Introduction

Recent developments in diagnostic imaging have increased the detection rate of lymphoma, for which a clear, histopathological diagnosis is critical for the subsequent choice of therapeutic regimen. Over the past decade, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) has become widely-used means of tissue collection. However the open lymph node biopsy has conventionally been used to diagnose lymphoma histologically, and the evidence backing the use of EUS-FNA/B for this purpose is still limited.

Aims & Methods

The present study aimed to compare the performance of EUS-FNA/B and the open biopsy for diagnosing lymphoma by retrospectively analyzing 1113 patients with 1224 lesions who underwent either of the two methods at the study center between 2012 and 2024. The patients’ background, pathological diagnosis, procedural factors, and complications were evaluated. The performance of the open biopsy was compared with that of EUS-FNAB in diagnosing lymphoma in accordance with the 5^th edition of the World Health Organization classification of hematolymphoid tumours ¹⁾ (WHO classification).

Results

An open biopsy was performed for 943 lesions, 621 of which were malignant lymphomas, with the face, head, neck, axilla or groin, limb, and other areas being the site of 46, 556, 96, 225, 4, and 16 lesions, respectively. EUS-FNAB was performed for 281 lesions, 82 of which were malignant lymphomas, with the intra-abdominal area, mediastinum, and rectum being the site of 270, 10, and 1 lesion, respectively. The needle gauge used for FNA was 19G, 22G, and 25G in 1, 143, and 36 lesions, respectively, while and the needle gauge for FNB was 20G, 22G, and 25G in 3, 74, and 3 lesions, respectively. The mean number of punctures was 2.3 (range 1-9). EUS-FNAB involved significantly fewer, procedural complications than the open biopsy (14/943 vs 0/281; p=0.04). According to the WHO classification, the diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) of the open biopsy has sensitivity 93.4 % (91.1-95.2), specificity 100.0 % (98.3-100.0), positive predictive value 100.0 % (99.0-100.0), and negative predictive value 88.7 % (85.0-91.8). The diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) of EUS-FNAB according to the same classification has sensitivity 79.3 % (68.9-87.4), specificity 100.0 % (97.2-100.0), positive predictive value 100 % (91.8-100.0), and negative predictive value 92.1 % (87.7-95.3 %). Between the groups, there was no significant difference in the proportion of lesions for which immunostaining was able to be performed (615/621 vs 80/82; p = 0.24). The positive diagnosis rate was significantly higher for the open biopsy (580/621 vs 27/40; p < 0.001) but did not differ significantly for the EUS-FNB (580/621 vs 38/42; p = 0.52). Univariate and multivariate analyses found that needle type (FNB needle) was a procedural factor in EUS (needle type, gauge, number of punctures, stroke length) contributing to the diagnosis of lymphoma (odds ratio: 3.83; p = 0.037).

Conclusion

EUS was less complicated than the open biopsy as means of collecting tissue for histologically diagnosing lymphoma, and EUS-FNB had a positive diagnosis rate comparable to that of the open biopsy.

References

1. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Myeloid and Histiocytic/Dendritic Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1703-1719.

Introduction

The PROFILE trial in patients with newly-diagnosed Crohn’s disease demonstrated that “top-down” therapy, with combination infliximab and immunomodulator from diagnosis, provided superior efficacy and a better safety profile over a one-year follow-up period compared to a conventional “accelerated step-up” management approach.

Aims & Methods

The current study aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness by assessing the healthcare cost and health outcomes associated with starting anti-TNF medication (intravenous infliximab, subcutaneous infliximab, subcutaneous adalimumab) as soon as possible after diagnosis. A de novo Markov model was developed to model the cost-effectiveness of using a “top-down” compared to “accelerated step-up” strategy in adults newly-diagnosed with active Crohn’s disease (HBI score >7, elevated CRP and/or faecal calprotectin >200ug/g and endoscopic evidence of disease activity with simple endoscopic score of Crohn’s disease activity of >6 [>4 if ileal-only disease]). Parameters were informed by individual patient data from PROFILE and data from the published literature. Use of intravenous infliximab, or subcutaneous infliximab, or subcutaneous adalimumab from diagnosis were modelled with biosimilar costs based on average real-world UK contract drug costs ascertained from 18 PROFILE trial sites in 2024. Key model outcomes included healthcare costs (drug acquisition, drug administration, disease management, hospitalisation, surgery) and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years gained [QALYs]) measured over a 5-year time horizon.

Results

The base case cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that a “top-down” strategy dominated over an “accelerated step-up” approach. Initiating intravenous infliximab from diagnosis yielded greater clinical benefits, with an incremental gain of 0.17 QALYs per patient over a 5-year period, and was less costly, saving £1,681 per patient over the same time frame. Similar clinical benefits were obtained when modelling use of SC infliximab and adalimumab. The greatest cost savings were with adalimumab, totalling £10,059 per patient over 5 years. Sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of the results for “top-down” therapy, showing it to be the most cost-effective option in 98.7% of model simulations.

Conclusion

This health economic analysis demonstrates that early effective “top-down” treatment with anti-TNF therapy from diagnosis results in lower healthcare resource use compared to an “accelerated step-up” strategy. The economic benefits align with improved clinical outcomes, as early, effective treatment better controls inflammation. Patients experience longer periods in remission, fewer disease-related flares, and enhanced quality of life. These findings were demonstrated for intravenous infliximab, subcutaneous infliximab and subcutaneous adalimumab. In newly-diagnosed patients with active Crohn’s disease, “top-down” treatment with anti-TNF therapy is more efficacious, safer and cost-effective than “accelerated step-up” based treatment strategies.

References

Noor NM, Lee JC, Bond S et al. A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):415-427.

Disclosure

NMN declares educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma AG.

Introduction

An increasing number of patients in clinical practice are transitioning from intravenous (IV) to subcutaneous (SC) dosing of infliximab. In this simulation study, we evaluated hypothetical dosing scenarios for both (normal to obese) adults and children switching from steady-state IV to SC infliximab, as well as those initiating SC infliximab therapy.

Aims & Methods

By combining two previous published infliximab models (1,2) we were able to simulate both IV and SC dosing in adults and children. Various dosing regimens were simulated using a large virtual population. In each scenario, the distribution of trough concentrations and area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) was calculated.

Results

Peak levels were higher after IV dosing compared to SC dosing, while trough levels were higher after SC dosing leading to more stable infliximab levels over time. Overall exposure remained largely similar when switching from a standard IV to SC dosing regimen. Patients with a high body mass index and those on high-frequency IV dosing regimens of infliximab demonstrated reduced exposure when transitioned to the fixed SC dose. Paediatric patients exhibited higher exposure on the fixed SC dose. Simulation of SC induction schemes demonstrated early achievement of steady state plasma levels.

Conclusion

Infliximab exposure (AUC) remains largely similar when transitioning from standard IV to SC dosing. Current dosing regimens may not be optimal for morbidly obese patients, paediatric patients and patients on high-frequency infliximab regimens. These findings provide a foundation for future clinical research to refine SC infliximab dosing in these populations.

References

1) Hanzel J, Bukkems LH, Gecse KB, D’Haens GR, Mathôt RAA. Population pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous infliximab CT-P13 in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021;54:1309–19.
2) Fasanmade AA, Adedokun OJ, Blank M, Zhou H, Davis HM. Pharmacokinetic Properties of Infliximab in Children and Adults with Crohn’s Disease: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from 2 Phase III Clinical Trials. Clin Ther. 2011;33:946–64.

Disclosure

RW has no conflicts of interest. RK is an employee and stockholder of Insight RX, a company developing clinical decision software. LD has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celltrion, Janssen-Cilag and Takeda and has developed continuing education materials for Ferring, all outside the submitted work.