Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended as a treatment modality for early gastric cancer because it allows organ-sparing, curative en-bloc resection, and complete histopathological evaluation. Although many endoscopists are interested in learning how to perform ESD, the procedure requires a high level of expertise and is technically challenging, especially for less experienced endoscopists.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to investigate the single-operator learning curve and clinical outcomes of consecutive gastric ESDs. Eight hundred-eleven gastric ESDs were performed between March 2016 and December 2022. The learning curve for ESD was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to analyze the number of ESDs required for achieving proficiency.

Results

Of the enrolled patients, 310 (40.9%) cases were diagnosed with early gastric cancer. Overall en-bloc resection rates, R0 resection, and curability is 98.6%, 96.3%, and 93.7%, respectively. The median ESD speed was 18.1 cm2/h (IQR 12.2 – 25.3). ESD speed was slower than average in the upper third (9.9 cm2/h), presence of submucosal fibrosis (11.0 cm2/h) and the presence of subcutaneous fat (11.1 cm2/h), and faster than 20 cm2/h in the lower third (20.2 cm2/h) and lesion sized > 3 cm (23.6 cm2/h). According to the existing literature, the proficiency benchmark is defined as en-bloc resection >90%, R0 resection and >80%, and resection speed >9 cm2/h. However, since the first case satisfies all the existing benchmarks, we should establish a new definition of speed among benchmarks. In the changes of resection speed, we defined 16.5 cm2/h as a benchmark for ESD speed, which is the median value of the rapidly changing slope, and the CUSUM curve revealed that 156 cases were needed to achieve proficiency.

Conclusion

Due to the development of endoscopic equipment, a higher level of ESD proficiency benchmark is required. One hundred sixty-five cases were required to attain a higher technical level of successful performance in gastric ESD.

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely implemented in Asia. Experience from the western world is still limited, so the evidence on the description of a learning curve (LC) is sparse.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study is to evaluate the LC for ESD of gastric lesions using accepted proficiency benchmarks (PB).
Retrospective analysis with a prospectively maintained database of all patients undergoing ESD at a Western tertiary center from June 2016 to December 2022.
Inclusion criteria: ESD of gastric lesions performed by a single operator.
Primary endpoint: a LC to estimate the number of ESDs required to achieve PB (>90% for en bloc resection, >80% for histologic margin-negative (R0) resection and resection speeds (RS) >9cm2/hr), using the CUSUM method.

Results

Of 477 ESD performed, a total of 235 ESD met the inclusion criteria.
The en bloc resection rate was 100%. The R0 resection rate was 97% so no statistically significant differences were found, since it was always within PB.
Using the CUSUM method, the LC was divided into learning periods [Phase I - learning phase (cases 1-48); Phase II - adaptation phase (49-72), Phase III - consolidation (from case 73 on).
Globally, after reaching the level of 9cm2/h and after resection 73, the cumulative moving average remains above this speed for all following resections.
Several locations reach moving average proficiency levels at different number of interventions (antrum: from the beginning, body: 134th).

Conclusion

The PB regarding the en bloc and R0 resection were achieved from the beginning.
The PB regarding de RS was achieved from the beginning for the antrum.
The PB regarding de RS, globally, has a clinically significant first learning inflection at ESD number 49 and at ESD number 73 achieved sustained PB for RS.

Disclosure

There are no conflict of interest.

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly being used as a minimally invasive treatment option for early gastric cancer (EGC), with a very low risk of lymph node metastasis.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to evaluate the short-, medium-, and long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing gastric ESD at a tertiary hospital center. Patients undergoing ESD for superficial gastric lesions (SGLs) between September 2015 and January 2023 were prospectively evaluated. Demographic, clinical (comorbidities, medication, and relevant family history), endoscopic (location, size, and morphology of the lesion, resection scar evaluation), and pathological data (from the resected specimen, mapping biopsies, and scar biopsies) were collected.

Results

Since 2015, 195 patients with SGLs (mean age 70.7±9.8 years, 58.6% male) underwent ESD, with a median follow-up time of 28 months (interquartile range 13-54). Most patients presented with intestinal metaplasia only in the antrum (n=72) or in the antrum and corpus (n=60), and the most frequent location of SGLs was the antrum (64.6%). Resection was R0 in 95.4% of cases and curative in 87.7% (only one non-curative case had no free horizontal margins). During the follow-up period, 15 metachronous lesions and 8 recurrences were identified, on average 24.1±3.4 months after the index procedure. It should be noted that most recurrences (n=5) were identified at the 36- and 48-month reevaluation endoscopies. The complication rate was 3.6%, corresponding to 3 intra-procedural perforations (2 treated endoscopically) and 4 cases of significant bleeding after the procedure were registered.

Conclusion

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is safe and effective, with a high cure rate and low complication and recurrence rates. The identification of mostly late recurrences suggests the need to develop risk assessment tools that allow for defining personalized follow-up intervals.

Introduction

When esophageal cancer is diagnosed at an advanced stage, it requires a highly invasive treatment, and its prognosis is poor. Although the number of endoscopic examinations has been increasing globally, esophageal cancer is still difficult to diagnose at an early stage. The rapidly increasing number of endoscopic examinations performed over a short period might influence diagnostic performance. Accessing the association between calendar month and esophageal cancer detection rates might improve policy and guide institutional support.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to evaluate the association between the increased number of examinations over a certain period and esophageal cancer detection rates (EDR) among a large population in the Korean National Cancer Screening Program (KNCSP). We performed a retrospective population-based study using the KNCSP database for gastric cancer between 2015 and 2019. We included 28,032,590 Koreans aged ≥40 years. We assessed monthly EDR and performed a negative binomial regression model and least square mean evaluation to evaluate the association between the screening month and EDR.

Results

In total, 28,032,590 subjects underwent upper endoscopy, according to KNCSP. The monthly number of subjects who underwent examinations was the highest in December (n=4,819,606, 17.2%). EDR tended to decrease towards the end of the year, and EDR was the lowest in December 2015 – 2019 (0.06 – 0.08). In the multivariable logistic model, the association of calendar month with detected cancer remained after adjusting for other confounding factors (December 2015: odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43 – 0.79; P < .001; 2016: odds ratio, 0.51; 95%CI, 0.38 – 0.67; P < .001). The age group adjusted the calendar month, and the predicted detection rate significantly decreased at the end of the year compared with the beginning of the year in 2015, 2016, and 2017 respectively.

Conclusion

In the KNCSP, the workload of endoscopists increased excessively, with an increasing number of examinations towards the end of the year, as demonstrated by decreased EDR during this period.

Introduction

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the first-line treatment for superficial gastric lesions with a negligible or very low risk of lymph node metastasis. However, a permanent risk of developing metachronous lesions persists. We intend to analyze the risk factors associated with the development of metachronous lesions in a population of patients undergoing ESD.

Aims & Methods

Prospective cohort study conducted at a single centre, involving patients who underwent gastric ESD for lesions between 2017 and 2023, with a follow-up period of ≥ 6 months. Lesion characteristics were analyzed, including the rate of metachronous lesions, and logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with the development of metachronous lesions.

Results

Included 78 ESDs performed on gastric epithelial lesions (59% female), with a mean age of 70.3±7.9 years. Regarding family history of gastric adenocarcinoma, 17.9% of patients had a first-degree relative. Among the analyzed lesions: 42.3% measured between 0-20mm, 57.7% ≥ 20mm; 12.8% were sessile, 71.8% flat and 15.4% depressed; 19.2% were located in the cardia, fundus or body, 21.8% in the incisura angularis and 59% in the antrum. Regarding histological findings: 42.3% low-grade dysplasia, 30.8% high-grade dysplasia, 23.1% intramucosal adenocarcinoma and 3.8% adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion. Nine metachronous lesions (11.5%) were detected, with a median time of occurrence of 24 [13-32] months. In the analysis of risk factors, statistical significance was found for location outside the antrum (21.6% vs. 1.9%; p=0.002) and the presence of adenocarcinoma (23.8% vs. 7%; p=0.039), but not for size ≥20mm (13.7% vs. 5.1%; p=0.178) or ulceration of the lesion (9.1% vs. 10.1%; p=0.915). Logistic regression analysis revealed that only location outside the antrum had a significant risk for the development of metachronous lesions (OR 13.4; 95% CI: 1.4-127.1).

Conclusion

Given the permanent risk of developing metachronous lesions, the identification of associated risk factors is important as it may eventually allow for the adaptation of surveillance programs.