Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) surveillance programs are recommended for individuals with a PDAC lifetime-risk ≥5% to improve outcomes.¹ While familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is linked to increased PDAC risk, robust data to guide surveillance recommendations is lacking.^2,3 This study evaluates PDAC risk in a large FAP-cohort and cost-effectiveness of PDAC-surveillance in this group.

Aims & Methods

Data were collected from FAP cohorts in the United States (US) and the Netherlands (NL), including individuals (≥18 years) with a confirmed (likely) pathogenic APC variant. To minimize ascertainment bias, individuals whose initial visit or registration was prompted by a PDAC diagnosis were excluded from the analysis. Cumulative PDAC incidence, adjusted for death as competing risk, was calculated for the FAP cohorts and compared with control data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and Statistics Netherlands. The cost-effectiveness of surveillance was evaluated using our previously developed Markov model.⁴ In comparison to the previous study, the model was modified by setting the inflation rate at 3%, discontinuing surveillance at age 75 and incorporating the relative risk derived from our FAP cohort.

Results

The US-cohort (n=357) and the NL-cohort (n=1000) had a median age at the end of follow-up of 46 years (IQR, 32.0-60.0) and 60 years (IQR, 47.5-72.5), respectively. Female participants comprised 52.9% of the US-cohort and 47.2% of the NL-cohort. Within the US-cohort, three PDAC cases were identified, however, two individuals had been referred to the Mayo Clinic at the time of PDAC diagnosis and were subsequently excluded from the analysis to reduce the risk of ascertainment bias. When combining both FAP-cohorts, the cumulative risk of PDAC by age 70 was 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3-1.8). Detailed cumulative risk estimates, stratified by cohort and age, are presented in Table 1. For comparison, the cumulative incidence of PDAC in the general population at age 70 was 0.32% (95% CI, 0.31-0.33), corresponding to a relative risk of 2.2 (95% CI, 0.9-5.7) for individuals with FAP. The cost-effectiveness analysis estimated that annual magnetic resonance imaging-based PDAC surveillance, starting at age 40, would be considered cost-effective if the relative risk reached at least 4.0, based on a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000.

Table 1. Adjusted cumulative incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in individuals with familial adenomatous polyposis

Conclusion

This is the largest cohort study to date to assess PDAC risk in individuals with FAP. Our findings indicate that PDAC risk in FAP patients is not significantly higher than in the general population. Moreover, their surveillance is shown not to be cost-effective.

References

1. Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R, Syngal S, Del Chiaro M, Bartsch DK, et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut. 2020;69(1):7-17.
2. Giardiello FM, Offerhaus GJ, Lee DH, Krush AJ, Tersmette AC, Booker SV, et al. Increased risk of thyroid and pancreatic carcinoma in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. 1993;34(10):1394-6.
3. Karstensen JG, Bülow S, Højen H, Jelsig AM, Jespersen N, Andersen KK, et al. Cancer in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: A Nationwide Danish Cohort Study With Matched Controls. Gastroenterology. 2023;165(3):573-81.e3.
4. Corral JE, Das A, Bruno MJ, Wallace MB. Cost-effectiveness of Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance in High-Risk Individuals: An Economic Analysis. Pancreas. 2019;48(4):526-36.

Disclosure

None

Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is often associated with metabolic disorders such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and/or diabetes. FGF21 analogs are promising therapies for MASH due to their direct anti-fibrotic effects as well as additional hepatic and extrahepatic benefits. Pegozafermin (PGZ), an FGF21 analog, was evaluated for safety and efficacy in a Phase 2b trial (ENLIVEN) with either weekly (QW) or every two-week (Q2W) dosing versus matching placebo in MASH patients with biopsy-proven F2/F3 fibrosis. Primary histology endpoints and non-invasive tests (NITs) were assessed at week 24, followed by additional NIT evaluation at the end of a 24-week blinded extension for a total of 48 weeks.

Aims & Methods

Patients were randomized to PGZ 15mg QW, 30mg QW, or 44mg Q2W or placebo for 24 weeks (histology-based primary endpoints). During the 24-week extension, most patients continued their assigned treatment with the exception of a subset of placebo patients who were re-randomized to receive PGZ 30mg QW. The full analysis set includes F2/F3 patients with NAFLD activity score (NAS) ≥4 at baseline (n=192).

Results

At 24-weeks, PGZ 30mg QW or 44mg Q2W led to statistically significant and clinical meaningful improvement in both primary histological endpoints (one stage of fibrosis improvement without worsening of MASH and MASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis) compared to placebo. Non-invasive testing at weeks 24 and 48 demonstrated that PGZ treatment was associated with robust and sustained reductions in liver fat content (MRI-PDFF), biomarkers of fibrosis (VCTE, ELF, PRO-C3) and liver injury (ALT, AST). PGZ also improved metabolic parameters such as lipids and HbA1c at both 24 and 48 weeks. PGZ was generally safe and well tolerated with the most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) being mild/moderate nausea and diarrhea. No deaths occurred; six early terminations for TEAEs including one drug-related serious AE occurred.

Conclusion

At 24 weeks, treatment with PGZ in MASH patients with F2/F3 fibrosis led to significant fibrosis regression and MASH resolution, which was corroborated by improvement across a variety of non-invasive tests including liver fat, inflammation, fibrosis, and metabolic markers. Benefits on NITs were sustained over the full 48-weeks of the study, with favorable safety and tolerability. PGZ is the first therapy to achieve fibrosis regression and MASH resolution with a Q2W dosing regimen. Phase 3 studies in noncirrhotic (ENLIGHTEN-Fibrosis) and cirrhotic (ENLIGHTEN-cirrhosis) patients are currently underway to confirm these results.

Disclosure

Jörn Schattenberg: Consultant: Akero, Alentis Therapeutics, Astra Zeneca, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Siemens Healthineers; Speaker: Gilead Sciences, Advanz, Echosens, MedPublico GmbH; Grants: Boehringer Ingelheim, Siemens Healthcare GmbH; Stock Options: AGED diagnostics, Hepta Bio
Arun J Sanyal: Consulting: Genefit, Gilead, Malinckrodt, Pfizer, Salix, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Merck, Hemoshear, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Terns, Albireo, Jannsen, Poxel, 89bio, Siemens, AstraZeneca, NGM Bio, Amgen, Regeneron, Genentech, Alnylam, Roche, Madrigal, Inventiva, Covance, Prosciento, HistoIndex, PathAI; Grants: Gilead, Malinckrodt, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Merck, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Fractyl, Madrigal, Inventiva; Stock holder: Exhalenz, GenFit, Hemoshear, Durect, Indalo, NorthSea, Tiziana, Rivus
Naim Alkhouri: Research funding: 89Bio, AbbVie/Allergan, Akero, Better Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corcept, DSM, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepagene, Healio, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Madrigal, Merck, NGM, Noom, NorthSea, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Pfizer, Poxel, Viking, and Zydus; Speaker bureau: AbbVie/Allergan, Alexion, Echosens, Eisai, Exelixis, Gilead, Intercept, Perspectum, Salix, and Theratechnologies; Consultant: 89Bio, AbbVie/Allergan, Echosens, Fibronostics, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Pfizer, and Zydus.
Rohit Loomba: Consultant: Aardvark Therapeutics, Altimmune, Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, CohBar, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Hightide, Inipharma, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Madrigal, Metacrine, Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Merck, Pfizer, Sagimet, Theratechnologies, 89bio, Terns Pharmaceuticals and Viking Therapeutics; Grants: Arrowhead Pharmacetuicals, AstraZeneca, Boegringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmeed Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sonic Incytes and Terns Pharmaceuticals; Stockholder: Co-founder LipoNexus, Inc
Mildred D Gottwald, Shibao Feng, Germaine D Agollah, Cynthia L Hartsfield, Hank Mansbach, Maya Margalit: 89bio employee and stock holder