Clinical Case Summary

A 19-year-old man with a long-standing history of recurrent abdominal pain and a recent episode of melena of unknown origin. He presented to the emergency department (ED) with hematochezia and asthenia, with a drop in hemoglobin to 8.9 g/dL. Upper and lower endoscopy were inconclusive. Capsule enteroscopy revealed a double-lumen sign and mildly erythematous mucosa, raising suspicion of Meckel’s diverticulum. A technetium-99m pertechnetate (Tc-99m) scan confirmed the presence of ectopic gastric mucosa. The patient subsequently underwent enterectomy, and histological analysis confirmed gastric mucosal heterotopia.
A 13-year-old man with a history of iron-deficiency anaemia requiring transfusion at 7 years old, and previous episodes of abdominal pain due to ileo-ileal intussusception. He had
undergone an inconclusive exploratory laparoscopy. He was admitted to the ED with melena and hypogastric pain. Blood tests revealed hemoglobin of 12.9 g/dL. Abdominal ultrasound showed thickening of the distal ileum over 11 cm, without signs of intussusception. Capsule enteroscopy revealed a segment of circumferential edema and erythema in the ileum, with absence of a clear villous pattern and an appearance suggestive of gastric mucosa. A Tc-99m scan confirmed the presence of ectopic gastric mucosa. Exploratory laparoscopy identified a 10–15 cm segment with gastric fold-like appearance within otherwise normal small intestinal mucosa, in the absence of a diverticulum. Histological analysis confirmed gastric mucosal heterotopia.
Gastric heterotopia is an important differential diagnosis in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding and can occur independently of the presence of Meckel’s diverticulum. The authors highlight the role of capsule enteroscopy in the diagnostic algorithm.

Introduction

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common chronic liver disease, with potential progression to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and fibrosis. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have revolutionized obesity treatment, but their role in MASH with fibrosis remains under investigation.

Aims & Methods

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs in MASH with fibrosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Primary outcomes included histologic improvement in fibrosis without worsening MASH, MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis, and improvement in disease activity score. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), laboratory, and anthropometric data.

Results

Six RCTs (1,000 patients, mean follow-up: 47 weeks) were included. GLP-1 RAs did not significantly improve fibrosis without worsening MASH (RR 1.35; 95% CI 0.91–2.01; p=0.141; I²=53.5%) or disease activity score (RR 1.33; 95% CI 0.93–1.89; p=0.114; I²=64%). However, they significantly increased MASH resolution without worsening fibrosis (RR 3.50; 95% CI 2.44–5.02; p<0.001; I²=0%). No significant differences were observed in serious AEs. GLP-1 RAs improved laboratory, imaging, glycemic, lipidic, blood pressure, and anthropometric parameters.

Conclusion

GLP-1 RAs appear effective and safe in MASH with fibrosis, particularly in resolving MASH without worsening fibrosis.

Introduction

While anatomical landmark identification and adequate inspection time are recognized as crucial quality indicators in upper endoscopy, they are difficult to document consistently and accurately based solely on endoscopist reports.

Aims & Methods

To address this issue at Assuta Healthcare, a multicenter organization with 20 endoscopy units and over 200 endoscopists, we implemented a video-based AI platform designed to measure total upper endoscopy time (EGD-T), assess photo documentation of landmarks, and streamline the photo labeling process. In the current study, we evaluated the platform and employed it to examine endoscopist-reported quality measures.
For all upper endoscopies performed at Assuta Healthcare in 2024 on patients 45 years and older, the Theator AI-based Surgical Intelligence platform automatically documented total procedure time as well as photo snapshots captured and labeled by endoscopists for seven landmarks: 1. esophagus, 2. gastroesophageal junction, 3. cardia or fundus, 4. body, 5. angulus, 6. antrum or pylorus, and 7. duodenum (second part). In a subset of procedures, the platform facilitated documentation by suggesting labels for captured snapshots. After validating platform accuracy, we examined platform-reported procedure times. We then assessed landmark photo documentation rates in procedures with and without platform labeling suggestions.

Results

The study included 21,989 upper endoscopies (60.7% female, median age of 62.2 years), of which 51.7% were conducted with platform labeling suggestions and the remaining 48.3% were conducted without. Validated platform accuracy was 98%. Median total procedure time measured by the platform was 3.18 minutes (IQR 2.18-4.25). When they did not receive suggestions, endoscopists did not label any landmarks in 25% of procedures. At 12%, this percentage was significantly lower (p < .001) when the platform did provided suggestions. This difference was also reflected in the median number of landmarks labeled, which was 2 (IQR 0-3) in procedures without labeling suggestions and 3 (IQR 1-4) in procedures with labeling suggestions (p < .001).

Conclusion

Implementing an AI tool to automatically assess procedure time in upper endoscopy provided accurate measurements, revealing durations considerably lower than recommended. It further revealed extremely low labeling rates, which increased when automated suggestions were provided. The results highlight critical gaps in the reporting of quality measures for upper endoscopy and indicate that AI-based documentation can be instrumental to quality assurance by identifying and addressing such gaps.

Disclosure

None

Introduction

High-resolution colonic manometry (HRCM) is the gold standard for measuring colonic contractility and guiding decisions for subtotal colectomy in refractory slow-transit constipation (STC). However, it is only available in a handful of centers worldwide. Body surface colonic mapping (BSCM) is a recently validated technology that allows for easy-to-apply and non-invasive transcutaneous evaluation of pre- and post-prandial colonic motility, and has shown strong correlation with HRCM.

Aims & Methods

We sought to evaluate pre- and post-prandial colonic activity using BSCM in patients with refractory STC and correlate with real-time symptoms.
We applied BSCM to refractory chronic constipation patients while undergoing standard diagnostic HRCM. After bowel prep and an overnight fast a HRCM catheter (36 sensors, 3 cm spacing) was advanced and clipped to the caecum. Two BSCM electrode arrays (each 8x8 sensors, 2 cm spacing, Alimetry) were placed on the abdomen after skin prep. Simultaneous HRCM and BSCM recordings were obtained during a 1-hour fasting period, 1 hour after a standardized low-fat meal, and 1 hour after luminally applied 10 mg of bisacodyl. BSCM electrical recordings were band-pass filtered to isolate colonic cyclic motor patterns (CMPs) of 4-10 cycles per minute. The BSCM motility index (MI) was computed from the global continuous wavelet transform spectrum and compared to a real-time symptom score (1-10 scale). Meal response was quantified based on the fasted-fed ratio (FFR) and response time (RT), a marked rise in MI relative to mealtime. Symptoms were recorded for 15 min. during 3,5h.

Results

A total of 9 patients with refractory STC (mean age 45, range 27-60, 22% male) were enrolled. BSCM MI correlated with bloating in 6 subjects, whereof strongly in 2 subjects (R= 0.53 and 0.74). Abdominal discomfort was even correlated to the BSCM MI in 8 subjects, whereof strongly in 2 (R0.74 and 0.79). Flatulence was only reported by 6 subjects and correlated to the BCSM MI in 4 of them, of which 2 strongly (Rs=0.67). While the desire to defecate was correlated with BSCM MI in 6 subjects, the urge to defecate was in 5. However, in both symptoms, there was a strong correlation in 3 subjects (R between 0.69-0.85). These symptoms were mainly provoked by the administration of bisacodyl, followed by strong colonic contractions. Lastly, BSCM MI correlated well with stomach ache symptoms in 6 subjects, of which 2 strongly (R=0.74 and 0.84). Overall symptom burden was strongly correlated with BSCM MI in 3 subjects (R between 0.61-0.8). One subject had clear increases in symptoms, while the colonic activity was low, whereas another subject had an almost perfect correlation between the two. The other subjects had an overall average correlation between symptoms and colonic motility.

Conclusion

BSCM is an easy-to-apply, painless, non-invasive tool that has the potential to elucidate underlying mechanisms driving symptoms in patients with refractory STC. Relating colonic motility to symptoms could aid in developing a more personalized approach to manage these patients' clinical treatment pathway