Introduction

Few studies have examined esophageal motility disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes operated with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or gastric bypass (RYGB).

Aims & Methods

We have recently reported overall prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in this group of patients (1) and now aimed to investigate potential differences between the two surgical methods regarding the prevalence of dysmotility 5 years after surgery. Furthermore, we also aimed to analyse and report on the available GERD-data in detail.
In the Oseberg study (January 2013 – December 2022), 125 patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m² and type 2 diabetes were screened, sixteen patients were excluded or withdrew consent, leaving 109 patients allocated to SG (n=55) or RYGB (n=54). To assess reflux symptoms, GerdQ (Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire) was completed. Gastroscopy and 24-hour pH monitoring were used to examine GERD. High-resolution manometry with the Chicago classification v3.0 was used to assess esophageal motility.

Results

At inclusion the average age was 47.7 years (SD 9.6), BMI was 42.3 kg/m2 (5.3), and 66% were women. At the 5-year follow-up, 29 (53%) patients in SG-group and 32 (59%) in RYGB-group underwent gastroscopy, 22 (40%) vs. 25 (46%) underwent 24-hour pH monitoring, 23 (42%) vs. 26 (48%) underwent manometry, and 42 (76%) vs. 42 (78%) completed GerdQ. The proportion of patients with GERD symptoms (GerdQ ≥8) was low in both groups, with a slightly lower prevalence after RYGB (2%) than after SG (14%). There was no difference in the prevalence of erosive esophagitis between the groups (38% in SG and 41% in RYGB), all findings with less advanced esophagitis (Los Angeles grades A and B), but one patient in each group had new onset Barrett's esophagus. The proportion of patients with pH<4 for more than 6% of the recording (Acid exposure time, AET) was significantly higher after SG compared with RYGB (59% versus 8%, p < 0.0001). Esophageal dysmotility was diagnosed in 14 (61%) after SG compared with 19 (73%) patients after RYGB. Most of these patients (n=22) had hypertensive or hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES), with no difference between groups. The remaining 11 patients had ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) or elevated distal contractile integral (DCI). None of the patients with dysmotility reported swallowing difficulties or chest pain with food intake.

Conclusion

The Oseberg study demonstrates a high prevalence of asymptomatic esophageal dysmotility after SG or RYGB with uncertain clinical relevance. Furthermore, a seven times higher prevalence of pathological acid reflux after SG compared with RYGB was demonstrated, but the prevalences of erosive esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility were approximately similar between groups. Few of the examined patients reported GERD symptoms, hence objective assessment of GERD should be included in long-term follow-up after SG to detect and prevent the development of Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma.

References

1. Hauge JW et al., Effect of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on the remission of type 2 diabetes, weight loss, and cardiovascular risk factors at 5 years (Oseberg): secondary outcomes of a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 Apr 1:S2213-8587(24)00396-6

Introduction

Corpus atrophic gastritis (CAG) requires endoscopic-histological surveillance due to the risk of developing gastric neoplastic lesions (GNL). This study aimed to identify variables associated with GNL development at long-term follow-up using a feature ranking method based on a novel One-Class Support Vector Machine (SVM) model.

Aims & Methods

A dataset containing clinical, endoscopic, and histological variables from consecutive CAG patients (2001-2023) adhering to a surveillance program was considered. GNL presence at the longest available follow-up was recorded. Gastric biopsies and histological evaluations were conducted according to the updated Sydney system. CAG patients with any missing data or a GNL diagnosis at the baseline gastroscopy were excluded from the final analysis. A Fisher score-based feature ranking method and One-Class SVM were used to select the optimal subset of baseline variables associated with GNL development, aiming to achieve average sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) above 80%.

Results

Overall, 355 CAG patients were initially considered. Of these, 36 were excluded due to the presence of GNL at baseline gastroscopy, and 216 for missing data. Thus, a total of 103 patients were considered and grouped into: CAG patients with [22 patients (F 68.1%), median age 68 (35-83) years] and without GNL at follow-up [81 patients (F 72.8%), median age 59(26-84) years]. After a median follow-up of 60 (12-192) months, 13 epithelial GNL (gastric adenocarcinoma or high/low-grade dysplasia) and nine type-1 gastric-neuroendocrine-tumors (T1gNET) were recorded. Parietal-cell-antibodies and pepsinogen-I < 30 μg/l were associated with both epithelial GNL and T1gNET. Antral inflammation and age > 60 were linked to epithelial GNL, while anti-thyroperoxidase-antibodies, smoking, and dyspeptic symptoms at CAG diagnosis were linked to T1gNET. Low-dose aspirin and H. pylori eradication therapy showed inverse associations with epithelial GNL and T1gNET, respectively.

Conclusion

This is the first study in which an AI model simultaneously considers clinical, endoscopic, and histological characteristics from a dataset of CAG patients, showing good sensitivity and specificity in identifying those variables associated with developing GNL. Nonetheless, we acknowledge the need for improved variable standardization and data balancing between groups to enhance model performance further.

Introduction

Epithelial barrier dysfunction is a hallmark of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), contributing to increased permeability, microbial translocation, and sustained mucosal inflammation^1,2. Targeting barrier restoration has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy³. Gallic acid, a dietary polyphenol with known anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties, has shown potential in modulating mucosal responses⁴. To investigate its impact on epithelial integrity under inflammatory stress, we utilized intestinal organoids as a physiologically relevant ex vivo model system.

Aims & Methods

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of gallic acid to restore intestinal epithelial barrier function under inflammatory conditions, using colonic epithelial organoids and integrating transcriptomic and permeability analyses.
The study was approved by the Kaunas Regional Biomedical Research Ethics Committee (protocol no. BE-2-31). Inflamed differentiated colonic epithelial organoids were established from a patient with ulcerative colitis (UC) and non-IBD control individual by exogenous stimulation with TNF-α and IFN-γ (10 ng/mL each) for 24 hours. For gallic acid (GA) screening, organoids were pre-treated with metabolite (100 μM) for 1 hour prior to inflammation induction and co-treated during the induction period. Subsequently, organoids were either processed for mRNA sequencing (1×75 bp, NextSeq 550, Illumina) or subjected to a FITC-Dextran (4kDa) assay. RNA-seq data was processed, analyzed, and visualized using nf-core/RNAseq pipeline and RStudio. Images for permeability assay analysis were acquired using an inverted fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Observer 7), processed with ImageJ, and analyzed and visualized in RStudio.

Results

Principal component analysis of transcriptomic profiles from both UC and non-IBD organoids revealed clear sample clustering driven by stimulation. Differential gene expression and Gene set enrichment (GSEA) analyses indicated a more pronounced cell response to both treatments in UC organoids compared to non-IBD organoids. Inflammation activated immune (CXCL9/10/11, CX3CL1), interferon (IFI44, SOCS1, NOS2), and defense genes (GBP4, GBP5, OAS2), while downregulating metabolic genes (FABP6, CFTR, HMGCS2) in both groups. Gene Ontology-based GSEA confirmed immune pathway enrichment and lipid metabolism suppression in inflamed cultures. In total, 3,148 and 1,479 DEGs were identified in inflamed UC and non-IBD organoids, respectively. GA treatment modulated 2,144 and 384 genes (e.g., LYPD8, MKI67, MT-ATP6, CXCL14, CCL22) in these groups, suggesting potential to rebalance inflammation and metabolism. GA co-treatment enhanced epithelial integrity in UC organoids via upregulation of cell junction, peptide hormone processing, and immune-related pathways. In non-IBD organoids, GA promoted cell adhesion pathways, supporting epithelial cohesion. Functional permeability analysis confirmed GA’s protective role, as supported by transcriptomic data. Mean percentages of FITC-Dextran-permeable organoids were 16.02% (untreated), 86.08% (inflamed), and 42.58% (inflamed + GA). A trend toward statistical significance (Wilcoxon p = 0.125) was observed in both untreated vs. inflamed and inflamed vs. inflamed + GA comparisons.

Conclusion

In conclusion, gallic acid modulates inflammatory and metabolic pathways during colonic inflammation and enhances epithelial barrier integrity.
Study was funded by the European Union and the State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) (project: miGut-Health, grant no. 101095470).

References

¹Jostins, L., et al. (2012). Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature, 491(7422), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11582
²Cleynen, I., et al. (2016). Inherited determinants of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis phenotypes: A genetic association study. The Lancet, 387(10014), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00465-1
³Vieujean, S., et al. (2025). Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-024-01035-7
⁴Tian, B., Ye, P., Zhou, X., Hu, J., Wang, P., Cai, M., Yang, K., Sun, P., & Zou, X. (2025). Gallic acid ameliorated chronic DSS-induced colitis through gut microbiota modulation, intestinal barrier improvement, and inflammation. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70024