Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a major cause of gastric diseases, with the virulence factor CagA carried by exosomes playing a crucial role in regulating inflammation. Ferroptosis and M1 polarization are key mechanisms in promoting inflammation, yet the role of CagA in inducing macrophage ferroptosis and M1 polarization to exacerbate gastric mucosal inflammation remains unclear.

Aims & Methods

CagA-positive (CagA+) and CagA-negative (CagA-) H. pylori strains were co-cultured with gastric epithelial cells, and their supernatants were collected. Exosomes were isolated using ultracentrifugation to obtain CagA+Exo and CagA-Exo. Changes in macrophage M1/M2 polarization markers and ferroptosis markers were analyzed under CagA+Exo and CagA-Exo treatment. The activation of the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway was assessed by Western blot, and STAT1 expression in the nucleus was evaluated using a nuclear protein extraction kit. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was used to identify the binding site of STAT1 on the SLC7A11 promoter. Biopsy samples from the gastric mucosa of gastritis patients infected with CagA+ or CagA- H. pylori were analyzed for macrophage polarization and ferroptosis markers.

Results

Exosomal CagA was found to induce macrophage M1 polarization and ferroptosis, with the ferroptosis inhibitor SLC7A11 playing a key role in CagA-induced ferroptosis. Exosomal CagA activated the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway, leading to M1 polarization and ferroptosis. Additionally, CagA+Exo increased nuclear STAT1 expression, which subsequently bound to the SLC7A11 promoter to regulate its transcription. In gastric mucosa biopsies from CagA+ H. pylori-infected gastritis patients, increased levels of iNOS (a marker of M1 polarization) and decreased expression of SLC7A11 were observed.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that exosomal CagA promotes macrophage M1 polarization and ferroptosis through the JAK/STAT1 signaling pathway. This study provides new insights and potential therapeutic targets for H. pylori-associated gastritis.

Introduction

Gastric mucosal visibility is essential for high-quality upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. While simethicone and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) have been shown to improve mucosal visibility, the optimal time interval between preparation and endoscopy remains undefined.

Aims & Methods

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of timing on mucosal visibility and explored the upper limit beyond which visibility begins to decline.
In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, adult patients undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy were randomized into four groups: placebo, simethicone + NAC with endoscopy performed after 10–20 minutes, 20–30 minutes, and >30 minutes. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving adequate gastric mucosal visibility (GMV), defined as a score of <7 on a validated visibility scale. A pre-specified subgroup analysis of the >30 minute group was performed by stratifying patients into 20-minute intervals (31–50, 51–70, and 71–90 minutes) to assess the durability of mucosal clarity over time.

Results

Comparison	Adequate gastric mucosal visibility (%)	P
10–20 min vs 20–30 min	27% vs 62%	0.001
10–20 min vs >30 min	27% vs 67%	0.001
10–20 min vs Placebo	27% vs 2.6%	0.001
20–30 min vs >30 min	62% vs 67%	0.174
20–30 min vs Placebo	62% vs 2.6%	0.001

1,140 patients (median age 42years, 63.2% males) were included in the study. Adequate GMV was significantly higher in all preparation groups compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The 20–30 minute and >30 minute groups demonstrated the highest rates of adequate visibility (61.5% and 73.5%, respectively), both significantly superior to the 10–20 minute group (26.9%) and placebo (2.6%). In the >30 minute subgroup analysis, the 31–50 minute interval demonstrated the highest adequacy (73.5%). The 51–70 minute group showed moderate adequacy (52.1%), which was not significantly different from the 20–30 minute group (p = 0.207). However, the 71–90 minute group had reduced adequacy (43.8%) and did not differ significantly from the 10–20 minute group (p = 0.145). No adverse events were reported across study arms.

Conclusion

Endoscopy performed between 20 and 50 minutes after mucosal preparation yields optimal gastric mucosal visibility. A decline in visibility beyond 50 minutes suggests a practical upper limit for endoscopy timing following preparation. These findings support structured, time-sensitive scheduling following mucosal cleansing to enhance procedural quality.

Disclosure

None