Introduction
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become a common treatment method for superficial esophageal cancer, allowing complete resection and accurate postoperative pathological evaluation, especially for relatively larger lesions1, 2. However, resection of larger lesions, especially circumferential lesions, can be time-consuming and challenging. The resected tissue can obstruct the esophageal lumen, leading to limited working space and poor visibility, thereby increasing the risk of adverse events such as perforation and muscular injury3. In recent years, several auxiliary traction techniques have been emerged, including positional adjustment traction, hemostatic clip elastic band traction, snare traction, line traction, and magnet anchor traction, which significantly improve the visibility of the submucosal layer during dissection and enhance the efficiency of the procedure 4-5. Among these techniques, snare traction allows bidirectional traction through "push and pull" maneuvers, offering flexibility and practicality in clinical practice. However, due to the difficulty and limited cases of circumferential esophageal ESD, there is currently no published literature demonstrating the advantages of snare traction-assisted ESD over traditional ESD techniques.
Aims & Methods
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction assisted ESD for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group n=35) and the control group (C-ESD, group n=33).
Results
There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P=0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P=0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28±0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22±0.11cm2/min, P=0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate，bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (P>0.05).
Conclusion
Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.
References
1 Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020; 32: 452-93.
2 Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, Fukami N. Aga institute clinical practice update: Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the united states. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 17: 16-25.e1.
3 Zhang W, Zhai Y, Chai N et al. Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: Efficacy and safety study to guide future practice. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32: 2814-21.
4 Fukami N. What we want for esd is a second hand! Traction method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013; 78: 274-6.
5 Jin P, Yu Y, Fu KI, Yu DL, Li AQ, Sheng JQ. A new traction method with use of the snare as a "second hand" during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2015; 47 Suppl 1 UCTN: E286-7.
