Introduction

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are widely implemented in the medical field for the analysis of medical images. PolyDeep is a CAD system that has demonstrated its efficacy in lesion detection.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study is to determine whether PolyDeep increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR) in the context of expert endoscopists participating in a regional, population-based colorectal cancer screening program in Spain. PolyDeep Advance 3 (NCT05513261) is a multicentric, randomized controlled clinical trial. For the primary endpoint, we aimed to assess whether the ADR is superior in PolyDeep-assisted colonoscopy compared to conventional colonoscopy. As secondary endpoints, we aimed to determine whether PolyDeep-assisted colonoscopy improves the polyp detection rate (PDR), serrated lesion detection rate (SLDR), advanced serrated lesion detection rate (ASLDR), and advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). We included participants who underwent colonoscopy for screening (i.e. those with a positive faecal immunochemical occult blood test – FIT+) or for surveillance after resection of advanced adenomas. We compared both groups using the chi-square and t-Student test.

Results

Between November 2023 and May 2024, we recruited 857 patients, of whom 30 were excluded. The baseline characteristics of the 827 patients included in the analysis were similar (male: 59.3%, screening colonoscopy: 66.7%, mean age: 61.7 ± 6.5 years, withdrawal time: 10:49 ± 04:32 minutes, colorectal cancer incidence: 2.8%). However, there were significant differences between both groups in the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (conventional colonoscopy: 7.7 ± 1.3 vs. PolyDeep-assisted colonoscopy: 7.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.01). Regarding ADR, we did not find statistically significant differences between conventional and PolyDeep-assisted colonoscopy (57.7% vs. 60.8%, p = 0.4). Similarly, for the secondary endpoints, there were no significant differences in PDR (68.7% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.8), SLDR (32.0% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.5), ASLDR (5.3% vs. 5.1%, p = 1.0), or AADR (24.5% vs. 23.6%, p = 0.8). In Table 1, we described lesion detection rates between both groups by indication (i.e., FIT+ or surveillance).

Conclusion

In the context of expert endoscopists PolyDeep did not increase the ADR.

Introduction

Aims & Methods

Results

Conclusion

References

Introduction

Chronic liver disease is a major global health concerns, contributing to over 1.4 million annual deaths worldwide¹. Its primary fatal outcomes, hepatic complications^2,3, arise from liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic decompensation. The early, reversible stages of chronic liver disease are frequently asymptomatic and overlooked, leading to delayed diagnoses and irreversible complications that treatment options are limited.^4,5. Therefore, reliable tools to identify whether a person will develop hepatic complications in the future have become a public health priority, enabling early diagnosis and timely intervention in high-risk populations.

Aims & Methods

This study aimed to employ machine learning to develop proteomics-based models for the early identification of hepatic complications. In this study, 37,178 adults without hepatic complications at baseline were analyzed from a prospective cohort from United Kingdom, with plasma levels of 2,736 proteins measured using Olink technology. Cox regression was used to identify significant proteins associated with incident hepatic complications. Models based on importance-top-ranking proteins were constructed using LightGBM learners of Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) and internal validated through 5-fold cross validation in the derivation set (n = 37,178). Independent validation was then conducted in a geographically distinct UKB cohort (n = 15,767).

Results

Over a median follow-up of 13.8 years, 338 participants developed hepatic complications. Cox regression identified 593 proteins significantly associated with incident hepatic complications. Among them, GDF15, PROC, GGT1, ANXA10, IL18, MFAP4, COL4A1, CDCP1 and IL6 were ranked highest in protein importance ordering. The protein model showed a considerable predictive accuracy for hepatic complications under different time scenarios in the UKB validation set: all-year (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.89), within 5 years (AUC = 0.88), within 10 years (AUC = 0.91), over 10 years (AUC = 0.81), and achieved superior predictive performance compared to models with demographic predictors, laboratory indicators, polygenic risk score (PRS) and traditional risk score models (Protein 0.89 vs. Demographics 0.83, Laboratory 0.85, PRS 0.49; Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] 0.76, Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index [APRI] 0.78; all P < 0.05). Combined with clinical data and PRS, the predictor performance is further enhanced: all-year (AUC = 0.91), within 5 years (AUC = 0.91), within 10 years (AUC = 0.90), over 10 years (AUC = 0.83). Individuals in the high-risk group stratified by the protein model were 16.27 times more likely to develop hepatic complications.

Conclusion

Our study constructed a novel protein model for hepatic complications risk stratification and could be used to predict individuals who will develop hepatic complications up to 16 years in advance in the general population.

References

1. Tham EKJ, Tan DJH, Danpanichkul P, et al. The Global Burden of Cirrhosis and Other Chronic Liver Diseases in 2021. Liver Int 2025;45:e70001.
2. Åberg F, Asteljoki J, Männistö V, et al. Combined use of the CLivD score and FIB-4 for prediction of liver-related outcomes in the population. Hepatol Baltim Md 2024;80:163–172.
3. Innes H, Morling JR, Buch S, et al. Performance of routine risk scores for predicting cirrhosis-related morbidity in the community. J Hepatol 2022;77:365–376.
4. Karlsen TH, Sheron N, Zelber-Sagi S, et al. The EASL–Lancet Liver Commission: protecting the next generation of Europeans against liver disease complications and premature mortality. The Lancet 2022;399:61–116.
5. Serra-Burriel M, Juanola A, Serra-Burriel F, et al. Development, validation, and prognostic evaluation of a risk score for long-term liver-related outcomes in the general population: a multicohort study. Lancet Lond Engl 2023;402:988–996.