Introduction

Resolution of pain, fatigue and other symptoms are key treatment goals for many patients (pts) with Crohn’s disease (CD);^1,2 however, time to symptomatic improvement in pts treated with vedolizumab (VDZ) has not been formally evaluated.

Aims & Methods

VOICE (NCT06249555) is a prospective, observational study in pts with CD aged ≥18 years initiating VDZ or anti-IL-23 antagonist treatment (tx) per product labelling as part of standard of care, with the main objective to explore the time course of response to VDZ as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domain Short Form (SF) scores. Inclusion criteria include baseline PROMIS Pain Interference (PI)-SF T-score ≥55 (0.5 SD above general population). We enrolled pts via Takeda pt support program in Canada, with additional pts enrolled at US and Canada sites. Planned sample size is 300 pts (VDZ, 200; anti-IL-23 antagonist [reference group not for formal comparison], 100); planned follow-up is 52 weeks (wks), with PROMIS PI data reported weekly for the first 14 wks. The primary endpoint is time to the first meaningful clinical improvement in PROMIS PI-SF T-score, defined as ≥2-point decrease in PROMIS PI-SF T-score from baseline. We also collect data on improvement in 7 PROMIS domains with clinical improvement defined as 5-point (0.5 SD)³ change in T-score from baseline, Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ; including SIBDQ improvement [≥9 point increase from baseline] and SIBDQ remission [score of ≥60]) and safety. Here, we report the results from pts with ≥1 VDZ dose and ≥1 post-baseline PI assessment included in the interim analysis (IA; prespecified to occur after 50 pts from VDZ group completed or discontinued before the wk 14 assessment to provide an early evaluation of tx response and safety).

Results

Overall, 64 pts with ≥1 VDZ dose and ≥1 post-baseline PROMIS PI assessment (mean±SD age, 43.1±17.0 years, 35.9% male, 92.2% White) were included in the IA. Disease duration (mean±SD) was 6.4±12.1 years; 84.4% of pts were anti-TNF-naïve. Data collection is ongoing for 57 pts (49 with and 8 without completed wk 14 PROMIS PI questionnaire); 7 pts discontinued from the study. The median time to achieve the first ≥2_-point decrease in PROMIS PI-SF T-score (in n=56 pts) was 12 days (95% CI, 6-13). Baseline PROMIS domain scores indicated notable impairment; by wk 14, improvements in mean PROMIS scores from baseline were observed in all 7 measured domains, with ≥5-point improvements in 4/7 domains (Table). At wk 14, 37.5% (24/64) and 7.8% (5/64) pts achieved SIBDQ improvement and remission, respectively. One pt had serious adverse events of appendicitis and diverticulitis, and another pt had a fatal event; none of these were related to VDZ tx.

Table. Summary of PROMIS domain T-scores

Conclusion

The IA results through wk 14 show an early improvement across multiple symptom domains and quality of life in pts with CD starting VDZ tx. Time to first ≥2-point decrease in PROMIS PI-SF T-score was short, with a benefit observed after 12 days from VDZ initiation. Study recruitment and data collection are ongoing.

References

1. Keefer L, et al. Gastroenterology. 2022;162(5):1439-1451.
2. Kitchen H, et al. Crohns Colitis 360. 2020;2(2):otaa033
3. Cella D, et al. Value Health. 2019;22(5):537-544.
4. Shaw BE, et al. Cancer. 2018;124(4):841-849.

Disclosure

This study was sponsored by Alimentiv, Inc.
V. Jairath reports consulting/advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Anaptyis Bio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Avoro Capital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Endpoint Health, Enthera, Ensho, Ferring, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilde Healthcare, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Gilead, Innomar, JAMP, Janssen, Merck, Metacrine, Mylan, MRM Health, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist, Prometheus Biosciences, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Roivant, Sandoz, Second Genome, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, TD Securities, Teva, Topivert, Ventyx, Vividion; speaker’s fees from, Abbvie, Ferring, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen Pfizer Shire, Takeda, Tillotts and Fresenius Kabi.
M. Long reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roivant, Syneos Health and Takeda; and research support from Lilly, Pfizer and Takeda.
M.D. Kappelman reports being a consultant to Eli Lilly and Takeda.
G. Radulescu and N. Li are employees of Alimentiv.
J.J. Wu, I. Romo Bautista, A. Insogna and C. Agboton are employees of Takeda and hold stock and/or share options in Takeda.
N. Narula has received advisory board/consulting honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Ferring, Fresinius Kabi, Innomar Strategies, Iterative Health, Janssen, Novartis, Organon, Pfizer, Sandoz and Takeda.

Introduction

The use of biologics has become an increasingly common treatment option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, data on maternal and fetal exposure to ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) remain scarce.

Aims & Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety of UST and VDZ in pregnant women with IBD. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in March 2025. The inclusion criteria were randomized and non-randomized studies comparing UST and VDZ for the treatment of IBD in pregnant patients and evaluating at least one predefined outcome of interest. Primary outcomes were spontaneous abortion and preterm delivery. Secondary outcomes included live birth, low birth weight, serious infections, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and malignancies. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio, applying a random-effects model to calculate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) for binary outcomes.

Results

This systematic review included six studies. Median maternal age ranged from 30 to 33 years, with similar distributions between groups. The average disease duration ranged from 8 to 14 years. Crohn’s disease was more prevalent in the ustekinumab group, while ulcerative colitis was more common in the vedolizumab group. No statistically significant differences were observed in spontaneous abortion (RR 1.66; 95% CI 0.89–3.10), preterm delivery (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31–1.16), live birth (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90–1.05), low birth weight (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.31–1.40), serious infections (RR 1.34; 95% CI 0.39–4.66), NICU admission (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.56–1.85), or malignancies (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.67–2.32) between UST and VDZ treatments.

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed across the outcomes analyzed when comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab for the treatment of pregnant patients with IBD.

Introduction

Tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors block signaling downstream of multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, and may have an improved safety profile relative to Janus kinase inhibitors. Phase 2 studies of the highly selective and potent TYK2 inhibitor zasocitinib in Crohn’s disease (CD; NCT06233461) and ulcerative colitis (UC; NCT06254950) are ongoing.^1,2 Here, we describe the design of a combined open-label extension trial (NCT06764615), which will include patients from both parent trials who are responsive to treatment.

Aims & Methods

Patients are eligible for the phase 2 parent studies in CD and UC if they are aged 18–75 years with moderately to severely active disease, and have inadequate or loss of response to, or intolerance of, ≥ 1 standard or advanced therapy. Patients who have failed treatment with ≥ 3 classes of advanced therapy are excluded. Patients are randomized to one of three (CD) or two (UC) doses of zasocitinib, or placebo, for a 12-week double-blind induction phase followed by a 40-week sponsor-open (CD) or open-label (UC) maintenance period. At the end of the parent trials, patients will be eligible for the combined open-label extension if they are clinical (CD) or symptomatic (UC) responders at Week 52, defined as: (1) CD: a ≥ 30% decrease in average daily very soft or liquid stools and/or a ≥ 30% decrease in average daily abdominal pain from baseline; and (2) UC: a ≥ 1-point and ≥ 30% decrease from baseline in partial modified Mayo score, and a ≥ 1-point decrease from baseline in rectal bleeding (RB) subscore or achievement of an absolute RB subscore of ≤ 1. All enrolled patients will receive the same dose of open-label, oral, once-daily zasocitinib for a maximum of 108 weeks, with study visits every 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week safety follow-up period. Data analysis will be descriptive, with no formal statistical comparisons performed.

Results

The primary objective of the study is to determine long-term safety and tolerability, assessed through the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events or adverse events of special interest. Secondary endpoints will assess the long-term efficacy of zasocitinib, including clinical, symptomatic, or endoscopic response or remission by visit or at Weeks 48 and 108, according to indication, and effects on patient-reported outcomes, including fatigue, bowel urgency, abdominal pain, and disease-specific health-related quality of life.

Conclusion

This open-label extension trial will provide data on the long-term safety of zasocitinib, as well as durability of treatment response among patients with CD or UC who experience treatment benefit in the phase 2 parent studies.

References

1. Jairath V et al. UEG Journal 2024;12(S8):1033.
2. Peyrin-Biroulet L et al. UEG Journal 2024;12(S8):1041.

Disclosure

GP reports receiving personal payments, honoraria, or speaker fees from AbbVie, Allergan, BMS, Celltrion, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, Sorriso, Takeda, and Tillotts, travel grants or fellowships from AbbVie, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, Takeda, and Tillotts, and is a Director and shareholder in Ampersand Health. SGR, LZ, VAN, LA, FN, TF, LS, and NS are employees and shareholders of Takeda.

Introduction

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) exhibit distinct performance characteristics versus monoclonal antibody (mABs) biological agents in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). There is a lack of direct comparative effectiveness data of JAKi small molecules versus mABs in the real world.

Aims & Methods

In the absence of direct head-to-head comparisons, we determined the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) versus vedolizumab and tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) mABs in advanced therapy (AT)-naïve and AT-exposed real-world UC subjects from a population-based prospective registry.

The Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC5) registry collected AT prescribing data for the entire Australian population up until Dec 2021. In Australia, all advanced therapies for IBD are prescribed without a hierarchical order in subjects with moderate-severe UC refractory to conventional therapies, irrespective of occupation and insurance status. Treatment is provided indefinitely in those that enter into clinical remission. Non-persistence was defined as failure to continue AT prescriptions for >6-months. Propensity score matching (PSM) statistically controlled for baseline selection biases. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for AT persistence and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P<0.05 was deemed statistically significant (SPSS, USA).

Results

A total of 9,671 consecutive UC patients were recruited (53% male, 23,348 patient-years of follow up). The cohort comprised 14,772 treatment lines: 6,044 infliximab (IFX), 1,981 adalimumab (ADA), 5,467 vedolizumab (VED), 750 golimumab (GOL) and 530 tofacitinib (TOF). TOF exhibited superior persistence versus IFX (HR: 1.88, 95%CI: 1.34-2.63, P<0.001), ADA (HR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.49-2.94, P<0.001) and GOL (HR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.55-3.11, P<0.001) but not versus VED (HR: 1.28, 95%CI: 0.92-1.80, P=0.14). Following PSM, TOF was not significantly higher in persistence compared to mABs among AT-naïve subjects (all P>0.05). However, TOF showed superior persistence compared to all mABs among AT-exposed (all P<0.001). The persistence of TOF (P=0.77) did not significantly decline moving from AT-naive- to AT-exposed treatment status, unlike for TNFi (-8 months) and VED (-19 months, both P<0.001). PSM-multivariate Cox regression showed predictors of higher persistence to be use of TOF, AT-naïve status, use of immunomodulator. Rankings of persistence of ATs are presented for AT-naïve- and AT-exposed UC subjects (Table).

Conclusion

This is the first real-world study comparing treatment effectiveness using a national universal insurance persistence dataset. It found that tofacitinib had significantly greater persistence than biological agents in patients with ulcerative colitis who had previously received advanced therapy. Unlike monoclonal antibodies, tofacitinib did not show a decline in persistence after exposure to advanced therapy. Given these findings, JAK inhibitors like tofacitinib should be strongly considered for patients switching advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis.

Disclosure

RL advisory board: AbbVie, Aspen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Glutagen, Hospira, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda; research grants: Joanna Tiddy USYD, McCusker Charitable Foundation, Celltrion, Shire, Janssen, Takeda, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, NHMRC, Gutsy Group, Pfizer, MRFF

Introduction

Mitochondrial dynamics refers to coordinated cycles of mitochondrial fission and fusion that allow mitochondrial networks to re-model their shape, distribution and size. These transient processes are involved in multiple cellular functions and the perturbation of mitochondrial dynamics is reported in models of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). The role of Dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), a critical GTPase for mitochondrial fission, remains understudied in an intestinal disease context.

Aims & Methods

This research aims to examine how mitochondrial networks are altered in mouse and cell culture-based models of intestinal injury and IBD. Cell culture-based assays were performed with the MODE-K intestinal epithelial cell line to explore the role of mitochondrial dynamics in vitro. A Drp1-specific knockout (Drp1 KO MODE-K) was generated using CRISPR-based approaches . Mitochondrial fission was also targeted pharmacologically using P110 and Mdivi-1 fission inhibitors. Intestinal tissue from IBD-related mouse models including TNF^ΔARE (ileitis), Il10^-/- (colitis), Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC (metabolic injury) and Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- (metabolic injury/colitis) mice were used for histological analyses and ex vivo organoid cultures. TOM20 was used to stain mitochondrial networks. A novel IBD mouse model with a Drp1 intestinal epithelial cell specific knockout Drp1 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- was generated to assess the role of Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission in vivo.

Results

TOM20 immunofluorescence staining of mouse tissue sections show that mitochondrial morphology, localisation and mass are diverse under different inflammation and injury-based conditions. The colitis susceptible Il10^-/- mice typically show more fragmented, rounder mitochondria with a decrease in mitochondrial mass compared to Il10^+/+ controls. Hsp60^Δ/ΔIEC mice have a conditional deletion of the Heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) in the epithelium which results in metabolic injury, a transient tissue injury with irregular tissue architecture and altered mitochondrial metabolism. This Hsp60 loss further accelerates Il10^-/- pathology in Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- mice. At day 4 (D4) post tamoxifen treatment, before the onset of crypt loss, Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- mice show an increase in a phosphorylated form of Drp1 (pDrp1^Ser616) indicating increased mitochondrial fission. At day 8 (D8), during peak metabolic injury, both Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^+/+ and Hsp60 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- mice show a significant increase in mitochondrial mass compared to controls. Furthermore, co-stimulation of ex vivo wild-type organoids with the inflammatory cytokine Tnf and the Drp1-specific inhibitor P110 increases mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR) markers at the mRNA level, highlighting the interplay between mitochondrial dynamics and stress responses in injury-based inflammatory conditions. Drp1 KO MODE-K cells also show a noticeable increase in dense, peri-nuclear TOM20 staining when compared to control cells. In extension, the novel Drp1 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^-/- model has proved viable and preliminary data indicates that Drp1 ^Δ/ΔIEC;Il10^+/+ mice have reduced body weights compared to Drp1 ^flox/flox;Il10^+/+ mice. Further characterisation will provide insight into the interplay between Drp1, mitochondrial dynamics and intestinal disease development.

Conclusion

Mitochondrial networks are altered in response to different types of inflammation or injury in models of IBD. Regulated mitochondrial fission and fusion is important for intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis and Drp1 loss or inhibition affects intestinal epithelial cell responses.

Introduction

Linked Color Imaging (LCI) is an endoscopic system that emphasizes the red mucosal color to identify subtle areas of inflammation. Endoscopic imaging, including LCI classification and LCI index, has been reported as a predictor of histological healing (HH) in ulcerative colitis (UC). Endoscopic changes (LCI classification, LCI index) in vedolizumab treatment have not been reported to date.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to evaluate endoscopic remission and HH using LCI endoscopy at week 22 of vedolizumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe UC. This was a phase 4, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, prospective study involving 12 patients with moderately to severely active UC receiving vedolizumab. Vedolizumab was administered for 54 weeks. Endoscopy and mucosal sampling from most inflamed sites or the patient’s rectum when all sites had equal endoscopic severity were performed at weeks 0, 22, and 54 to assess the LCI index, LCI classification, Mayo endoscopic score (MES), Nancy score (If MES = 0, it was collected from the rectum). This study was also evaluated a variety of possible factors such as fecal calprotectin, serum vedolizumab concentration and mucosal gene expression associated with changes induced by vedolizumab. LCI index was numerically evaluated for the redness of a 40-pixel square area within the LCI image. LCI classification was defined by assigning one of the three categories (A, no redness; B, redness with visible vessels; C, intense redness without visible vessels). HH was defined as a Nancy score ≤1, and clinical outcomes were compared between HH and non-HH groups. Correlation coefficients between LCI endoscopy and other clinical markers (MES, Nancy score, fecal calprotectin and vedolizumab concentration) were analyzed at weeks 0, 22, and 54. Gene expression analysis was performed on 374 genes, comparing HH (n=8) vs. non-HH (n=3) and LCI classification A (n=5) vs. LCI classification B and C (n=6) at week 22. Biomarkers common to HH and LCI-A were identified as LCI-Deep remission (L-DR) markers.
The study was registered with the Japan Clinical Trial Registry (Identifier: UMIN000042855).

Results

At week 22, 66.7% (8/12) achieved histological healing (HH), while 50.0% (6/12) met LCI classification A criteria. The LCI index change from baseline showed a statistically significant difference between HH and non-HH (week 22: p=0.021; week 54: p=0.011).Correlation analysis demonstrated that LCI index was significantly associated with: MES (week 22: ρ=0.729, week 54: ρ=0.789), Nancy score (week 22: ρ=0.695, week 54: ρ=0.725), fecal calprotectin (week 22: ρ=0.555, week 54: ρ=0.783), vedolizumab concentration (week 22: ρ=0.758, week 54: ρ=-0.418). Gene expression analysis identified IL1B, CXCL11, CD38, CSF2RB, PTPN6, CD86, NFKB2, IFNAR2, STAT1, GNAI2, FES and IRF9 as L-DR markers, as they were commonly associated with both HH and LCI classification A. There are genes involved in NF-κB signaling pathway and JAK-STAT signaling pathway associated with UC. HH and LCI endoscopy have been found to correlate well but do not perfectly align.
In this study, we proposed a definition of L-DR, which encompasses both HH and LCI endoscopic remission.

Conclusion

This study introduces L-DR as a novel definition for combined endoscopic (LCI-A) and HH (Nancy score ≤1) in UC patients receiving vedolizumab. Additionally, we identified candidate L-DR biomarkers that may serve as potential indicators of deep remission.

Disclosure

Tomohisa Takagi, Male, (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan):
Scholarship funds from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation,
Collaborative research fund from PreMedica Inc.,
Lecture fees by Mochida Pharma. Co., Ltd., Yanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., EA Pharma. Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Towa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Pfizer Japan Inc.
Kazuhiko Uchiyama, Male, ( Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan):
Collaboration research fund from Janssen Pharma. K.K.
Lecture fee by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. Co. Ltd. and Janssen Pharma. K.K.
Yuji Naito, Male, (Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan):
Scholarship funds from Taiyo Kagaku Co. Ltd., Morinaga Co. Ltd., Miyarisan Pharma Co. Ltd, Morishita-Jintan Co. Ltd., Fujikko Co. Ltd., Mizkan Co. Ltd., Mykinso Co. Ltd.
Collaboration research fund from Takeda Pharma. Co. Ltd. and Taiyo Kagaku Co., Ltd.
Lecture fees by Takeda Pharma. Co. Ltd., Mochida Pharma. Co. Ltd., Biofermin. Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharma. Co. Ltd., and Miyarisan Pharma. Co. Ltd.