Introduction

Barrier healing (BH) has emerged as a novel treatment target in Inflammatory Bowel disease (IBD). Persistence of barrier impairment despite endoscopic and histological remission has been associated with worse long-term outcomes. However, accurate real-time assessment of intestinal barriers remains challenging in clinical practice. This study explores the role of advanced endoscopy (ultra-high magnification endocytoscopy [ECS] and confocal laser endomicroscopy [CLE]) for real-time, in vivo, structural and functional assessment of epithelial and vascular intestinal barrier. Further, we aim to investigate their correlation with automated barrier protein expression and clinical outcomes in IBD.

Aims & Methods

IBD patients undergoing endoscopic evaluation and healthy controls (HC) were recruited from two tertiary university centres.
The intestinal mucosa was assessed with ECS or CLE by novel scoring systems including epithelial and vascular features. BH was defined as ECS score ≤1 or CLE score ≤4, with preserved villi/crypt architecture, normal vessels, and, for CLE, absence of fluorescein leakage.
Biopsies were collected from both inflamed and non-inflamed areas. Epithelial (ZO-1, Claudin-2, E-cadherin) and vascular (PV-1 and CD-31) barrier markers were analysed through confocal microscopy, and their mean expression was automatically quantified using QuPath (v0.5.1). A biopsy-wise analysis assessed the correlation between endoscopic and histopathological evaluation. Moreover, occurrence of clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up according to imaging-detected barrier impairment was evaluated.

Results

A total of 74 IBD patients (39 Crohn’s disease [CD], 35 Ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 9 HC) were considered. 46% (34/74) and 42% (30/74) IBD patients were in endoscopic and histological remission, respectively, while advanced imaging-defined BH was present in 24.3% (18/74) patients (Table 1). Barrier impairment was significantly associated with clinical outcomes at 6-month follow-up (p<0.01).
Mean expression of Claudin-2 was significantly higher in UC with ECS-based barrier impairment (85.5 vs 175.1, p 0.02), while PV1 expression was elevated in CD with CLE-based barrier dysfunction (362.1 vs 442.2, p 0.1). Significant correlations were found between ECS/CLE scores and epithelial and vascular barrier proteins.
In UC, Claudin-2 showed a moderate correlation with altered crypt architecture, goblet cell depletion and ECS total score (r 0.5), while PV-1 was moderately associated with altered vascular pattern and ECS total score (r -0.4).
In CD, Claudin-2 demonstrated a moderate correlation with crypt distortion, goblet cell depletion and total CLE scores (r 0.5), while PV-1 moderately correlated with fluorescein leakage, altered vessel architecture and total CLE score (r 0.4).

Conclusion

pCLE and ECS enable real-time intestinal barrier assessment in IBD, showing good correlation with epithelial and vascular barrier proteins and predicting clinical outcomes. This approach shows promise for targeting BH, guiding early and long-term disease management, and enabling flare-up prediction.

Introduction

The BIOSTOP Trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label study conducted in Norway to evaluate the two-year outcomes of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) antibody withdrawal in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) in sustained clinical and endoscopic remission. Prior non-randomized studies have suggested that approximately half of such patients maintain remission after anti-TNF discontinuation and that reintroduction of anti-TNF therapy is generally effective and safe in the event of relapse.

Aims & Methods

A total of 174 UC patients in confirmed clinical and endoscopic remission were enrolled across 19 gastroenterology centers between June 2017 and December 2020 and randomized 1:1 to either continue or discontinue anti-TNF therapy. Eligibility criteria included at least 12 months of first-line anti-TNF maintenance treatment, clinical remission, fecal calprotectin <200 µg/g, and endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic score 0 or 1). Two-year follow-up data were available for 172 patients (86 in each group). In 156 of the patients endoscopies were available for central reading (77 in the withdrawal group and 79 in the maintenance group). The primary endpoint was sustained endoscopic remission at two years.

Results

At two years, central reading of follow-up colonoscopies confirmed endoscopic remission in 64 of 77 patients (83%, 95% CI 71.8 – 93.1) in the anti-TNF withdrawal group, compared to 77 of 79 patients (96 %, 95 % CI 92.1 – 100.8) in the anti-TNF maintenance group. The non-inferiority primary endpoint of the study was thus not met. During the study period, 48% of patients in the withdrawal group and 88% in the maintenance group remained in sustained clinical and endoscopic remission without relapse. Among the 45 patients in the withdrawal group who experienced endoscopic confirmed relapse, 28 (62%) resumed anti-TNF therapy, with 26 achieving both clinical and endoscopic remission. Additionally, 10 of 13 patients with mild relapses achieved endoscopic remission with optimized non-biologic therapy. There were no difference in serious adverse events between the groups.

Conclusion

After two years, 83% of patients in the anti-TNF withdrawal group and 96% in the maintenance group were in clinical and endoscopic remission, including those who experienced flares and achieved new remission after reintroduction of anti-TNF or optimized non-biologic therapy. Nearly half of the patients maintained remission without anti-TNF, and the majority of relapses were effectively managed. These findings suggest that anti-TNF withdrawal is a safe option for selected UC patients in confirmed remission, provided they are monitored closely.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03011268; EudraCT Number: 2016-001409-18. Trial completion date: 31 January 2025.

Disclosure

No disclosures

Introduction

Cholestatic pruritus is common, debilitating and undertreated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Here, we describe the results of GLISTEN (NCT04950127), a Phase 3 study investigating the efficacy and safety of the ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor linerixibat for pruritus in PBC.

Aims & Methods

In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study, patients with PBC and moderate-to-severe pruritus received oral linerixibat 40 mg or placebo twice daily. Pruritus severity and pruritus-related sleep interference were assessed using a 0–10 numerical rating scale. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in worst itch over 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints included: at Week 2, change in worst itch; over 24 weeks, change in sleep interference; at Week 24, proportion of responders (≥ 2-, ≥ 3-, ≥ 4-point reduction in worst itch) and analysis of responses to 2 patient global impression items (itch severity and change). Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) reporting.

Results

238 patients were randomised; 95% were female, itch severity was mean (standard deviation [SD]) 7.34 (1.54), 52% had alkaline phosphatase < 1.67 times upper limit of normal, and 47% were receiving stable therapy for pruritus. Pruritus improvement over 24 weeks was significantly greater with linerixibat than placebo: least-squares (LS) mean change -2.86 versus -2.15, adjusted mean difference -0.72; p = 0.001. At Week 24, the observed mean (SD) difference from baseline in pruritus was -3.66 (2.50) with linerixibat and -2.82 (2.32) with placebo. The effect of linerixibat was rapid and superior to placebo at Week 2: LS mean change -1.78 versus -1.07, adjusted mean difference -0.71; p < 0.001. Linerixibat also significantly improved pruritus-related sleep interference over 24 weeks versus placebo: LS mean change ‑2.77 versus -2.24, adjusted mean difference -0.53; p = 0.024. At Week 24, more patients on linerixibat than placebo achieved a ≥ 2-point (68% vs 64%), ≥ 3-point (56% vs 43%) or ≥ 4-point (41% vs 29%) reduction in pruritus and a higher proportion of linerixibat than placebo-treated patients reported their pruritus was very much improved (55% vs 37%) or absent (21% vs 9%). AEs reported more frequently with linerixibat than placebo were predominantly gastrointestinal (GI), including diarrhoea (61% vs 18% of patients) and abdominal pain (18% vs 3% of patients); 4% of patients in the linerixibat group discontinued treatment due to diarrhoea.

Conclusion

In patients with PBC and moderate-to-severe pruritus, linerixibat rapidly and significantly improved pruritus and pruritus-related sleep interference versus placebo. While GI AEs were more common with linerixibat than placebo, they rarely led to treatment discontinuation.

Disclosure

Funded by GSK. Various authors declare conflicts of interest as consultants, employee, recipients of grants and stockholders. These will be reported in full during the presentation.

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) mediated enterocolitis (IMC) may lead to treatment discontinuation. Corticosteroids for IMC is associated with serious side effects and might affect cancer progression in addition to preclude continued ICI treatment. We hypothesized that vedolizumab, a gut selective α4β7 integrin inhibitor, is effective as a first-line treatment and investigated whether vedolizumab reduces corticosteroid exposure and facilitate ICI resumption.

Aims & Methods

We conducted a single center, open-label, explorative phase 2 trial including patients treated with ICI who developed IMC. Patients were randomized 1:1 ratio to receive vedolizumab (300 mg) or standard treatment with corticosteroids, with infliximab used as recue therapy for corticosteroid failure. The primary outcome was cumulative corticosteroid dose at week 30. Key secondary outcomes included cumulative corticosteroid dose at week 10, corticosteroid free remission at week 10 and ICI resumption rates.

Results

Twenty-two patients received vedolizumab, and 19 patients received standard treatment. At week 10, the mean cumulative corticosteroid use was significantly lower in the vedolizumab arm (1157 mg vs. 2207 mg). By week 30, the mean corticosteroid use remained lower but not statistically significant (1378 mg vs. 2390 mg, estimated difference 1012 mg, 95% CI -229 to 2253, p=0.107), Among patients with less severe IMC, who did not need corticosteroids during screening, vedolizumab-treated patients used in average 1729 mg less corticosteroid (95% CI 631 to 2827). Corticosteroid-free remission at weeks 2 and 10 was more common with vedolizumab. Seven patients (33.3%) in the vedolizumab group resumed with ICI compared to three (16.7%) in the standard arm. In patients with severe colitis, who required upfront corticosteroid treatment, a trend towards longer hospitalization in the vedolizumab arm was observed.

Conclusion

For patients with less severe colitis, not needing corticosteroids during screening, vedolizumab may be a viable corticosteroid-sparing option, enabling faster remission and ICI resumption.

Disclosure

The study was funded by Aage og Johanne Louis-Hansens Fond, National Research grants. Takeda Pharma provided the study drug vedolizumab.