Parenteral nutrition (PN) is the intravenous delivery of nutrients, commonly used to treat intestinal failure (IF). IF occurs when gut function is insufficient to absorb macronutrients, water, or electrolytes, requiring IV supplementation to maintain health. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) classifies IF into acute (type 1) and chronic (types 2 and 3), with chronic cases often needing long-term home parenteral nutrition (HPN). Although IF is rare, its prevalence in Europe is rising. PN formulations are complex, requiring skilled management by a specialized multi-disciplinary team to avoid complications.

Ostomy management refers to the care and maintenance of an ostomy and involves various aspects to ensure the individual’s health, comfort, and quality of life. This should involve the patient, a close support system (family and/or friends), and a healthcare team, including ostomy nurses and healthcare professionals specialising in ostomy care.

The complexity of managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stems from the heterogeneity of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. This leads to differences in disease course, complications, and treatment responses among patients. Current treatment strategies rely on a trial-and-error approach, but there's a need for personalized therapy. Efforts have been made to develop reliable prognostic and predictive biomarkers to overcome disease heterogeneity. This article discusses common mistakes in biomarker development, interpretation, and application in IBD, emphasizing evidence-based insights and lessons learned from other fields.

Biological therapy has revolutionised the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). However, up to one-third of patients with IBD are primary non-responders, and up to half can lose response over time.These unwanted outcomes can be explained by either pharmacodynamic (mechanistic failure) or pharmacokinetic (PK) issues with or without the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADA), so-called immunogenicity.1 Reactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), defined as the measurement of drug concentrations and anti-drug antibody (ADA) levels in the setting of primary non-response (PNR) or secondary loss of response (SLR), can help to explain better and manage these unwanted outcomes. However, it would make sense to try to prevent PNR and SLR by routinely measuring drug concentrations and ADA to achieve and maintain a targeted therapeutic drug concentration, the so-called proactive TDM. Here we discuss some common mistakes and significant errors to avoid when utilising TDM of biologics in patients with IBD. The discussion is based on evidence, whenever possible, and our clinical experience and perception of the field.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a lifelong inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of unknown origin characterized by alternating flare and remission periods. An acute severe episode, so-called acute severe UC (ASUC), may happen in approximately one-quarter of patients during their life.1 Notably, more than 25% of ASUC episodes correspond to the index presentation of the disease. Patients with ASUC should be promptly identified by the modified Truelove and Witts criteria recommended by the most recent international guidelines and admitted rapidly to a digestive unit. Indeed, ASUC is a life-threatening condition still leading to a 1% death rate in Western countries. In the current article, we will discuss the most frequent and/or relevant mistakes in managing patients admitted for an ASUC episode and how to avoid them. The manuscript is based on the available evidence and expert opinion when evidence is lacking.

Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) is a common yet frequently under-recognised cause of maldigestion, malabsorption, and malnutrition. Although traditionally associated with primary pancreatic disorders such as chronic pancreatitis, cystic fibrosis, pancreatic cancer, or pancreatic surgery, it is now evident that PEI also occurs in a wide range of extra-pancreatic conditions and clinical settings. Advances in diagnostic testing and expanding clinical awareness have improved detection; however, significant misconceptions persist regarding when to suspect PEI; how to interpret diagnostic tests; and how to initiate, optimise, and monitor pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). In everyday practice, these errors may lead to delayed diagnosis, inappropriate treatment, persistent symptoms, and preventable nutritional deficiencies. This “Mistakes in…” article highlights common pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of PEI, focusing on inappropriate reliance on faecal elastase testing, failure to recognise secondary causes, undertreatment with PERT, and inadequate nutritional assessment. By addressing these frequent mistakes, we aim to promote a more structured, patient-centred, and evidence-informed approach to PEI that improves clinical outcomes and quality of life.