Introduction

Biliary stenting by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common palliative endoscopic procedure for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction or for patients unfit for surgery.

Aims & Methods

We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study in 3 centres in Portugal, involving patients submitted to first palliative biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction by ERCP, between 2015 and 2022. This study aimed to identify predictive factors of 90-day mortality after endobiliary drainage and propose a predictive model. We have analysed data from 217 patients. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.29.

Results

In our cohort, 51,2% (N=111) of patients were female and the mean age was 74 years. 52,5% (N=114) had stage IV disease and in 88% (N=191) the biliary obstruction resulted from primary tumour involvement. The most frequent tumour was primary pancreatic cancer (53,5%, N=116), followed by cholangiocarcinoma (26,7%, N=58). Metallic stents were used in 53,9% (N=117) of the patients, mainly with fully uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (66,7%, N=78). In the multivariate regression model, the independent predictors for 90-day mortality after first ERCP-guided stent placement were primary tumour size <3 cm (p = 0,014; OR 0,394; 95% CI, 0,187-0,830), stage IV malignant disease (p = 0,005; OR 3,776; 95% CI, 1,507-9,465), intrahepatic biliary obstruction (p = 0,004; OR 3,727; 95% CI, 1,518-9,150) and palliative chemotherapy after ERCP biliary drainage (p <0,0001; OR 0,44; 95% CI, 0,015-0,132). Using these variables, we developed a prediction model for the risk of mortality within 90 days after biliary drainage (Hosmer-Lemeshow X² = 2,907, p = 0,893) with R² of 44,1% in our cohort. The AUROC for our prediction model was 0,833 (p <0,0001; 95% CI, 0,774-0,892). By the Youden’s J statistic, the optimal cut-off value for was 0,4, with a sensitivity of 73,9% and specificity of 76,3%. Patients with a score < 0,2 had a low likelihood of death, whereas a score ≥ 0,9 had a high likelihood of death.

Conclusion

The present study was able to identify statistically significant predictive factors of 90-day mortality after ERCP-guided biliary stenting in unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, which may help to stratify the risk of death within 90 days post-stent placement. Since all these predictive factors can be determined before ERCP, this risk stratification could help in the definition of the proper palliative strategy for each patient.

References

Termsinsuk, P., Charatcharoenwitthaya, P., & Pausawasdi, N. (2022). Development and validation of a 90-day mortality prediction model following endobiliary drainage in patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. Frontiers in oncology, 12, 922386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.922386;
Sripongpun, P., Attasaranya, S., Chamroonkul, N., Sookpaisal, T., Khow-Ean, U., Siripun, A., Kongkamol, C., Piratvisuth, T., & Ovartlarnporn, B. (2018). Simple Clinical Score to Predict 24-Week Survival Times in Patients with Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction as a Tool for Selecting Palliative Metallic or Plastic Stents. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 49(2), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-017-9918-9;
Afshar, M., Khanom, K., Ma, Y. T., & Punia, P. (2014). Biliary stenting in advanced malignancy: an analysis of predictive factors for survival. Cancer management and research, 6, 475–479. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S71111.

Introduction

The randomized controlled OPTIC trial reported that optimised mercaptopurine treatment was superior to placebo in achieving clinical, endoscopic and histological outcomes at one year in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients failing 5-aminosalicylates after receiving induction treatment with corticosteroids.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-guided mercaptopurine treatment in UC. Data were collected during the OPTIC trial to perform a health economic evaluation for mercaptopurine treatment versus placebo in UC patients. The economic evaluation was performed from a health care and societal perspective using a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis with a time horizon of one year. Volumes and costs of in-hospital care, out-of-hospital care, out-of-pocket expenses and productivity loss were assessed. Main outcomes were the costs per patient who achieved combined corticosteroid-free clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at one year and the costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

Results

In total, 59 patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 29) and control (n = 30) group. Patients on mercaptopurine treatment showed a non-significant gain in QALYs of 0.047 (-0.024 to 0.117) (P=0.184) corrected for baseline health utility. Non-significant differences in costs were €63 (-€1267 to €1434; P=0.927) in favour of placebo from a health care perspective and -€742 (-€3683 to €2016; P=0.644) in favour of mercaptopurine from a societal perspective, including patients’ out-of-pocket expenses and employers’ productivity loss. The probability of optimised mercaptopurine treatment being cost-effective was 0.80 at a willingness to pay per additional QALY of €20,000.

Conclusion

Optimised mercaptopurine treatment in UC patients failing 5-aminosalicylates is a cost-effective strategy from a societal perspective.

References

1. de Boer NKH, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Jharap B, et al. Thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease: new findings and perspectives. J Crohns Colitis 2018;12:610–20.
2. Löwenberg, M., Volkers, A., van Gennep, S., Mookhoek, A., Montazeri, N., Clasquin, E., Duijvestein, M., van Bodegraven, A., Rietdijk, S., Jansen, J., van Asseldonk, D., van der Zanden, E., Dijkgraaf, M., West, R., de Boer, N., & D'Haens, G. (2023). Mercaptopurine for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, 17(7), 1055–1065.

Disclosure

NA

Introduction

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS), in particular bowel wall thickness (BWT), is accurate in determining endoscopic disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Reduction of BWT six weeks into advanced anti-inflammatory treatment predicted endoscopic response and clinical remission. Filgotinib is a preferential JAK1-inhibitor effective in UC. Currently, there is no data on IUS-kinetics or early prediction of treatment response with filgotinib.

Aims & Methods

In this study, we aimed to identify early IUS predictors of treatment response to filgotinib in patients with moderate to severe UC. This prospective observational study included UC patients with active endoscopic disease (i.e. endoscopic MAYO score (EMS) ≥2) starting with filgotinib. Clinical scores (UCEIS, Lichtiger), biochemical parameters and IUS parameters of the sigmoid were assessed at baseline, after 4 weeks (W4) and at the time of the second endoscopy (between W8 and W23). Endoscopic remission (i.e. EMS=0), endoscopic response (i.e. decrease in EMS ≥1 compared to baseline) and clinical remission (SCCAI ≤2 or Lichtiger score ≤3) were assessed. IUS response (i.e. defined as a reduction in BWT of >25% or >2.0 mm, or >1.0 mm and one colour Doppler signal) was assessed at week 4. All normally distributed data were reported in mean ± standard deviation [SD] and non-normally distributed in median and interquartile range [IQR]. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare continuous non-parametric variables, chi square tests for dichotomous variables.

Results

A total of 20 patients were included. 13 patients underwent second endoscopy, 2 refused a follow-up endoscopy and 5 patients were still in follow-up. At baseline, 9 patients (9/20, 45%) had received ≥2 biologicals, 16 patients (16/20, 80%) had previous anti-TNF exposure, and no patients were exposed to other JAK-inhibitors. 8 patients (8/20, 40%) had severe endoscopic disease at baseline (i.e. EMS=3). 5 patients (5/13, 38%) were endoscopic responders at W8-23, and no patient reached endoscopic remission. BWT was significantly lower in the sigmoid colon from W4 onwards for patients reaching endoscopic response (Table 1). Decrease in BWT compared to baseline was statistically greater in endoscopic responders from W4 onwards (Table 1). IUS response was seen at W4 in 6 patients, of which 5 were endoscopic responders (83%, p=0.002). Decrease in BWT from W4 onwards was statistically greater in patients reaching clinical remission at W8-23 (-45% (-55% to -36.6%) vs -9% (-25% to +8%), p=0.014).

Conclusion

On IUS, UC patients treated with filgotinib have significantly lower BWT from week 4 onwards compared to baseline, which could predict endoscopic response.

Disclosure

MP received speakers fees from Janssen and Tillotts
CT received speakers fees from Tillotts
FV received speaker or honoraria fees from AbbVie, Janssen and Tillotts
ML received consultancy/lecturefees from Abbvie, Bristol Myers Squibb , Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Pfizer, Takeda and Tillotts.
RG Received speakers fee from Janssen and Tillotts
GD has served as a consultant and/or received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion Healthcare, Cytoki Pharma, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Galapagos, Glaxo SmithKline, Gossamer Bio, Immunic, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kaleido, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonist Therapeutics, Takeda, Tillotts, Ventyx Biosciences.
KG has received grants from Pfizer Inc, Celltrion and Galapagos; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Galapagos, Gilead, Immunic Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc., Samsung Bioepis and Takeda and speaker’s honoraria from Abbvie, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda and Tillotts.

Clinical Case Summary

We present a case of a 37-year-old woman with ulcerative pancolitis (diagnosis in 2004), under therapy with salicylates until 2016. At that time, the patient had a flare up with need of corticosteroid therapy and started infliximab and azhatioprine. In 2018, she was in deep remission, so azathioprine was stopped. In may 2022, the patient developed intermittent fever and palpable purpura on lower limbs. It was evaluated by Dermatology who, after extensive negative ethiological study and partial response to corticosteroids, decided to perform a skin biopsy - leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Subsequently, she started intermittent episodes of hematuria, fatigue and arthralgias. Laboratory tests showed an increase in creatinine twice above the patient's baseline value, large amounts of red blood cells in the urinary sediment and moderate (subnephrotic) proteinuria. From the additional study, only an immunoglobulin A (IgA) elevation of 538 (LSN < 400) is reported. At this time, due to suspicion of IgA nephropathy, a renal biopsy was performed, which confirmed the presence of IgA deposits in the glomerular mesangium. After ruling out infectious, autoimmune and neoplastic causes, Henoch-Schönlein purpura (non-thrombocytopenic purpura and IgA nephropathy) secondary to anti-TNFα was assumed. In an IBD meeting, it was decided to stop anti-TNF and start azathioprine. Due to gastrointestinal intolerance and herpetic infection, vedolizumab was proposed, with a favorable response so far.
The approach of the adverse effects of IBD therapy can be challenging and not very consensual, requiring a multidisciplinary discussion. Henoch-Schönlein purpura is a rare adverse effect of anti-TNFα, particularly in adulthood, which in the present case appeared several years after the start of therapy. We intend to emphasize the need for a high degree of suspicion in this condition, as an early diagnosis has an impact on discontinuation of therapy and can radically change the prognosis.

Clinical Case Summary

A 40-year-old male came to our emergency department referring worsening jaundice, mental status deterioration, epigastric pain and anorexia over the past week. Four weeks earlier he presented odynophagia, myalgias, and hand pruritus but didn’t seek medical attention.
Patient’s clinical background included cognitive impairment due to peripartum anoxia and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. At admission, he had elevated liver enzymes (R value=2,7), coagulopathy (INR 1.3), pancreatic enzymes >3 times the upper normal level and hyperbilirubinemia (mostly conjugated).
The CT-scan revealed pancreatic tail globosity, diffuse abdominal and retroperitoneal peri-centimetric lymph nodes and excluded biliary lithiasis.
After common causes of acute hepatitis and pancreatitis were ruled out, and since patient was at risk of acute liver failure despite supportive treatment, a liver biopsy was performed. Autoimmune hepatitis, drug-induced liver injury or lymphoproliferative disease were held as potential differentials. Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) RNA was then found and genotyped in the serum (genotype 3). HEV infection was assumed as the cause for both hepatitis and pancreatitis. Histological pattern was inconclusive and epidemiological source wasn’t found.

HEV infection paradigm has changed and is now considered an endemic zoonotic infection in most high-income countries (Portuguese seroprevalence is 16.3%)¹. Infection occurs due to ingestion of undercooked pig or boar meat and should be suspected in every acute hepatitis, mostly with a cholestatic pattern.
The setting of acute HEV hepatitis complicated with acute pancreatitis (AP) is uncommon². AP usually starts after a median of 10 days of jaundice onset³. Literature only reports association between AP and HEV caused by genotype 1 from Southeast Asia^{3 4}, and genotype 3 was only related to gallstone-related pancreatitis, according to current knowledge⁵. This might be the first form of HEV genotype 3 infection with hepatitis and pancreatitis.

References

1. Nascimento MSJ, Pereira SS, Teixeira J, et al. A nationwide serosurvey of hepatitis E virus antibodies in the general population of Portugal. Eur J Public Health 2018;28(4):720-24. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx213 [published Online First: 2017/12/14]
2. Debnath P, Datta AK, Chakraborty U, et al. Acute viral hepatitis E complicated with acute pancreatitis in an immunocompetent adult. BMJ Case Rep 2021;14(2) doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-239684 [published Online First: 2021/02/06]
3. Haffar S, Bazerbachi F, Garg S, et al. Frequency and prognosis of acute pancreatitis associated with acute hepatitis E: A systematic review. Pancreatology 2015;15(4):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2015.05.460 [published Online First: 2015/06/08]
4. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis E virus infection. J Hepatol 2018;68(6):1256-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.005 [published Online First: 2018/04/04]
5. Karlsson M, Norder H, Bergstrom M, et al. Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 is associated with gallstone-related disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019;54(10):1269-73. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1666163 [published Online First: 20190925]