Introduction

Recently, the number of ESD cases of early gastric cancer detected after Helicobacter pylori eradication (GCAE) has been increasing. As the number of years since eradication increases, the management of metachronous carcinomas after ESD for GCAE has also become an issue. Serum gastrin level has been reported to be useful in identifying groups at high-risk of developing gastric cancer. In this study, we investigated the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with early-stage GCAE who underwent ESD at our department. Furthermore, we determined the risk of metachronous GCAE after ESD and the correlation between serum gastrin level and metachronous GCAE.

Aims & Methods

We retrospectively analyzed a total of 300 lesions in 245 patients who underwent ESD for GCAE with known period after eradication at Hiroshima University Hospital between April 2010 and December 2019 and examined their clinicopathology. We divided 220 lesions in 194 patients with initial GCAE who had no history of gastric endoscopic resection before successful eradication into the " metachronous gastric cancer (MGC) groups " and " no metachronous gastric cancer (NGC) groups ". Then, we examined the clinicopathological characteristics of metachronous gastric cancer cases. We classified 74 lesions in 63 patients of male and differentiated type cancers who have not been using PPIs into two groups: 37 lesions in 32 patients with gastrin level of less than 80 pg/ml and 37 lesions in 31 patients with gastrin level higher than 80 pg/ml.

Results

At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 16 patients (8.2%) developed metachronous gastric cancers. Males were more predominant in the MGC group than in the NGC group (male / female; 16/0 vs. 223/74，p=0.02), which included increased cases of severe atrophy of the background gastric mucosa (mild to moderate / severe; 3/13 vs. 94/84, p=0.01), more lesions in the U and M regions of stomach (U･M / L; 19/4 vs 121/76, p=0.05), and a higher proportion of synchronous multiple lesions (synchronous tumor/ no synchronous tumor; 11/12 vs. 160/37, p=0.01). The relationship between gastrin levels and metachronous gastric cancer was examined, revealing that gastrin levels were higher in the MGC group. The group with a gastrin level of 80 pg/ml or higher had a significantly higher incidence of metachronous lesions than the group with that of less than 80 pg/ml (OR 6.88; 95% CI, 1.61–29.3; p=0.01).

Conclusion

These results that male patient with severe atrophy, the rates of localization to the U and M regions of stomach and the incidence of synchronous multiple lesions before ESD indicate should be noted and surveyed more strictly for metachronous gastric cancers developing after ESD of GCAE. Patients with gastrin 80 pg/ml or higher had increased risk of MGC, indicating that gastrin level may be a serological marker for MGC.

Introduction

Postoperative ileus, is one of the most common causes of prolonged hospital stays after abdominal surgery which cause from physiologic hypomotility of the gastrointestinal tract occurring immediately after abdominal surgery. Multi-modal approach to the resolution of postoperative ileus includes ERAS protocol such as opioid minimization, early ambulation, intake of prokinetic drug. Mosapride citrate (mosapride) is known to promote gastrointestinal motility. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of mosapride on postoperative ileus and postoperative gastrointestinal motility in patients undergoing elective open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Aims & Methods

The study was approved by ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital Mahidol University (Ref. Number COA.MURA2021/328,ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04905147). Forty-four colorectal cancer patients, undergoing open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Ramathibodi Hospital during July 2021-August 2022, were randomly assigned to a mosapride group or control group. The mosapride group received 15 mg of mosapride by enteric route with 50 ml of water three times a day, starting on postoperative day 1. The control group received 15 mg of placebo drug with 50 ml of water at the same time. Postoperative time to the first passage of flatus and the first bowel movement were evaluated by one investigator with triple blind study. Time to step diet, length of postoperative hospital stays, and adverse effects were also evaluated in secondary outcomes.

Results

All forty four patients were include, twenty-three in control group and twenty-one in mosapride group. There were no statistically significance differences between mean age and type of surgery (laparoscopic or open) in two group (P>0.05). Time to first bowel movement and time to passage of flatus after operation were significantly shorter in the mosapride group than the control group (26 vs 50 hours, P=0.004 and 40 vs 70 hours, P=0.003, respectively). Time to step diet (soft diet) was also shorter in the mosapride group (90 vs 132 hours, P=0.004). Time to defecate was less in mosapride group than control group (80 vs 120 hours, P <0.001). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in patients receiving mosapride (7 vs 10 days, P=0.004).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the efficacy of mosapride when administered to patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery. Mosapride significantly enhance recovery of gastrointestinal motility and shorter length of hospital stay with no significant adverse effects.

References

1. Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg 1999;230:251–9
2. Vather R, O'Grady G, Bissett IP, Dinning PG. Postoperative ileus: mechanisms and future directions for research. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;41(5):358-370.
3. Goldstein JL, Matuszewski KA, Delaney C, Senagore A, Chiao E, Shah M, et al. Inpatient economic burden of postoperative ileus associated with abdominal surgery in the United States. P AND T.2007;32(2):82.
4. Venara A, Neunlist M, Slim K, Barbieux J, Colas PA, Hamy A, et al. Postoperative ileus: Pathophysiology, incidence, and prevention. J Visc Surg 2016;153:439-46.
5. Luckey A, Livingston E, Taché Y. Mechanisms and Treatment of Postoperative Ileus. Arch Surg. 2003;138(2):206–214.
6. Georgiadis, G & Markantonis, Sophia & Triantafillidis, John. (2000). Prokinetic agents: Current aspects with focus on cisapride. Annals of Gastroenterology. 13.
7. Reynolds, J.C. & Putman, P.E. (1992) Prokinetic Agents, Gastroenterol Clin of North Am, Vol.21, pp.567-596.
8. Taniyama, K., Makimoto, N., Furuichi, A. et al. Functions of peripheral 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors, especially 5-hydroxytryptamine₄ receptor, in gastrointestinal motility. J Gastroenterol 35, 575–582 (2000).

Introduction

Rigid surgical instruments used for conventional laparoscopic surgery provide limited movement, and it is difficult to perform skillful surgery due to their long, jointless straight features. Articulated instruments could have the same advantages seen in robotic surgery, such as excellent control in smaller spaces, restoration of more intuitive and ergonomic movements, and the ability to overcome obstacles on a direct visual line. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical performance and clinical outcomes of patients following laparoscopic colorectal surgery with multijoint laparoscopic instruments, ArtiSential® (LivsMed, Seongnam, Korea), compared with those using conventional instruments.

Aims & Methods

Patients aged 19–80 years undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease between December 2021 and November 2022, were consecutively enrolled. The first 20 cases underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery, and the latter 50 cases underwent laparoscopic surgery using ArtiSential®. Unedited operative videos were submitted to the Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills (C-SATS) platform for evaluation using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), which is a validated tool for technical proficiency. Each of GOALS’ four domains (bimanual dexterity, depth perception, efficiency, and tissue handling) was scored on a Likert scale between 1 and 5, scoring anchor, with a total score ranging from 4 to 20. The learning curve analysis was performed using the cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) for GOALS grades (Registration number: KCT0006798).

Results

There was no significant difference between group with regards to type of operation, hospital stay, and 30-day postoperative complication. The GOALS’ grades were similar between the two groups (15.7 ± 0.7 vs. 15.9 ± 0.5, P = 0.190), but the scores in two domains (depth perception and tissue handling) were significantly higher in the ArtiSential® group (3.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.0 ± 0.2, P = 0.014 and 3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 4.1 ± 0.2, P = 0.048, respectively) compared with those in the conventional group. In addition, patients in the ArtiSential® group experienced a shorter operation time (122.3 ± 58.9 vs. 88.1 ± 35.1, P = 0.022) and less intraoperative blood loss (56.5 ± 69.9 vs. 29.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.002) than those in the conventional group. According to the CUSUM learning curve analysis, the first 10 cases using ArtiSential® were in the inexperienced phase, and the remaining 40 cases were in the experienced phase. The GOALS’ score in the experienced phase of ArtiSential® was improved compared with that in the conventional group (16.0 ± 0.5 vs. 15.7 ± 0.7, P = 0.037).

Conclusion

A plateau in the learning curve of laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed with an articulated instrument was observed in approximately 10 cases, and it can be expected that surgical proficiency in the experienced phase increases without deterioration of clinical outcome as compared to that in conventional surgery.

References

.

Disclosure

This research was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grantnumber: HI20C2092).

Introduction

The sex differences in the incidence of gastric cancer have been well known. However, uncertainty still exists in terms of prognosis of GC. For example, the US SEER data reports a significantly better prognosis in females than in males, but the prognosis is better in males than in females in Korean Central Cancer Registry data. Roles of molecular markers and gut microbiota as new prognostic factor are emerging recently, but few studies seem to try to reveal sex differences.

Aims & Methods

In this background, we aimed to analyze the differences in GC characteristics according to sex in Korean patients, mainly focused on survival. This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of fifteen thousand patients diagnosed with GC at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2023 were included. Clinicopathological characteristics, histologic types, survival rates with age- and stage-stratification, and associated risk factors were analyzed. Information related to death was cross-verified using medical record review and data from the National Statistical Office.

Results

The ratio of males and females was about 2:1, and there was no differences in stage between sexes. Female patients were significantly younger than males, had more gastric body cancers and tumors with diffuse type or poorly differentiated histology. Females underwent less endoscopic treatment and more surgery, and tumors with microsatellite instability was more common in females, while mutation of p53 was less common. In histological types according to Lauren classification, diffuse type histology was more common in younger patients in both males and females. The proportion of intestinal type GC increased with age, but the proportion increased rapidly in males while increased gradually in females. In Cox multivariate regression analysis for GC-related death, older age, proximal tumor location, diffuse type histology and advanced tumor stage were risk factors. In terms of survival, overall and GC-specific survival did not show significant differences between sexes in the analysis of the total population. However, sex differences in survival reversed with age, that younger females under 50 showed survival disadvantages, but the survival became similar in 50s, and older females over 60 showed survival advantages in both overall and GC-specific survival. Furthermore, in the stratification analysis according to the stage, there were no significant differences in stages I to III. But, stage IV female patients showed significant survival disadvantages. In subgroup analysis of stage IV patients, the differences between males and females in median survival were two months, and female patients were significantly younger and had a higher proportion of diffuse type GC than male patients, which shows aggressive feature and is related to poorer survival.

Conclusion

Significant differences in survival between sexes were observed with stratification analysis, although sex itself was not an independent prognostic factor. These age-dependent changes are thought to suggest the effect of sex hormones. These differences should be considered in clinical practice and later research in terms of tailored medicine.

Introduction

There are no established treatments for esophageal anastomotic stricture refractory to endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). Patients experience a reduced quality of life and suffer a financial burden after surgery until the strictures are relieved. New treatments for refractory anastomotic stricture are clearly needed. Local steroid injection is reported to improve the effects of EBD. In addition, EBD with local steroid injection is a current community standard treatment for patients with refractory anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy, although the effect is limited. A new endoscopic treatment for such strictures is radial incision and cutting (RIC), which improves strictures by cutting through scar tissue at the stricture site with an electrocautery knife and removing any fibrous tissue that may cause re-stricture. However, the evidence for its effectiveness is limited to retrospective studies and small case series.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phaseⅡ/Ⅲ trial was to investigate the safety and the superiority of RIC with steroid injection compared with EBD with steroid injection for patients with refractory anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer. This is the first randomized controlled trial in the world for patients with refractory esophageal anastomotic strictures. Patients with Dysphagia Score ≥2 (able to swallow only semisolid foods or liquids) who had strictures through which a conventional endoscope (diameter, 9.6–10.4 mm) did not pass despite three or more EBDs or bougienage dilations were eligible for this trial. The primary endpoint in the phase II part was proportion of hemorrhages, post-operative esophageal perforations, esophageal hemorrhages, pneumothorax, lung or mediastinum infections or other unexpected adverse events. Co-primary endpoints in the phase III part were re-stricture-free survival and number of dilations for 24 weeks after treatment. This study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031180177.

Results

From May 2014 to March 2022, 130 patients were enrolled from 32 institutions participating Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group and 65 patients each were randomized to EBD arm and RIC arm. The median number of dilations before registration was five in each arm. Dysphagia Score represented grade 2 (able to swallow semisolid foods) in 104 (80.0%) patients, grade 3 (able to swallow liquids only) in 25 (19.2%) patients, and grade 4 (unable to swallow liquids) in 1 (0.8%) patient in whole of study. Grade 3/4 pre-defined adverse events occurred in 1 (1.5%) patient in each arm. Median re-stricture-free survival in EBD arm was 10.6 weeks (95% CI: 6.9-20.1 weeks) and 8.7 weeks (95% CI: 7.1-10.9 weeks) in RIC arm (hazard ratio 1.22, 90% CI 0.85-1.74, one-sided p=0.82). The median number of dilations for 24 weeks after initial treatment was once (IQR: 0-2) in EBD arm and twice (IQR: 0-4) in RIC arm (one-sided p=0.99). The proportion of patients with anastomotic diameter >10 mm at 8 weeks after treatment was 27.7% (95% CI: 17.3-40.2%) in EBD arm and 24.6% (95% CI: 14.8-36.9%) in RIC arm.

Conclusion

RIC with steroid injection was not superior to repeated EBD with steroid injection for refractory anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. EBD combined with steroid injection remains the standard of care for refractory anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy.

Introduction

Stenosis after esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) has a high incidence of ranks, and muscular injury might be an important risk factor for esophageal stenosis.

Aims & Methods

Our study aimed to classify muscular injury degree and investigate its association with postoperative stenosis. This retrospective study included 1,033 patients with esophageal mucosal lesions treated by ESD between August 2015 and March 2021. Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed, and stenosis risk factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression. A novel muscular injury classification system was proposed and further used to investigate the association between the different degrees of muscular injury and postoperative stenosis. Finally, a scoring system was established for the prediction of muscular injury.

Results

Of 1,033 patients, 118 (11.4%) had esophageal stenosis. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the history of endoscopic esophageal treatment, circumferential range, and muscular injury were significant risk factors for esophageal stenosis. Patients with Type II muscular injuries tended to develop complex stenosis (n = 13, 36.1%, p < 0.05). Moreover, Type II muscular injuries were more likely to predispose patients to severe stenosis than Type I (73.3 and 92.3%, respectively). According to the scoring system for predicting muscular injury, patients with high scores (3-6) were more likely to suffer muscular injury. The score model presented good discriminatory power in the internal validation (AUC: 0.706; 95% CI: 0.645-0.767) and goodness-of-fit in the Hosmer-Lemeshow test (p = 0.865).

Conclusion

Muscular injury was an independent risk factor for esophageal stenosis. The scoring system demonstrated good performance in predicting muscular injury during ESD.

References

1. Yang D, Othman M, Draganov PV. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection For Barrett's Esophagus and Colorectal Neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:1019-28.
2. Chen M, Dang Y, Ding C, et al. Lesion size and circumferential range identified as independent risk factors for esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4065-71.
3. Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020;32:452-93.
4. Zhang BZ, Zhang Y, Wang YD, et al. Stent placement to prevent strictures after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2021;34.
5. Wu QN, Xu XY, Zhang XC, et al. Submucosal fibrosis in achalasia patients is a rare cause of aborted peroral endoscopic myotomy procedures. Endoscopy. 2017;49:736-44.
6. Nagami Y, Ominami M, Shiba M, et al. Prediction of esophageal stricture in patients given locoregional triamcinolone injections immediately after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2018;30:198-205.
7. Xu Y, Lin Z, Zhong S, et al. Muscular injury was identified the risk factor of post-operative stenosis after large area but non-circumferential esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2022:1-8.

Introduction

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is a common gastroenterological emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1-3]. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently recommended as the gold standard modality for both diagnosis and treatment [4]. As historically played a limited role in the diagnosis of acute NVUGIB, multidetector-row computed tomography angiography (MDCTA) is emerging as a promising tool in the diagnosis of NVUGIB, especially for severe cases [5-6]. However, to date, evidence concerning the role of MDCTA in the NVUGIB diagnosis is still lacking.

Aims & Methods

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic performance of emergent MDCTA performed prior to any diagnostic modality or following urgent upper endoscopy to identify the status, the site and the underlying etiology of severe NVUGIB. Institutional databases were reviewed in order to identify severe acute NVUGIB patients who were admitted to our bleeding unit and were referred for emergent MDCTA prior to any hemostatic treatment (<3 hours) or following (<3 hours) endoscopy, between December 2019 and October 2022. The study aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of MDCTA to detect the status, the site and the etiology of severe NVUGIB with endoscopy, digital subtraction angiography, surgery, pathology or a combination of them as reference standards.

Results

A total of 68 patients (38 men, median age 69 years [range 25–96]) were enrolled. The overall MDCTA sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to diagnose bleeding status were 77.8% (95% CI: 65.5-87.3), 40% (95% CI: 5.3-85.3), and 75% (95% CI: 63.0-84.7), respectively (Table 1). Finally, the overall MDCTA sensitivity to identify the bleeding site and the bleeding etiology were 92.4% (95% CI: 83.2-97.5) and 79% (95% CI: 66.8-88.3), respectively.

Table 1. The diagnostic performance of MDCTA in detecting bleeding status.

Conclusion

MDCTA seems to be a feasible and effective modality in detecting the site, the status and the etiology of severe acute NVUGIB. It may play a crucial role in the management of selected cases of NVUGIB, especially those clinically severe and/or secondary to rare and extraordinary rare sources, effectively guiding timing and type of treatment. However, further large prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of MDCTA in the diagnostic process of acute NVUGIB.

References

1. Wuerth BA, Rockey DC. Changing Epidemiology of Upper Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage in the Last Decade: A Nationwide Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 1286–1293.
2. Laine L, Yang H, Chang S-C, et al. Trends for incidence of hospitalization and death due to GI complications in the United States from 2001 to 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 1190–1195; quiz 1196.
3. Sanders DS, Perry MJ, Jones SGW, et al. Effectiveness of an upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage unit: a prospective analysis of 900 consecutive cases using the Rockall score as a method of risk standardisation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 16: 487–494.
4. Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 300–332.
5. Napoli A, Fleischmann D, Chan FP, et al. Computed tomography angiography: state-of-the-art imaging using multidetector-row technology. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2004; 28 Suppl 1: S32-45.
6. Wu L-M, Xu J-R, Yin Y, et al. Usefulness of CT angiography in diagnosing acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3957–3963.

Disclosure

No conflict of interest to declare.