Introduction

Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) are frequently associated with acute (AP) or recurrent pancreatitis (RP), likely due to the mucin-induced obstruction of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). According to the 2024 Kyoto Guidelines, pancreatitis represents an indication for surgical evaluation in IPMN patients. However, pancreatic sphincterotomy (PS) may represent a less invasive alternative for patients who are unfit for surgery or as a bridge to surgery, aiming to reduce the risk of further pancreatitis episodes.

Aims & Methods

This single-center retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PS in patients with BD-IPMN and RP. We included 33 patients who underwent PS between 2016 and 2023, with at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients with other causes of RP or prior pancreatic surgery were excluded. The frequency of pancreatitis episodes before and after PS was compared. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution or ≥50% reduction in pancreatitis episodes. Adverse events, presence of worrisome features (WF), and progression to high-risk stigmata (HRS) were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test and Fisher’s exact test, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

Among the 33 patients analyzed (39.4% female, 60.6% male, mean age 59 ± 13.9 years) clinical success was achieved in 81.8% of the cases. Specifically, 72.7% of the patients experienced no further AP episodes after PS and 9.1% experienced a reduction in episode frequency, while 18.2% of patients did not respond to treatment. Adverse events occurred in 15% of patients, including: 12% with post-ERCP pancreatitis (all mild) and 3% with intra-procedural bleeding; no perforations were reported. During follow-up WF emerged in 5 patients (15%), while no cases of HRS were identified. Among the 6 non-responders, 3 underwent a second PS, with 2 achieving clinical improvement, and 3 underwent duodenocephalopancreasectomy (DCP), including 1 for a concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) unrelated to IPMN progression. Notably, no cases of IPMN degeneration were observed in the series

Conclusion

Pancreatic sphincterotomy appears to be a safe and effective approach for managing recurrent pancreatitis in patients with BD-IPMN, potentially reducing the need for surgery in selected cases.

Clinical Case Summary

Cryptosporidiosis is a gastrointestinal infection caused by the protozoan Cryptosporidium spp. It is typically self-limited in immunocompetent patients. However, in immunocompromised individuals, it can lead to moderate to severe diarrhea and significant morbidity and mortality.¹
We present the case of a 31-year-old woman with a history of Crohn’s disease in remission, who presented with a one-week history of diarrhea (up to 10 bowel movements daily), abdominal pain, and fever (38°C). Laboratory tests revealed an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and intestinal ultrasound showed bowel wall thickening, hyperemia and wall disruption, suggestive of an active flare. However, routine stool culture isolated Cryptosporidium, and based on her clinical background, oral paromomycin and azithromycin were initiated, resulting in complete clinical remission.
Cryptosporidiosis is a common parasitic cause of diarrhea, particularly affecting immunocompromised patients, such as those with HIV, cancer or solid organ transplants.²
Although few cases have been described in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the immunosuppressive state of these patients may increase the risk of infection. Diagnosing cryptosporidiosis in this population can be challenging, as stool tests detect only about 30% of cases, and the clinical presentation often mimics an IBD flare.³
Treatment is generally supportive and reserved for severe or refractory cases. Nitazoxanide is the drug of choice, and in non-responders, it can be combined with fluoroquinolones or azithromycin. In IBD patients, the decision to initiate specific antiparasitic treatment depends on the degree of immunosuppression and the clinical scenario.⁴
A clear association between IBD and cryptosporidiosis has not been established, but it is crucial to rule out opportunistic gastrointestinal infections in suspected flare-ups before starting specific therapies.
image "Bowel wall thickening, hyperemia, and disruption of the normal layer pattern."

References

(1) Janssen B, Snowden J. Cryptosporidiosis. 2023 Jul 10. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan–. PMID: 28846353.
(2) Liu B, Schnider A, DeArmond M, Banach DB, Haubrich BA. Cryptosporidiosis in individuals with inflammatory bowel disease: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e086529. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086529. PMID: 39414295; PMCID: PMC11481120.
(3) Ferreira J, Baden R, Magge S, Cheifetz A. Cryptosporidiosis masquerading as a Crohn's flare. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2011 Oct;17(10):E133-4. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21811. Epub 2011 Jul 7. PMID: 21739536.
(4) Manthey MW, Ross AB, Soergel KH. Cryptosporidiosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:1580–6.