Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease. It has been strongly connected to metabolic syndrome, and for many years, fatty liver was considered to be an exclusive feature of obese patients. However, recent studies have highlighted the presence of NAFLD in non-obese subjects, with or without increased visceral fat or even in lean subjects without increased waist circumference. “Lean NAFLD” is a relatively new concept and there is significant scientific interest in understanding the differences in pathophysiology, prognosis and management compared with NAFLD in overweight/obese patients.
Aims & Methods
The aim of our study was to compare the epidemioclinical and metabolic features of lean and obese NAFLD patients. We conducted a comparative observational study of all patients referred to our departement to evaluate their liver elasticity using Fibroscan®. A simultaneous measurement of steatosis was performed by the Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) of Fibroscan®. The threshold used to define the presence or not of steatosis was 245 dB. A measurement of the metabolic parameters (Cholesterol, TG, Glycemia) was performed.
Our study population was then divided into 2 groups:
Group 1 (G1): a lean NAFLD group (BMI < 25 kg/m²)
Group 2 (G2): an overweight or obese NAFLD group (BMI >= 25 kg/m² ).
A descriptive and comparative study (p significant if <= 0.05) was performed between the two groups.
Results
We included 317 patients with a mean age of 52.31 +/- 13.40 years old. The prevalence of NAFLD in the overall population was 58%. Among the 184 subjects with NAFLD, 19% had a BMI <25 Kg/m².
G1 consisted of 35 patients (19%) with a mean age of 50.3 +/-13.06 years old, a sex ratio M/F of 1.05 and a mean BMI of 23.08 +/- 1.2 Kg/m². G2 was composed of 149 patients (81%) with a mean age of 53.13 +/- 11.7 years old , a sex ratio M/F of 0.5 and a mean BMI of 32.4 +/- 1.5 Kg/m².
When comparing the two groups, we found that lean patients with NAFLD were significantly younger than the obese NAFLD patients (50.3+/-13.06 years old versus 53.13+/- 11.7 years old ; p=0.02). Regarding biological parameters, the mean triglycerides and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were significantly higher in G1 patients than in G2 patients with mean values of (1.9 mmol/l versus 1.6 mmol/l; p=0.03); (8.3 mmol/l versus 6.4 mmol/l; p=0.01) respectively. Liver function disturbances were greater in G1 patients than in G2 patients with mean levels of AST, ALT, PAL and GGT (56 versus 40 ; p=0.4); (66 versus 45; p=0.3); (458 versus 179; p=0.02); (123 versus 61; p= 0.09) respectively. The prevalence of advanced fibrosis was similar in both groups at 1.8% (p=0.6).
Conclusion
Our study suggests that NAFLD is more severe in lean subjects than in obese subjects and is associated to more hepatic and extrahepatic metabolic disturbances. That is why clinicians must be particularly cautious with these patients who had a healthier metabolic profile but seems to have a worse prognosis.