Introduction

While ileocecal resection (ICR) is the most common surgical procedure in Crohn's disease (CD), non-ICR surgeries account for only 20% of cases and remain underrepresented in the literature. This study aimed to identify specific clinical risk factors for surgical recurrence in CD patients undergoing small bowel or colonic resections without involving the ileocecal valve.

Aims & Methods

This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 257 patients with CD (124 small bowel resections, 133 colonic resections) across 13 Italian centers from 1978 to 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to identify clinical risk factors associated with surgical recurrence.

Results

The cohort comprised two distinct groups: small bowel resections (n=124), characterized by male predominance (63.71%), a high prevalence of stricturing disease (60.48%), and a median follow-up of 75.5 months; and colonic resections (n=133), featuring a more balanced gender distribution (47.37% male), higher rates of penetrating disease (47.37%), and a median follow-up of 88.0 months. Penetrating disease behaviour emerged as the only significant predictor of recurrence in logistic regression analysis (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.03-4.52, p=0.041), while factors typically predictive in ICR, such as smoking (OR 0.90, p=0.843) and prior resections (OR 0.96, p=0.913), were non-significant. Cox regression identified prior biologic exposure as a significant predictor of earlier recurrence (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.22-5.18, p=0.012), with TNF experience specifically associated with increased risk (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.12-4.67, p=0.024). The cumulative number of risk factors (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.82, p=0.046) and postoperative intra-abdominal septic complications (HR 2.75, 95% CI 1.18-6.44, p=0.020) also contributed to recurrence risk. Disease phenotypes significantly differed between resection types (p<0.001), with stricturing disease most prevalent in small bowel resections (60.48% vs. 36.09% in colonic) and penetrating disease more common in colonic resections (47.37% vs. 36.29% in small bowel). Results are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Univariate logistic regression analysis of predictors for postoperative surgical recurrence in patients undergoing small bowel or colonic resections. Abbreviations: CI: Confidence Interval; CD: Crohn’s Disease; IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Disease; POR: Postoperative recurrence; TNF: Tumour Necrosis Factors.

Conclusion

This study reveals distinct risk factors for surgical recurrence after non-ICR surgeries in CD. Unlike ICR where smoking, perianal disease, and prior resections predominate, non-ICR recurrence is primarily associated with penetrating disease phenotype and prior biologic exposure. These findings demonstrate that risk stratification models developed for ICR are not applicable to non-ICR surgeries, highlighting the need for procedure-specific approaches to postoperative management. Tailored prophylactic strategies should address the unique recurrence dynamics of small bowel and colonic resection surgeries.

Introduction

The Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) is the most widely used endoscopic index for assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Although artificial-intelligence　(AI)–assisted colonoscopy is expected to reduce inter-observer variability, the MES 4-point scale (0–3) lacks sufficient sensitivity to detect subtle changes in mucosal activity, limiting its ability to capture incremental improvement or deterioration. Moreover, because MES focuses on qualitative features—such as bleeding and erosions—without considering the extent or surface area of inflammation, it provides an incomplete estimate of a patient’s overall inflammatory burden.

Aims & Methods

We sought to develop and validate a quantitative, AI–driven colonoscopic score—Quantitative Ulcerative Colitis Assessment using Deep-learning (QUAD)—and to determine whether it predicts clinical relapse in patients with UC. The QUAD system was trained on 84 743 colonoscopic images from 998 UC patients at three centers and comprises three main functions: i) Image filtering: Automatic exclusion of low-quality images that are unsuitable for analysis owing to light saturation (halation), inadequate insufflation, excessive proximity to the mucosa, chromoendoscopy, or virtual chromoendoscopy. ii) Frame-level scoring: Each frame is divided into four quadrants; inflammation in each quadrant is graded from 0 to 3, and the quadrant scores are summed to yield a QUAD score of 0–12. iii) Video-level aggregation: Full-length withdrawal videos are processed to generate (i) an Entire QUAD score (0–60), representing pan-colonic inflammation, and (ii) a Distal QUAD score (0–12) for the rectosigmoid segment (final 20 % of the video).
The QUAD system contains mainly three function: i) automatically exclude low quality images that is ineligible for analysis in cases of halation, inadequate air de­livery, proximity to mucosa, chromoendoscopy, and virtual chromoendoscopy; ii) fully auto­mated twelve-class score output based on frame analysis: Each frame was divided into four quadrants; inflammation in each quadrant was graded 0–3 and summed to yield a QUAD score of 0–12; and iii) full-length withdrawal videos were processed to generate (I) an Entire QUAD (0–60) for considering whole-colon inflammation status and (II) a Distal QUAD (0–12) for the distal rectum–sigmoid segment (final 20 % of the video). An open-label cohort of adults with quiescent UC (partial Mayo score ≤ 2 for ≥6 months) was prospectively enrolled at a single center (August 2022–February 2023), and followed for 24 months after baseline colonoscopy; clinical relapse was defined as partial Mayo score > 2. The predictive value of QUAD scores for relapse was evaluated.

Results

Frame-level QUAD scores correlated strongly with expert-assigned MES values (Spearman r = 0.68, p < 0.01). Among 156 participants (median age, 51 years; 49 % male), 22 experienced relapse during follow-up. Relapse occurred in 19.4 % (19/98) of patients with a QUAD score > 3 versus 5.2 % (3/58) with a score ≤ 3 (log-rank p = 0.01).
In video analysis, an Entire QUAD > 6 did not significantly stratify relapse risk (16.8 % [17/101] vs 9.1 % [5/55]; log-rank p = 0.17). In contrast, a Distal QUAD > 3 was strongly associated with relapse (43.8 % [7/16] vs 10.7 % [15/140]; log-rank p < 0.01).

Conclusion

AI-generated QUAD provides a sensitive, fully quantitative measure of mucosal inflammation and stratifies relapse risk in clinically quiescent UC. In particular, the automatically derived Distal QUAD—focused on the distal colon and independent of operator image selection—offers a practical, objective tool for longitudinal monitoring and treatment tailoring in UC.

Introduction

Aims & Methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

The treatment of esophageal motor disorders (EMD) has historically been focused on decreasing pressure at the gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) by disrupting muscular fibers at this level. The classic management through dilatation, botulinum toxin injection, and Heller's myotomy (HM) underwent a revolution with the advent of third-space endoscopy, offering safe access to the submucosal space and enabling peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
In this prospective national multicenter study, the results of the implementation period of this technique in Spain from 2016 to the present are analyzed, examining its short, medium, and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, outcomes based on EMD, previous treatments, and other multiple variables are also investigated.

Aims & Methods

The primary aim of this study was to ascertain the clinical efficacy of POEM.
Secondary objectives included the identification of predictors of clinical success and the measurement of the incidence of post-POEM GERD and significant complications, as well as the determination of the risk factors for complications
This is a prospective multicenter study conducted across 13 hospitals in Spain. Symptomatic patients undergoing POEM for any EMD were recruited between June 2016 and February 2023. Baseline characteristics, procedural details and outcomes related to efficacy and safety during short and long-term follow-up were analyzed.

Results

A total of 441 patients were enrolled, with type II achalasia representing the most common diagnosis (62.1%). POEM was the primary treatment in 277 patients (62.8%). Clinical success data were available for 396 patients, with a success rate of 94.4% at the last available follow-up (2 years in 117 patients, 1 year in 140, <1 year in 139). A higher baseline Eckardt score was an independent risk factor for clinical failure in the long-term follow-up (p = 0.024). Symptomatic reflux occurred in 4.7% of the patients, with a significant esophagitis rate of 10.1%. Complication incidence was 9.3% (41/441), including 14 (3.2%) severe events. Older age (p = 0.025) and total procedure duration (p=0.036) were independent risk factors for complications, while mucosal injury was found to be a predictor of severe complications (p = 0.027).

Conclusion

These findings confirm the clinical efficacy and safety during the implementation phase of POEM for all EMD in Spain.