Introduction

During endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal neoplasms, an interesting feature is occasionally detected in which the muscle layer under the tumour seems to be pulled upwards into the lesion in a triangle-shape. This feature is named muscle retracting sign (MR sign) and appears to indicate a potentially difficult ESD with high risk of incomplete and non-curative resection, although data about this subject is still scarce, without current studies in western countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not MR sign is associated with worst outcomes.

Aims & Methods

A retrospective analysis, using a prospectively collected database from 2 western centres, including all patients who underwent ESD for colorectal neoplasms with positivity for MR sign from July 2017 to January 2023 was performed. The presence of MR sign was determined by the endoscopist during the procedure. The results were evaluated in terms of complete, en bloc, R0 and curative resection rates, complications and local recurrence.

Results

In a total of 411 lesions treated by ESD, 26 presented MR sign (6.3%, mean size 62,3mm, range 20-180mm): 9 colonic and 17 rectal, corresponding to 26 patients (male 61.5%, mean age 70 years): 9 in colon and 17 in rectum. Morphologically and according to Paris classification, 13 were 0-Is (50%), 10 LST-G-M (38.5%), 1 0-Isp, 1 LST-G-N and 1 LST-NG-F. Technical success was achieved in 24 lesions (24/26, 92.3%) with 2 procedures aborted due to the perception of high perforation risk, both located in the colon (2/9, 22%). In the rectum, there was the need to perform intramuscular dissection in 3 procedures to complete the resection (3/17, 17.6%). Among resected lesions, en bloc and R0 resection rates were 100% and 66.7% (16/24). According to ESGE 2022 criteria, resection was considered curative in 66.7% (16/24), non-curative with high risk in 8.3% (2/24) and with local-risk recurrence in 25% (6/24). Intraprocedure complications were recorded in 2 resections (8%), both in the rectum and both perforations endoscopically managed. No recurrence was recorded in a mean follow-up time of 7 months (range 1-22 months).

Conclusion

This analysis show that MR sign is mostly present in large bulky protruding lesions and seems associated with a higher incomplete resection procedure rate in colon lesions but in rectum. Also, it seems associated with higher complication rate, namely perforations, and non-curative resection rates among resected lesions. Therefore, in the colon, an anticipated switch for surgery in clinically fit patients should be considered in the presence of this sign or even before initiating ESD when lesion morphology suggests its presence. To the authors’ best knowledge, this is the first study of the impact of the present of MRS in ESD in the West.

References

Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, Man-I M, East J, Ono W, Nishino E, et al. Clinical significance of the muscle-retracting sign during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(03):E246–51.
Suzuki N, Dhillon A, Seward E, Humphries A. CLIP MUSCLE PROTECTION (CLIMP) METHOD IN MUSCLE-RETRACTING SIGN DURING COLONIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION. Gut. 2021;70(Suppl 1):A1–A262.

Disclosure

Toyonaga T, Tanaka S, Man-I M, East J, Ono W, Nishino E, et al. Clinical significance of the muscle-retracting sign during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(03):E246–51.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PC) screening can improve survival in high-risk patients by detecting preneoplastic lesions or early-stage tumors.
Surveillances is mainly based on annual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). However, little has been described regarding the possibility of finding other morphological changes that may be also important.

Aims & Methods

The aim of the study is to evaluate all the findings described in screening test and to analyze the correlation between these two screening techniques.
Descriptive observational single-center study that includes high-risk PC patients either due to family history (familial pancreatic cancer) or because they belong to hereditary syndromes, who have been undergone pancreatic cancer screening at our center from 2015 to 2023. Demographic variables and findings described in the EUS or MRI were collected.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 57.3 ± 8.2 years and a predominance of females (65.7%). Four patients (11.4%) were smokers, two were diabetic (5.7%), and one had a history of chronic pancreatitis (2.9%). The median follow-up time was 23 months (interquartile range 8-59 months).
The most frequent hereditary syndrome was hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (n=19, 54.3%), followed by familial atypical multiple mole melanoma syndrome (n=4; 11.4%). The BRCA2 mutation was the most common identifiable genetic factor (34.8%).
Regarding screening test findings, solid tumors were detected in three patients (8.6%) (Two stage I and IV adenocarcinomas and one stage I neuroendocrine tumor). In two individuals (5.7%) branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm were observed. Other pancreatic abnormalities were detected in 18 patients (51.4%) that include chronic pancreatitis-like parenchymal changes (34.3%), peripancreatic lymph nodes and fatty pancreas (5.7%). Finally, in 12 patients (34.3%) the screening tests were normal.
In relation to the concordance between MRI and EUS, in ten patients (28.6%) there was no agreement between these two techniques. EUS detected more parenchymal changes (n=5), pancreatic steatosis (n=2) and one neuroendocrine tumor that were not described on MRI. In contrast, MRI detected a cystic lesion and a pseudonodular enhancement that were not found on EUS.

Conclusion

Pancreatic cancer screening in high-risk individuals, detects neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions at a high rate.
Other findings, such as chronic pancreatitis-like parenchymal changes, peripancreatic lymph nodes or fatty pancreas, were also common in these patients
MRI and EUS have a good correlation, but EUS detects more parenchymal changes.

References

1. Goggins M, Overbeek KA, Brand R et al. Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium. Gut 2020; 69 (1): 7-17
2. Bogdanski AM, van Hooft JE, Boekestijn B, Bonsing BA, Wasser MNJM, Klatte DCF, van Leerdam ME. Aspects and outcomes of surveillance for individuals at high‑risk of pancreatic cancer. Fam Cancer 2024; 23(3):323-339.
3. Blackford AL, Canto MI, Dbouk M, Hruban RH, Katona BW, Chak A et al. Pancreatic Cancer Surveillance and Survival of High-Risk Individuals. JAMA Oncol. 2024;10(8):1087-1096.
4. Maurer E, Lehman B, Matthäi E, Denzer U, Figiel J, Jseinghaus M et al. Pancreatic cancer screening is effective in individuals at risk with predisposing germline gene variants, but not in gene variant‐negative familial pancreatic cancer families. United European Gastroenterol J 2024; 12 (9): 1211-1221

Clinical Case Summary

A 70-year-old patient with diabetes mellitus and cholecystectomy performed six months earlier was admitted to the emergency department for generalized abdominal pain, hyporexia and weight loss.
An abdominal CT scan showed a solid-cystic pancreatic lesion suggestive of mucinous neoplasia, together with peritoneal nodules in the right paracolic gout. In view of the suspicion of malignancy, an echoendoscopy with fine needle aspiration puncture (EUS-FNA) was performed, identifying an irregular lesion with heterogeneous and hypovascular ultrastructure in the pancreatic neck-body and a discrete dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. Finally, the histological study didn´t show neoplastic cells.
Suddenly the patient experienced a clinical worsening with severe pain and high fever. Laboratory tests showed a progressive increase in C-reactive protein and leukocytosis with left shift. In a control CT scan, a reduction in the size of the pancreatic lesion is observed, together with an increase in the peritoneal lesions which present a polyglobulated contour, hypercapillary margins and rarefaction of the surrounding fat. These finding suggesting the presence of peritoneal abscesses secondary to dropped gallstones. After broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, the intra-abdominal abscesses improved radiologically, but the collection persisted in the right posterior pararenal space which was drained under ultrasound control with subsequent disappearance of fever and normalization of analytical parameters.
Dropped gallstones occur in approximately 7% of cholecystectomies. The secondary granulomatous reaction in paucisymptomatic patients can simulate peritoneal tumor processes in imaging tests, being one of the adverse effects described in relation to this pathology. In our case, the concomitant presence of peritoneal lesions together the pancreatic lesion oriented the initial case as a malignant process; however, the patient's evolution were key to the final diagnosis.

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is associated with an intense catabolic, local-regional and systemic inflammatory state, which can lead to changes in body composition, with prognostic implications.

Aims & Methods

Aims: To evaluate the body composition by anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and computed tomography (CT) and its influence in AP severity, endocrine insufficiency (EnPI-AP), pancreatic exocrine (EPI-AP) and post-pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT).
Methods: Prospective longitudinal study of consecutive adult patients diagnosed with first AP episode. EPI-AP patients were randomized to receive PERT (4000IU/meal+20000IU/snack) vs. placebo (clinicaltrials.gov:NCT05480241). Body composition was assessed using anthropometry, BIA (InBody 570) and CT (cross-sectional areas L1/L3). Obesity was diagnosed for body mass index (BMI)≥30Kg/m², waist-to-hip ratio (WHR)>0.9(men)/0.85(women) and percentage total fat mass (TFM)>20%(men)/28%(women). Visceral obesity was defined by abdominal circumference (AC)>94(men)/80(women)cm, visceral fat area (VFA)≥100cm² and visceral/subcutaneous fat ratio (VSFR)≥0.4. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by skeletal muscle mass (SMM)<20(men)/15(women)Kg, SMM index (SMMi)<7.0/5.5Kg/m² and skeletal muscle area index (SMAi)<41(men)/38.5(women)cm². The three methods were correlated using spearman test and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

A total of 105 patients (65.7%(n=69) males; mean age:63.8±17.1yo) were enrolled and followed-up. AP was moderately-severe/severe in 32.4%/16.2%. EPI-AP and EnPI-AP occurred in 47.6%(n=50) and 17.1%(n=18). EPI-AP was persistent (≥6months after AP diagnosis) in 58%. After 6-month post-randomization, 44%(n=11/25) under PERT and 40%(n=10/25) under placebo resolved EPI-AP (p=0.598).
Obesity was diagnosed in 19.0%(n=20) by BMI, 97.1%(n=102)/72.4%(n=76) by WHR in antropometry/BIA, and 57.1%(n=60) by TFM. Visceral obesity was diagnosed in 78.1%(n=82) by AC, in 41.9%(n=44)/ 97.2%(n=103) by VFM in BIA/CT and in 90.5%(n=95) by VSFR. Sarcopenia was diagnosed in 1.0%(n=1) by MMS.
Considering outcomes, moderately-severe/severe AP was strongly associated with WHR by BIA (OR=10.2; p=0.034) and VFA by BIA (OR=1.08; p=0.029) and CT (OR=1.003; p=0.038). EPI-AP was statically associated with WHR by BIA (OR=11.6; p=0.048) and SMMi by BIA (OR=77.4; p=0.048) and TFM (OR=2.3; p=0.048). Severe EPI-AP was strongly associated with VSFR (OR=20;95%CI; p=0.048) and SMMi by BIA (OR=23.2; p=0.003) and CT (OR=2.3; p=0.041). SMMi by BIA (OR=14.1; p=0.030) and CT (OR=1.6; p=0.031) predicted EnPI-AP.
For obesity, TFM by BIA had a strong correlation with BMI (r=0.61; p<0.001) and a weak correlation with WHR by anthropometry (r=0.37; p<0.001). Regarding visceral obesity, VFA by BIA was weakly correlated with WHR by anthropometry (r=0.29; p=0.004) and VFA by CT (r=0.20; p=0.045). For sarcopenia, SMM by BIA was strongly correlated with SMM by CT (r=0.78; p<0.001).
In EPI-AP patients, a significant decrease of WHR (t(52)=2.262; p=0.028) and TFM (t(53)=1.695; p=0.046) by BIA was observed after 6months of PERT.

Conclusion

Body composition is significantly changed in AP, with >2/3 of patients with obesity, especially the visceral component. Obesity, including visceral obesity, correlates with AP severity. Obesity, including visceral obesity and sarcopenia are correlated with the EPI-AP and its severity, while sarcopenia is correlated with EnPI-AP. PERT has led to a significant reduction in obesity markers. Body composition assessment by BIA (TFM, VFA and SMM) and CT (VFA and SMM) were of clinical value and comparable.

References

1. Kim J, Kim S-s, Hwang HK, Kang CM, Kim KS, Kim SH. Body composition assessment using bioelectrical impedance analysis and computed tomography in patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in Korea: a before and after study. Ann Nutr Metab 2023;15(3):72-80.
2. Wang S, Wang M, Jiang L, Zhao X. Low skeletal muscle quality extracted from CT is associated with poor outcomes in severe acute pancreatitis patients. Eur J Radiol 2024;170:111215.
3. Zhou Y, Hao N, Duan Z, Kong M, Xu M, Zhang D, et al. Assessment of acute pancreatitis severity and prognosis with CT-measured body composition. Int J Gen Med 2021;14:3971-3980.
4. Chaigneau T, Morello R, Vannier E, Musikas M, Piquet M-A, Vupont B. Impact of sarcopenic obesity on predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis. Did Liver Dis 2023;55(7):926-932.