Introduction

Although CADe/x systems increase colorectal polyp detection, their ability to predict histological diagnosis is limited.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study is to determine which factors related to morphology, histology and the image characteristics are associated with histology prediction by PolyDeep, a CADe/x system.
For this analysis, 5546 still images of colorectal polyps collected in PIBAdb database (https://www.iisgaliciasur.es/home/biobanco/colorectal-polyp-image-cohort-pibadb/?lang=en) were used. The images were obtained from videos recorded by endoscopist. Each image was associated with the endoscopy description (morphology, size), the final histology diagnosis and the characteristics (size, area) related with the Red, Green and Blue model (RGB model) and the Hue, Saturation and Value model (HSV model). Finally, the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) determined the probability a polyp was classified as neoplastic lession (adenomatous, Traditional Serrated Adenoma,TSA, Sessile Serrated Lession, SSL). We determined Polydeep classified lesions as neoplastic if the probability was ≥0.5. We performed three analysis: (1) linear multiple regression in order to determine which variables are associated with the probability of classification as neoplastic lesions. (2). A multivariate logistic regresion analysis to define the variables associated with the classification as a neoplastic lesions. (3) A multivariate logistic regression to establish which variables are associated with missclassification of polyps. We use the R software for statistical computing.

Results

PolyDeep classified 84,51% of the lesions as neoplastic lession and managed to correctly classify 85.02% of the evaluated polyps (92.8% adenomas, 82.5% TSA, 84.2% SSL and 51.6% hyperplastic). The R² in the multiple linear regression is the 0.3655. The model associated to the neoplastic diagnosis has an Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) of 3363.3 and the model associated with missclassification, has an AIC of 3547.5. The variables associated to each regression model showed in the attached table.

Conclusion

The results obtained in this study allow us to establish strategies to improve Polydeep predicted histological diagnosis.

Introduction

Tofacitinib is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). The recommended induction scheme is 10 mg twice daily (BID) for at least 8 weeks followed by a maintenance dose of 5 mg BID. However, some patients require 10mg bid, for 16 weeks at the induction phase. Our study aimed to assess the demographics and disease characteristics of such patients and their outcome at 24 weeks.

Aims & Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study which included patients with moderate to severe UC, who received induction therapy with Tofacitinib 10mg bid for a 16-week period. Data were collected between July 2018 and November 2022. The primary objective was disease outcome, defined as clinical remission and/or the need of steroids. Secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal, treatment de-escalation and adverse events.

Results

In total 31 patients, are currently enrolled in our study, from 10 IBD centres [males: 51.6%, mean age at study entry: 40.0 years, median disease duration: 7 years]. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline are shown in table 1. Four patients (12.9%) discontinued treatment before week 24, due to inadequate response. De-escalation of dosing to 5mg bid tofacitinib was attempted in 13 of 27 patients (48.1%) and was successful in 7 patients (53.8%) who maintained clinical response until week 24 of the study. Of the other 6 out of 13 patients, 6 patients received again the higher dose (10 mg bid) and regained response and only one patient discontinued treatment. Overall, 85.7% (6/7) of the patients who received tofacitinib 5mg bid and 66.7% (14/21) who received 10mg bid at 24 weeks, had received more than one biologic prior to tofacitinib (P=0.34). At week 24, the partial Mayo score was available in 26 patients; 13 patients were in steroid-free clinical remission (pMayo <2). Twelve patients had mild active disease (pMayo 2-4) and 9 of them had stopped steroids. No major adverse events were observed during the entire observation period.

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, a 24-week treatment with tofacitinib 10mg BID is safe and the majority of patients achieve clinical remission and manage to stop steroids. De-escalation at 5mg bid is successful in more than half of them. We prospectively follow up our cohort to investigate whether these preliminary results will be confirmed for a longer period.

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is characterized by chronic inflammation due to an uncontrolled immune response orchestrated through, i.e. neutrophils. The basement membrane acts as a front-line defense promoting tissue integrity, where the α-3 chain of type IV collagen is solely expressed on the outermost layer of the mucosa. Detection of subclinical ulceration is crucial since early-stage IBD presents a unique window of opportunity for intervention, as the disease might become a self-sustaining process once deep inflammation becomes established. We therefore, wanted to develop a biomarker reflecting early tissue injury, aiding in the implementation of prompt treatment.

Aims & Methods

A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay quantifying a human neutrophil elastase (HNE) degraded fragment of type IV collagen α-3 chain was developed (C4A3-HNE). Dilution- and spiking recovery, inter- and intra-variability, and interference were evaluated. Acceptance criteria for technical validation were a recovery of 100% ±25 and an inter-intra variability of <15%. Commercial serum samples were purchased from ProteoGenex. Biological relevance was validated in an observational study from Odense University Hospital (OUH) and healthy controls. Groups were compared using Kruskal Wallis (Dunn‘s corrected).

Results

The technical validation of the C4A3-HNE assay demonstrated acceptable results for recovery, variation, and interference. Biological relevance was assessed in commercial IBD samples and healthy donors. C4A3-HNE was elevated in both CD and UC compared to healthy (p=0.001 and <0.0001)(AUC [95% CI]: 0.820 [0.669-0.971]; 0.875 [0.775-1.000]). The results were validated in an independent cohort of IBD patients (both p<0.0001). For UC, analysis showed that compared to patients in endoscopic remission, C4A3-HNE is elevated in patients with mild endoscopic activity, decreasing dose-dependently for moderate and severe disease (T1). Fecal calprotectin and CRP levels were also lower in IBD patients with high levels of C4A3-HNE (T1). With a cut-off value of 54.1 ng/ml, C4A3-HNE could significantly discriminate between mild and severe endoscopic disease (T1).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates the biological and possible clinical relevance of the novel C4A3-HNE biomarker. The biomarker is elevated in patients with IBD compared with healthy, and high levels may reflect early mucosal damage in patients with UC. Furthermore, inflammatory markers were lower in IBD patients with high levels of C4A3-HNE, pointing towards high levels being indicative of early disease. C4A3-HNE may provide early detection of mucosal damage or prediction of relapse; however, further studies are required to assess the clinical validity of this biomarker.

Disclosure

MA, MP, MK, and JM are employees of Nordic Bioscience A/S. MK owns stocks in Nordic Bioscience A/S.

Introduction

The LIR!C trial demonstrated that laparoscopic ileocaecal resection (ICR) is a cost-effective alternative to infliximab therapy (IFX) in patients with uncomplicated ileocaecal Crohn’s disease (CD), with comparable quality of life outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the 10-year follow-up of patients enrolled in the LIR!C trial.

Aims & Methods

This retrospective follow-up study included patients from the original LIR!C trial, a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing ICR to IFX treatment in patients with ileal CD. Long term follow-up data were collected between February 3 and April 14, 2025. Data extraction was focused on initiation or switch of IBD treatments (corticosteroids, immunomodulators and/or advanced medical therapies) and (re)-resections. The follow-up period ranged from trial enrolment to the last visit with the gastroenterologist or surgeon. Primary outcomes were: (1) proportion of patients in clinical remission without therapy switch (no medical therapy or re-resection in the ICR group, and continuation or the cessation of IFX in case of remission in the IFX group), and (2) therapy-free remission, defined as clinical remission without IBD medication and (re)resections.

Results

Follow-up data were available from 60 ICR patients and 57 IFX patients (87% of 134 patients originally included). The median follow-up time was 12 years (IQR 9-14). The clinical remission rate without therapy switch was 40% in the ICR group compared to 26.3% in the IFX group (p=0.117). Of the 60 ICR patients, 24 (40%) had no additional therapy, 13 (21.7%) received an immunomodulator, 18 (30%) biological therapy and 5 (8.3%) underwent a second resection after biological treatment. In the IFX group, 33 (57.9%) required an ICR of whom 25 (75.8%) had previously received second-line biological treatment. Additionally, 7/57 patients (12.3%) were therapy free, 8 (14%) continued IFX treatment, 6 (10.5%) received other biological treatment, and 3 (5.3%) switched to an immunomodulator. Therapy-free remission was significantly higher in the ICR group when compared to the IFX group (40% vs 12%, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

After 10 years of follow-up, the clinical remission rate without therapy switch was comparable between both groups, highlighting the long-term durability of both treatment approaches. The majority of IFX patients needed ICR within 10 years of follow-up. 40% of the ICR group did not require any additional therapy further supporting ICR as first-line treatment option in ileal CD.

References

Ponsioen, C. Y., de Groof, E. J., Eshuis, E. J., Gardenbroek, T. J., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Hart, A., Warusavitarne, J., Buskens, C. J., van Bodegraven, A. A., Brink, M. A., Consten, E. C. J., van Wagensveld, B. A., Rijk, M. C. M., Crolla, R. M. P. H., Noomen, C. G., Houdijk, A. P. J., Mallant, R. C., Boom, M., Marsman, W. A., Stockmann, H. B., … LIR!C study group (2017). Laparoscopic ileocaecal resection versus infliximab for terminal ileitis in Crohn's disease: a randomised controlled, open-label, multicentre trial. The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2(11), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30248-0

Disclosure

GD'H served as a consultant for AbbVie, Alimentiv, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Exeliom Biosciences, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Takeda; and has received speakers bureau fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda.