Introduction

Functional diseases of the gastrointestinal tract are a common diagnosis, with the most common manifestations being functional dyspepsia and IBS. The pathophysiological mechanisms and etiology of this group of diseases are not fully understood, but stress is believed to play a key role.

Aims & Methods

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-histamine diet in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Patients who meet the ROME IV criteria were included in the study. The study included 120 patients, divided into three groups: low- histamine diet, FODMAP diet and mediterranian diet.Questionnaires were used to assess stress levels PSS-4, anxiety GAD-7, severity of IBS - IBS Severity Score, and quality of life. The questionnaires were completed three times: both at the beginning of the study, immediately after the end of the 4-week diet, and one month after the end of the diet therapy.

Results

The low-histamine diet led to a statistically significant improvement in IBS symptoms compared to baseline. These findings suggest that the dietary intervention had a positive therapeutic effect ( low- histamine diet : t = 9.6181, p-value < 0.001, low FODMAP diet Z = 22, p-value < 0.001, mediterannian diet Z =119, p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Dietary therapy plays a key role in the management of IBS. The low-histamine diet shows promising results and may serve as a viable alternative to the FODMAP diet.

Disclosure

The study was launched after receiving approval from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) at the Medical University "Prof. Dr. Paraskev Stoyanov" – Varna, protocol 111/ 20.01.2022y.Data were processed and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods chosen according to the nature of the variables and research questions. The analysis includes:

• Evaluation of the statistical significance of the main and interactions between the factors (Repeated Measures with Wicolxon and Paired t-test).
• Regression analysis to assess relationships between dependent and independent variables. As well as using heteroskedasticity-robust standard error estimates (HC3) to ensure accuracy of regression analysis results.

Introduction

Individuals with Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) may experience avoidant/restrictive food intake disorders (ARFID). However, these findings have been limited to specialist neurogastroenterology clinics. We assessed the association between ARFID and DGBI within the adult general population.

Aims & Methods

A population-based Internet survey with pre-defined demographic quotas was conducted across the UK and USA in 2023. The survey included the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire for DGBI, the nine-item ARFID screen (NIAS), and questions regarding demographics, body mass index, non-GI somatic symptoms, anxiety and depression, quality of life, and healthcare utilisation.

Results

4002 adults (mean age 47 [range 18-91] years, 50% females) completed the survey, of whom 1704 (42.6%) had symptoms compatible with at least one DGBI.
The prevalence of ARFID-positive screens was significantly higher among participants with DGBI compared to those without DGBI (34.6% vs. 19.4%, OR 2.2), with similar findings noted in each country. Among participants with DGBI, positive ARFID screens by NIAS subscale were poor appetite (21.5%), picky eating (18.1%) and a fear of aversive consequences (9.9%).
ARFID was present in 42.1% of those with oesophageal DGBI, 49.2% with gastroduodenal DGBI, 33.1% with bowel DGBI, and 41.8% with anorectal DGBI. The presence of ARFID among the two widely investigated DGBI, i.e. functional dyspepsia and IBS, was 56.2% and 50.4%, respectively.
The presence of ARFID increased with the number of DGBI regions, ranging from 19.4% in those with no DGBI, 27.5% with DGBI in one region, 40.0% for DGBI in two regions, 49.7% for DGBI in three regions, and 61.1% for DGBI in four regions (p<0.001). A positive correlation was seen between the number of DGBI regions and the severity of ARFID (r=0.29, p<0.001).
Individuals with DGBI plus ARFID, compared to those with only DGBI, were significantly more likely to be underweight (7.9% vs. 1.5%), have greater non-GI somatic symptoms and mood disturbances, reduced mental and physical quality of life, and increased GI healthcare visits; all p<0.001.

Conclusion

Positive ARFID screens are common in DGBI and associated with increased general health burden. Routine screening for ARFID in DGBI will inform the multi-integrated care plan provided by clinicians, dietitians, and psychologists.

Disclosure

Nil

Introduction

Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) is increasingly recognized within the paediatric population and specialist clinics. However, there is sparse data on the prevalence and burden of ARFID within the adult general population. We addressed this issue.

Aims & Methods

A population-based Internet survey with pre-defined demographic quotas was conducted across the UK and USA in 2023. The survey collected data on demographics, body mass index (BMI), ARFID (using the nine-item ARFID screening tool, NIAS), disorders of gut-brain interaction (using the Rome IV diagnostic questionnaire), PHQ-15 somatic symptoms, PHQ-4 anxiety and depression, PROMIS-10 quality of life, and healthcare utilisation.

Results

In total, 4002 adults (mean age 47 [range 18-91] years and 50% females) completed the survey. Overall, 26.0% (n=1035) screened positive for ARFID, with similar results between the UK (23.0%) and USA (29.0%). The prevalence of positive ARFID screens by NIAS subscale were 15.3% for poor appetite, 13.9% for picky eating, and 6.2% for fear of aversive consequences. In all, 18.2% had a single ARFID domain, 5.7% had two domains and 1.9% had all three domains.
ARFID was more common in females than males (29.6% vs. 22.1%, OR 1.5), and highest amongst people aged 18-39 years (31.6%), followed by those aged 40-64 years (25.0%), and lowest in those 65 years and over (16.1%); p<0.001.
Individuals with ARFID - compared to those without ARFID - had a significantly higher prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (51% vs. 37.5%, OR 2.2), including irritable bowel syndrome (11.8% vs. 4.0%, OR 3.2) and functional dyspepsia (25.8% vs. 7.0%, OR 4.6). They were significantly more likely to be underweight (BMI<18.5; 7.0% vs. 1.5%), experience greater somatic symptoms and mood disturbances, reduced mental and physical quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization (i.e. medication use and doctor visits). An increase in the number of ARFID domains was associated with greater general health impairment; p<0.001.

Conclusion

Elevated ARFID symptoms are common within the adult general population, affecting 1-in-4 people, and associated with substantial health burden. Increased awareness of ARFID will aid clinical service provision and future research on how to best manage this patient group.

Disclosure

Nil