Introduction

The development of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has led to a paradigm shift in the treatment of esophageal motility disorders^1-5. Hiatal hernia (HH) has been reported in approximately 4-20% of patients with achalasia^6-8. Due to the altered position of the proximal stomach entering thoracic cavity, careful anatomical inspection at the completion of myotomy is essential to minimize the risk of adverse events⁷. Although two observational studies suggested that the presence of HH did not significantly affect clinical outcomes^9-10, these studies were limited by small sample sizes from single centers, with 13 and 56 cases of HH, respectively. Further study involving larger cohorts is needed to enable meaningful comparisons and to elucidate the impact of HH on POEM outcomes.

Aims & Methods

We hypothesized that the coexistence of a HH may be associated with adverse events, such as mediastinitis and esophageal perforation, or incomplete myotomy due to the technical challenges of approaching the esophagogastric junction^6-7. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare outcomes between patients with and without HH undergoing POEM. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in the United States from 2016 through 2022, we identified 6572 patients undergoing POEM for achalasia or non-achalasia spastic disorders. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare adverse events, defined as any adverse event associated with an extended length of stay (>3 days), reintervention, 30-day mortality, and length of stay between the groups.

Results

	HH (n=1276)	Non-HH (n=1276)	P value
Adverse events	107 (8.4)	80 (6.3)	0.04
Infection (peritonitis, mediastinitis, sepsis)	62 (4.9)	42 (3.3)	0.04
Bleeding (gastrointestinal bleeding, hematoma)	32 (2.3)	26 (2.0)	0.49
Perforation (esophageal perforation, laceration)	9 (0.7)	8 (0.6)	0.52
Trauma (pneumothorax, injuries to other organs)	14 (1.1)	5 (0.4)	0.03
Reintervention	92 (7.2)	67 (5.3)	0.04
Pneumatic dilatation	88 (6.9)	67 (5.3)	0.08
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy	18 (1.4)	6 (0.5)	0.01
Second POEM	0 (0)	4 (0.3)	0.05

In the propensity score-matched analysis involving 1276 pairs, the HH group had significantly higher rates of adverse events (8.4% vs 6.3%; p = 0.04) and reintervention (7.2% vs 5.3%; p = 0.04) compared to the non-HH group (Table). The most common adverse events were infections, such as peritonitis and mediastinitis (4.9% vs 3.3%; p = 0.04). A longer length of stay (median: 4 vs 3 days; p < 0.01) was observed in the HH group. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was noted between the groups. On logistic regression analysis, HH (OR 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06–1.68) and achalasia (vs. non-achalasia spastic disorders; OR 1.54; 95% CI, 1.17–2.02) were associated with adverse events.

Conclusion

The risk of adverse events and reintervention were higher in the HH group. These findings highlight the need for tailored management in POEM for HH cases.

References

[1] Inoue H, et al. POEM for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010;42:265-71.
[2] Ramchandani M, et al. Recent Advancements and Future Perspectives of POEM. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association. 2024;22:1983-96.e2.
[3] Inoue H, et al. Statement for GERD after POEM from an international multicenter experience. Esophagus. 2020;17:3-10.
[4] Ponds FA, et al. Effect of POEM vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2019;322:134-44.
[5] Inoue H, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for POEM. Digestive endoscopy. 2018;30:563-79.
[6] Ushimaru Y, et al. Occult Hiatal Hernia in Achalasia Patients: Its Incidence and Treatment Options. Dig Surg. 2019;36:418-25.
[7] Fletcher PR. Acute hiatal hernia with oesophageal perforation following Heller's operation. Br J Surg. 1978;65:486-8.
[8] Sanei-Moghaddam A, et al. Cricopharyngeal myotomy for cricopharyngeus stricture in an inclusion body myositis patient with hiatus hernia: a learning experience. BMJ case reports. 2013;2013.
[9] Xu P, et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is an effective treatment for achalasia combined with hiatal hernia. Surgical endoscopy. 2024;38:4543-9.
[10] Tutuian G, et al. Achalasia and Hiatal Hernia: A Rare Association and a Therapeutic Challenge. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;29:455-9.

Disclosure

No disclosures for this study