Introduction
Vedolizumab (VDZ), a monoclonal antibody therapy approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) in China in 20201 has a unique, gut-selective, anti-lymphocyte trafficking (GSALT) mechanism of action.2 However, there is limited data on VDZ's real-world effectiveness and safety in Chinese IBD patients.3 Interim results from the VALUE study that enrolled patients with UC have been published 3,4 and final results are reported here.
Aims & Methods
VALUE (NCT04872491), a multicenter, single-arm, prospective, observational study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of VDZ in adult Chinese patients with IBD (N = 500) over 72 weeks. Clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission were assessed at Weeks 14, 30, and 54. Partial Mayo and Mayo endoscopic subscores at baseline and Weeks 14, 30, and 54 were calculated. Clinical response was defined as ≥2-point reduction in Partial Mayo Clinic score and ≥25% decrease from baseline score accompanied with ≥1-point decrease in the rectal bleeding or absolute rectal bleeding subscore ≤1. Clinical remission was defined as Partial Mayo Clinic score ≤2 with no subscore >1, endoscopic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1, and complete endoscopic remission as Mayo endoscopic subscore 0. Safety results and CD patients’ data are presented in separate VALUE abstracts (IDs: AS-UEG-2025-01329 and AS-UEG-2025-01324).
Results
Among 409 UC patients enrolled in the final analysis, 91.9% (376/409) were included in the effectiveness analysis set. Mean age (±standard deviation [SD]) of patients was 46.3 (±15.1) years, and 59.4% (n=243) were male. At baseline, 30.8% (126/409) of patients had moderate UC, and 29.8% (122/409) had severe UC. The median duration of UC was 2.5 years, concomitant steroids were prescribed in 18.9% (71/376). Mean (±SD) partial Mayo score was 5.1 (2.1) at baseline, which declined to 1.7 (1.7), 1.5 (1.7) and 1.3 (1.5) by Weeks 14, 30 and 54, respectively, post-VDZ treatment. Patients achieving clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic remission, and complete endoscopic remission were 76.9% (220/286), 71.1% (207/291), 63.6% (35/55), and 21.8% (12/55) at Week 14; 78.1% (193/247), 76.3% (190/249), 63.6% (28/44), and 27.3% (12/44) at Week 30; and 80.3% (155/193), 83.3% (165/198), 71.4% (20/28), and 50.0% (14/28) at Week 54, respectively. Patients with moderate and severe UC; biologic naïve patients and patients with prior exposure to biologics at baseline also achieved clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission (Table). Compared with baseline, mean (±SD) reduction of C-reactive protein (mg/L) at Weeks 14, 30, and 54 were 7.8 (20.2), 6.5 (22.2), and 3.4 (24.8), respectively; mean (±SD) reduction of fecal calprotectin (mu g/g) was 42.7 (150.7) at Week 14 and 212.6 (480.1) at Week 30. The proportion of patients achieving clinical remission without steroid use by Week 14 was 37.7% (23/61), which increased to 60.6% (20/33) by Week 54.
Data are presented as % (n/N). N, number of patients having clinical response/remission/endoscopic remission data. n, number of patients achieving clinical response/remission and endoscopic remission data.
|
| Moderate UC
| Severe UC
|
| Clinical response
| Clinical remission
| Endoscopic remission
| Clinical response
| Clinical remission
| Endoscopic remission
|
Week 14
| 89.8 (79/88)
| 65.9 (58/88)
| 57.1 (12/21)
| 90.0 (72/80)
| 63.8 (51/80)
| 56.3 (9/16)
|
| Week 30 | 87.7 (64/73)
| 69.9 (51/73)
| 30.8 (4/13)
| 91.2 (62/68)
| 66.2 (45/68)
| 90.9 (10/11)
|
| Week 54 | 92.2 (59/64)
| 81.3 (52/64)
| 62.5 (5/8) | 88.5 (46/52)
| 73.1 (38/52)
| 60.0 (3/5)
|
| Biologic-exposed UC: 10.9% (41/376)
| Biologic-naïve UC: 89.1% (335/376)
|
| Week 14 | 69.0 (20/29)
| 66.7 (20/30)
| 16.7 (1/6)
| 77.8 (200/257)
| 71.7 (187/261)
| 69.4 (34/49)
|
| Week 30 | 74.2 (23/31)
| 71.0 (22/31)
| 83.3 (5/6)
| 78.7 (170/216)
| 77.1 (168/218)
| 60.5 (23/38)
|
| Week 54 | 60.0 (15/25)
| 81.5 (22/27)
| 83.3 (5/6)
| 83.3 (140/168)
| 83.6 (143/171)
| 68.2 (15/22)
|
Conclusion
This study indicated that VDZ demonstrated a good effectiveness profile in Chinese UC patients in the real-world setting.
References
- Yan J et al., Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103: e38759.
- Soler D et al. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009; 330: 864-875.
- Baili C et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023; 118: S213-S214.
- Yan C et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2023; 119: S894-S895.
Disclosure
This study was funded by Takeda (China) International Trading Co. Ltd. Xiuli Zuo, Ye Chen, and Yingchao Li have no conflicts of interest. Lifei Gu and Fang Zhou are Takeda employees and hold Takeda stock options. Minhu Chen received speaker honorariums from Takeda China, AstraZeneca China, Xian Janssen, and Eisai China.
Medical writing support for the development of this abstract under the direction of the authors was provided by Vibhuti Singh, Ph.D., of Cactus Life Sciences (part of Cactus Communications), funded by Takeda (China) International Trading Co., Ltd.