UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Online Course
accredited
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Proctologic disorders are a widespread problem—their high incidence means that many different healthcare professionals (e.g. gastroenterologists, surgeons, dermatologists, nurses, young residents, etc.) will be confronted by patients complaining about a proctologic disease.

This course by European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) experts Harald Rosen, Janindra Warusavitarne and Nuha Yassin provides the most recent state-of-the-art information on the common proctologic disorders of haemorrhoids and perianal skin conditions.

Learning objectives

  • To understand how to reach a conclusive diagnosis of GORD
  • To know how to reach a conclusive diagnosis of no GORD
  • To understand how to deal with an inconclusive diagnosis

Target audience

This course is suitable for gastroenterologists and surgeons in training, but is also appropriate for other physicians, as well as nurses, biotechnicians and medical students who have an interest in coloproctology.

Proctology — haemorrhoids and perianal skin conditions

Proctology — haemorrhoids and perianal skin conditions

Harald Rosen, Janindra Warusavitarne, Nuha Yassin

Event

Proctology — haemorrhoids and perianal skin conditions

Topics

Surgery

Accreditation status

accredited

Duration

1 hour

Published

2021
Login to access
UEG Online Course
accredited
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

About this online course

Stem cells are primitive and undifferentiated cells in human tissues (foetal and adult) with self-renewal, multipotency and longevity properties. They are responsible for cellular regeneration within the gastrointestinal tract but also play an essential role in different GI pathologies (e.g., Barrett’s oesophagus).

A gastroenterologist’s guide to stem cells, by Simon Leedham and Stuart McDonalds, covers the basic definitions of stem cells and their different locations in the gastrointestinal tract, homeostasis, the role of stem cells in intestinal regeneration, metaplasia, and tumour heterogeneity. The course includes comprehensive PPT slides, and bespoke video presentations filmed in London in December 2022. Figures, schemes, and further readings are included for consideration. The combined material has a total duration of approximately 60 minutes. The estimated time needed to complete the course, including the final assessment, is 60 minutes.

Target audience

This course is suitable for gastroenterologists in training, but is also appropriate for nurses, basic scientist in gastroenterology, medical students with interest in gastroenterology as well as other physicians (oncology, regenerative medicine, research).

Gastroenterologist's guide to stem cells

Gastroenterologist's guide to stem cells

Simon Leedham, Stuart McDonald

Event

Gastroenterologist's guide to stem cells

Accreditation status

accredited

Duration

1 hour

Published

2024
Login to access
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

Endoscopy abnormalities of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are currently graded based on the EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) ranging 0 to 9. Research has shown that esophageal biopsies are often omitted in Europe in patients reporting dysphagia when the upper endoscopy (EGD) shows no abnormalities [1]. However, a proportion of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) may have normal endoscopy (i.e., EREFS=0), making the diagnosis more difficult and increasing the risk of diagnostic delay.

Aims & Methods

We investigated predictors of a diagnosis of EoE when the EGD is unremarkable (i.e., EREFS=0). Consecutive adult patients (≥18 years) with dysphagia who had EREFS=0 at an EGD with six esophageal biopsies were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent EGD while off any eosinophil-depleting treatment. EoE with EREFS=0 was diagnosed based on the presence of at least 15 eosinophils/high-power field in at least one of six esophageal biopsies. When all six esophageal biopsies showed <15 eosinophils/high-power field, patients were diagnosed with non-EoE dysphagia (NED). Demographics, diagnostic delay (i.e., interval time between symptoms onset and diagnosis), esophageal symptoms, and atopic comorbidities (i.e., allergic rhinitis, asthma, eczema) were collected for all patients. Pearson's Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test were used for comparisons. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to quantify associations between disease states. Significance threshold was set at p<0.05.

Results

Of 133 included patients, 51 (38%) had NED, while 82 (62%) had EoE with EREFS=0. Patients with EoE were more commonly males (67% vs 35%; p<0.001) and younger (37 vs 46 years; p=0.005) compared to patients with NED. Patients with EoE were diagnosed with a significantly longer diagnostic delay than NED (28 vs 4 months; p<0.001). Heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain and dyspepsia had similar prevalence in the two groups. In contrast, patients with EoE had a significantly higher prevalence of atopic comorbidities compared to NED (83% vs 39%; p<0.001).
The presence of rhinitis, diagnostic delay longer than 12 months, any atopic comorbidity, age younger than 37 years, and male sex were associated with an increased risk of EoE with OR of 47.0, 11.6, 7.4, 3.8, and 3.7, respectively (p<0.01 for all).

Conclusion

EoE remains a possible diagnosis in patients reporting dysphagia even when endoscopy is normal. The presence of rhinitis and longer diagnostic delay, the presence of any atopic comorbidity, and younger age are associated with a diagnosis of EoE and are helpful to raise the suspicion of EoE and prompt endoscopists to collect esophageal biopsies.

CharacteristicNED (Non-EoE dysphagia) with EREFS 0
N = 51 (38%)​
EoE with EREFS 0,
N = 82 (62%)​
p-value​Odds Ratio
Sex (Male/total)18 / 51 (35%)55 / 82 (67%)<0.0013.7 (IQR, 1.6 - 8.3)
Age at diagnosis46 (40, 58)37 (28, 50)<0.013.8 (IQR, 1.4 - 10.8)
Diagnostic delay(months)4 (1, 10)28 (10, 90)<0.00111.6 (IQR, 3.8 - 40.8)
Atopy20 / 51 (39%)68 / 82 (83%)<0.0017.4 (IQR, 3.1 - 18.2)
Rhinitis3 / 51 (5.9%)62 / 82 (76%)<0.00147.6 (IQR, 13.2-264.1)

References

[1] Tourlamain, G., Garcia-Puig, R., Gutiérrez-Junquera, C., Papadopoulou, A., Roma, E., Kalach, N., Oudshoorn, J., Sokollik, C., Karolewska-Bochenek, K., Oliva, S., Strisciuglio, C., Bauraind, O., Auth, M. K., Thomson, M., Otte, S., Rok, O., Dias, J. A., Tzivinikos, C., Urbonas, V., Kostovski, A., … ESPGHAN EGID Working group (2020). Differences in Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Europe: An Assessment of Current Practice. Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 71(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002672

PREDICTORS OF EOSINIPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS IN PATIENTS WITH DYSPHAGIA AND NORMAL ENDOSCOPY

PREDICTORS OF EOSINIPHILIC ESOPHAGITIS IN PATIENTS WITH DYSPHAGIA AND NORMAL ENDOSCOPY

Filippo Ovidi 1, Pierfrancesco Visaggi 1, Irene Solinas 1, Emanuele Marciano 2, Jason M. Dunn 3, Terence Wong 3, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino 4, Nicola de Bortoli 1, Sebastian S. Zeki 3

1 Gastroenterology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

2 Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy

3 St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom

4 University of Padua, Division of Gastroenterology, Padua, Italy

Conference

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Oesophagus

Submission format

Abstract

Session

Upper functional GI disorders: From basic to clinical (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024
UEG Online Course
accredited
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Modern guideline development has evolved over the last 20 years to improve quality of clinical guidelines.

This course aims to provide basic knowledge of developing guidelines. It will explain the process of how to go about writing protocol, the very basics regarding GRADE, and what you need to do after completing a guideline. It will also signpost you to other courses organised by Guideline International Network.

The course includes comprehensive PPT slides and bespoke video presentations. The combined material has a total duration of approximately 30 minutes. The estimated time needed to complete the course, including the final assessment, is 45 minutes.

Target audience

This course is suitable for gastroenterologists in training, but is also appropriate for physicians in other disciplines and surgeons , as well as nurses, biotechnicians and advanced-years’ medical students who have an interest in developing guidelines.

Enrol Part 2: How to develop guidelines - Part 2

How to develop guidelines - Part 1

How to develop guidelines - Part 1

Yasuko Maeda, Adele Sayers, Ana Dugic

Event

How to develop guidelines - Part 1

Topics

Education & Training

Accreditation status

accredited

Duration

45 minutes

Published

2024
Login to access
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

Splenomegaly can exacerbate liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Thus, inhibiting splenomegaly may be a novel treatment for liver cirrhosis. We have previously demonstrated that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor can attenuate cirrhotic splenomegaly. However, the transcriptome profiles and precise pathogenesis of cirrhotic splenomegaly remain unknown, and few effective therapies are available. The role and mechanism of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in cirrhotic splenomegaly remain unclear.

Aims & Methods

Aims: We attempt to identify the transcriptomic profile of cirrhotic spleen, providing comprehensive valuable information for pathogenesis of splenomegaly. And to further validate the protective role of celecoxib on cirrhotic splenomegaly.
Methods: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized into the control group, TAA and TAA+Celecoxib groups. The control group: received intraperitoneal injection of normal saline (1ml, twice a week); the TAA group: received intraperitoneal injection of thioacetamide (TAA, 200 mg/kg, twice a week for 16 weeks); the TAA+celecoxib group: received TAA intraperitoneally and celecoxib via gastric gavage (20 mg/kg/day). Splenic gene profiling was analyzed by high-throughput RNA sequencing. Histological analysis of spleen tissue was evaluated by H&E, Sirius red, Prussian blue staining, and transmission electron microscopy. The splenic mRNA levels of collagen III and α-SMA and splenic contents of Ki-67 and VEGF were quantified.

Results

A total of 1461 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in the spleens of the TAA group compared to the control group. The immune response and immune cell activation might be the major signaling pathways involved in the pathogenesis of cirrhotic splenomegaly. With its immunoregulatory effect, celecoxib can ameliorate cirrhotic splenomegaly and liver cirrhosis. Furthermore, 304 coexisting DEGs were obtained between TAA vs. control and TAA+celecoxib vs. TAA. According to GO and KEGG analyses, celecoxib may attenuate cirrhotic splenomegaly by suppressing splenic immune cell proliferation, inflammation, immune regulation, and fibrogenesis. The impacts of celecoxib on splenic immune cell proliferation, inflammation, immune regulation, and extracellular matrix were then validated by the decreased splenic Ki-67-positive cells, macrophages, fibrotic areas, and mRNA levels of collagen III and α-SMA.

Conclusion

Celecoxib attenuates cirrhotic splenomegaly by inhibiting splenic immune cell proliferation, inflammation, and fibrogenesis. The current study further validate that COX-2 inhibitors could serve as a novel medical treatment for cirrhotic splenomegaly based on transcriptomic analysis.

EFFECT OF CELECOXIB ON SPLENOMEGALY IN CIRRHOTIC RATS BASED ON TRANSCRIPTOMIC ANALYSIS

EFFECT OF CELECOXIB ON SPLENOMEGALY IN CIRRHOTIC RATS BASED ON TRANSCRIPTOMIC ANALYSIS

Shihang Tang 1, LanYing He 1, Aihua Li 1, Shishi Yu 1, Weiqing Chen 1

1 Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China

Conference

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Hepatobiliary

Submission format

Abstract

Session

PP 07 Liver & biliary (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2023; 11 (Supplement 8)

Published

2023
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

Autonomic neuropathy affecting multiple organs is a common and severe complication of diabetes1. Neuropathy of the enteric nervous system and the regulatory autonomic nerve fibers can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract, causing mild to severe gastrointestinal symptoms2. The correlation between gastrointestinal symptoms and underlying pathophysiology is generally weak, so objective assessment is important to guide treatment3-5. Methods for direct evaluation of enteric neuropathy are not yet available in clinical practice. Hence, gastrointestinal transit times and contractile activity are used as proxies for enteric autonomic dysfunction6,7. Panenteric gastrointestinal assessment is considered essential, yet suitable methods are generally inaccessible, and diagnosing diabetic gastroenteropathy often causes significant challenges4,8. It is unknown whether measures of extraintestinal autonomic function can reflect diabetic gastroenteropathy and whether these measures could serve as supplementary diagnostic tools.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to assess 1) whether gastrointestinal symptoms are associated with motility measures and 2) whether gastrointestinal symptoms/motility measures are associated with extraintestinal autonomic markers. We included 81 persons with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (65% female, mean age 54) with gastrointestinal symptoms and either symptoms or signs of autonomic neuropathy. The Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) were used to assess gastrointestinal symptoms. The wireless motility capsule assessed panenteric transit times and motility indices. Cardiovascular reflex tests performed with the VAGUS device and the cardiac vagal tone assessed with the eMotion Faros device estimated cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy, while the SUDOSCAN evaluated sudomotor function.

Results

Proximal gastrointestinal symptoms were positively associated with the gastric motility index (GCSI: 1.18 (1.04 - 1.35), p=0.01; GSRS: 1.15 (1.03 - 1.29), p=0.02; median ratio (95%CI)), while only satiety reflected gastric emptying time (1.24 (1.03 - 1.49), p=0.02). Diarrhea was associated with decreased small bowel transit time (0.93 (0.89 - 0.98), p=0.005), while constipation was associated with prolonged colonic transit time (1.16 (1.03 - 1.31), p=0.02). Gastrointestinal symptoms increased with the degree of abnormal cardiovascular reflex tests (GCSI: 0.67 (0.16 - 1.19), p=0.03; GSRS: 0.87 (0.30 - 1.45), p=0.01; mean difference (95%CI)) but not with motility measures. Cardiac vagal tone and sudomotor function were not associated with gastrointestinal markers.

Conclusion

Gastrointestinal and extraintestinal autonomic measures were not associated. However, proximal gastrointestinal symptoms were associated with the gastric motility index and cardiovascular reflex tests. Hence, the latter may contribute to evaluating whether proximal gastrointestinal symptoms are autonomically derived.

References

1. Verrotti A, Prezioso G, Scattoni R, Chiarelli F. Autonomic neuropathy in diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014;5:205.
2. Azpiroz F, Malagelada C. Diabetic neuropathy in the gut: pathogenesis and diagnosis. Diabetologia. 2016;59(3):404-408.
3. Arora Z, Parungao JM, Lopez R, Heinlein C, Santisi J, Birgisson S. Clinical utility of wireless motility capsule in patients with suspected multiregional gastrointestinal dysmotility. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60(5):1350-1357.
4. Kuo B, Maneerattanaporn M, Lee AA, et al. Generalized transit delay on wireless motility capsule testing in patients with clinical suspicion of gastroparesis, small intestinal dysmotility, or slow transit constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(10):2928-2938.
5. Rouphael C, Arora Z, Thota PN, et al. Role of wireless motility capsule in the assessment and management of gastrointestinal dysmotility in patients with diabetes mellitus. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29(9).
6. Kempler P, Amarenco G, Freeman R, et al. Management strategies for gastrointestinal, erectile, bladder, and sudomotor dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011;27(7):665-677.
7. Camilleri M, Chedid V, Ford AC, et al. Gastroparesis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):41.
8. Bertoli D, Mark EB, Liao D, et al. MRI-Based Quantification of Pan-Alimentary Function and Motility in Subjects with Diabetes and Gastrointestinal Symptoms. J Clin Med. 2023;12(18).

ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS, MOTILITY, AND EXTRAINTESTINAL AUTONOMIC MEASURES IN DIABETIC GASTROENTEROPATHY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN GASTROINTESTINAL SYMPTOMS, MOTILITY, AND EXTRAINTESTINAL AUTONOMIC MEASURES IN DIABETIC GASTROENTEROPATHY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

Ditte Smed Kornum 1, Christina Brock 2, Tina Okdahl 3, Davide Bertoli 3, Huda Kufaishi 4, Anne-Marie Wegeberg 3, Katrine Lundby Høyer 1, Esben Bolvig Mark 3, Birgitte Brock 4, Christian Stevns Hansen 4, Filip K. Knop 5, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes 3, Klaus Krogh 1

1 Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark

2 Aalborg Universityhospital, Aalborg, Denmark

3 Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark

4 Steno Diabeters Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark

5 Clinical Metabolic Research at Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Conference

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Oesophagus

Submission format

Abstract

Session

OESOPHAGEAL, GASTRIC AND DUODENAL (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024
UEG Presentation
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky
Laudatio UEG Lifetime Achievement Awardee

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Laudatio UEG Lifetime Achievement Awardee

Jeanin van Hooft 1

1 Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands

Event

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Session

Opening Plenary

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2024; 12 (Supplement 8)

Published

2024

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.