Introduction

The efficacy of IL-23 blockade has implicated IL-23 in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and myeloid cells that express FcγRI (CD64) have been identified as the primary cellular source of IL-23 in inflamed IBD gut tissue [1, 2]. Guselkumab (GUS), risankizumab (RZB), and mirikizumab (MIRI) are monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) specifically directed against the IL-23p19 subunit. GUS is a fully human IgG1 mAb, RZB is a humanized IgG1 mAb, and MIRI is a humanized IgG4 mAb. Guselkumab has a native Fc domain while RZB and MIRI contain mutations in the Fc domain that diminish binding to FcγRs.

Aims & Methods

Here, we evaluated CD64 and IL-23 transcript expression in IBD patient gut biopsies, binding of GUS, RZB, and MIRI to IL-23 and CD64, and their potency for neutralization of recombinant or endogenous, locally produced, IL-23 in in vitro assays. IL23A, IL12B, and FCGR1A (CD64) expression was analyzed from bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing datasets. IL-23 binding affinity was evaluated using a kinetic exclusion assay. Binding of GUS, RZB, and MIRI to CD64 was assessed in cells with recombinant expression of CD64. Potency for inhibition of recombinant IL-23 was evaluated by impact on IL-23-induced phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Potency for inhibition of endogenous, locally produced IL-23 was determined in a co-culture of THP-1 (a CD64⁺ monocyte cell line activated to produce IL-23) and an IL-23 reporter cell line (measuring biologically active IL-23).

Results

Analysis of bulk and single cell RNA sequencing datasets showed that FCGR1A, IL23A, and IL12B were significantly increased in inflamed versus non-inflamed IBD gut biopsies, and that IL23A was predominantly expressed by FCGR1A-expressing myeloid cells. GUS, RZB, and MIRI displayed single-digit picomolar binding affinity for IL-23. GUS demonstrated binding to CD64, while no binding was observed for RZB or MIRI. GUS, RZB, and MIRI demonstrated comparable potency for inhibition of signaling by recombinant IL-23 in human PBMCs. However, in a co-culture of IL-23–producing CD64⁺ THP-1 cells with an IL-23–responsive reporter cell line, GUS demonstrated enhanced potency compared to RZB and MIRI for inhibition of IL-23 signaling.

Conclusion

Our transcriptomic analysis supported previous observations of CD64⁺ myeloid cells as a key source of IL-23 production in inflamed IBD gut tissue. GUS binding to CD64 on IL-23–producing cells likely contributed to the enhanced functional potency of GUS compared to RZB and MIRI for inhibition of IL-23 signaling in the co-culture assay. These in vitro data support a hypothesis for optimal localization of GUS in inflamed tissues where CD64⁺ IL-23–producing myeloid cells are increased and in proximity to IL-23–responsive lymphoid cells, enabling GUS to more potently neutralize IL-23 at its source of production.

References

1. Chapuy, L., et al., IL-12 and Mucosal CD14+ Monocyte-Like Cells Induce IL-8 in Colonic Memory CD4+ T Cells of Patients With Ulcerative Colitis but not Crohn's Disease. J Crohns Colitis, 2020. 14(1): p. 79-95.
2. Chapuy, L., et al., Two distinct colonic CD14(+) subsets characterized by single-cell RNA profiling in Crohn's disease. Mucosal Immunol, 2019. 12(3): p. 703-719.

Disclosure

RA served as a paid or unpaid consultant for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, Dr. Falk Pharma, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Merk Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Stelic, sterna biologicals, Takeda, and Tillotts.
JRA served as a consultant for Abbvie, Ferring, Finch, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roivant, Seres Therapeutics, and Roivant Adiso; served as a speaker for Abbvie, Bristol Myer Squibb, and Janssen; and received research support from Janssen, Merck, and Pfizer.
MTA is a consultant or served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Arena Pharmaceuticals Inc. (now Pfizer), Bristol Myers Squibb, Celsius Therapeutics, Lilly, Gilead, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Global Services, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and UCB; and received fees for lecturing from Alimentiv, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Prime, and WebMD Global LLC.
AH, HI, TF, EL, MD, PB, TS, JW, IS, KK, AF and KS are employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC and may hold stock in Johnson & Johnson.

Introduction

The phase 2b GALAXI 1 and phase 3 GALAXI 2&3 studies evaluated guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor, in participants (pts) with moderately to severely active CD.¹ Pts treated with ustekinumab (UST) who met inadequate response criteria during the long-term extension (LTE) could cross over to GUS 200 mg SC q4w. Here, we present efficacy and safety results in pts who received GUS after experiencing an inadequate response to UST in the pooled GALAXI LTE.

Aims & Methods

Individuals with prior inadequate response or intolerance to UST were excluded from GALAXI; however, during the LTE, pts treated with UST 90 mg SC q8w who met inadequate treatment response criteria (not in clinical response [≥100-point reduction in CDAI score from baseline or CDAI<150] and CDAI ≥220) between Wks 52-80 of LTE were eligible for a treatment switch to GUS 200 mg SC q4w, without IV induction. Clinical response and clinical remission (CDAI<150) were both assessed 16 weeks after treatment switch. Endoscopic response (≥50% improvement from baseline SES-CD or SES-CD≤2) and endoscopic remission (SES-CD≤4 and ≥2-point reduction from baseline and no subscore >1 in any individual component) were assessed at Wk 96. Safety was assessed through Wk 96.

Results

In total, 80 pts treated with UST underwent treatment switch to GUS 200 mg SC q4w maintenance therapy due to meeting inadequate treatment response criteria between Wks 52-80 of the LTE. Of these 80 pts, 75 were included in the efficacy analyses (baseline mean age, 35.2yrs; male, 64.0%; mean CD disease duration, 8.21yrs; mean CDAI, 291.5; mean SES-CD, 12.8; history of inadequate response/intolerance to biologics [BIO-IR], 60.0%).
The proportions of pts achieving clinical response and clinical remission 16 weeks after treatment switch from UST to GUS 200 mg SC q4w were 61.3% and 52.0%, respectively. These results were comparable to the proportions of pts treated with GUS 200 mg IV q4w induction in the BIO-IR subgroup of the total LTE population who achieved clinical response and clinical remission at Wk 12 (61.7% and 46.7%, respectively).
The proportions of pts achieving endoscopic response and endoscopic remission at Wk 96 (ie, ~1 year after treatment switch from UST to GUS 200 mg SC q4w) were 49.3% and 30.7%, respectively. These results were similar to the proportions of pts in the BIO-IR subgroup receiving GUS 200 mg SC q4w maintenance who achieved endoscopic response and endoscopic remission at Wk 48 (57.2% and 35.5%, respectively).
Safety results are summarized in the Table.

Table. Safety Summary From Treatment Switch Through Week 96

Conclusion

Among pts who experienced inadequate response to UST in the LTE, more than half achieved clinical remission 16 weeks after treatment switch to GUS 200 mg SC q4w, and approximately 50% were in endoscopic response ~1 year after treatment switch. These data suggest pts with an inadequate treatment response to UST may benefit from GUS treatment. Results should be interpreted considering that pts received GUS SC maintenance therapy directly without IV induction. Key safety event rates were consistent with the known safety profile of GUS in approved indications.

References

1) Sachen K, Hammaker D, Sarabia I, et al. Frontiers in Immunology. 2025; doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1532852.

Disclosure

AA reports potential conflicts of interest with AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, DiaSorin, Eli Lilly, Gilead, IBD Horizons, Janssen, Pfizer, Takeda, and TLL Pharmaceuticals
DW reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Takeda
RL reports having received advisory board fees from AbbVie, Aspen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chiesi, Ferring, Glutagen, Hospira, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, and Takeda; received research grants from Celltrion, Shire, Janssen, Takeda, Joanna Tiddy grant from University of Sydney, McCusker Charitable Trust, Gastroenterological Society of Australia, NHMRC, Gutsy Group, and Pfizer
RVR, WvD, and CB are employees of Johnson & Johnson and own company stock/stock options.
TH received grant support from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, JIMRO Co. Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Boston Scientific Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., consulting fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, EA pharma Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Pfizer Inc., Nichi-Iko Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, and lecture fee from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, AbbVie GK, EA pharma Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., JIMRO Co., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc. Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
JP reports consultancy fees/honorarium from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Athos, Atomwise, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celsius, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mirum, Nimbus, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus, Protagonist, Revolo, Sanofi, Sorriso, Surrozen, Takeda, and Wasserman, and has served on a data safety monitoring board for Alimentiv, Mirum, Sorriso, Sanofi, and Surrozen.

Introduction

Fistulizing perianal Crohn’s disease (CD) remains a significant therapeutic challenge, with limited randomized controlled trials to date, restricted so far to infliximab and, more recently, filgotinib. The USTAP (NCT04496063) trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UST in patients with actively draining perianal fistulas through a multicenter randomized controlled design.

Aims & Methods

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial enrolled adult patients with active draining fistulizing perianal CD. Between April 2020 and June 2024, eligible patients with persistent fistula drainage were randomized 1:1, after seton placement when necessary, to receive either UST (6 mg/kg IV at baseline followed by 90 mg SC at week 8, then every 8 weeks) or placebo. Steroids were allowed at baseline with a standardized steroid taper. Seton removal was planned at week 6. The primary endpoint was combined clinical remission (absence of drainage from all external fistula openings) and radiological remission (defined as the absence of abscesses >2 cm confirmed by blinded central pelvic MRI) at week 12. Secondary endpoints included clinical remission, radiological remission, changes in disease activity (CDAI, PDAI), IBD-DI, and safety. Endpoints were independently reviewed by a blinded adjudication committee. Randomization was stratified by prior anti-TNF exposure and study center. The intended sample size was 73 patients per group to detect a 20% difference in remission rates (power 80%, alpha 5%). Due to slow recruitment, the study was discontinued in June 2024 after randomizing 32 patients, without unblinding the study data. Patients were subsequently followed until week 48.

Results

Thirty-three patients consented to participate with 32 patients (women: 41%; median age: 42) ultimately randomized (UST: 16; placebo: 16) across 10 French centers. Seventy percent had prior anti-TNF exposure (50% in UST arm, 50% in placebo arm), and 23% had previously failed two or more anti-TNF therapies. At baseline, 84% had one draining fistula, 16% had two, and 25% had associated abscesses. At week 12, combined remission was achieved in 62% in the UST group versus 25% in the placebo group (Table). Clinical remission was observed in 69% in the UST group vs. 31% in the placebo group, while radiological remission rates were 87.5% in the UST group and 75% in the placebo group. In the UST arm, mean change in CDAI, PDAI and IBD-DI from baseline to week 12 was -56.3, -2.2 and -4.9, (vs. -9.8, -1.6 and +4.9, in the placebo arm, respectively). Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were similar in both treatment groups: 23 AE (62%) occurred in the placebo group, and 14 AE (38%) in the UST group. Six SAEs were reported overall, including two gastrointestinal events, one renal disorder, and one anal abscess. Two patients in the placebo group discontinued study by week 6 due to SAEs (an anal abscess and a peri-ileal abscess).

Conclusion

In this trial, where the majority of patients had prior anti-TNF exposure, the observed short-term clinical benefit of UST supports its use in fistulizing perianal CD.

Disclosure

This work was supported by a grant from Johnson & Johnson
Pauline Wils : Johnson & johnson, Takeda, Amgen, Abbvie, Celltrion, Ferring
S Nancey: Abbvie, Johnson and Johnson, Fresenius Kabi, Biogen, Takeda, Medac, Celltrion, MSD, Pfizer, Sandoz, Lilly,Ferring, Amgen
E. Messmer: No conflict of interest for this study
A Bourreille: Johnson and Johnson
A Buisson: Consulting fees from: Abbvie, Amgen, Arena, Biocon, Biogen, Celltrion Healthcare, CTMA, Ferring, Galapagos/AlfaSigma, GutyCare/Resilience Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Nexbiome, Pileje, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda et Tillotts. Lecture fees from: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion Healthcare Galapagos/AlfaSigma, Ferring, Janssen, Lilly, Mayoli-Spindler, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Norgine, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Tillotts and Vifor Pharma. Research grants/fundings from: Abbvie, Celltrion Healthcare, Janssen, Lessaffre, Lilly, Pfizer, Sandoz and Takeda
L Caillo: No conflict of interest for this study
L Vuitton: abbvie amgen J&J Pfizer Takeda Lilly MSD Mayoli Ferring Dr Falk Alpha Sigma
R Altwegg: Abbvie, Johnson ans Johnson, Takeda, Pfizer, Lilly, Alphasigma, Celltrion, Amgen, Biogen, Sandoz, Ferring
X Hébuterne reports clinical research funding from Abbvie, Abivax, Amgen, Celltrion, Lilly, Fresenius-Kabi, J&J, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Prometheus, MSD, Roche, Takeda, serving on advisory boards for Abbvie, Biogen, Celltrion, Lilly, J&J, and participating in lectures and educational activities for Abbvie, Amgen, Celltrion, Lilly, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, J&J, MSD, Nestlé Health Sciences, Nutricia, Pfizer, Tillots, Takeda.
O Ernst: No conflict of interest for this study
P Meunier: No conflict of interest for this study
V Laurent: No conflict of interest for this study
D Laharie: received board and lecture fees from: Abbvie, Alfasigma, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Ferring, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Takeda
E Vicaut: No conflict of interest for this study
L Peyrin-Biroulet: Consulting : Abbvie, Abivax, Adacyte, Alimentiv, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena, Banook, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Connect Biopharm, Cytoki Pharma, Enthera, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, GSK, IAC Image Analysis, Index Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Mopac, Morphic, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Oncodesign Precision Medicine, ONO Pharma, OSE Immunotherapeuthics, Pandion Therapeuthics, Par' Immune, Pfizer, Prometheus, Protagonist, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Satisfay, Takeda, Telavant, Theravance, Thermo Fischer, Tigenix, Tillots, Viatris, Vectivbio, Ventyx, Ysopia ; lecture : Abbvie, Amgen, Arena, Biogen, Celltrion, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Tillots, Viatris

Introduction

Many prospective studies conducted in healthy volunteers have shown that diet is associated with the risk of developing IBD. By contrast, data are scarce on the role of diet in disease activity in patients with IBD. The aim of the present study was to find dietary factors associated with the risk of IBD relapses.

Aims & Methods

The “Mikinautes” e-cohort is a nationwide French prospective study recruiting IBD patients older than 6 years at inclusion and followed in private practice and public hospitals. French Crohn and Colitis Patients’ association was also involved in the design, funding and recruitment. Patients filled in online questionnaires about their dietary habits and health status. Validated food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) recorded average intakes of 230 food items over the past 12 months. Patients were followed for at least one year and medical records were prospectively collected. Relapse was defined by i) an increased disease activity reported monthly by the patients and/or a clinical report mentioning a relapse, together with ii) a documented consultation with a doctor and iii) a change in IBD therapy, either drug, enteral nutrition and/or surgery).
A posteriori dietary patterns (DPs) were identified using principal component analysis (PCA) performed on 31 food groups. Primary analysis was a Cox model among patients in remission at inclusion to reduce potential reverse causality. Secondary analyses included: i) a Cox model conducted among all patients, which measured the time between the onset of the last relapse before inclusion (or the ongoing relapse at inclusion) and the first relapse during follow-up and ii) a logistic model comparing inactive versus active patients (defined as patients who had at least one relapse at inclusion or over the first year of follow-up). Models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status and energy intake.

Results

After exclusion of 14 patients with implausible dietary intakes, 693 patients were retained for analyses, comprising 66% of females, 59% Crohn Disease (CD) patients, 34% ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and 7% indeterminate colitis (IC). Median follow-up [Q1-Q3] was 2.1 years [1.6;2.7]. 77% of patients were in remission at inclusion. Their cumulative probability (95% CI) of flare were 18% [15%; 21%] at 1 year and 25% [22%; 29%] at 2 years. In total, 36% of patients had an active disease after one year of follow-up (including active patients at inclusion).
Four DPs were identified through PCA. In CD, primary Cox analysis revealed an association between the second DP and disease activity (HR 95% CI: 0.42 [0.22;0.80] for 3^rdvs 1^st tertile of consumption, p-trend=0.050). This DP was characterized by high intakes of vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, cereals, eggs and unsweetened beverages and by a low consumption of dairy products and desserts, bread, sweet/fat or salty/fat products. Secondary analyses confirmed this association (HR: 0.37 [0.18;0.78] for 3^rdvs 1^st tertile, p-trend=0.010; OR: 0.42 [0.22;0.80] for 3^rdvs 1^st tertile, p-trend=0.010). In UC, fruit consumption was protective toward relapse in primary (HR: 0.46 [0.26;0.82] for 3^rdvs 1^st tertile, p-trend=0.009) together with secondary analyses; no dietary pattern was associated with relapse.

Conclusion

A diet characterized by a high consumption of fruit, vegetables, legumes and nuts is associated with a reduction in the risk of relapse by half in patients with CD. High fruit consumption is associated with the same decreased risk of relapse in patients with UC. These results inform dietary counseling in IBD.

References

Acknowledgements: This study was funded by the French association AFA Crohn-RCH France. It was supported by the networks of the Pediatric GETAID, the GETAID, the CREGG, the ANGH and EPIMAD. We thank Nutrinet-Santé, IBD patients and their doctors who contributed to this study.

Disclosure

FC reports receiving research grants from Alpha Wassermann, MaaT pharma, Mayoly Spindler, Medtronic, Nestlé; receiving payment for lectures from AbbVie, AlphaSigma, Ferring, Janssen, Eli Lilly,
Nestlé Health Sciences, Pierre Fabre, Pileje, Takeda, Tillots, Viatris ; receiving consulting fees from AbbVie, Janssen, MaaT pharma, Tillots. HS, SA, CGR, AB, LD and JPH have nothing to declare.

Introduction

Guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting interleukin-23p19 subunit inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in participants (pts) with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) induction. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of SC induction followed by SC maintenance through Week (W) 48 in ASTRO, a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, treat-through study in pts with moderately to severely active UC.

Aims & Methods

Eligible pts had modified Mayo scores of 5 to 9, rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≥2. Pts also had documented inadequate response/intolerance to biologics, Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, and/or sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) inhibitors (BIO/JAKi/S1Pi-IR) or to corticosteroids, 6-mercaptopurine, or azathioprine. Randomization was stratified by baseline BIO/JAKi/S1Pi-IR status and MES with 418 pts allocated 1:1:1 to GUS 400 mg SC every 4 weeks (q4w) (×3)→GUS 200 mg SC q4w (N=140), GUS 400 mg SC q4w (×3)→GUS 100 mg SC every 8 weeks (q8w) (N=139), or PBO SC (N=139). PBO pts who met rescue criteria were switched to GUS at W16; GUS pts who met rescue criteria stayed on their assigned GUS dose regimen (sham rescue).

Results

At W48, greater proportions of pts in the GUS groups achieved clinical remission compared with PBO (36.7% for GUS 100 mg q8w [Δ 29.5%], 42.9% for GUS 200 mg q4w [Δ 35.6%], 7.2% for PBO) (Table). Endoscopic remission proportions were 25.9% for GUS 100 mg q8w (Δ 20.9%), 26.4% for GUS 200 mg q4w (Δ 21.4%), and 5.0% for PBO. Clinical response, symptomatic remission, endoscopic improvement, histologic improvement, and histologic remission proportions were also greater for GUS vs PBO. Consistent with the results of the overall population, efficacy was also observed for subpopulations of BIO/JAKi/S1Pi-naïve and BIO/JAKi/S1Pi-IR pts. Safety events per 100 pts-years were not greater in the GUS groups compared with the PBO group: adverse events (AE) (GUS 100 mg q8w and 200 mg q4w vs PBO: 308.3 and 310.7 vs 357.1), serious AEs (6.5 and 8.2 vs 38.4), serious infections (0.8 and 2.5 vs 3.7), and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (4.9 and 4.1 vs 19.8).
Table. Efficacy endpoints at Week 48 in the overall population and by biologic, JAK inhibitor, and/or S1P inhibitor history

Conclusion

GUS SC induction followed by SC maintenance was efficacious through 1 year in pts with moderately to severely active UC, and the safety profile is consistent with GUS in its approved indications including UC.

Disclosure

ML reports research support from Lilly, Pfizer, and Takeda; consulting for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus, Roivant, Takeda, and Target RWE.
JRA reports grant support from Janssen, Merck, and Pfizer; consultancy fees from AbbVie, Adiso, Bristol Myers Squibb, Ferring, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Roivant, Celltrion, TrexBio, Shattuck Labs and Seres Therapeutics; payments for speaking from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Janssen; and is a steering committee member and investigator for Janssen.
SD reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Athos, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring, Gilead, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB, and Vifor; and reports lecture fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Ferring, Gilead, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, and Takeda.
MG, TB, YA, KH, SJ, LJ, and HZ are employees of and may own stock in Johnson & Johnson.
TH reports research grants from AbbVie GK, Boston Scientific Corporation, EA Pharma Co. Ltd., JIMRO Co. Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Zeria Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.; consulting fees from AbbVie GK, Abivax, Bristol Myers Squibb, EA Pharma Co. Ltd., Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Lilly, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.; and lecture fees from AbbVie GK, EA Pharma Co. Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., JIMRO Co., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
DTR reports consulting and/or speaker fees and/or advisory board participation for AbbVie, Altrubio, Apex, Avalo, Bristol Myers Squibb, Buhlmann Diagnostics, Celgene, Connect BioPharma, Intouch Group, Iterative Health, Janssen (Johnson & Johnson), Lilly, Pfizer, Samsung Neurologica, and Takeda; Altrubio, Datos Health, and Iterative Health stock options; grants from Takeda; and membership on the Board of Directors of Cornerstones Health, Inc. and on the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation’s Board of Trustees.
LPB reports grants or contracts from Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Medac, MSD, and Takeda; consulting and/or payment or honoraria and/or data safety monitoring board or advisory board participation for AbbVie, Abivax, Adacyte, Alfasigma, Alimentiv, Amgen, Applied Molecular Transport, Arena, Banook, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Connect Biopharm, Cytoki Pharma, Enthera, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, GlaxoSmithKline, IAC Image Analysis, Index Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Janssen, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Medac, Mopac, Morphic, MSD, Nordic Pharma, Novartis, Oncodesign Precision Medicine, ONO Pharma, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pandion Therapeutics, Par' Immune, Pfizer, Prometheus, Protagonist, Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Satisfay, Takeda, Telavant, Theravance, Thermo Fischer, Tigenix, Tillots, Viatris, Vectivbio, Ventyx, and Ysopia; and meeting attendance/travel support from AbbVie, Alfasigma, Amgen, Celltrion, Connect Biopharm, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, Gossamer Bio, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Morphic, MSD, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Thermo Fischer, and Tillots.