Abstract

Objectives

To provide a consensus statement and recommendations on MR imaging in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

Methods

The European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) convened a multinational European panel of experts selected based on a literature review and their leadership in the field. A modified Delphi process was adopted to draft a list of statements. For each statement, the panelists indicated the level of agreement using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 means “no agreement,” 2 means “poor agreement,” 3 means “slight agreement,” 4 means “fair agreement,” and 5 means “complete agreement.” The median score for each statement was collected. The level of evidence was reported according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Descriptive statistics were used to rate agreement levels and the consensus’ internal reliability.

Results

The 12 voting committee members were from Italy (n = 4, 33.4%), Austria (n = 2, 16.7%), Sweden (n = 1, 8.3%), France (n = 1, 8.3%), the United States (n = 1, 8.3%), Switzerland (n = 1, 8.3%), and Belgium (n = 2, 16.7%). The final questionnaire consisted of 55 statements. The agreement reached by the expert panel was complete for 23 statements (41.8%), fair for 16 (29.1%), slight for 15 (27.2%), and poor for 1 (1.9%). Statements that received complete agreement were used to structure a reporting template.

Conclusions

This statement paper recommends how and when to perform MRI in PSC patients. A structured reporting template has been created to improve quality care and communication among radiologists and clinicians.

Key Points

Question A standard MR protocol and the most common imaging features to be reported are fundamental for the correct evaluation of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients.

Findings Twelve expert radiologists reported which are the most important imaging features and how and when to perform MR in PSC patients.

Clinical relevance The identified statements reported in this paper and the structured reporting template are useful for radiologists and clinicians to help correctly manage PSC patients.

Executive Summary

Robotic surgery has been utilized increasingly, including in colorectal surgery. Newer robotic platforms are coming onto the market, and more emphasis is being placed on the safety and adequate training of surgeons and theatre teams. Training in robotic colorectal surgery has not been standardized, and there are no agreed structured training and assessment methods. Some studies in minimally invasive surgery across specialities have shown that training curricula shortened the learning curve in minimally invasive surgery and, therefore, there is a greater need for guidance on training in robotic colorectal surgery based on up-to-date available evidence on the subject.

The European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) Guidelines Committee aimed to conduct a comprehensive literature review, assess currently available evidence and collate expert opinion on training in robotic colorectal surgery. Evidence was graded, and the recommendation was based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. When evidence is lacking expert opinion is considered, and the research gap is highlighted.

Abstract

Pelvic exenteration (PE) is a radical surgical approach designed for the curative treatment of advanced pelvic malignancies, requiring en-bloc resection of multiple pelvic organs. While the procedure is radical, it has shown promise in enhancing long-term survival and is now comparable in surgical mortality to elective resections for primary pelvic cancers. Imaging plays a crucial role in preoperative planning, with MRI, CT, and PET/CT being pivotal in assessing the extent of cancer and formulating a surgical roadmap. This paper presents clinical practice guidelines for imaging in the context of PE, developed jointly by ESGAR, SAR, ESUR, and the PelvEx Collaborative. These guidelines aim to standardise imaging protocols and reporting to improve the preoperative assessment and facilitate decision-making in the multidisciplinary treatment of pelvic cancers. Our recommendations underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the need for clear and precise imaging reports to optimise patient care.

Clinical relevance statement

Our recommendations underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the need for clear and precise imaging reports to optimise patient care.

Key Points

• MRI is mandatory for local staging in pelvic exenteration.

• Structured reporting (using the template provided in this guide) is recommended.

• Multidisciplinary review of imaging is critical for surgical planning.

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), requires meticulous diagnostic and monitoring protocols to optimize patient outcomes. This document synthesizes key advancements and recommendations for clinical indices, endoscopic scoring, imaging, histological assessment, and tools for evaluating IBD disability. Emphasizing validated, reproducible methods aligns with the ongoing evolution of precision medicine in IBD care, including training. The methodology of the guidelines update process is described in part 1.

Abstract

Background

Hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndromes, including familial adenomatous polyposis and other rare adenomatous polyposis syndromes, increase the lifetime risk of colorectal and other cancers.

Methods

A team of 38 experts convened to update the 2008 European recommendations for the clinical management of patients with adenomatous polyposis syndromes. Additionally, other rare monogenic adenomatous polyposis syndromes were reviewed and added. Eighty-nine clinically relevant questions were answered after a systematic review of the existing literature with grading of the evidence according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Two levels of consensus were identified: consensus threshold (≥67% of voting guideline committee members voting either ‘Strongly agree’ or ‘Agree’ during the Delphi rounds) and high threshold (consensus ≥ 80%).

Results

One hundred and forty statements reached a high level of consensus concerning the management of hereditary adenomatous polyposis syndromes.

Conclusion

These updated guidelines provide current, comprehensive, and evidence-based practical recommendations for the management of surveillance and treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis patients, encompassing additionally MUTYH-associated polyposis, gastric adenocarcinoma and proximal polyposis of the stomach and other recently identified polyposis syndromes based on pathogenic variants in other genes than APC or MUTYH. Due to the rarity of these diseases, patients should be managed at specialized centres.