecked UBT). Comparative non-inferiority between bismuth-quadruple and VA-dual or VAC-triple was assessed by one-sided μ test and derivation of a two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI), with noninferiority being determined by a lower 95% CI end more than –10% with a Bonferroni-adjusted p-value of <0.017. A two-sided p-value of 0.05 was used to define statistical significance for other analyses.
Results
298 subjects (mean age:35.7±8.4 years; male:134 [45.0%]; body mass index:23.2±3.5 kg/m2; VC-dual:100, VAC-triple:98, bismuth-quadruple:100) were enrolled, and 292 (98.0%) had UBT rechecked. ITT analysis showed both VA-dual (eradication rate of 96.0%) and VAC-triple therapies (95.9%) were non-inferior to bismuth-quadruple therapy (92.0%) (difference:4.0%, 95% CI:-2.9% to 11.5%, p<0.001; and 3.9%, 95% CI:-3.1% to 11.5%, p<0.001, respectively). mITT analysis also showed non-inferiority of VA-dual and VAC-triple therapies to bismuth-quadruple therapy (97.0% and 96.9% vs 95.8%, with difference:1.1% and 1.1%, p=0.002 and 0.002, respectively). Similar observation was noted for PP analysis (96.7% and 96.7% vs 97.4%, with difference:-0.7% and -0.7%, p=0.009 and 0.010, respectively) (Table 1). The frequency of adverse events was 39.0%, 56.1% and 71.0% in VA-dual, VAC-triple and bismuth-quadruple therapies, respectively.
Table 1. Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of vonoprazan-dual, vonoprazan-triple and bismuth-quadruple therapies
| | | | | VA-dual vs bismuth- quadruple therapy | VAC-triple vs bismuth- quadruple therapy | VA-dual vs VAC-triple therapy |
| | VA-dual therapy | VAC-triple therapy | Bismuth- quadruple therapy | Difference (95% CI) | Non- inferiority p-value | Difference (95% CI) | Non- inferiority p-value | Difference (95% CI) | Non- inferiority p-value |
ITT | 96.0% (96/100) | 95.9% (94/98) | 92.0% (92/100) | 4.0% (-2.9% to 11.5%) | <0.001 | 3.9% (-3.1% to 11.5%) | <0.001 | 0.08% (-6.3% to 6.5%) | 0.005 |
mITT | 97.0% (96/99) | 96.9% (94/97) | 95.8% (92/96) | 1.1% (-4.9% to 7.6%) | 0.002 | 1.1% (-5.1% to 7.5%) | 0.002 | 0.01% (-5.8% to 6.1%) | 0.004 |
PP | 96.7% (89/92) | 96.7% (87/90) | 97.4% (75/77) | -0.7% (-6.9% to 6.1%) | 0.009 | -0.7% (-7.1% to 6.0%) | 0.010 | 0.01% (-6.3% to 6.5%) | 0.006 |
Abbreviation: VA-dual, vonoprazan dual; VAC-triple, vonoprazan triple; CI, confidence interval; ITT, intention-to-treat analysis; mITT, modified intention-to-treat analysis; PP, per protocol analysis The p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni’s correction. The significance level was set at 0.05/3 = 0.017 for each comparison. |
Conclusion
VA-dual and VA-triple therapies were non-inferior to bismuth-quadruple therapy in Southern China. Given the lower adverse effects and fewer antibiotic use, VA-dual therapy is the preferred first-line treatment for HP infection.
Disclosure
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81903581), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant Nos. JCYJ20190807150005699 and RCBS20200714115000009), the Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (Grant No. SZXK059), the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Severe Infections (Grant No. ZDSYS20200811142804014), and the Health Commission Grant of Guangdong Province, China (ref. no. B2021239).