Introduction
The PROFILE trial in patients with newly-diagnosed Crohn’s disease demonstrated that “top-down” therapy, with combination infliximab and immunomodulator from diagnosis, provided superior efficacy and a better safety profile over a one-year follow-up period compared to a conventional “accelerated step-up” management approach.
Aims & Methods
The current study aimed to evaluate cost-effectiveness by assessing the healthcare cost and health outcomes associated with starting anti-TNF medication (intravenous infliximab, subcutaneous infliximab, subcutaneous adalimumab) as soon as possible after diagnosis. A de novo Markov model was developed to model the cost-effectiveness of using a “top-down” compared to “accelerated step-up” strategy in adults newly-diagnosed with active Crohn’s disease (HBI score >7, elevated CRP and/or faecal calprotectin >200ug/g and endoscopic evidence of disease activity with simple endoscopic score of Crohn’s disease activity of >6 [>4 if ileal-only disease]). Parameters were informed by individual patient data from PROFILE and data from the published literature. Use of intravenous infliximab, or subcutaneous infliximab, or subcutaneous adalimumab from diagnosis were modelled with biosimilar costs based on average real-world UK contract drug costs ascertained from 18 PROFILE trial sites in 2024. Key model outcomes included healthcare costs (drug acquisition, drug administration, disease management, hospitalisation, surgery) and health outcomes (quality-adjusted life years gained [QALYs]) measured over a 5-year time horizon.
Results
The base case cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that a “top-down” strategy dominated over an “accelerated step-up” approach. Initiating intravenous infliximab from diagnosis yielded greater clinical benefits, with an incremental gain of 0.17 QALYs per patient over a 5-year period, and was less costly, saving £1,681 per patient over the same time frame. Similar clinical benefits were obtained when modelling use of SC infliximab and adalimumab. The greatest cost savings were with adalimumab, totalling £10,059 per patient over 5 years. Sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of the results for “top-down” therapy, showing it to be the most cost-effective option in 98.7% of model simulations.
Conclusion
This health economic analysis demonstrates that early effective “top-down” treatment with anti-TNF therapy from diagnosis results in lower healthcare resource use compared to an “accelerated step-up” strategy. The economic benefits align with improved clinical outcomes, as early, effective treatment better controls inflammation. Patients experience longer periods in remission, fewer disease-related flares, and enhanced quality of life. These findings were demonstrated for intravenous infliximab, subcutaneous infliximab and subcutaneous adalimumab. In newly-diagnosed patients with active Crohn’s disease, “top-down” treatment with anti-TNF therapy is more efficacious, safer and cost-effective than “accelerated step-up” based treatment strategies.
References
Noor NM, Lee JC, Bond S et al. A biomarker-stratified comparison of top-down versus accelerated step-up treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed Crohn's disease (PROFILE): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):415-427.
Disclosure
NMN declares educational/travel grants and/or speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, J&J, Lilly, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Takeda and Tillotts Pharma AG.
