Introduction
Dose escalation (DE) of intravenous infliximab is an option for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients who lose response after induction therapy1, 2. DE of subcutaneous (SC) infliximab from 120 mg to 240 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) showed restoring efficacy in the 54-week LIBERTY-UC and LIBERTY-CD studies, and safety profiles were generally comparable between patients with or without DE3. Both two studies included an extension phase through Week (W) 102, and we present post-hoc long-term efficacy and safety results of DE in patients who treated in extension phase in two studies.
Aims & Methods
Patients with moderately to severely active UC and CD were treated with 3 doses of infliximab IV 5mg/kg as induction therapy (Weeks 0, 2 and 6). Clinical responders at W10 were randomized (2:1) to receive either CT-P13 SC 120 mg or placebo Q2W as maintenance therapy up to W54. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, would benefit from continued treatment entered open-label extension study from W56 to W102 and received CT-P13 SC 120 mg regardless of previously assigned arm. From W22, the patients who met loss of response criteria were permitted to escalate the dose to CT-P13 SC 240 mg Q2W through W102 for both arms. The results from CT-P13 SC arm are analyzed.
Results
A total of 237 and 180 patients who were randomly assigned to CT-P13 SC 120 mg arm and treated in extension phase in UC and CD study, each. Among them, DE from CT-P13 SC 120 mg to CT-P13 SC 240 mg prior to W102 was more common in UC than CD (30.0% [71/237] vs 20.6% [37/180]). Patients showed improvement in terms of clinical remission at W102 (both CD and UC) or endoscopic response at W102 (CD) after DE. Also, patients showed improvement in other efficacy endpoints after DE (Table 1). Compared to the first DE visit, patients who escalated the dose had a statistically significant reduction of more than half in mean modified Mayo score in UC (5.9 vs 2.1, P<0.0001) and mean CDAI score in CD (270.58 vs 76.31, P<0.0001) at W102.
The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the maintenance and extension phase of both studies was comparable between patients with and without DE (In UC, 84.7% [61/72] vs 78.1% [132/169], In CD, 86.8% [33/38] vs 79.7% [118/148]). Among these, TEAEs of infection were as follows; In UC, 40.3% (29/72) vs 43.2% (73/169), In CD, 55.3% (21/38) vs 42.6% (63/148). The incidence rate of treatment-emergent serious adverse events in the maintenance and extension phase of both studies was also comparable between patients with and without DE (In UC, 12.5% [9/72] vs 10.1% [17/169], In CD, 13.2% [5/38] vs 10.8% [16/148]).
| Table 1. Summary of efficacy outcome in CT-P13 SC treated patients at Week 102 |
| CT-P13 SC in LIBERTY-CD | CT-P13 SC in LIBERTY-UC |
| | Proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes at W102 regardless of dose escalation, n/N* (%) | Proportion of patients with dose escalation achieving efficacy outcomes at W102, n’/N** (%) | | Proportion of patients achieving efficacy outcomes at W102 regardless of dose escalation, n/N (%) | Proportion of patients with dose escalation achieving efficacy outcomes at W102, n’/N’ (%) |
| Clinical remission1 | 142/180 (78.9%) | 26/37 (70.3%) | Clinical remission7 | 132/237 (55.7%) | 25/71 (35.2%) |
| Endoscopic response2 | 102/180 (56.7%) | 15/37 (40.5%) | Endoscopic-histologic mucosal improvement8 | 119/237 (50.2%) | 21/71 (29.6%) |
| Clinical response3 | 148/180 (82.2%) | 25/37 (67.6%) | Clinical response9 | 167/237 (70.5%) | 43/71 (60.6%) |
| Corticosteroid-free remission4 | 44/74 (59.5%) | 13/19 (68.4%) | Corticosteroid-free remission10 | 49/96 (51.0%) | 14/41 (34.1%) |
Clinical remission (alternative definition)5 | 131/180 (72.8%) | 24/37 (64.9%) | - | - | - |
| Endoscopic remission6 | 71/180 (39.4%) | 8/37 (21.6%) | - | - | - |
n = Number of patients achieving efficacy endpoints at Week 102 regardless of dose escalation; N*= Number of patients who were randomly assigned to CT-P13 SC 120 mg arm and treated in extension phase and have a SES-CD score of at least 6 (or at least 4 if isolated ileal disease) at Screening; n’ = Number of patients achieving efficacy endpoints at Week 102 among dose-escalated patients; N**= Number of patients with dose escalation to CT-P13 SC 240 mg prior to Week 102 in CT-P13 SC 120 mg arm and treated in extension phase and have a SES-CD score of at least 6 (or at least 4 if isolated ileal disease) at Screening; N = Number of patients who were randomly assigned to CT-P13 SC 120 mg arm and treated in extension phase; N’= Number of patients with dose escalation to CT-P13 SC 240 mg prior to Week 102 in CT-P13 SC 120 mg arm and treated in extension phase.
- Clinical remission, defined as an absolute Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) score of <150 points
- Endoscopic response at Week 102, defined as > 50% decrease in Simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD) score from the baseline value
- Clinical response, defined as a decrease in CDAI score of 100 points or more from the baseline value
- Corticosteroid-free remission, defined as being in clinical remission (by an absolute CDAI score of <150) in addition to not receiving any corticosteroids for at least 8 weeks prior to Week 102, among the patients who used oral corticosteroids at baseline
- Clinical remission, defined as an average worst daily abdominal pain (AP) score of ≤1 (using 4-point scale) and an average daily loose/watery stool frequency (SF) score of ≤3 (of Type 6 or Type 7 on BSFS) with no worsening in either average score compared with the baseline value.
- Endoscopic remission, defined as an absolute SES-CD score of ≤4 with no sub-score of >1
- Clinical remission, defined as modified Mayo score with stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 point, rectal bleeding subscore 0 point, and endoscopic subscore 0 or 1 point
- Endoscopic-histologic mucosal improvement, defined as absolute endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 point from modified Mayo score and an absolute Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) score of 3 points or less with an accompanying lamina propria neutrophils and neutrophils in epithelium subscore of 0 point
- Clinical response, defined as decrease in modified Mayo score from baseline of at least 2 points and at least 30%, with an accompanying decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of at least 1 point or an absolute rectal bleeding subscore of 0 or 1 point
- Corticosteroid-free remission, defined as being in clinical remission (by modified Mayo score) in addition to not requiring any treatment with corticosteroid for at least 8 weeks at Week 102, among the patients who used oral corticosteroids at baseline
|
Conclusion
DE of CT-P13 SC from 120 mg to 240 mg Q2W following IV induction in patients who initially respond but subsequently lose response, shows clinical efficacy over an extended observation period of 102 weeks. Safety profiles were generally comparable between patients with or without DE, and no new safety concerns were found after DE as well in long term treatment.
References
1 Taxonera C et al. Infliximab dose escalation as an effective strategy for managing secondary loss of response in ulcerative colitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2015; 60 (10): 3075-3084
2 Cesarini M et al. Dose optimization is effective in ulcerative colitis patients losing response to infliximab: A collaborative multicentre retrospective study. Dig Liver Dis.2014; 46(2): 135-139
3 S. Danese et al. MP362 Subcutaneous infliximab (CT-P13 SC) dose escalation as an option for managing the loss of response in inflammatory bowel disease: post hoc analysis of LIBERTY-UC study and LIBERTY-CD study. Gastroenterology. Volume 166, Issue 3, Supplement, 2024, Page S13
Disclosure
• S. Schreiber: Consultancy and personal fees from AbbVie, Arena, BMS, Biogen, Celltrion, Celgene, Falk, Ferring, Fresenius, Gilead, HIKMA, IMAB, Janssen, MSD, Morphic, Pfizer, Protagonist, Provention Bio, Sandoz, Takeda, and Theravance.
• J.F. Colombel: Receiving payment for lectures from AbbVie, Amgen, Allergan, Inc. Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Shire, and Takeda; Receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Galmed Research, Genentech, Glaxo Smith Kline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Kaleido Biosciences, Imedex, Immunic, Iterative Scopes, Merck, Microbia, Novartis, PBM Capital, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, Sanofi, Takeda, TiGenix, Vifor; Hold stock options in Intestinal Biotech Development.
• S.B. Hanauer: Consultancy from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Arena, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Cosmos, Catalys Pacific, Covance, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus, Receptos, Salix, Samsung Bioepis, Seres Therapeutics, Sorriso, Takeda, TLL, UCB, Vhsquared; Clinical Research for AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, Celgene, Genentech, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus, Receptos, Takeda, UCB; Speaker for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda; Independent Data Monitoring Conference for Arena, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gossamer, Prometheus, Protagonist.
• W. Sandborn: Consulting fees from Alimentiv, Shoreline Biosciences; Stock or stock options from Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Ventyx Biosciences, Mirador Therapeutics; Employee at Ventyx Biosciences, Mirador Therapeutics; Board of Directors at Prometheus Laboratories.
• B.E. Sands: Consultant or received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Adiso Therapeutics, AgomAb, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Artizan Biosciences, Artugen Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bacainn Therapeutics, Biora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celltrion, ClostraBio, Connect Biopharm, Cytoki Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Enthera, Evommune, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Genentech, Glaxo SmithKline, Gossamer Bio, HMP Acquisition, Imhotex, Immunic, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kaleido, Kalyope, Merck, MiroBio, Morphic Therapeutic, MRM Health, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonist Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, RedHill Biopharma, Sun Pharma Global, Surrozen, Synlogic Operating Company, Takeda, Target RWE, Theravance Biopharma R&D, TLL Pharmaceutical, USWM Enterprises, Ventyx Biosciences, Viela Bio.
• S. Danese: Consultancy fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, AstraZeneca, Athos Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Gilead, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Morphic, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, Teladoc Health, TiGenix, UCB Inc., Vial, Vifor. Reports lecture fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc., Gilead, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, Takeda.
• S.J. Lee, S.H. Kim, Y.J. Bae, S.H. Lee, S.G. Lee, J.H. Lee, J.M. Kim, G.H. Park, J.M. Lee, J.H. Lee are Employee of Celltrion, Inc.