Introduction

The undetermined pancreatic cystic neoplasms represent 20-30% of the total number of pancreatic cystic lesions(PCL). The diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) morphology is 51%. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration(EUS-FNA) should be performed for differentiating between mucinous and non-mucinous pancreatic cysts when the characterization of the cyst cannot be made on the basis of non invasive imaging techniques.

Aims & Methods

Our aim was to assess the utility of the Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin(Ngal) concentration alone or combined with glucose level in cyst fluid obtained by EUS with EUS-FNA for discriminating between mucinous and non-mucinous PCL's.
This prospective study was performed between april 2018 and may 2020 at one tertiary referral hospital and included 63 patients , 30 with undetermined pancreatic cysts (group A) and the controlled group was represented by 33 patients with pancreatic pseudocysts after acute pancreatitis drained by EUS (group B). The patients from group A underwent EUS-FNA for liquid analysis and the patients from group B had liquid collection during the drainage of pseudocysts. The final diagnosis was based on surgery or EUS results (morphology, cytology, glucose and carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) intracystic level) or on imaging during follow-up (24 month). We performed sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for cystic and serum Ngal determination and measured glucose levels by a hand glucometer.

Results

The final diagnosis was pseudocyst in 33 patients, serous cystadenoma in 6, mucinous cystadenoma in 3, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms in 19 patients, and ductal adenocarcinoma in 2 patients. The cystic fluid analysis of these patients showed that the mean Ngal value for the serous cystic adenomas was 336ng/dl, 728ng/dl for the mucinous lesions and 1116ng/dl for the pseudocysts. The intracystic Ngal concentration (cut-off ≥ 500 and ≤ 800ng/dl) had diagnsotic sensitivity 70.8%, and specificity 92.3% for mucinous cysts. Serum Ngal concentration had no diagnostic contribution. The cystic glucose levels (cut-off ≤ 22mg/dl) had sensitivity 83.3% and specificity 82.1% for mucinous lesions. Combined glucose(cut-off ≤ 22mg/dl) and Ngal(cut-off ≥ 500 and ≤ 800ng/dl ) testing showed sensitivity of 58,3 and specificity 100% for mucinous cysts. Wheras either positive Ngal (cut-off ≥ 500 and ≤ 800ng/dl) or glucose (cut-off ≤ 22mg/dl) testing showed sensitivity 95.8% and specificity 74.4%.

Conclusion

Pancreatic cyst fluid NGAL concentration alone and combined with glucose level appeared to be useful in discriminating mucinous cysts.

References

State‑of‑the‑Art Update of Pancreatic Cysts -Andrew Canakis · Linda S. Lee2 Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2022) 67:1573–1587

Disclosure

Nothing to disclouse

Introduction

The quality of colonoscopy is influenced by patient and operator factors. Studies investigating operator attentional fatigue on adenoma detection rate (ADR) have yielded conflicting results.

Aims & Methods

This study aims to compare ADR, polyp detection rate (PDR) and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) and complication rates between elective colonoscopies performed early and late in the list, across multiple operators (n>15), over 10 years, in a tertiary Brisbane (Australia) hospital.
A retrospective study was conducted on elective colonoscopies performed between 2012 and 2022 at The Prince Charles Hospital. ‘Early procedures’ are defined as procedures starting in the first hour of the first procedure starting and ‘late procedures’ are defined as procedures starting within the last hour of the last procedure starting. This pre-defined early and late procedures were used as surrogate markers for operator fatigue, accounting for a possible non-linear relationship between time and onset of fatigue, as well as the variation in number of colonoscopies performed every hour. Timing and the order of colonoscopy were used as alternative surrogates, in a secondary analysis.
Logistic regression was performed on all categorical outcome variables, and Poisson regression was modelled on continuous outcome variables, due to their non-linear distribution. Multivariate analysis included all potential confounding variables related to outcomes of interest. Statistical significance was defined as a P-value less than 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS® statistical software (SAS Institute Inc, USA).
Exclusion included; surveillance for IBD and elective ESD.

Results

In total, 15 proceduralist (11 gastroenterologists, 4 surgeons) performed 39, 206 elective colonoscopies from 2012 to 2022. The baseline characteristics of patients, year and procedure sessions are similarly distributed between the early and late groups.
Multivariant analysis found significant associations between late procedures and lower adenoma detection rates, polyp detection rates and SSL detection rates. After adjusting for age, gender, proceduralist, year, morning or afternoon procedure, and bowel preparation quality, PDR, ADR and SDR remain 20-28% lower in late colonoscopies compared with early ones. We also found that age, gender, proceduralist, year and bowel preparation independently affected ADR in multivariant analysis. However, morning or afternoon ADRs did not significantly differ after adjusting for other variables. Proceduralist were found to be the only additional significant variable for SDR in multivariant analysis. There was no significant association between timing of procedures and major adverse events.

Conclusion

This is the largest single-centre study on operator fatigue and its effect on colonoscopy quality. Although the minimum standards for ADR was achieved, ‘late procedures’ have statistically significant lower ADR, PDR and SSLDR compared to ‘early procedures’. There was no difference in the complication rates between ‘early procedures’ and ‘late procedures’.
This study highlights the detrimental effect of fatigue in later procedures affecting the quality of colonoscopies and may be applicable in principal to other procedural based clinical work. Importantly, this may or perhaps will or is having an impact on patient safety, satisfaction, outcomes and clinical KPI’s for the operators and hospital administrators.

Disclosure

None

Introduction

Etiology of acute pancreatitis can be established in the majority of patients. However, in 25 % of cases it remains elusive. Biliary microlithiasis/sludge is detected in up to 75% of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP). As recurrent biliary pancreatitis can be prevented, the underlying etiology of IAP should be established. The aim of this multicentre retrospective study was to develop a machine learning-aided non-invasive prediction tool to guide clinicians in the selection of idiopathic acute pancreatitis patients to be referred to endosonography to establish etiology and allow treatment.

Aims & Methods

We retrospectively used routinely recorded clinical and laboratory parameters of 218 consecutive patients with confirmed acute pancreatitis admitted to our tertiary care hospital between 2015 and 2020. Patients who did not receive endosonography as part of the diagnostic work-up and whose pancreatitis episode could be adequately explained by other causes than biliary sludge and microlithiasis were excluded. We trained supervised machine learning classifiers using H2O.ai automatically selecting the best suitable predictor model to predict microlithiasis/sludge. The predictor model was validated in two independent retrospective cohorts from two tertiary care centers (TU Munich & University Medical Center Göttingen).

Results

28 categorized patients’ variables recorded at admission were identified to compute the predictor model with an accuracy of 0.84 [95% CI 0.791, 0.9185], positive predictive value of 0.84 and negative predictive value 0.80 in the identification cohort (218 patients). In the validation cohort, the robustness of the prediction model was confirmed with an accuracy of 0.76 [95% CI 0.673, 0.8347], positive predictive value of 0.76 and negative predictive value of 0.78 (117 patients).

Conclusion

We present a robust and validated machine learning-based predictor model consisting of routinely recorded lab work at admission that can predict biliary sludge and microlithiasis as cause of acute pancreatitis and select patients for EUS.

Introduction

Liver transplant is the only definitive treatment for chronic liver disease (CLD). Referral to a hepatologist for consideration for liver transplant should be made when a patient with CLD experiences a hepatic decompensation or has a MELD score ≥ 15. Failure to refer in a timely manner can result needing a liver transplant evaluation (LTE) in the inpatient setting while a patient is experiencing acute decompensation.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to compare the clinical presentation of patients undergoing LTE in the inpatient setting versus the outpatient setting to identify potential risk factors for requiring urgent evaluation. A list of all LTEs performed at our institution between 10/2017-8/2021 was obtained. Medical records were preliminarily reviewed for evaluation setting (Inpatient vs. Outpatients); evaluations for re-transplantation and acute liver failure were excluded. After all Inpatients (n=159) were identified, Outpatients (n=159) were selected at random to create a sample matched for age, gender, race, and ethnicity (n=318). Data were collected using our institutions electronic medical record and outside health records as obtained during LTE process. “Prior decompensations” refers to the number of the following clinical decompensations experienced prior to the time of LTE: ascites, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), variceal/acute UGIB, SBP and HRS. Categorical variables and continuous were compared between using Fisher’s Exact test, and student’s T test, respectively.

Results

Alcohol was the most common CLD etiology (42.1% Inpatient, 48.4% Outpatient). Inpatients tended to live further from our center than Outpatients (p=0.079). Inpatients had significantly higher MELD-Na scores (27.1 ± 8 vs. 13.3 ± 6; p<0.0001). Malnutrition was more common in 5.6 times more common in inpatients than outpatients (OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.9-10.8, p<0.001).. A similar proportion of patients had 1 hospitalization. But inpatients were 3 times as likely to have had ≥ 1 liver-related hospital admission prior to LTE (p<0.0001). Inpatients had significantly more prior decompensations than Outpatients prior to inpatient LTE (3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 1.8 ± 1.1, p<0.001), with the greatest differences in SBP and HRS.

Conclusion

Multiple liver-related hospitalizations and malnutrition may be considered a risk factor for ultimately needing inpatient LTE and should be taken seriously by health care providers caring for patients with CLD. Episodes of SBP and HRS should prompt providers to consider immediate or urgent LTE referral regardless of other factors.

References

Multiple liver-related hospitalizations may be considered a risk factor for ultimately needing inpatient LTE and should be taken seriously by health care providers caring for patients with CLD. Episodes of SBP and HRS should prompt providers to consider immediate or urgent LTE referral regardless of other factors.

Disclosure

D Devuni has received grant funding from Sequana Medical and receives grant support from the NIAAA (AA017986-11), both for research unrelated to this work.

Introduction

Urgency is not an IBD Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) in the STRIDE II but it has been assessed at baseline and as an outcome measure in recent pivotal RCTs with newer biologicals and targeted synthetic small molecules in both Crohn’s disease CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, although it is reasonable to assume that UC patients or CD patients with rectal involvement may complain for severe urgency, urgency has been assessed even in patients with Crohn’s ileitis (iCD).

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study was to assess whether urgency is reported by iCD patients with flares or quiescent disease in a Real-World (RW) setting. This prospective, pilot, RW study included CD patients with solely L1 phenotype. L1 location was documented by ileocolonoscopy, histology and, imaging (MRE, US, or capsule endoscopy). Patients with colonic and/or rectal disease, perianal involvement and complicated ileal disease were excluded. Patients were interviewed by office visits during disease flare [HBI>5, CRP <5mg/dl, faecal calprotectin (FC)>250μg/g faecal tissue and SES-CD for terminal ileum >3 if colonoscopy was performed within a month prior to the visit) and during clinical remission (HBI<5, CRP <5mf/dl and FC <200μg/g and ileal SES-CD=0, in a recent ileocolonoscopy). The presence of and severity of urgency was recorded by a Symptom Rating Score of 0-10 (absent to very severe). The presence and severity of abdominal pain, the number and consistency of stools, nocturnal stools, blood and/or mucus in the stools, and the feeling of inadequate evacuation were sought by a structed questionnaire.

Results

During a 15-month period, 85 iCD patients [45 males, median age (range) 33 (18-65) years, median (range) disease duration 9 (0.6-25) years] were enrolled in the study. Patients were receiving a wide range of treatments, including anti-TNF agents (n=35), ustekinumab (N=25), vedolizumab (N=5), azathioprine (n=10), budesonide (n=5) and mesalazine (n=15). Fifty patients had a flare, 65 were in remissionand 30 patients were interviewed sequentially in flare and remission of disease. All patients in disease flare reported abnormal classical PROs of CD. Moderate to severe urgency [median score 5, range 4-8] was reported by 5/50 (10%) patients with disease flare, 8/65 (12%) patients with disease remission and 2/30 (6.5%) patients who were interviewed during flare and remission of disease. 3/50 patients with urgency during a flare of CD did not report urgency during disease remission. Six of the 8 patients who were interviewed only with iCD in remission and reported urgency had concurrently typical Irritable Bowel Symptoms (IBS, abdominal pain relieved by defecation, alternating diarrhoea/constipation, inadequate bowel emptying).

Conclusion

This prospective, pilot, real-world study shows that the reliability of urgency as classical PRO in patients with iCD is questioned and raises doubts whether urgency should be included in the spectrum of PROs for patients with iCD both in RCTs and in RW studies. Validation of the terminology in different ethnic languages may also pose additional barriers in patient understanding and reporting the symptom in the presence of additional IBS-type symptoms. Large studies are needed to assess if urgency is present in patients with iCD and how reliably is reported especially in multinational RCTs.

Disclosure

Dr GJ Mantzaris: Research grants: AbbVie, Genesis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda; advisor/speaker: AbbVie, Aenorasis, Dr Falk, Ferring, Hospira, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, MYLAN, Pfizer, Takeda, Vianex.
Dr A Loukou: Nothing to declare

Introduction

Infection by Leishmania spp. in patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is an uncommon infectious complication. The use of anti-TNF-α is well known risk factor for Leishmania infection (LI), particularly in some endemic areas, but only a few case series have been reported in the literature, mainly in the Mediterranean basin.

Aims & Methods

Aim: To evaluate the main demographic, IBD-disease features and risk factors as well as LI disease characteristic and required treatment among IBD patients who develop LI.
Methods: This is a retrospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in twenty-five Spanish hospitals, promoted by the Young Group of GETECCU, including patients diagnosed with IBD and subsequent diagnosis of LI.

Results

We collected a total of 73 patients, 48 of them were men (65.8%) with a mean age of 48 ± 15.06 years. 92% of patients resided in the Mediterranean basin, an endemic area of Leishmania. Only 1 patient was born outside of Spain. Nineteen percent of patients were smokers and 16.4% had some comorbidities.
Fifty patients had Crohn's disease (CD) (68.5%) with ileocolonic involvement (30.1%) and inflammatory behaviour (45.2%) and 42.9% had perianal disease. 94% of CD patients were on clinical remission at the time of LI diagnosis. In addition, 23 patients had ulcerative colitis (UC) (31.5%), being extensive colitis the most frequent extent (78.3%), and all of them were on clinical remission or had mild disease activity. 69 patients (94.5%) were under immunosuppressive and/or biologic treatment during the 6 months prior to the LI. 6.8% were on immunosuppressants monotherapy, 42.5% in combotherapy and 38.4% under biologic monotherapy. Regarding biological treatment, 97% of patients were under AntiTNF and only 2 patients were under treatment with Ustekinumab.
Regarding the characteristics of LI, 62 patients presented cutaneous involvement (85%), 9 visceral (12%) and the rest presented mucocutaneous involvement.
Symptoms associated to LI were fever (9.6%), abdominal pain (4.1%) and constitutional syndrome (8.2%), moreover 24.7% required hospital admission. Regarding the location of the skin lesions, the most frequent were the upper limbs (35.6%) followed by lower limbs (30.1%).
The treatment used for LI was systemic amphotericin in 60.3% of patients and pentavalent antimonials in 35.4%; the remaining patients were treated with other treatments, including miltefosine. LI solved at one month in 33 patients (45.2%) and at one year in 95.3% of patients, and only 11% of patients had recurrent LI.
Treatment was stopped temporarily in 38.4% of patients and definitively in 27.4%, starting Ustekinumab (36.8%), Vedolizumab (15.8%) and antiTNF (10.6%) and the rest of the patients remained without biological treatment after the LI.

Conclusion

The usage of antiTNF is associated to LI in IBD patients, but LI could also happen under inmunossupresants or ustekinumab therapy. Although cutaneous involvement is the most frequent manifestation, 12% of patients have visceral involvement or LI recurrences. This infectious complication should be considered in IBD patients in endemic areas.

Disclosure

No Conflict of Interest.