Introduction

Capsule endoscopy is the first-line examination for digestive bleeding with likely origin in the small bowel, in hemodynamically stable patients. In the 2022 update, ESGE guidelines recommend that, in the context of overt bleeding, capsule enteroscopy should be performed as soon as possible, ideally within the first 48 hours. In the previous guidelines, published in 2015, the recommended window was 14 days.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to evaluate the improvement in yield offered by the new recommendations regarding the timing of urgent capsule enteroscopy. Patients with suspected overt middle gastrointestinal bleeding between January 2005 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Diagnostic and therapeutic yield, rebleeding rate, and mortality were compared when capsule enteroscopy was performed within the first 48 hours, within the first 14 days, or between the 3rd and 14th day after admission.

Results

A total of 138 patients were included (58.7% men, median age 66 years), 87 of whom (63.0%) underwent capsule enteroscopy within the first 48 hours after hospital admission. The median follow-up was 55 months (5-180). The diagnostic yield (presence of blood or lesions with bleeding potential) was slightly higher when capsule enteroscopy was performed within the first 48 hours (81.6% versus 76.5%, p=0.349). On the other hand, capsule enteroscopy within the first 48 hours was significantly associated with higher therapeutic yield (endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical treatment) - 54.0% versus 39.2%, p=0.02. The rebleeding rate was significantly lower in patients undergoing enteroscopy within 48 hours after admission (19.5% versus 29.4%, p=0.04). On the other hand, overall mortality at 36 months did not differ between strategies (21.8% and 25.5%, p=0.401).

Conclusion

Performing capsule endoscopy within the first 48 hours, as recommended by recently published guidelines, is associated with favourable short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Introduction

Ustekinumab, an interleukin (IL) 12/23 inhibitor is a biologic used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Clinical and real-world evidence has demonstrated its ability to provide a clinically meaningful response and remission among patients; however, the economic impact of its use may not be favourable from the payer perspective. The objective of this targeted literature review was to understand the economic impact of ustekinumab reference product in the treatment of patients with IBD.

Aims & Methods

A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE for economic publications that evaluate the economic impact of ustekinumab or include ustekinumab within their analyses. Search terms included “budget impact model”, “budget impact analysis”, “cost-utility”, “cost-effect”, “ulcerative colitis”, “Crohn’s disease” and “ustekinumab” from database inception until Feb 8^th, 2024. Only studies published in English were eligible for inclusion.

Results

A total of 30 hits were screened for inclusion, yielding 12 relevant studies that discussed economic implications of ustekinumab. Five articles were conducted from the US payer perspective, two from the Japanese payer perspective, and one each from the Canadian, Swedish, Polish, French, and German perspectives. The economic models included budget impact models (n = 2), cost-effectiveness models (n = 8), and cost per responder/remitter analyses (n = 2). Five studies used a CD patient population, six studies focused on UC, and one study included a mixed population of CD and UC. In CD studies, two found ustekinumab was cost-effective: these studies were conducted from the perspective of Polish and Swedish payers in CD patients who failed anti-TNF therapy. Both studies used a Markov based model to assess cost-effectiveness of treatments. In the remaining CD studies, ustekinumab was associated with the highest cost per responder/remitter (Japanese payer perspective) and was dominated by other treatments in cost-effectiveness analyses (US payer perspective). The studies conducted in the UC patient population also found that, although clinically effective, ustekinumab was dominated (based on the incremental cost effectiveness ratio [ICER]) by other biologics included in the analyses (eg, vedolizumab and infliximab). Similar to the CD patient population, the cost per responder/remitter was highest for ustekinumab compared to five other therapies including tofacitinib and golimumab (US payer perspective). However, in two UC studies, ustekinumab was observed to be more effective than the most cost-effective treatment option (from the Japanese and US payer perspectives), highlighting that its price negatively affected its ICER. Moreover, cost-effectiveness analyses conducted by the German and Canadian perspectives, demonstrated that ustekinumab was not a cost-effective therapy at the current willingness to pay threshold (0% probability). Note, that no studies tested the possible cost-effectiveness of an ustekinumab biosimilar which would positively influence the cost associated with ustekinumab treatment.

Conclusion

This literature review demonstrated that, despite its high efficacy, ustekinumab is among the highest costing biologics available for the treatment of IBD with low probabilities of cost-effectiveness across several studies. As the economic burden for IBD is increasing globally, cost-saving therapeutic options such as biosimilars may help to provide savings that can be redistributed in a healthcare system or provide funds to expand patient access.

Disclosure

Kunal Shastri is an employee of Fresenius Kabi a manufacturer of biosimilars. Kerise Clarke, Margaret Ainslie-Garcia, Nicole Ferko are employees of EVERSANA a company who receives consulting fees from Fresenius Kabi.

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer, predominantly diagnosed in patients with chronic liver diseases. The absence of specific biomarkers and the typically asymptomatic progression of the disease lead to delayed diagnosis. Patients with liver disease, including HCC, exhibit alterations in the gut microbiome and increased bacterial permeability, factors that may influence disease progression and patient outcomes. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in exploring circulating microbiome signatures as potential indicators of liver disease stutus, providing a new avenue for understanding HCC.

Aims & Methods

Aims: To identify the signatures of the circulating blood microbiome associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, response to treatment and disease prognosis.
Methods: This study conducted a post-hoc analysis of the SORAMIC clinical trial utilizing peripheral blood plasma samples. For this analysis, blood plasma samples from a cohort of 71 patients with HCC were examined (25 treated with Sorafenib and 46 with SIRT/Sorafenib). Peripheral blood samples were collected at two time points: baseline (prior to the initiation of anti-tumor therapy) with all 71 patients included, and post-therapy (7 to 9 weeks after treatment) with 39 patients included. Additionally, peripheral blood samples were obtained from 52 control subjects, who were endoscopically diagnosed with colonic diverticulosis, to compare against the patient group. The composition of the circulating blood microbiome was assessed through 16S rRNA gene sequencing, targeting the V1-V2 hypervariable regions. Subsequent analyses focused on identifying associations with potential novel biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment.

Results

Patients with HCC had significantly diminished α-diversity of the circulating blood microbiome as compared to controls. Significant differences were also observed in between microbial communities of these two cohorts based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index. Patients with HCC had significantly higher levels of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes and lower levels of Firmicutes and Campylobacterota. Differential abundance analysis revealed that families of Gordoniaceae, Cryomorphaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Comamonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae were significantly enriched in patients with HCC. At the genus level, patients with HCC had higher levels of Gordonia, Fluviicola, Burholderia, Limnohabitans and Escherichia/Shigella and lower levels of Corynebacterium. HCC patients, who responded to treatment with SIRT/Sorafenib showed an increase in blood bacterial diversity, enrichment of families Burkholderiales incertae sedis, Arcobacteraceae, Peptostreptococcaceae, Moraxellaceae, genera Sphaerotilus, Aliacrobacter, Rhodoluna, Giesbergeria, Microbacterium, Romboutsia, Arcicella, Pseudorhodoferax and depletion in families Gordoniaceae, Cryomorphaceae and genera Cloacibacterium, Gordonia, Limnohabitans, Fluviicola after the treatment. Levels of Acinetobacter, Enhydrobacter and Micrococcus in the blood before the HCC treatment were associated with patient prognosis.

Conclusion

Patients with HCC exhibit a unique circulating blood microbiome profile characterized by reduced bacterial diversity. Response to treatment is linked to an increase in α-diversity and changes in the circulating microbiome profile. Specific members of the circulating microbiome show potential prognostic capabilities, suggesting their utility as biomarkers for predicting disease progression and treatment outcomes in HCC.

Introduction

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease in which muscle weakness develops insidiously. In advanced stages of the disease dysphagia, weight loss and malnutrition occur in the majority of patients. Thus, the consideration of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement is common. However, the optimal timing and setting for the procedure as well desired spirometry results are either are not stated in most guidelines or debated. Previous studies have suggested greater procedural risk for patients whose forced vital capacity (FVC) was less than 50% than predicted

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of our tertiary center simplified approach to PEG tube placement in patients with ALS.
The electronical records of patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement between 1.1.2020 to 1.1.2023 were retrospectively reviewed. All adult patients diagnosed with ALS who underwent ambulatory PEG tube placement were included. Patients who underwent PEG tube placement during hospitalization due to acute illness were excluded. The common practice of our center regarding PEG placement in patients with ALS is as follows: initial evaluation at the Gastroenterology clinic of patients referred by the neurology clinic, followed by ambulatory PEG placement under sedation by an anesthesiologist. We collected baseline information from the neurology and gastroenterology clinic visits regarding comorbidities and baseline FVC and the functional rating score [ALS-FRS, 0-48 points, lower score indicating a more severe disease). The data concerning the procedure and possible complications were collected from endoscopy reports, emergency department visits and clinic visits after the procedure.

Results

Six hundred and sixty patients had underwent PEG tube placement in our center during study period. Of them, 67 patients had an established diagnosis of ALS (10.2%). One patient was excluded due to PEG placement in the setting of an acute illness during admission, thus 66 patients were included (mean age at PEG placement 63.5±12.7 years and 37.8% were females). Mean ALS-FRS score was 23.6±8.81 and mean FVC was 49.8±19.45% of predicted. More than half (54.7%) of the patients were using non-invasive ventilation support device at home prior to the procedure and 12.1% of patients had underwent endotracheal tube placement prior to PEG tube placement.
The averaged duration of PEG tube placement was 11.96±5.3 minutes. All PEG procedures were completed successfully. Complications were documented during two PEG placements (3%): one patient suffered from aspiration and was hospitalized and later diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia and the second patient suffered from gastric perforation and peritonitis which was diagnosed a few hours after the procedure. During the 30 days following PEG placement, 3 (4.5%) complications were documented: Two patients (3%) suffered from PEG site infections and were treated with antibiotics and one (1.5%) was diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia. No deaths occurred during the procedure or during the 30 days that followed.

Conclusion

The simple straight forward approach to PEG placement in our institution was successful and safe in the vast majority of cases. The complications rate in our cohort is comparable to other studies, even though the patients in our cohort had significantly reduced lung function and functional scores then accepted in the common practice.

References

1. Miller R G, Jackson C E, Practice parameter update: the care of the patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: drug, nutritional, and respiratory therapies (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Neurology, 2009 Oct 13;73(15):1218-26
2. EFNS Task Force on Diagnosis and Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Andersen P M, Abrahams S, EFNS guidelines on the clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (MALS)--revised report of an EFNS task force, Eur J Neurol 2012 Mar;19(3):360-75.
3. Korner S, Hendricks M, Weight loss, dysphagia and supplement intake in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): impact on quality of life and therapeutic options, BMC Neurol 13, 84 (2013).
4. Russ K B, Phillips MC, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Am J Med Sci . 2015 Aug;350(2):95-7.
5. Gregory S, Siderowf A, Gastrostomy insertion in ALS patients with low vital capacity: respiratory support and survival, Neurology . 2002 Feb 12;58(3):485-7.
6. Thomas K, Schrager J, Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case series with a multidisciplinary, team-based approach, Ann Gastroenterol 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):480-484