UEG Week Recordings UEG Week Posters Online courses Guidelines Mistakes in... Podcasts Webinars
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In
Visit ueg.eu Create myUEG account Log In

Filters:

UEG Online Course
accredited
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Functional dyspepsia is a common and chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) defined by upper abdominal symptoms. Correct diagnosis and recognition of the existing syndromes, including postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndrome is important, as this will affect the management decisions.

All aspects of functional dyspepsia —from its definition and impact to pathophysiology and management— are covered in this online course by Lucas Wauters, Jan Tack and Tim Vanuytsel. The course includes comprehensive PPT slides and bespoke video presentations, which were filmed in Leuven in March 2020. The combined material has a total duration of approximately 40 minutes. The estimated time needed to complete the course, including the final assessment, is 60 minutes.

Learning objectives

  • To understand how to reach a conclusive diagnosis of GORD
  • To know how to reach a conclusive diagnosis of no GORD
  • To understand how to deal with an inconclusive diagnosis

Target audience

This course is suitable for gastroenterologists in training, but is also appropriate for physicians and surgeons in other disciplines, as well as nurses, dietitians and medical students who have an interest in gastroenterology.

This course was developed by Lucas Wauters, Jan Tack and Tim Vanuytsel (department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven) in receipt of an Activity Grant from UEG.

Functional dyspepsia: Diagnosis and treatment

Functional dyspepsia: Diagnosis and treatment

Lucas Wauters, Jan Tack, Tim Vanuytsel

Event

Functional dyspepsia: Diagnosis and treatment

Topics

Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Accreditation status

accredited

Duration

1 hour

Published

2020
Login to access
UEG Podcast Episode
UEG Podcast
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

The weird, wonderful , unusual and unexpected in gastroenterology

Pradeep Mundre 1, Charles Murray 2

1 Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS trust, Leeds, United Kingdom

2 Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Published

2024
UEG Poster
Audio / Video Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Clinical Case Summary

A 67-year-old man initially presented in 2020 with intermittent dysphagia for solid food. An endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract revealed an inflammatory, presumed peptic stenosis at the level of the Z-line. No hiatus hernia was present. A balloon dilatation was performed and therapy with proton pump inhibitors was started. This maintained remission until 2023, when he represented with frequent bolus retention, retrosternal chest pain and regurgitation. A repeat endoscopy appeared normal; however, biopsies revealed lymphocytic esophagitis. A high-resolution oesophageal manometry was performed to clarify the cause of dysphagia. Water swallows showed no abnormal findings; however, the patient had repeated, symptomatic outlet-obstruction during the solid test meal. This finding is often seen in eosinophilic esophagitis.1 The diagnosis of primary lymphocytic esophagitis, considered to be a variant of this condition,2 was proposed. Treatment with oro-dispersible budesonide (1mg bid) was started.
At the same time, an abnormal AV conduction pattern was noted on ECG. Echocardiography and a cardiac stress test were normal; however, CT imaging showed bihilar lymphadenopathy with peri-lymphatic pulmonary nodules. Broncho-alveolar lavage showed lymphocytic alveolitis (29% lymphocytes) and an elevated CD4/CD8 ratio (ratio = 4). ACE (51 U/l) was normal and granulomas were not seen on fine needle aspiration of the lymph nodes; however, the diagnosis of stage 2 pulmonary sarcoidosis was confirmed on PET-CT. Oral prednisolone (30mg od) replaced locally active steroids. The patient was symptom free after one month treatment.
Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease that often affects the lungs, skin and lymph nodes; however, involvement of the digestive tract is rare, and secondary lymphocytic esophagitis has hardly ever been described.3 The investigation, primary or secondary aetiology, and management of dysphagia in this case of lymphocytic esophagitis will be discussed.

References

1. Sykes C, Fairlamb G, Fox M, et al. Assessment of Esophageal Motility in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Scoping Review. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023;57:10-30.
2. Greuter T, Straumann A, Fernandez-Marrero Y, et al. Characterization of eosinophilic esophagitis variants by clinical, histological, and molecular analyses: A cross-sectional multi-center study. Allergy 2022;77:2520-2533.
3. Brito-Zeron P, Bari K, Baughman RP, et al. Sarcoidosis Involving the Gastrointestinal Tract: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114:1238-1247.

Disclosure

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose

IS THIS PRIMARY OR SECONDARY LYMPHOCYTIC OESOPHAGITIS?

IS THIS PRIMARY OR SECONDARY LYMPHOCYTIC OESOPHAGITIS?

Raik Hartwig 1, Matthias Breidert 2, Kristina Affolter 2, Mark Fox 3

1 Klinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland

2 Olten Hospital, Olten, Switzerland

3 Zürich University and Klinik Arlesheim, Arlesheim, Switzerland

Conference

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Oesophagus

Submission format

Clinical Case

Session

Clinical Cases (Posters)

Published

2024
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Clinical Case Summary

Closure of mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may reduce the risk of postprocedural perforation and bleeding. However, defect closure with traditional through-the-scope (TTS) or over-the-scope (OTS) clips and OTS suturing devices may be technically limited by defect size and location. The development of a new through-the-scope helix tack suture system (TTSS) has emerged as a promising tool for overcoming these limitations, particularly when combined with TTS clips.

We present two cases of gastric ESD defect closure with TTSS and adjunctive TTS clip application, highlighting the outcomes and main challenges to achieve complete defect closure.

CASE 1: 73-year-old woman with a 15mm Paris 0-IIb dysplastic lesion of the posterior wall of the antrum. En-bloc ESD was performed and the 25mm mucosal defect was closed with TTSS in a ‘Z’ pattern. However, suboptimal tack placement resulted in incomplete closure of the central portion of the scar, leaving two areas of exposed submucosa at the edges. Complete defect closure was accomplished with the additional placement of four TTS clips at the edges, only possible due to the previously achieved proximity.

CASE 2: 55-year-old man referred for ESD of a 13mm Paris 0-IIa dysplastic lesion in the lesser curvature of the antrum. En-bloc ESD was accomplished, and the resulting 25mm mucosal defect was closed using TTSS in a 'Z' pattern. Complete defect closure was achieved with the additional placement of one TTS clip.

Both patients were discharged the following day and presented with no complications at 1-month follow-up.

These cases highlight the potential of TTSS becoming a practical solution for the closure of complex post-ESD defects, allowing earlier patient discharge. While this novel TTSS with adjunctive TTS clip application appears to be effective in the management of sizable defects, proper suture pattern and tack placement are paramount for achieving complete defect closure.

References

  1. Kobara H, Tada N, Fujihara S, Nishiyama N, Masaki T. Clinical and technical outcomes of endoscopic closure of postendoscopic submucosal dissection defects: Literature review over one decade. Dig Endosc. 2023 Jan;35(2):216-231.
  2. Hernandez-Lara A, Garcia Garcia de Paredes A, Rajan E, Storm AC. Step-by-step instruction: using an endoscopic tack and suture device for gastrointestinal defect closure. VideoGIE. 2021;6(6):243-245.
  3. Hernandez A, Marya NB, Sawas T, Rajan E, Gades NM, Wong Kee Song LM, et al. Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video). Endosc Int Open. 2021 Apr;9(4):E572-E577.
  4. Canakis A, Dawod SM, Dawod E, Simons M, Di Cocco B, Westerveld DR, et al. Efficacy, Feasibility, and Safety of the X-Tack Endoscopic HeliX Tacking System: A Multicenter Experience. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Jan 29.
  5. Canakis A, Deliwala SS, Frohlinger M, Twery B, Canakis JP, Shaik MR, et al. Endoscopic outcomes using a novel through-the-scope tack and suture system for gastrointestinal defect closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. Published online March 22, 2024.
GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION DEFECT RESOLUTION STRATEGIES: THE PATH TO CLOSURE WITH THROUGH-THE-SCOPE HELIX TACK SUTURE SYSTEM

GASTRIC ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION DEFECT RESOLUTION STRATEGIES: THE PATH TO CLOSURE WITH THROUGH-THE-SCOPE HELIX TACK SUTURE SYSTEM

João António Cunha Neves 1, Jéssica Chaves 2, Joana Roseira 1, Mario Dinis-Ribeiro 2, Diogo Libânio 2

1 Unidade Local de Saúde do Algarve, Portimão, Portugal

2 Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal|||MEDCIDS - Department of Community, Medicine, Health Information and Decision, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

Conference

UEG Week Vienna 2024

Topics

Oesophagus

Submission format

Clinical Case

Session

Clinical Cases (Posters)

Published

2024
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Clinical Case Summary

We report the case of a 64-year-old man with preexisting hepatic sarcoidosis complicated by liver cirrhosis, who presented with confusion as an initial manifestation of COVID-19 confirmed by rapid Antigenic test. His Child Pugh score was 8 (Class B) and MELD was 16. Chest radiographs showed bilateral patchy interstitial opacities. Computed tomography (CT) of the brain was normal. Lumbar puncture was not performed because of a marked thrombocytopenia. Urine cytobacteriological examination did not show a urinary tract infection. An abdominal ultrasound showed normal hepatoportal flow and a mild ascites. Ascitic fluid analysis did not show spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Since the patient was cirrhotic, we have considered the diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy as a possible explanation for the neurological symptoms, so he started Lactulose and Rifaximin. However, his clinical condition showed no improvement, the neurological disorders remained the same. A brain MRI showed in FLAIR MR sequences a few hyperintensities punctiform in the white matter of the supratentorial region and the subcortical of the left insula region. There were no signs of a cerebral granuloma nor toxoplasmosis. It did not show venous thrombosis. There were no microheamorragies neither ischemic lesions. After careful evaluation by neurologic experts, encephalitis associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection was concluded. The patient was treated by intravenous Dexamethasone and he fully recovered without sequelae. This case illustrates the fact that neurological manifestations associated with COVID-19 infection are not necessarily a reflection of critical illness, and should incite clinicians to actively look for any evidence of COVID-19 infection as a differential diagnosis in patients with preexisting cirrhosis, presenting with neurological symptoms, during the epidemic period of COVID-19.

COVID-19 ENCEPHALITIS IN A CIRRHOTIC PATIENT

COVID-19 ENCEPHALITIS IN A CIRRHOTIC PATIENT

Sahar Hamza 1, Sabbah Meriam 1, Dorra Trad 1, Houssaina Jlassi 1, Norsaf Bibani 1, Dalila Gargouri 1

1 Habib Thameur Hospital, Tunis, Tunisia

Conference

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Submission format

Clinical Case

Session

PP 12 Clinical Cases (Posters)

Published

2023
UEG Poster
Standard Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

​The clinical scenarios in which probiotics (PB) are useful as adjuvants to Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy have not been well established.

Aims & Methods

Aims: To determine the use and factors associated with the prescription of PB adjuvants to H pylori eradication regimens, by European gastroenterologists in clinical practice.
Methods: Prospective, multicentre, non-interventional registry (Hp-EuReg) of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists. Data were collected in an AEG-REDCap e-CRD from 2013 to 2022. All data from countries with at least 30 cases undergoing eradication therapy and at least 1 case with associated PB were included, using patients without PB as controls. Analysis was performed by geographic area.

Results

A total of 36,699 patients were included, 8,233 (22%) with PB. Multiple PB formulations were used, including 9 genera and 32 species, the most frequent being Saccharomyces boulardii (2,315), Lactobacillus rhamnosus (1,897), Bifidobacterium breve (1,765), Lactobacillus reuteri (1,732) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (1,447). Forty-one percent of the formulations were multi-genus, 34% were symbiotic and 11% were combined with other products.
As factors associated with prescribing, there was a higher rate of females in the PB group (64% vs 60%; p<0.0001), with similar age (49 vs 51). Patients in the PB group had a higher rate of resistance to clarithromycin (11.4 vs 1.4), metronidazole (10.7 vs 1.4) and dual (10.7 vs 1.4). In terms of line of eradication therapy, PB use was more frequent (p<0.0001) in patients in 5th (28%) and 6th line (46%) compared to 1st (22%), 2nd (23%), 3rd (24%) and 4th (24%).
The rate of PB use varied between the different eradication regimens, being most frequent in sequential (74%), followed by hybrid (38%) and dual (33%). In contrast, the rate was lower in classic bismuth quadruple (24%), or the same in single capsule (21%), triple (17%) and non-bismuth quadruple (15%).
The percentage of PB use per country ranged from 95% in Serbia to 0.2% in Slovenia. The central geographical area had by far the highest prescription rate (83%). The rates in the rest were 38% in the east, 9% in the southeast, 7% in the southwest and 1% in the north. We observed that the rate of adverse effects in the non-PB group was higher in the central area than in the other areas (38% vs. 28%; p<0.0001), suggesting that in areas with less PB use there may be a prescription of PBs driven by the expectation of adverse effects.

Conclusion

The prescription of PB adjuvant to eradication therapy is very heterogeneous. There is greater use of PB associated with sequential, dual and hybrid therapies, patients with antibiotic resistance, advanced lines of treatment and women. In areas with lower PB use, there seems to be a prescription bias towards patients with a higher expected risk of adverse effects.

PRESCRIPTION PATTERN OF PROBIOTICS AS AN ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI ERADICATION: RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN REGISTRY ON THE MANAGEMENT OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION (HP-EUREG)

PRESCRIPTION PATTERN OF PROBIOTICS AS AN ADJUVANT THERAPY FOR HELICOBACTER PYLORI ERADICATION: RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN REGISTRY ON THE MANAGEMENT OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION (HP-EUREG)

Diego Casas Deza 1, Javier Alcedo 1, Miguel Lafuente 2, F. Javier Lopez 2, Ángeles Pérez-Aísa 3, Matteo Pavoni 4, Ilaria Maria Saracino 5, Bojan Tepes 6, Laimas Virginijus Jonaitis 7, Manuel Castro-Fernández 8, Manuel Pabon-Carrasco 8, Alma Keco-Huerga 8, Irina Voynovan 9, Luis Bujanda Fernández de Piérola 10, Alfredo J. Lucendo 11, Natasa Brglez Jurecic 12, Maja Denkovski 12, Perminder S. Phull 13, Luis Ricardo Rodrigo Sáez 14, Angel Lanas 15, Samuel Jesús Martínez-Domínguez 15, Jose Maria Huguet 16, Dmitry S. Bordin 17, Antonio Gasbarrini 18, Juozas Kupcinskas 7, Gülüstan Babayeva 19, Oleksiy Gridnyev 20, Marcis Leja 21, Theodore Rokkas 22, Ricardo Pinto 23, Frode Lerang 24, Doron Boltin 25, Veronika Papp 26, ANTE TONKIC 27, Sinead M. Smith Sinead M. Smith 28, Halis Simsek 29, Marino Venerito 30, Lyudmila Boyanova 31, Vladimir Milivojevic 32, Lumir Kunovsky 33, Tamara Matysiak-Budnik 34, Wojciech Marlicz 35, Michael Doulberis 36, Anna Cano-Catala 37, Luis Hernández Villalba 38, Leticia Moreira Ruiz 39, Olga P. Nyssen 40, Francis Mégraud 41, Colm O'Morain 28, Javier Gisbert 40

1 Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain|||Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain

2 University of Zaragoza, Faculty of Sciences, Zaragoza, Spain|||Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems (BIFI). University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

3 Agencia Sanitaria Costa del Sol, Marbella, Málaga, Spain

4 IRCCS St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy|||University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

5 IRCCS St. Orsola Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

6 DC Rogaska, Rogaska Slatina, Slovenia

7 Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania

8 Valme University Hospital, Sevilla, Spain

9 A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation

10 Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain|||Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain|||Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU), San Sebastian, Spain

11 Tomelloso General Hospital, Tomelloso, Ciudad Real, Spain|||Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain|||La Princesa Health Research Institute, Madrid, Spain

12 Interni Oddelek Diagnostic Centre Bled, Bled, Slovenia

13 Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom

14 University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain

15 Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain|||Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain|||Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain

16 University General Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain

17 A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation|||A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian Federation|||Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russian Federation

18 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy

19 Azerbaijan State Advanced Training Institute for Doctors named by A. Aliyev, Baku, Azerbaijan

20 L.T. Malaya Therapy National Institute of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine

21 Gastro, Digestive Diseases Centre, Riga, Latvia|||University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia

22 Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens, Greece

23 Centro Hospitalar do Porto, Porto, Portugal|||Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal|||Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Porto, Portugal

24 Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway

25 Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Tel Aviv, Israel|||Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

26 Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

27 University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia

28 Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

29 Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey|||HC International Clinic, Ankara, Turkey

30 University Hospital of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany

31 Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria

32 Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia|||University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

33 University Hospital Olomouc, Olomuc, Czechia|||Palacky University Olomouc, Olumuc, Czechia|||University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia|||Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia

34 University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France

35 Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland

36 Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland

37 Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Barcelona, Spain

38 Hospital Santos Reyes, Aranda de Duero, Burgos, Spain

39 Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain|||Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain|||University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

40 La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain|||La Princesa Health Research Institute (IIS-Princesa), Madrid, Spain|||Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Madrid, Spain

41 Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

Conference

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Stomach & H. Pylori

Submission format

Abstract

Session

PP 02 H. pylori (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2023; 11 (Supplement 8)

Published

2023
UEG Poster
Audio / Video Poster
Share via Email Share on Facebook Share on X Share on LinkedIn Share on Bluesky

Log in to access this content.

Free for all myUEG account holders. Your access level is set automatically based on your occupation. Medical professionals get full access to all content. If you are a non-medical user, you can only access UEG Week content from congresses you attended.

Log In Create a free account

Not sure what you can access? Learn more about account types.

Introduction

Chronic liver injury ultimately progresses to the development of cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis can be in a compensated or decompensated phase, the latter marked by clinical events such as ascites, hepatic encephalopathy and variceal bleeding. These events are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and the management is challenging and labor-intensive. Due to ongoing unhealthy lifestyle factors resulting in chronic liver injury, the burden of cirrhosis on healthcare systems in Europe is increasing. There is however limited data on the impact of cirrhosis on Dutch healthcare resources.

Aims & Methods

We aimed to determine the point-prevalence and claimed health costs of adults (≥ 18 years) registered as patients with cirrhosis at Dutch hospitals. To this end we extracted health claims data (timeframe 2017-2021) from the records of the Dutch health claims database (Vektis), which covers almost all inhabitants of the Netherlands. We used diagnosis codes ‘compensated cirrhosis’ and ‘decompensated cirrhosis’ to identify patients.

Results

The point prevalence of patients with cirrhosis increased from 48,7 patients per 100.000 adult Dutch inhabitants in 2017 to 75,2 per 100.000 in 2021 (+54%). The point-prevalence for cirrhosis was highest in the province of Limburg with 105,6 patients per 100.000 adult Dutch inhabitants. The annual increase in unique new patients for which hospitals claimed costs was n=3.725 in 2018, n=3.840 in 2019 (+3%), n=3.749 in 2020 (-2%) and n=3.695 in 2021 (-1%). The largest increase was observed in the province of Zuid-Holland (approximately 5 new patients per 100.000 adult Dutch inhabitants per year). Total number of hospital admissions increased with 19% from 2.443 admissions in 2017 to 2.899 admissions in 2021. The median length of stay for admitted patients with cirrhosis in 2017-2021 was four days [IQR 2-7 days]. The annual reported costs for patients with cirrhosis increased from €35 million in 2017 to €78 million in 2021 (+120%).

Conclusion

The point-prevalence of Dutch adults registered as a patient with cirrhosis in Dutch hospitals increased by more than fifty percent, with remarkable regional differences. Consequently, the total healthcare costs claimed for these patients more than doubled in less than five years.

INCREASE IN POINT-PREVALENCE AND COSTS OF LIVER CIRRHOSIS IN THE NETHERLANDS – A NATIONWIDE HEALTH CLAIMS DATA ANALYSIS

INCREASE IN POINT-PREVALENCE AND COSTS OF LIVER CIRRHOSIS IN THE NETHERLANDS – A NATIONWIDE HEALTH CLAIMS DATA ANALYSIS

Koos de Wit 1, Gwen M.C. Masclee 1, Minneke J. Coenraad 2, Frans Cuperus 3, Matthijs Kramer 4, Raoel Maan 5, Robert Bart Takkenberg 1, Marten Alexander Lantinga 1

1 Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, Netherlands

2 Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands

3 University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands

4 Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands

5 Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Conference

UEG Week Copenhagen 2023

Topics

Hepatobiliary

Submission format

Abstract

Session

PP 07 Liver & biliary (Posters)

Citation

United European Gastroenterology Journal 2023; 11 (Supplement 8)

Published

2023

The global reference point for the digestive health community

Platform Publisher

United European Gastroenterology

Wickenburggasse 1 1080 Vienna, Austria

Contact us

support@ueg.eu

ueg.eu

T: +43 1 997 1639

Legal

Terms & Conditions

Imprint

Privacy Policy

Explore

My Bookmarks

My recommendations

My fields of interest

© 2026 United European Gastroenterology

Change fields of interest

These fields are selected based on the interests in your myUEG profile.
Click the item to unselect it. You can select multiple items.