Introduction

Piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (pEMR) is the preferred treatment for large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs)[1,2]. A major limitation of pEMR is residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA), which was reported to in 15%-30% of cases at first surveillance colonoscopy (SC1)[3], performed 3-6 months after the index procedure, but is reduced to the range of 3%-5% by applying ablative measures to the post-EMR resection margin[4].

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of late SC1 on RRA.
This is an analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of adult patients referred for pEMR at two academic centers in Israel, from 2016 to 2023. We included all patients who underwent pEMR of LNCPCs and completed SC1.
We compared outcomes between patients who completed early SC1 at 3-6 months following the index procedure with patients who completed late SC1 later than 6 months. All procedures and surveillance colonoscopies were performed by experienced endoscopists trained in pEMR using high-definition scopes. EMR was followed by thermal ablation of the entire mucosal defect margin with snare soft tip coagulation, as previously described[4].
Scar evaluation at SC1 was performed with high-definition white light and chromoendoscopy. Our primary endpoint was RRA at SC1.
Analyses were performed per lesion. We compared baseline parameters and outcome rates between groups, and performed multivariate analysis to assess the adjusted association of months to SC1 with RRA.

Results

We analyzed 516 lesions that underwent index pEMR resection and subsequent SC1. Baseline parameters and recurrence rates are presented in Table 1. The early SC1 group (n=371) underwent SC1 at a mean of 5.1 months versus a mean of 11.1 months in the late SC1 group (p<0.01; Table 1). Polyp size in the early SC1 group was significantly larger than that in the late SC1 group (mean size 35.9 mm [SD 13.9] vs. 32.1 mm [SD 12.4], p<0.01; Table 1). The distribution of lesion location, granularity differed between the groups (Table 1). However, there were no significant differences in lesion Paris classification or rates of high grade dysplasia (Table 1).
We found no statistically significant difference in the rate of recurrence at SC1 between the two groups (6.3% in the standard group versus 4.8% in the delayed group, p=0.64). Additionally, a sub-analysis comparing the early SC1 group to patients with very late SC1 (>12 months – mean time to SC1 17.9 (SD [5.4] months) and did not reveal significant difference in recurrence at SC1 (6.2% in the early SC1 vs 6.3% in the very late group, p=1).
Multivariate analysis, adjusted for lesion size, location, and high-grade dysplasia, showed that time to SC1 was not significantly associated with RRA (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.13).

TABLE 1. Comparison of baseline variables and outcome between the early and late SC1.

Conclusion

Late SC1 is not associated with an increased RRA. Hence, we suggest that high-quality pEMR with margin ablation may alleviate the need for early SC1, thereby reducing healthcare and patient burdens. Further interventional studies are required.

References

[1] Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270–297. doi:10.1055/S-0043-102569/ID/JR15335-1/BIB
[2] Shaukat A, Kaltenbach T, Dominitz JA, et al. Endoscopic Recognition and Management Strategies for Malignant Colorectal Polyps: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 159: 1916-1934.e2. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.050
[3] Belderbos TDG, Leenders M, Moons LMG, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 388–400. doi:10.1055/S-0034-1364970/ID/JR910-7/BIB
[4] Klein A, Tate DJ, Jayasekeran V, et al. Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection. Gastroenterology 2019; 156: 604-613.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.003

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interests

Introduction

Biologic therapies such as anti-TNF-alpha agents (infliximab, adalimumab), interleukin modulators, and gut-selective integrin antagonists like vedolizumab have significantly improved outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), leading to enduring remission, better quality of life, and reduced surgical intervention and hospitalizations. However, many patients may eventually lose response, often due to factors like the formation of anti-drug antibodies, altered drug metabolism, or individual patient characteristics. Dose escalation—by increasing dosage or reducing intervals—is commonly used to counteract this loss, especially for anti-TNF therapies guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. Vedolizumab poses a greater challenge in this regard due to the lack of standardized monitoring protocols. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of dose-escalated infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab in IBD patients who worsened after initial response, evaluating outcomes such as treatment persistence and clinical remission, to guide more personalized, cost-effective treatment strategies.

Aims & Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of IBD patients who underwent Infliximab (IFX), vedolizumab, or adalimumab (ADA) therapy dose escalation between 2020-2024 at a tertiary IBD centre. Primary outcomes included clinical remission using disease activity scores (Simple Clinical Colitis Activity/SCCAI Index for UC, Harvey-Bradshaw Index/HBI for CD), biochemical markers (CRP, faecal calprotectin) and treatment persistence, evaluated at 3-12 months, 12 months, and annually up to 36 months post-escalation.

Results

A total of 155 patients (median age 31 years, 46% female) were included, of which 89 patients (57%) were prescribed dose-escalated IFX, 48 patients (31%) were prescribed dose-escalated ADA and 18 patients (12%) were prescribed dose-escalated Vedolizumab. Of those included, 118 patients (76%) had Crohn’s disease, 36 patients (23%) had ulcerative colitis (UC) and 1 patient (1%) had indeterminate disease. Indications for dose escalation included secondary loss of response (SLOR) (105/155; 68%) and/or low drug levels (65/155; 42%). Dose-escalated IFX led to significant improvements in disease activity scores at 3 months (HBI: p=0.002; SCCAI: p=0.0003). Improvement in SCCAI was maintained at 12 months (p=0.00007), 2 years (p=0.0008) and 3 years (p=0.025). Improvement in HBI was maintained at 2 years (p=0.01) and 3 years (p=0.049). Significant improvement in CRP following dose-escalated IFX was reported at 3 months (p=0.011), 12 months (p=0.004), 2 years (p=0.006) and 3 years (p=0.03). Dose-escalated ADA led to a significant improvement in HBI at 3 months (p=0.023). This improvement was maintained at 12 months (p=0.005) and 2 years (p=0.008). Early improvement in faecal calprotectin was reported at 3 months (p=0.046). Significant initial improvement in SCCAI following dose-escalated Vedolizumab was reported at 3 months (p=0.043). This improvement was not maintained at any further follow-up points (p>0.05). Minor adverse events were reported in 3 patients receiving dose escalated ADA and in 6 patients receiving dose escalated IFX.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that biologic dose escalation is an effective and safe mechanism to recapture clinical remission, with high rates of treatment persistence.

Introduction

Systemic corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for moderate to severe immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced enterocolitis (ICIec). Infliximab (IFX) is recommended for steroid-refractory cases; however, up to 28% of patients do not respond. Repeated-dose IFX regimens may improve outcomes and reduce recurrence, but optimal management strategies remain undefined. Here, we describe a series of patients treated with dashboard-guided IFX for ICIec.

Aims & Methods

A retrospective, descriptive case series was conducted at the IBD clinic of Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron between January 2021 and February 2025. The study included adult patients with ICIec who received IFX guided by a pharmacokinetic (pK) model. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed.

Results

The dashboard model was applied in five patients to provide additional guidance for treatment decisions. The median age was 60 years, and three patients were female. The median time between the first immunotherapy dose and development of ICIec was 14.8 weeks. Endoscopy revealed extensive disease in 60% of patients, and 40% also had upper GI involvement. At baseline, 40% had severe inflammation. Median IFX levels at weeks 1 and 2 following the first IFX dose were 23.5 µg/mL and 22.3 µg/mL, respectively. The median interval between the first and second IFX doses was 12 days. Clinical remission was achieved in 4 out of 5 patients (80%). With a median follow-up of 16.7 ± 8 weeks, 4 of 5 patients (80%) remained in clinical remission without ICIec recurrence; one patient died due to an infectious complication.

Conclusion

Dashboard-guided IFX dosing showed benefit in ICIec patients. Use of pharmacokinetic modeling may support more tailored IFX dosing strategies, potentially improving treatment outcomes in a subset of ICIec patients with severe or extensive disease. Prospective studies are needed to better define optimal treatment strategies for ICIec.