Introduction

PEUGIC (Post-Endoscopy Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer) is defined as carcinoma in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract which was preceded by negative upper endoscopy in the last 3 years. According to current knowledge, the rate of PEUGIC is an important parameter of quality and should not exceed 10 %. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and risk factors of PEUGIC at non-university hospital in Frydek-Mistek (Czech Republic) between 2013 and 2023.

Aims & Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of the patients diagnosed with upper GI cancer from January 2013 to December 2023. The data analyzed included family history of upper GI cancer, indications of the examination, therapy, tumor location and histological type. Risk factors for PEUGIC were calculated using the Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test, with p <0,05 considered significant.

Results

During the study period, a total of 22727 gastroscopies were performed in total, and 122 patients were diagnosed with upper GI cancer (88 men and 34 women), including 35 esophageal tumors, 80 gastric tumors, and 7 duodenal tumors. Family history of upper GI tumor was reported in 10 patients. PEUGIC was identified in 12 patients (9,84%, 9 men and 3 women, mean age 69,25 years), including 6 in the esophagus, 5 in the stomach, and 1 in the duodenum. Two patients had early detection as part of adequate surveillance (Barrett's esophagus, post-polypectomy). Thus, we can evaluate 10 patients as true PEUGIC (8,20%). The rate of PEUGIC was 17,14 % (6/35) in the esophagus, 6,25 % (5/80) in the stomach, and 14,3 % (1/7) in the duodenum. Tumor location (for esophagus p=0,086, for stomach p=0,065, for duodenum p=0,525), histology (for adenocarcinoma p=0,332, for spinocelular cancer p=0,402, for neuroendocrine tumor p=0,25), male gender (p=0,815), or family history of upper GI tumor (p=0,335) were not statistically significant risk factors for detecting PEUGIC.

Conclusion

The overall rate of PEUGIC at our institution over the 11-year study period was 9,86 %, without early detected lesions as part of adequate surveillance, it was 8,20 %. Early detection of PEUGIC, which indicate poorer endoscopy quality, need to be distinguished from early detection of carcinoma within adequate surveillance.

Introduction

The Updated Sydney System recommends reporting the severity of both glandular atrophy (GA) and intestinal metaplasia (IM) as two independent parameters. However, the OLGA system assesses both GA and IM together as part of the same entity which should be reported as an average severity. The OLGIM system is based on the IM severity recommended by the updated Sydney system. Thus, the final OLGIM score can be estimated by any clinician. Currently, no system addresses the severity of both GA and IM as they are reported following the updated Sydney recommendation.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to assess the utility of a new system, OLGIMA (Operative Link on Gastric IM and GA assessment), as a tool to identify patients at higher risk for GC in daily practice.
Consecutive diagnostic UGI endoscopies performed for any indications in patients older than 18 years old were recorded prospectively in 21 Spanish hospitals between April 2021 and July 2023. Protocolized gastric biopsies were taken according to the Updated Sydney consensus. We excluded patients with dysplasia, any malignancy, suspicion of autoimmune chronic atrophic gastritis, and lack of histological data. The severity of both GA and IM was assessed in the antrum (including incisura) and corpus following the updated Sydney system. After that, we considered the most advanced severity (none:0; mild:1; moderate:2; marked:3) provided for any of them in each of the two topographical areas. Then, the OLGIMA staging was done according to the same methodology used by the OLGA and OLGIM systems.

Results

A total of 998 patients were included. The median age was 57 (IQR 46 - 67), and 64% were women. Hp infection was identified in 334 (35%) patients (19% active infection and 16% eradicated). GA was identified in 192 (19.2%) patients which was limited to the antrum in 113 (11.3%) cases and extensive in 79 (7.9%). IM was identified in 159 (15.9%) patients which was limited to the antrum in 114 (11.4%) cases and extensive in 45 (4.5%). According to IM severity, 27 (2.7%) patients were OLGIM III/IV. According to GA severity, 22 (2.2%) patients were significantly extensive. The OLGIM system would have missed 12 (1.2%) patients with GA at higher risk. Considering both criteria, we would have detected 39 (3.9%) patients at higher risk in total (17 OLGIM III-IV, 12 extensive significative GA, and 10 both OLGIM III-IV and extensive significative GA). The new OLGIMA system categorized all 39 (3.9%) patients, OLGIM III-IV and significantly extensive GA, in the high-risk group (OLGIMA III/IV).

Conclusion

The new OLGIMA system (based on the severity of IM and GA recommended by the updated Sydney system) was able to detect patients at higher risk including all cases of OLGIM III/IV and also with advanced GA. The OLGIMA staging is much simpler and it can be estimated by any clinician regardless of whether the biopsy from incisura was taken.

References

Rugge M, Meggio A, Pennelli G et al. Gastritis staging in clinical practice: the OLGA staging system. Gut. 2007;56:631-6
Capelle LG, de Vries AC, Haringsma J et al. The staging of gastritis with the OLGA system by using intestinal metaplasia as an accurate alternative for atrophic gastritis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1150-8
Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Marcos-Pinto R et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51:365-388.