Introduction

Antibiotic resistance is one of the main reasons for H. pylori treatment failure. International guidelines recommend that the choice of antibiotics used to treat H. pylori in a given population should be based on the pattern of antibiotic resistance in that region. However, H. pylori antibiotic resistance testing is not routinely carried out in the majority of Irish Hospitals. Recent evidence from the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group has indicated that resistance to certain commonly used antibiotics to eradicate H. pylori varies between European countries, and in certain areas resistance has reached a sufficient level to avoid prescribing these antibiotics as empirical therapy (1). In addition, previous antibiotic use positively correlates with resistance for two major classes of antibiotics commonly used to treat H. pylori infection (1). Because antibiotic resistance is a constantly evolving process, the European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group and the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report (2) have highlighted the importance for local resistance surveys to be carried out on a regular basis in order to guide clinicians in their choice of therapy for successful eradication of H. pylori.

Aims & Methods

In this multisite study we aimed to assess the rate of primary and secondary antibiotic resistance for H. pylori in Ireland, with a view to guiding national treatment strategies. The study comprised of four sites with samples analyzed from two large urban teaching hospitals and two rural teaching hospitals. Patients attending for gastroscopy were invited to participate in the study. Following informed consent, 1 antrum and 1 corpus gastric biopsy were collected from each patient and transported to the laboratory in selective medium. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was carried out by E-test (bioMerieux) and resistance classified according to the EUCAST clinical breakpoints MIC values.

Results

In total, 126 isolates were successfully cultured and antimicrobial susceptibility assessed. 103 of these were isolates of treatment naïve patients (50±16 years old, 59% male) and 23 were of previously treated patients (48±12 years old, 61% female). As can be seen in table 1, primary antibiotic resistance rates have reached alarmingly high levels for both clarithromycin and metronidazole, and reach nearly double the rate of resistance with the previously treated group.

Conclusion

Antibiotic resistance rates have reached significant levels for all major classes of antibiotics for the treatment of H. pylori. Of note, first-line clarithromycin triple therapy can no longer be recommended in Ireland.

References

(1) Megraud F et al. Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics in Europe in 2018 and its relationship to antibiotic consumption in the community. Gut. 2021
(2) Malfertheiner P, et al Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report Gut 2022;71:1724-1762.
(3) Smith, S. et al. The Irish Helicobacter pylori Working Group consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection in adult patients in Ireland. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 29, 552–559 (2017).

Introduction

Gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage accounts for 30% of acute decompensations in cirrhotic patients, with 60% originating from variceal bleeding. Each decompensation episode carries an in-hospital mortality rate of 13%, and a 6-week mortality rate of 20%, commonly assed using Child Pugh (CP) and MELD scores. The ALBI (Albumin-Bilirubin) score, which includes only two variables, offers a simplified evaluation of liver function. However, there is limited data on its utility in predicting short-term mortality in cirrhotic patients with GI hemorrhage.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to evaluate the association between ALBI Score with short-term mortality in cirrhotic patients with GI hemorrhage. We conducted a prospective, cross-sectional study between January and December of 2023 at Hospital Roosevelt, Guatemala, including cirrhotic patients admitted for GI hemorrhage. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test, normally distributed continuous variables with Student’s t-test, and non-normally distributed variables with the Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic binary regression and AUROC analysis were used to assess associations with short-term mortality. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS.

Results

A total of 187 patients were included: 50.8% female and 49.2% male, with a mean age of 56 among survivors and 58 among non-survivors. Of these, 52.9% had a prior diagnosis of cirrhosis, while 47.1% were newly diagnosed. Cirrhosis etiology was metabolic in 50.2%, alcoholic in 42.7%, autoimmune in 4.3%, HCV in 1.6%, and HBV in 1.1%. At admission, 80.8% had no ascites and 97.3% had no hepatic encephalopathy. he causes of GI hemorrhage were 86.1% esophageal varices, 3.2% gastric varices, 9.1% gastric ulcers, and 1.6% esophagitis.
Non-survivors had significantly lower systolic blood pressure (93.90 ± 16.3 mmHg vs. 107.92 ± 17.4 mmHg; p = 0.002) and mean arterial pressure (69.50 ± 14.5 mmHg vs. 79.67 ± 11.7 mmHg; p = 0.005) compared to survivors. Non-survivors exhibited significantly higher INR (1.79 ± 0.56 vs. 1.52 ± 0.41; p = 0.026) and total bilirubin (5.85 ± 8.73 mg/dL vs. 2.02 ± 2.82 mg/dL; p = 0.031), and lower serum albumin levels (2.40 ± 0.43 g/dL vs. 3.10 ± 0.54 g/dL; p < 0.001).

Prognostic scores were significantly higher among non-survivors: MELD (19.25 ± 10.09 vs. 13.57 ± 5.47; p = 0.002), MELD-Na (20.35 ± 9.76 vs. 14.44 ± 6.42; p = 0.002), Child-Pugh (9.15 ± 2.21 vs. 7.18 ± 1.90; p < 0.001), and ALBI score (-0.96 ± 0.51 vs. -1.76 ± 0.58; p < 0.001). Additionally, the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter among non-survivors (3.90 ± 3.82 days) compared to survivors (6.59 ± 5.58 days; p = 0.001).

• Higher ALBI score was significantly associated with mortality (Risk Ratio 25.80; 95% CI: 6.75–98.67; p < 0.001),
• Hospital stay <5 days (RR 9.91; 95% CI: 2.07–47.47; p = 0.004),
• Endoscopy performed within 12 hours (RR 7.53; 95% CI: 2.01–28.15; p = 0.003).

Conclusion

The ALBI score outperforms CP and MELD scores in predicting short-term mortality (in-hospital, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks) in cirrhotic patients with GI hemorrhage. Observed mortality was 10% in-hospital, 13% at 4 weeks, and 16% at 6 weeks.

Introduction

The urea breath test (UBT) is the clinic's most popular and accurate non-invasive diagnostic method for H. pylori infection. Yet, it is time-consuming and unavailable to some individuals. The oral rapid urease test (RUT) is an emerging non-invasive convenience method but lacks clinical data support.

Aims & Methods

A double-center, double-blind, methodological comparative design experiment is invited to evaluate the consistency of the oral RUT with UBT. 247 participants were enrolled. Their Dental plaque and tongue coating samples were collected, blind and tested with RUT.

Results

The significant association between the RUT and UBT was analyzed.A total of 247 participants were included in the study. The oral RUT showed a high level of agreement with the UBT. The sensitivity of the test reagent was 98.63% (95% CI: 92.64%, 99.76%), and the specificity was 96.34% (95% CI: 92.25%, 98.31%). The overall conformity rate was 97.05% (95% CI: 94.03%, 98.56%). The positive predictive value was 92.31%, and the negative predictive value was 99.37%. The positive likelihood ratio was 26.96, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.01. The Kappa value was 0.97.

Conclusion

The efficacy of oral RUT for Helicobacter pylori infection diagnosis is extremely consistent with the UBT.

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) infection is the main risk factor for gastric cancer. Infection leads to chronic inflammation and gastric gland hyperplasia. We found that infection induces alterations in the stromal niche, such as inhibited secretion of BMP ligands and increased expression of BMP inhibitors. BMP signaling is known to be involved in differentiation of base progenitor cells into pit secretory cells. However, whether it plays a role in regulating mucosal antimicrobial defense is still unknown and we now investigate how the downregulation of BMP signaling affects mucosal inflammatory responses.

Aims & Methods

Exploiting in vivo murine models as well as in vitro assays, we aim to investigate how the downregulation of epithelial BMP signaling affects mucosal homeostasis.
3D gastric organoids were used to explore the role of BMP in epithelial responses to microbial proteins (qPCR, Western Blotting). The effects of epithelial BMP downregulation and stromal Il1r1 signaling were investigated by exploiting conditional knockout mice (Axin2CreERT2-Bmpr1afl/fl or Bmpr1a KO; Col1a2CreERT2-Il1r1fl/fl or Il1r1 KO) either uninfected or infected with H.pylori PMSS1. Tissue samples were analyzed via immunofluorescence, RNA-in situ hybridization and gene expression analysis (qPCR, whole transcriptome). 2D primary murine stromal cell culture were exploited to investigate stromal responses to inflammatory triggers.

Results

Exploiting 3D organoids, we demonstrate that epithelial cells activate NF-κB signaling in response to microbe-derived proteins, while this effect is inhibited upon BMP signaling activation. In vivo, inhibition of BMP signaling in the epithelium via knockout of Bmpr1a (Bmpr1a KO) not only causes gland hyperplasia but also strongly enhances inflammation at the pit of gastric glands, where it is absent in mice with functional BMP signaling. We explore the consequences of increased inflammation upon epithelial Bmpr1a KO, demonstrating via whole transcriptome analysis that this is linked to enhanced antimicrobial tissue responses and that KO mice show reduced H.pylori colonization. Moreover, we discover that the influx of IL-1β producing cells observed upon BMP signaling downregulation has an impact on stromal cells, which in turn produce pro-regenerative factors causing epithelial reprogramming into a highly proliferative fetal-like regenerative state. We demonstrate that Il1r1 KO mice, where stromal cells lack the ability to respond to IL-1β, do not show fetal-like reprogramming and are more colonized by H.pylori.

Conclusion

Chronic H.pylori infection causes tissue reprogramming into a fetal-like state via a crosstalk between epithelial, stromal and immune cells. This state is linked to an enhanced proinflammatory response, increased proliferation and boosters antimicrobial defense. We propose that long-term activation of this state may enhance the risk for malignant transformation.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in Spain, with an estimated 44,573 new cases in 2025. The standard CRC screening strategy involves the immunological faecal occult blood test (FIT), followed by colonoscopy in positive cases. However, the low specificity of FIT results in a significant number of unnecessary colonoscopies, placing a high burden on healthcare systems. There is a growing need to explore alternative screening strategies that offer better cost-effectiveness ratios. The gut microbiota plays a key role in CRC carcinogenesis, and several bacterial species involved in this process have been identified. A diagnostic tool based on the combination of FIT (cut-off 100 ng/mL – FIT100) and a bacterial signature has been designed to detect CRC and advanced lesions (AL, defined as ≥1 cm and/or high-grade dysplasia and/or a hairy component). This tool uses qPCR to analyse the relative abundance of specific bacteria in the same stool sample used for FIT testing. Previous studies, including a proof-of-concept (N=172), confirmatory study (N=327), and clinical performance study (N=2,481), have validated the tool.

Aims & Methods

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the bacterial signature applied to FIT100 positive participants and its potential to reduce unnecessary colonoscopies in the CRC screening program in Catalonia.
A prospective observational study was conducted in a multicentre cohort across five hospitals, including participants from the CRC screening program with a positive FIT100. Blinding was applied to the FIT, bacterial signature, colonoscopy, and biopsy. Colonoscopy-biopsy was used as the reference standard. The study included 1,453 participants, of which 48 were excluded from the analysis mainly because of poor sample conditions, resulting in a final sample of 1,405 participants. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of true positives detected by the FIT that the bacterial signature also identifies as positive. Specificity was defined as the proportion of false positives of FIT that the bacterial signature correctly identifies as true negatives.

Results

From the 1,405 analysed cases, 44 were CRC, 472 AL, and 889 without AL. For CRC detection, the sensitivity was 95.5%, with a specificity of 18.4%. The reduction in false positives was 18.4%. For AL and CRC combined, the sensitivity was 82.6%, with a specificity of 18.4%.

Conclusion

The bacterial signature applied to FIT100 positive participants demonstrates high sensitivity for CRC detection while reducing unnecessary colonoscopies by minimizing false positives. Its implementation in the CRC screening protocol could improve the overall efficiency of the screening process. Future studies should focus on cost minimization and assess the tool's cost-effectiveness to ensure a favourable risk-benefit ratio for broader implementation.

Introduction

No clinical trial has previously assessed the best therapeutic strategy between switching to another anti-TNF or swapping to another class of biologic class after the failure of a first anti-TNF in ulcerative colitis (UC). The aim of the EFFICACI trial was to compare the efficacy of vedolizumab to infliximab in patients who had failed a first sub-cutaneous anti-TNF (golimumab and/or adalimumab).

Aims & Methods

EFFICACI was a French double-blind multicenter randomized controlled trial (1:1) comparing intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg at weeks 0-2-6 to intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0-2-6. Eligible patients had moderate-to-severe UC, defined by a total Mayo score ≥ 6 with an endoscopy subscore ≥ 2, despite at least 12 weeks (W) of treatment with adalimumab or golimumab as first line of advanced therapy. The primary endpoint was steroid free clinical remission at W14 (total Mayo score ≤2 without subscore >1 including an endoscopic subscore ≤ 1). Clinical response was defined as a decrease in partial Mayo score ≥3 points and ≥30% from inclusion and a decrease in rectal bleeding score ≥1. The number of patients (N=150) was estimated for a 20% difference in favor of vedolizumab with a type 1 risk of 5% and a power of 80%. Patients were subsequently followed in an open-label fashion until week 54. The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Only results at W14 will be presented. (CPP: 2018-002673-21; ClinicalTrial: 35RC17_8841_EFFICACI)

Results

From January 2018 to December 2023, 151 patients were randomized among 19 centers: 78 in the vedolizumab arm and 73 in the infliximab arm. One patient randomized to the infliximab arm did not receive treatment and considered as failure regarding the ITT analysis. Characteristics and demographics at inclusion were similar between groups, with 102/151 (67.5%) patients failing adalimumab and 49/151 (32.5%) failing golimumab. Concomitant immunosuppressive treatment with thiopurine or methotrexate was associated with infliximab and vedolizumab for 37/72 (51.4%) patients and 43/78 (55.1%) patients, respectively. At W14, proportions of patients in clinical remission (primary endpoint) were 34.6% (27/78) with vedolizumab and 19.2% (14/73) with infliximab (p=0.033). The clinical response rates were 46/78 (59.0%) with vedolizumab and 36/72 (50.0%) with infliximab (p=0.27). Proportions of patients in clinical response at W2, W6 and W14 are shown in Figure 1. At W14, endoscopic improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 or 1) was observed in 36/77 (46.8%) patients in the vedolizumab arm and 21/72 (29.2%) in the infliximab arm (p=0.027). No factor at inclusion was predictive of remission at week 14, including pharmacokinetic data for the first-line anti-TNF. Adverse event rates were similar in both groups - 46 (63.9%) infliximab arm, 55/78 (70.51%) vedolizumab arm. Before week 14, a colectomy was indicated in one patient in the vedolizumab arm; eight patients were hospitalized for a severe flare (5 in the infliximab arm and 3 in the vedolizumab arm). At W54, proportions of patients in clinical remission and still treated with the treatment allocated after randomization were 34 (46.6%) with vedolizumab and 25 (36.2%) with infliximab (p=0.21). Data at W54 are still under investigation at the time of abstract submission.

Conclusion

After failure of a first subcutaneous anti-TNF, induction therapy with vedolizumab was superior to infliximab in achieving steroid free clinical remission at week 14 in patients with UC.

Disclosure

National grant by the French PHRC, grant from takeda

Introduction

Differences in endoscopic response and biological features across ileal, ileocolonic, and colonic Crohn’s disease (CD) suggest distinct mechanisms for healing. We developed an endoscopic clustering method using segmental intestinal endoscopic scores in patients with moderately to severely active CD to investigate the potential influence of regional mucosal heterogeneity on treatment effect. We then evaluated endoscopic outcomes across subtypes between placebo (PBO), guselkumab (GUS), and ustekinumab (UST) in the Phase 3 GALAXI 2 and 3 studies.

Aims & Methods

Endoscopic clustering was established using baseline segment Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) values from terminal ileum, right colon, transverse colon, left/sigmoid colon, and rectum from cohort 1 (1233 patients, GALAXI 1, GALAXI 2, GRAVITI trials) and cohort 2 (525 patients, GALAXI 3). Patient clusters were identified using consensus hierarchical clustering, and a machine learning classification model was developed for patient cluster assignment of cohort 2. GALAXI 2 and GALAXI 3 patients were combined to evaluate Week (WK) 12 and WK48 endoscopic outcomes between PBO, GUS, and UST.

Results

We identified 7 CD endoscopic subtypes (ileum only, ileum dominant, right colon dominant, mid-colon, colonic, ileocolonic, rectum dominant), highlighting heterogeneity within Montreal classification. In total, GUS showed higher endoscopic remission rates than UST at WK12 and at WK48. Patient clusters were used with baseline stricturing data (SES-CD narrowing > 0) to consolidate groups with differential treatment effects: Group 1 (62% of patients, mixed ileocolonic/colonic) showed similar endoscopic remission rates at WK12 between GUS (26%) and UST (27%) with higher rates for GUS at WK48 (39-44% GUS, 30% UST); Group 2 (ileum only) and Group 3 (characterized by strictured right colon), totaling 38% of patients, showed higher endoscopic remission rates with GUS at WK12 (19%, 20%), where UST showed placebo-like efficacy (7%, 2%), with higher rates with GUS at WK48 (Group 2: 20-26% GUS, 18% UST; Group 3: 28-30% GUS, 12% UST). Endoscopic responders to GUS, and not UST, at WK12 in Group 2 and 3 patients with baseline stricturing showed greater reduction in narrowing than non-responders, contributing to 21% vs 5% reduction in total SES-CD.

Conclusion

Endoscopic patient clustering provides higher resolution of CD subtypes to delineate differential treatment effects. GUS demonstrated endoscopic efficacy across all patients at WK12, where UST showed placebo-like efficacy in 38% of patients, supporting superior endoscopic efficacy over UST across all patients by WK48. Reductions in narrowing with GUS proposes a role of GUS in affecting stricture biology in addition to broader segment-specific molecular treatment effects that will be explored in future research.

Disclosure

Dylan Richards, Loqmane Seridi, Klebea Sohn, Brad Mcrae, Natalie A. Terry, Marion Vetter, Daniel Cua, Patrick Branigan are employees of Janssen and may hold stock in Johnson & Johnson.
Walter Reinisch reports serving as a speaker for AbbVie, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, Galapagos Medice, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Sobi, Takeda; serving as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, AOP Orphan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calyx, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Index Pharma, Janssen, Medahead, Microbiotica, Pfizer, and Takeda; serving as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, and Pfizer; and receiving research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi, and Takeda.
Raja Atreya has served as a speaker or consultant, or received research grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion Healthcare, DrFalk Pharma, Galapagos, Gilead, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pandion Therapeutics, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Takeda, and Viatris.