Introduction

In patients admitted for an acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) episode responding to intravenous (IV) steroids, the most effective treatment regimen is unknown. The benefit of early infliximab (IFX) therapy remains to be established in this indication.

Aims & Methods

In this French multicentre, parallel group, open-label randomised controlled trial, thiopurine and biologics-naïve adults admitted for ASUC defined by a Lichtiger score >10 were included between December 2016 and June 2021 if they responded to IV steroids. Response to IV steroids was defined according to the absence of Oxford criteria. They were randomly assigned to receive an early combination therapy with IFX (5 mg/kg IV at week 0, 2 and 6 and then every 8 weeks) and azathioprine (AZA) (2 and 2.5 mg/kg/day) with a quick steroid discontinuation of AZA (2 and 2.5 mg/kg/day) and standardized steroid tapering regimen (AZA arm). Steroids use was prohibited after day 7 in the IFX+AZA arm and after week 14 in the AZA arm.
The primary endpoint was treatment failure at week 52 (w52), defined as absence of steroid-free clinical remission according to total Mayo Clinic score (≤2 with no individual subscore >1) at w52, absence of endoscopic response (Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 according to local reading) at w52, or use of a prohibited treatment for relapse (partial Mayo score >5), severe adverse event leading to interruption of any of the allocated treatment, colectomy or death during the study period.
A sample size of 73 patients per group was calculated to detect 24%-difference between both group with a 1:1 randomization ratio, a 80% power and a 5% two-sided alpha risk. Due to challenges in recruiting patient, the steering committee decided to prematurely terminate the study in September 2019 blindly of any study results, after including 64 patients.

Results

64 were randomised (32 males, median age of 34.5 [IQR 26.3-50.3] years, 38% with pancolitis, Lichtiger score of 13.0 [95%CI 12-14], CRP of 29.0 [12.8-96.8] mg/L and serum albumin of 31.2 [27.7-35.6] g/L at baseline): 32 were assigned to IFX+AZA arm and 32 to AZA arm. Components of the composite primary endpoint are given in table 1.

	IFX + AZA arm (n=32)	AZA arm (n=32)
Death	0	0
Colectomy	0	0
use of a prohibited treatment for relapse	6 (18.8%)	10 (31.2%)
severe adverse event leading to interruption of any of the allocated treatment	5 (15.6%)	3 (9.4%)
Retracted consent	1 (3.1%)	0
Absence of steroid-free clinical remission at w52	5 (15.6%)	8 (25.0%)
Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥2	6 (18.8%)	8 (25.0%)

In the ITT population, treatment failure at w52 was observed in 81.5% in the AZA arm versus 53.3% in the IFX+AZA arm (OR 3.85, 95%CI [1.15-12.88], p=0.03). In the PP population, treatment failure at week 52 was observed in 81.5% (22/27) in the AZA arm versus 50.0% (13/26) in the IFX + AZA arm (OR 4.40, 95%CI [1.28-15.18], p=0.02). In total 121 treatment emergent adverse events (AE) were reported in 40 patients including 23 serious AE in 18 patients (11 in the IFX + AZA arm vs 7 in the AZA arm, p=0.24). Serious AE included infectious AE in 6 cases (1 vs 5, p=0.20) and UC relapse in 9 (4 vs 5, p=0.60). No deaths were reported.

Conclusion

At w52, combination therapy with IFX + AZA and quick steroids discontinuation was more effective than AZA with standard steroids tapering regimen to prevent treatment failure in patients with ASUC responding to IV steroids. In routine practice, pre-emptive use of early combination therapy with IFX + AZA should be encouraged in ASUC patients responding to IV steroids (EudraCT 2014-005212-42).

Disclosure

this study was funded by Pfizer

Introduction

Duvakitug, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, inhibits TL1A binding to death receptor 3 (DR3), which drives inflammation in Crohn’s disease (CD). The RELIEVE-UCCD trial (NCT05499130), a 14-week induction study, evaluated duvakitug in ulcerative colitis and CD. This was the first placebo-controlled study of an anti-TL1A in moderately to severely active CD. This subgroup analysis was performed to understand the impact of duvakitug in patients with moderate and severe endoscopic inflammation by assessing Week 14 outcomes in subgroups based on endoscopic disease severity at baseline.

Aims & Methods

Patients with CD (N=138) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a subcutaneous (SC) loading dose (LD) of duvakitug 2250 mg followed by SC duvakitug 900 mg or duvakitug 450 mg every 2 weeks (q2w), or matching placebo LD followed by placebo q2w. Patients were required to have a simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease (SES-CD) ≥6 (≥4 for isolated ileal disease) for study eligibility. In this analysis, endoscopic and patient-reported clinical outcomes were assessed by baseline SES-CD scores of ≤15 (moderate) and >15 (severe).¹ Endpoints included response and remission based on endoscopic assessment (SES-CD) and clinical assessment [2-item Patient Reported Outcome assessment tool (PRO2)] at Week 14. Outcomes were analyzed using descriptive summary statistics.

Results

Among patients with severe endoscopic activity (SES-CD >15) at baseline, endoscopic response was achieved by 36% in the duvakitug 900 mg arm, and 18% in the duvakitug 450 mg arm compared to 8% in the placebo arm. In patients with moderate endoscopic activity (SES-CD ≤15) at baseline, endoscopic response was achieved by 51% in the duvakitug 900 mg arm, and 29% in the duvakitug 450 mg arm compared to 15% in the placebo arm (Table). Greater proportion of patients achieved endoscopic remission, clinical response and remission with both doses of duvakitug compared to placebo in the moderate and severe endoscopic subgroups (Table). The overall adverse event profile was similar across treatment arms by disease severity subgroups.

Table: Week 14 endoscopic and clinical response and remission in CD patients with moderate and severe endoscopic activity at baseline

	Baseline SES-CD ≤15			Baseline SES-CD >15
	Placebo (N=33)	Duvakitug 450mg (N=35)	Duvakitug 900mg (N=35)	Placebo (N=13)	Duvakitug 450mg (N=11)	Duvakitug 900mg (N=11)
Endoscopic Response (SES-CD)	15%	29%	51%	8%	18%	36%
Endoscopic Remission (SES-CD)	12%	20%	31%	0%	9%	9%
Clinical Response (PRO2)	36%	54%	54%	0%	36%	45%
Clinical Remission (PRO2)	33%	40%	40%	8%	27%	27%
CD, Crohn’s disease; PRO2, two-item patient reported outcome measure; SES-CD, simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease
Endoscopic response (SES-CD): ≥50% decrease in SES-CD at Week 14 from baseline. Endoscopic remission (SES-CD): SES-CD score ≤2 at Week 14. Clinical response (PRO2): Decrease from baseline of ≥50% in PRO2 (daily average abdominal pain and daily average stool frequency scores). Clinical remission (PRO2): abdominal pain score ≤1 and stool frequency ≤3.

Conclusion

In CD patients, duvakitug demonstrated efficacy in endoscopic and patient-reported clinical outcomes in both moderate and severe endoscopic activity subgroups in this Phase 2b study. Duvakitug was well tolerated across both subgroups. These findings support further development of duvakitug as a potential treatment option for moderately to severely active CD.

References

1. Moskovitz DN, Daperno M, Van Assche G. Defining and validating cut-offs for the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:S1097.

Disclosure

W.R. has served as a speaker for AbbVie, Celltrion, Ferring, Janssen, Galapagos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Pfizer, Sobi and Takeda; as a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, AOP Orphan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calyx, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead,
Index Pharma, Janssen, Medahead, Microbiotica, Pfizer, Teva and Takeda; as an advisory board member for AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer and Teva; and have received research funding from AbbVie, Janssen, Sandoz, Sanofi and Takeda.
V.J. has received consulting/advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, AnaptyisBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Asieris, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Endpoint Health, Enthera, Ensho, Ferring, Flagship Pioneering, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Gilead, Innomar, JAMP, Janssen, Merck, Metacrine, Mylan, MRM Health, Pandion, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Protagonist, Prometheus Biosciences, Reistone Biopharma, Roche, Roivant, Sandoz, Second Genome, Sorriso, Spyre, Synedgen, Takeda, Teva, Ventyx and Vividion; and speaker’s fees from, Abbvie, Ferring, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, Pfizer, Shire, Takeda and Tillotts.
B.S. has served as a consultant or received speaker’s fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Adiso Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Artizan Biosciences, Artugen Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bacainn Therapeutics, Biora Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calibr, Celltrion Healthcare, ClostraBio, Connect Biopharm, Cytoki Pharma, Eli Lilly and Company, Entera, Evommune, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Genentech, Glaxo SmithKline, Gossamer Bio, HMP Acquisition, Imhotex, Immunic, InDex Pharmaceuticals, Innovation Pharmaceuticals, Inotrem, Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kaleido, Kalyope, Merck, MiroBio, Morphic Therapeutic, MRM Health, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Prometheus Laboratories, Protagonist Therapeutics, Q32 Bio, RedHill Biopharma, Sun Pharma Global, Surrozen, Synlogic Operating Company, Takeda, Target RWE, Theravance Biopharma R&D, TLL Pharmaceutical, USWM Enterprises, Ventyx Biosciences, Viela Bio, and has stock options from Ventyx Biosciences.
S.D. reports consultancy fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv, Allergan, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Athos Therapeutics, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Hospira, Inotrem, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB, and Vifor; and reports lecture fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Janssen, Mylan, Pfizer, and Takeda.
K.A., N.G., B.R-D. are employees of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
P.L. is an employee of Sanofi.
Duvakitug is being developed in partnership by Teva and Sanofi.

Introduction

Complex perianal fistulas represent one of the most challenging manifestations of Crohn’s disease. Combined surgical and medical therapy with biologic drugs represents today the first-line treatment option, but its efficacy does not exceed 60% in terms of healing. Recently, new therapeutic approaches, such as autologous microfragmented adipose tissue (M-Fat) injection, have shown promising results. Indeed, a recent non-profit prospective pilot study on 15 patients has demonstrated that the local injection of M-Fat is a safe and promising “rescue therapy” for patients with multiresistant complex fistulizing Crohn’s disease (PCD), with a 66.7% rate of combined remission in such difficult patients. It has to be highlighted that the M-Fat injection is minimally invasive, with less risk of sphincteric damage and can be carried out in day-surgery setting.

Aims & Methods

The primary aim of this multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial (ATTIC) is to evaluate the efficacy of the infiltration of M-Fat in the healing of perianal complex fistulas not-responding to treatment with biologics. Consecutive patients referring to the 6 investigation Centers for surgical treatment of persistent complex fistulizing PCD refractory to biosurgical approach were assessed for eligibility. After baseline pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, those included were submitted to surgical drainage with “cone-like” fistulectomy, and then randomized to receive a 15 to 20 cc local injection, at the internal orifice level and along fistula tracts, of M-Fat obtained by a lipoaspiration and processed with an enzyme-free technology (treatment group), or a suture placement and injection of 15 cc of saline solution at the internal orifice (control group). Clinical follow-up were conducted at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks; at 24 weeks after surgery, pelvic magnetic resonance was obtained. Success was defined as “combined remission”, combination of clinical (absence of drainage upon gentle finger compression) and radiological healing (absence of residual collections > 3 mm). Clinical remission was defined as clinical healing of all external openings not confirmed at radiological assessment.

Results

An overall 92 patients were screened, and 66 (33 per group) completed the 24-week follow-up. A statistically significant difference in favour of the treatment group in terms of combined remission emerged at the primary endpoint at 24-week follow-up (control group, 18.18%; treatment group: 57.58%; p = 0.0020). No significant differences in clinical outcome measures were encountered at any of the other follow-up points. No significant differences emerged between the groups in terms of recurrence rate, complication rate, and number of adverse events. Clinical remission was 63.64% in the treatment group compared to 51.52% in the control group with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial demonstrates that the intraoperative injection of M-Fat, associated with surgical complete drainage of perianal sepsis, is safe, effective, and reproducible in healing complex multirefractory perianal Crohn's disease, while improving the quality of life and significantly reducing the risk of definitive oostomy.

Introduction

Celiac disease (CeD) is triggered by gluten peptides that bind to HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 in the small intestine leading to gluten specific Th1 T cell expansion and villous atrophy. The oral transglutaminase 2 inhibitor Zed1227 blocks the deamidation of gliadin peptides, a prerequisite for effective gliadin antigen presentation. The CEC-3 clinical trial demonstrated that Zed1227 effectively prevented mucosal damage in 160 CeD patients in remission challenged with 3 g gluten daily for 6 weeks (Schuppan D et al, NEJM 2021).

Aims & Methods

We analyzed regulatory T cell (Treg) gene expression pre and post gluten challenge in the 100 mg/d Zed1227 vs placebo treated patients using RNAseq from the patients’ small intestinal biopsies (Dotsenko V et al, Nat Immunol 2024). We focused on genes of Treg subtypes and related cells. Subanalysis was performed via different gene set enrichments for Treg subsets, regulatory pathways and cell types. Genes that were enhanced in favorable vs unfavorable villous height to crypt depth (V/C) ratio outcomes, also after placebo treatment, were analyzed. We further analyzed pre-disposing genes before challenge, favoring a beneficial or negative post challenge V/C outcome.

Results

93% of the top 100 most significant regulatory genes were upregulated in Zed1227-treated patients compared to those treated with a placebo. These regulatory genes included TGF-beta signaling genes such as Smad7 and MERTK, cholesterol- and fatty acid related genes, such as ACAT1 and NPC1L1, specific autophagy/apoptosis related genes such as VPS35, SQSTM1, BMF, and inhibitory genes like SOCS2. Zed1227 treated patient samples with a maintained post challenge V/C ratio showed evidence for upregulated iTreg genes. Interestingly, Treg genes from placebo-treated subjects were upregulated in correlation with better inflammatory control under gluten challenge compared to worse control.
Moreover, in pre-challenge duodenal samples we identified protective genes that help maintain tolerance during gluten challenge, as reflected by a better post challenge V/C ratio. Examples are ubiquitin ligase RNF167, BAD, FOXN3, BAG1 and CLAUDIN15, whereas other genes like IRF9, CD96 and HLA-/TAP1 were predictive of a more pronounced V/C ratio decline after gluten exposure.

Conclusion

Our data derived from superbly analyzed pre- and post challenge duodenal biopsies demonstrate an active anti-inflammatory immune modulation, largely Treg cell mediated, in CeD in patients prior to and during gluten challenge. Zed1227 treatment potently activates this regulatory response. The balance of several beneficial vs detrimental predisposing Treg-related genes may play a causative role in the variable sensitivity of CeD patients to gluten exposure. Our data support future Treg based therapies to attenuate inflammation in CeD and other (intestinal) autoimmune diseases.

References

Schuppan, D., Mäki, M., Lundin, K. E. A., Isola, J., Friesing-Sosnik, T., Taavela, J., Popp, A., Koskenpato, J., Langhorst, J., Hovde, Ø., Lähdeaho, M. L., Fusco, S., Schumann, M., Török, H. P., Kupcinskas, J., Zopf, Y., Lohse, A. W., Scheinin, M., Kull, K., Biedermann, L., … CEC-3 Trial Group (2021). A Randomized Trial of a Transglutaminase 2 Inhibitor for Celiac Disease. The New England journal of medicine, 385(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032441
Dotsenko, V., Tewes, B., Hils, M., Pasternack, R., Isola, J., Taavela, J., Popp, A., Sarin, J., Huhtala, H., Hiltunen, P., Zimmermann, T., Mohrbacher, R., Greinwald, R., Lundin, K. E. A., Schuppan, D., Mäki, M., Viiri, K., & CEC-3 Investigators (2024). Transcriptomic analysis of intestine following administration of a transglutaminase 2 inhibitor to prevent gluten-induced intestinal damage in celiac disease. Nature immunology, 25(7), 1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-024-01867-0

Disclosure

V.D. and K.V. received funding from Dr. Falk Pharma to Tampere University to conduct the study. B.T., T.Z., R.M. and R.G. are employees of Dr. Falk Pharma. The data presented here are the subject of patent applications EP24173619.8 and EP24173615.6 filed by Dr. Falk Pharma, and B.T., T.Z., R.M., R.G., V.D. and K.V. are inventors on these applications. M.H. and R.P. are employees of Zedira. J.T. is a consultant for Jilab Oy and Dr. Falk Pharma. K.E.A.L. is a consultant for Amyra, Bioniz Pharmaceuticals, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Dr. Falk Pharma, Itrexon Actobios, TOPAS Therapeutics and Takeda California. D.S. is the data and safety monitor for Boehringer Ingelheim (Phil.) and is a consultant for the Dr. Falk Pharma, Takeda, Immunic, Sanofi and TOPAS Therapeutics. J.I. is the owner of Jilab Oy. M.M. is the founder, owner and Chair of the Board of Maki HealthTech (MHT). MHT receives Management/Advisory Affiliation fees from Dr. Falk Pharma and other funding not related to the research from Topas Therapeutics, Calypso Biotech, Vaccitech, ImmunogenX, Equillium and Immunic. MHT holds patents (patent number 7361480 (United States) and European Patent Office Number 1390753) licensed to Labsystems Diagnostics from where MHT receives royalties via Tampere University Hospital. All other authors declare no competing interests.