Introduction
The surgical landscape for ulcerative colitis (UC) is evolving alongside the expanding use of advanced medical therapies. Whether the introduction and widespread adoption of biologic and small-molecule therapies have altered the long-term need for colectomy in UC remains controversial. In addition, the surgical pathway following subtotal colectomy remains a point of clinical variation. Restoration of intestinal continuity can be achieved via ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), traditionally considered the gold standard, or ileo-rectal anastomosis (IRA)1. However, a significant proportion of patients opt for a permanent ileostomy. Recent data highlight considerable international and regional variability in these practices2.
Aims & Methods
We aimed to describe the contemporary landscape of UC surgery using the UK IBD BioResource, a national platform recruiting from over 100 centres3.
We analysed patients with a confirmed diagnosis of UC undergoing a subtotal colectomy. Temporal trends in colectomy incidence and IPAA uptake were evaluated across two eras, using 2012 as a cut-off to reflect the period following the widespread availability of anti-TNF maintenance and newer agents. Risk of colectomy was assessed using Cox regression, and IPAA formation was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression.
Results
Our cohort included 14,248 patients with UC. Of those patients, 965 (6.8%) underwent a subtotal colectomy.
The risk of colectomy was significantly lower in the recent era (after 2012) compared with the earlier era (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.98, p=0.028).
Among those with a colectomy and fully available surgical details (n=627), 333 (53%) had an ileo-anal pouch and 294 (47%) did not.
Most notably, patients undergoing colectomy after 2012 were significantly less likely to receive an ileo-anal pouch than those in the earlier era (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.07–0.16, p<0.001).
Indications for colectomy have remained stable across eras.
Among patients who underwent a subtotal colectomy without a subsequent IPAA, 61.5% had the rectum remaining in situ, whereas 28.5% underwent completion proctectomy.
Conclusion
We demonstrate a previously unreported and significant decline in the uptake of restorative pouch surgery after colectomy for UC in the UK.
This trend may reflect shifts in surgical decision-making and/or evolving patient preferences.
Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying drivers of this marked shift in clinical practice.
References
1. Worley GHT, Vaughan-Shaw P, Sahnan K. Surgical management of ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg. 2023 Jul 17;110(8):885-887.
2. Worley G, Nordenvall C, Askari A, Pinkney T, Burns E, Akbar A, Olén O, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Myrelid P, Faiz O. Restorative surgery after colectomy for ulcerative colitis in England and Sweden: observations from a comparison of nationwide cohorts. Colorectal Dis. 2018 Sep;20(9):804-812.
3. Parkes M; IBD BioResource Investigators. IBD BioResource: an open-access platform of 25 000 patients to accelerate research in Crohn's and Colitis. Gut. 2019 Sep;68(9):1537-1540.