Introduction

Early gastric cancer (EGC) accompanied by ulcers is considered to have a higher malignant potential. Although some EGCs are indications for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), their curability is determined by the risk of lymph node metastasis, which is assessed based on post-ESD pathological diagnosis including submucosal invasion depth and lymphovascular invasion. Endoscopic diagnosis is essential to predict the curability of EGC (R0 resection) before treatment, but the relationship between ulcerative lesions and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) on morphological changes of ulcerative EGCs and the relevance to clinical outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the database at Nagoya City University Hospital from January 2011 to July 2022 and identified 673 patients with gastric neoplasms who were resected with ESD. Among them, 448 EGCs were differentiated adenocarcinoma, of which 143 ulcerative EGCs were enrolled in this study. Ulcer changes were assessed at initial and follow-up endoscopies, and ulcerative EGCs were categorized into two groups: the improved group is defined as complete or partial healing of ulcers, or unchanged scars; the unimproved group is defined as no change or exacerbation of ulcers, or exacerbation of scars. The analysis was divided into two cohorts; those who received PPI or P-CAB before ESD (the PPI/P-CAB cohort) (n = 76) and those who did not (the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort) (n = 67).

Results

The improved and unimproved groups were 45 and 31 EGCs in the PPI/P-CAB cohort, and 37 and 30 EGCs in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort, respectively. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. In the PPI/P-CAB cohort, deep submucosal invasion rate, lymphovascular invasion rate and R0 resection rate were significantly higher in the unimproved group than in the improved group. On the other hand, no significant differences were found between the improved and unimproved groups in the non-PPI/P-CAB cohort. Especially, the significance of PPI/P-CAB administration was prominent in the ulcerative EGCs with open-type atrophy, and R0 resection rate of ulcerative EGCs with PPI/P-CAB was significantly higher in the improved group than in the unimproved group (improved vs. unimproved, 90.9% vs. 48.0%, p = 0.001). When improved ulcer with PPI/P-CAB administration is the indication of endoscopic resection in the ulcerative EGC with open-type atrophy, this strategy can lead to a high sensitivity (78.9%) and accuracy (76.3%) for the curability, which was higher than conventional endoscopic diagnosis alone (p = 0.021).

Conclusion

PPI or P-CAB administration may contribute to potential selection of ulcerative EGCs enabling endoscopic curative resection.

Clinical Case Summary

A 71-year-old female presented to the gastroenterology clinic following a two year history of dysphagia and sensation of food sticking in the oesophagus. Her dysphagia was limited to solid foods, and symptoms were not exacerbated by positional change. Pain was mostly localised around the sternal notch where she would have the sensation of a food bolus. Over the preceding 2 years, she had experienced about 7.5kg of weight loss with no constitutional symptoms of fevers or fatigue. Her past medical history included hypertension, dyslipidaemia, lower back pain, cold agglutinin disease, monoclonal B lymphocytosis and peripheral arterial disease. On examination, there were no signs of malnourishment or palpable lymph nodes in the axilla, neck or supraclavicular region. Her abdomen was soft and non-tender. Given largely non-illuminating blood results, an oesophageal-gastroduedonoscopy was performed. However, no findings were noted, specifically no oesophageal webs, Zenker diverticulum, gastroparesis, trachealisation of the oesophagus or corrosive pathology. H. pylori was also not isolated on histopathology. A barium swallow was then performed which showed extensive external compression of the proximal third of the oesophagus at the level of the arch of the aorta, most indicative of dysphagia lusoria (Fig 1). Computed tomography angiography (CTA) showed retroesophageal aberrant right subclavian artery bifurcating from the ascending aorta independent of a brachiocephalic artery and causing external oesophageal compression (Fig 2 & 3). Given this definitive diagnosis, the patient was then seen in clinic where management of dysphagia lusoria was explained. Despite ongoing symptoms, the patient decided to continue with conservative management and lifestyle modifications, which included eating smaller bites and increase in fluid intake. Although an extensive compression typically requires surgical intervention, our patient was stable at two-year follow-up (Fig 4 A-B).

References

Figure 1: Barium swallow examination showing extrinsic compression of the proximal third of the oesophagus at the level of the aortic arch (white arrow).
Figure 2: Axial view of computed tomography angiography (CTA) showing the posterior course of the retroesophageal aberrant right subclavian artery.
Figure 3: Axial view of computed tomography angiography (CTA) showing compression of oesophagus (white arrow) by the retroesophageal aberrant right subclavian artery (white arrowhead).
Figure 4: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) multi-planar reconstruction (MPR) showing the posterior course of the right subclavian artery (white arrow), crossing the mediastinum and compressing the oesophagus. A. coronal view B. Sagittal view

Disclosure

None.

Clinical Case Summary

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has transformed oncology management, achieving durable remissions. However, its widespread has also led to significant immune-mediated side effects, whose treatment is a challenge in today's medicine.
We present the case of a 59-year-old man diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer who started treatment with Nivolumab(anti-PD1). After 6 months, the patient was admitted for 3 weeks diarrhoea(4 liquid stools/day).
A colonoscopy was done, identifying severe pancolitis with oedema, erythema, nodularity and superficial ulcers. PA revealed diffuse non-specific colitis with CMV IHC -. Given the suspicion of immune-mediated colitis vs de novo IBD, treatment was started with iv GCC, with no improvement.
Given the contraindication of long-term use of anti-TNF in IBD patients with active malignancies, induction with IV Ustekinumab (anti-IL12/23) was decided. Ustekinumab 390 mg iv was given, after which the patient showed clinical improvement until complete resolution. He continued with Ustekinumab 90 mg/8 weeks. A follow-up colonoscopy showed pancolic scarring with pseudopolyps and no inflammatory activity. Given these findings Ustekinumab was discontinued after 1 year, with the patient remaining asymptomatic and without oncologic progression.
Immune-mediated colitis is a common side effect, being mild in most cases. When severe cases occur, CPI should be discontinued indefinitely, and high-dose iv GCC (up to 2 mg/kg) should be initiated. Up to one-third of GCC-treated patients don't respond and are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy with biologic drugs.
Although clinical guidelines recommend Infliximab/Vedolizumab for induction as 2º line treatment, the therapeutic decision should be individualized, as they are contraindicated in IBD patients with active malignancies. Therefore, in this context of complex differential diagnosis, Ustekinumab (with lower rate of oncological side effects) appears to be an effective option.

References

Photo 1: Initial colonoscopy: severe pancolitis with erythema, oedema, superficial ulcers and mucosal nodularity.
Photo 2: Abdominal CT: Diffuse thickening of the colon with increased uptake of the wall.
Photo 3: Follow-up colonoscopy: Chronic scar changes without signs of acute activity.

Introduction

The estimated global prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease (CeD) is 0.7% and sero-positive prevalence is 1.4%. Differences in definitions of CeD cases and at-risk populations, as well as underdiagnosis, may affect accurate estimation of the size of the diagnosed CeD population. In this study, we calculated the 10-year prevalence of diagnosed CeD in the USA using different CeD case definitions and at-risk populations.

Aims & Methods

A prevalence analysis of CeD cases was conducted using data collected from the Optum Clinformatics^® Data Mart, a US claims database. Prevalence calculations were based on two different definitions of CeD cases. Case definition 1 included any of the following: 1) International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/-10 diagnostic codes for CeD (≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient codes), 2) tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (tTG-IgA) positive serology or 3) biopsy-confirmed CeD (defined as esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] followed by an ICD diagnostic code for CeD used as proxy). Case definition 2 was defined as the first ever positive tTG-IgA test followed by biopsy-confirmed CeD. The prevalence of diagnosed CeD was estimated for each study year from 2013 to 2022. Prevalence estimations were age- and sex-standardized using 2022 US Census data.

Results

The total population (denominator) comprised ~81 million individuals; of whom, 110,140 had ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient diagnostic codes for CeD, 41,184 had ≥ 1 positive tTG-IgA test and 44,641 had biopsy-confirmed CeD. Among all individuals that were tested for tTG2-IgA, 0.85% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82, 0.89) were positive for CeD. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of diagnosed CeD according to case definition 1 modestly increased from 0.27% (95% CI: 0.27, 0.27) in 2013 to 0.35% (0.34, 0.35) in 2022. Over the same time period, the age- and sex-standardized prevalence of diagnosed CeD according to case definition 2 increased from 0.01% (0.01, 0.01) to 0.03% (0.03, 0.03), respectively.

Conclusion

The overall prevalence of diagnosed CeD in the USA modestly increased from 2013 to 2022. During this same time period, the proportion of patients who underwent an EGD after a positive tTG-IgA test steadily rose. Validation of the CeD case definitions used in this study will be important to enable these results to be replicated or refuted. Furthermore, a standardized and validated CeD case definition will support comparisons between studies and inform better clinical care/disease management.

Disclosure

MA, SM, NC, KG and DAL are employees of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and receive stock or stock options.